Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Kindred Hospital East Greensboro during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Nursing staff failed to follow infection control policies during wound care and contact isolation. One resident with multiple pressure and lower extremity wounds received dressing changes in which an RN removed and discarded dressings from different sites together, cleansed and packed several wounds sequentially without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene between sites, treated bilateral heel wounds without glove changes, touched a newly identified leg wound with soiled gloves, repositioned the resident while still gloved, and did not disinfect the overbed table used as a work surface. In a separate case, a resident on contact precautions for MDRO pneumonia was cared for by an RN who entered the room and handled enteral feeding supplies wearing gloves but without donning a required gown, despite posted isolation signage and readily available PPE.
A resident with an initial Level I PASRR indicating no mental health diagnosis was later documented with major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia, but the facility did not submit a request for a Level II PASRR evaluation. Record review showed no evidence of a Level II request, and the MDS assessment reflected that the resident was not considered by the state Level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness. The social worker reported that she only reviewed PASRRs for new admissions or expiring Level I screens and did not routinely request Level II evaluations after new diagnoses, while the Administrator stated there was no established practice or clear responsibility for resubmitting PASRR information when new mental health conditions were identified.
A resident with documented diagnoses of major depressive disorder, anxiety, depression, and bipolar disorder was given an antipsychotic (haloperidol) for visual hallucinations, and a schizophrenia diagnosis was added to the active diagnosis list by a nurse based on a medication lacking a corresponding diagnosis. The nurse could not clearly identify which physician, if any, provided this diagnosis, and the MDS did not code the resident for schizophrenia. Review of electronic and paper records, as well as interviews with the consultant pharmacist, a physician, the DON, and the Administrator, revealed no clinical documentation or physician confirmation to support schizophrenia, and the resident’s care plan did not address this diagnosis.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment, respiratory failure, and a tracheostomy required ongoing respiratory services, including trach care. During an observed trach care procedure, an RT set up a trach care tray on an unclean overbed table, double-gloved, and repeatedly placed soiled gauze and other used items back into the tray containing clean supplies, including taking clean gauze from under used gauze to continue cleaning the site. The RT removed only the outer pair of gloves and did not perform hand hygiene before applying a clean dressing. In subsequent interviews, the RT reported misunderstanding training, while the supervisor, DOR, IP, DON, and a physician all described expectations for cleaning the work surface, avoiding contamination of clean items, using appropriate PPE, and performing hand hygiene between dirty and clean tasks.
A resident with major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and schizophrenia was receiving multiple psychotropic medications, including an antipsychotic and antidepressants, but had no documented visits with a mental health provider over an extended period. The facility assessment showed there were no psychiatrists, psychologists, or licensed counselors available, and mental health services were instead handled by attending physicians and a social worker, despite most residents being on psychotropic medications. Staff reported that the resident experienced ongoing and worsening hallucinations and episodes of crying, and relied on verbal reassurance from CNAs and nursing staff, while the social worker acknowledged uncertainty in managing these hallucinations and confirmed the absence of a mental health provider, and the DON and administrator confirmed dependence on internists to manage behavioral health needs.
A resident receiving amiodarone for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation did not receive appropriate TSH monitoring despite a Consultant Pharmacist’s recommendation and a physician order. The pharmacist identified that no TSH level had been documented for at least six months and recommended obtaining one and repeating it every six months. A one-time TSH order was entered by the physician, but the lab did not draw the test, the order auto-discontinued after 24 hours, and the DON did not verify completion or re-order the lab. Review of the medical record confirmed that no TSH result was obtained and no prior TSH results were available.
A resident with a pressure ulcer had multiple weekly wound assessments and treatment orders incorrectly documenting the wound as being on the right buttock, with no documentation of a left buttock wound. The TAR contained ongoing physician orders and recorded treatments for a right buttock wound, and a nurse repeatedly signed off on these entries despite actually providing care to the left buttock. During surveyor observation, treatment was seen being given to the left buttock and no right buttock wound was present, and the nurse later admitted he had documented the wound location and corresponding treatment orders incorrectly since admission.
A nurse in an LTC facility was found to have misappropriated narcotic medications, affecting multiple residents. The nurse signed out medications like Oxycodone and Lorazepam without proper documentation on the MAR and at times when she was not present. Witness signatures for medication waste were also found to be incorrect or missing. The facility's investigation led to the nurse's suspension and termination.
The facility failed to report the misappropriation of controlled medications within 24 hours as required. An audit revealed discrepancies in medication records for six residents, with medications signed out by a nurse not recorded on the MAR and issues with witness signatures. The Administrator delayed reporting to the state agency due to uncertainty about the nature of the issue, notifying other entities only after misappropriation was suspected.
The facility failed to properly store and label food items, with observations revealing expired and improperly stored foods in the refrigerator and freezer, and dented cans mixed with usable ones in dry storage. The Kitchen Supervisor and RD acknowledged the issues, emphasizing the need for sealed containers and proper labeling.
The facility failed to provide required annual dementia management training for three NAs. The Staff Development Coordinator did not populate the necessary training modules, and the Administrator could not find documentation confirming the training was provided.
A facility failed to provide a four-ounce portion of pureed beef taco meat and did not prepare pureed foods according to the recipe for a resident with a diet order for pureed textured foods. The cook used an incorrect method to prepare the meal, and the recipe binder lacked necessary recipes for pureed foods. The RD and Administrator acknowledged that recipes should be followed to ensure correct portions and texture modifications.
A facility failed to provide written notification to a resident's responsible party regarding multiple hospital transfers for conditions like hypotension and altered mental status. Although phone notifications were made, no written notices were documented or mailed, contrary to regulatory expectations.
The facility failed to post accurate and consistent daily nurse staffing data at the beginning of shifts. Observations and record reviews revealed discrepancies in posted data and missing records for several days. Staff interviews indicated a lack of adherence to procedures, with the charge nurse admitting to forgetting to post data. The Administrator expected accurate postings and record maintenance, which was not achieved.
Failure to Follow Wound Care Aseptic Technique and Contact Precaution PPE Requirements
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves failures in infection prevention and control practices during wound care and contact isolation. Facility policies required hand hygiene before and after resident contact, before clean/aseptic procedures, after contact with body fluids or non-intact skin, after touching the patient environment, and before donning and after removing gloves. The clean dressing change policy required removal of soiled dressings with one pair of gloves, hand hygiene, then a new pair of gloves to cleanse each wound, with hand hygiene and glove changes between multiple wounds, and cleansing from least to most contaminated. During an observed wound care session for Resident #14, Nurse #3 did not follow these procedures. For Resident #14, who had multiple wounds to the sacrum, right ischium, left buttock, and bilateral heels, Nurse #3 removed dressings from the sacrum and right ischium together by rolling them into one bundle and discarding them, then removed the dressing from the left buttock separately. After performing hand hygiene and donning clean gloves, Nurse #3 cleansed the sacral, right ischial, and left buttock wounds using multiple gauze pads but did not perform hand hygiene or change gloves between each wound. Using the same pair of gloves, Nurse #3 then packed all three wounds and applied separate clean dressings without changing gloves between wounds. For the left and right heel treatments, Nurse #3 applied a protective barrier wipe to the left heel, then cut off the soiled bandage from the right foot, placed the scissors on the overbed table, and applied the same type of barrier wipe to the right heel, again without hand hygiene or glove change between heels. When a new wound on the outer right leg was identified during this process, Nurse #3 touched it with a gloved finger that had already been used for the heel treatments. Additional lapses occurred when Nurse #3 repositioned Resident #14 while still wearing the same soiled gloves and without performing hand hygiene before repositioning. After completing the treatment, Nurse #3 discarded supplies, removed gloves, and performed hand hygiene but did not clean the overbed table used as the work surface. In a separate observation involving Resident #13, who was on contact precautions for a multiple drug-resistant organism related to pneumonia, Nurse #2 entered the resident’s room and handled enteral feeding supplies on the overbed table while wearing gloves but without donning a gown, despite posted signage and available PPE indicating that both gown and gloves were required for every room entry. Nurse #2 later confirmed awareness that a gown was required and stated that wearing it had slipped her mind. The Infection Preventionist and Director of Nursing confirmed that facility policy and expectations required glove and gown use for contact precautions and hand hygiene with glove changes between wounds during dressing changes.
Failure to Request Level II PASRR Evaluation After New Serious Mental Health Diagnoses
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to submit a request for a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) evaluation for a resident who developed serious mental health diagnoses after admission. The PASRR history detail dated 5/16/11 showed only a Level I PASRR had been completed, which at that time indicated no mental health diagnosis and did not meet Level II criteria. The resident was later admitted with a diagnosis that included major depressive disorder, and the active diagnosis list showed bipolar disorder, unspecified, added on 4/18/19 and schizophrenia, unspecified, added on 7/20/24. Review of the resident’s electronic and paper medical record revealed no evidence that a request for a Level II PASRR determination was ever submitted, and the MDS annual assessment indicated the resident was not considered by the state Level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness or intellectual disability/related condition. In interviews, the social worker responsible for PASRR evaluations at the time of the new serious mental health diagnoses stated she typically only reviewed PASRRs for new admissions or when a Level I PASRR had an expiration date. She acknowledged that the resident’s new diagnoses of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia represented a significant change in mental health but confirmed it was not her normal practice to submit a request for a Level II PASRR evaluation. The Administrator reported that the facility received the resident’s Level I PASRR from the hospital and was unsure who was responsible for resubmitting PASRR information when new mental health diagnoses were identified. The Administrator further stated that it was not the facility’s normal practice to resubmit PASRR information after admission and that this was not something the facility was doing.
Unsupported Schizophrenia Diagnosis and Antipsychotic Use Without Clinical Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that services met professional standards of quality when it did not have clinical documentation to support a diagnosis of schizophrenia for one resident who was reviewed for unnecessary medications. The resident was admitted with major depressive disorder and later readmitted from a hospital stay, with the hospital discharge summary not listing schizophrenia as a diagnosis. A provider progress note documented that the resident was seen for visual hallucinations and that haloperidol 1 mg every 6 hours as needed was added for continued hallucinations, but the note did not list schizophrenia as a diagnosis. The resident’s active diagnosis list showed schizophrenia, unspecified, as an admitting diagnosis active as of a specified date, with no onset date, and categorized under medical management. The schizophrenia diagnosis was entered into the record by a nurse, who stated she added it based on a medication that lacked a correct diagnosis and believed, but could not confirm, that a physician had given her this information. The resident’s care plan, last revised on a specified date, did not include a care plan for schizophrenia. The MDS quarterly assessment coded the resident for anxiety, depression, and bipolar disorder, but not schizophrenia. Review of the electronic and paper records revealed no clinical documentation supporting schizophrenia. The consultant pharmacist reported that the pharmacy had not requested adding a schizophrenia diagnosis, and a physician stated he had not given or written such a diagnosis and, to his knowledge, the resident did not have schizophrenia. The DON was unable to locate documentation from either physician supporting the diagnosis and only believed that one physician had reported a significant history of schizophrenia, while the Administrator could not recall whether the resident had that diagnosis and indicated she would discuss it with the clinical team.
Improper Tracheostomy Care and Infection Control Practices
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide tracheostomy care consistent with professional standards for one resident who required ongoing respiratory services. The resident was admitted with metabolic encephalopathy and respiratory failure and was documented on the quarterly MDS as severely cognitively impaired and receiving oxygen therapy, suctioning, respiratory services, and tracheostomy care. The resident’s care plan included a goal of having no abnormal drainage around the tracheostomy site and interventions such as instructing the resident or caregiver in tracheostomy care and suctioning. During an observed tracheostomy care procedure, the respiratory therapist (RT) performed hand hygiene and applied two pairs of clean disposable gloves, then opened a tracheostomy care tray on the resident’s overbed table without cleaning the work surface. The RT poured normal saline into the tray and used gauze saturated with saline to clean around the tracheostomy site, then placed the dirty gauze on a dressing package on the overbed table. The RT subsequently placed additional soiled gauze back into the tracheostomy care tray on top of remaining clean gauze and removed clean gauze from under used gauze to continue cleaning the site, thereby mixing clean and dirty supplies. The RT also used cotton-tipped applicators saturated with saline to clean around the site and continued to place used items in the same tray containing clean supplies. The RT removed the top pair of gloves before opening and applying a clean dressing but did not perform hand hygiene before applying the dressing. In interviews, the RT stated she had been trained to work from the tracheostomy care tray, was unaware she needed to clean the work surface before setup, and believed she had been instructed to double glove, although the third shift supervisor denied giving such a directive. The Director of Respiratory Therapy reported that the department followed Lippincott’s guidance for hand hygiene, had no written tracheostomy care policy, and that tracheostomy care was taught at the bedside. The Infection Preventionist and DON both stated expectations that staff should not contaminate clean areas, should perform hand hygiene, and should not go from dirty to clean during care. The physician interviewed stated he would expect clean gloves between dirty and clean tasks, that double gloving was not appropriate PPE, and that staff should not take shortcuts with hand hygiene.
Failure to Provide Necessary Behavioral Health Services for Resident on Psychotropic Medications
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide necessary behavioral health care and services to support a resident’s highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. One resident with major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and schizophrenia was admitted to the facility and was receiving multiple psychotropic medications, including venlafaxine, cariprazine, and fluoxetine for bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder. A quarterly MDS assessment documented that the resident was cognitively intact, had psychiatric/mood disorders including anxiety, depression, and bipolar disorder, and was receiving antipsychotic and antidepressant medications, with self-reported feelings of being down, depressed, or hopeless on several days during the assessment period. Despite these diagnoses and ongoing psychotropic medication use, the facility was unable to provide any documentation of mental health provider visits for this resident since the last recertification survey. The facility assessment indicated that there were no behavioral or mental health providers such as psychiatrists, psychologists, or licensed counselors available, and that mental health and behavior services were instead provided by the attending physician and the social worker. The facility’s provider matrix showed that 16 of 20 residents were prescribed psychotropic medications, yet there was no dedicated mental health provider serving them. The resident reported being unable to recall the last time she spoke with a doctor specifically about her mental health and expressed a desire to talk to a doctor when she began to feel down. Staff interviews further demonstrated that the resident experienced ongoing and worsening hallucinations, including seeing animals and people who were not present, along with episodes of crying. A nurse aide and a nurse both reported that the resident had a history of hallucinations and that staff attempted to calm her by talking and reassurance. The social worker confirmed that the facility did not have a mental health provider, acknowledged that the resident’s hallucinations were worsening, and stated uncertainty about how to engage with the resident during these episodes, although she provided emotional and psychosocial support. The DON and the administrator both confirmed that there was no mental health provider currently seeing residents and that the attending internist physicians were relied upon to manage residents’ mental health needs and medications, with no clear indication of specialized behavioral health services being provided to address the resident’s ongoing symptoms.
Failure to Obtain Ordered TSH Monitoring for Resident on Amiodarone
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident receiving amiodarone 200 mg daily for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation did not have appropriate thyroid monitoring as recommended. The Consultant Pharmacist reviewed the resident’s medications upon admission and identified that there was no TSH (thyroid stimulating hormone) level documented in the medical record for the previous six months, despite the resident’s ongoing amiodarone therapy. The pharmacist documented a recommendation on 10/27/25 for a TSH level to be obtained on the next convenient lab day and every six months thereafter. A physician order for a one-time TSH blood test was entered on 11/06/25, but the test was never drawn, and the order automatically discontinued within 24 hours. The DON stated that the TSH lab was not obtained as ordered, that the order was entered as a one-time order which auto-discontinued, and that she did not follow up to confirm that the TSH was drawn or re-order it when it was missed. Review of the resident’s electronic and paper records showed no TSH results from this order and no prior TSH results from the hospital discharge record. The physician later confirmed being notified that the TSH order had not been completed and stated he was not concerned because the test was for monitoring purposes.
Inaccurate Documentation of Pressure Ulcer Location and Treatment
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to maintain an accurate medical record for a resident with a pressure ulcer. Weekly wound assessments dated 11/03/25, 11/11/25, 11/18/25, 11/25/25, and 12/02/25 documented multiple wounds, including a pressure ulcer to the right buttock, but contained no documentation of a wound to the left buttock. These assessments were completed by Nurse #3. Review of the December Treatment Administration Record (TAR) showed physician orders and documented treatments for a right buttock wound over multiple date ranges in December, with Nurse #3 signing off on those treatments on several days. There was no documentation of any wound treatment to the left buttock in the TAR. On observation on 12/17/25 at 8:46 a.m., Nurse #3 was seen providing wound treatment to the resident’s left buttock, and no wound was observed on the right buttock. In a subsequent interview, Nurse #3 acknowledged that since the resident’s admission he had incorrectly documented the wound location as the right buttock instead of the left buttock on both the weekly wound assessments and the treatment orders, and that he had continued to sign off treatments for a right buttock wound after actually treating the left buttock. The DON confirmed that Nurse #3 had informed her that the wound documentation and orders were incorrect and stated that she had not conducted rounds with Nurse #3 and that a process needed to be put in place.
Misappropriation of Narcotic Medications by Nurse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect residents from the misappropriation of narcotic medications, affecting six residents. Nurse #1 was involved in discrepancies related to the administration and documentation of narcotic medications, including Oxycodone, Hydrocodone, and Lorazepam. The Controlled Medication Utilization Records showed that medications were signed out as administered by Nurse #1, but these administrations were not documented on the Medication Administration Records (MAR). Additionally, there were instances where Nurse #1 signed out medications at times when she was not present in the facility, as evidenced by time punch records. Several residents, including those with severe cognitive impairments and chronic pain, were affected by these discrepancies. For instance, a resident with spinal stenosis and chronic pain was signed out as receiving Oxycodone multiple times without corresponding entries on the MAR. Another resident with spastic hemiplegia and respiratory failure had Oxycodone signed out at times when Nurse #1 was not on duty. Furthermore, there were questionable witness signatures for the waste of medications, with several nurses denying that the signatures were theirs or that they had witnessed the waste. The facility's investigation revealed a pattern of misappropriation by Nurse #1, who frequently marked narcotics as wasted with incorrect or missing witness signatures. The discrepancies were identified through audits and staff interviews, leading to the suspension and eventual termination of Nurse #1. The facility reported the incidents to relevant authorities, including the police department and the North Carolina Board of Nursing.
Failure to Timely Report Misappropriation of Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to submit an initial report to the state regulatory agency within 24 hours of discovering the misappropriation of resident property, specifically controlled medications. This deficiency involved six residents whose medication records showed discrepancies. The Director of Nursing (DON) was informed of a discrepancy in the Controlled Medication Utilization Record for two residents, which led to an audit revealing multiple instances where medications were signed out by a nurse but not recorded on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). Additionally, there were issues with witness signatures not matching the master signature log, and some nurses denied the handwriting was theirs. The Administrator did not send an initial report to the state regulatory agency within the required 24-hour timeframe because there was uncertainty about whether the issue constituted misappropriation of resident medications. Once misappropriation was suspected, notifications were made to various entities, including the corporate agency, pharmacy, law enforcement, Drug Enforcement Agency, and the North Carolina Board of Nursing. However, the report to the State Agency was delayed until ten days after the initial discovery, as the facility was conducting an investigation and wanted to ensure the problem was corrected.
Deficiency in Food Storage and Labeling Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to proper food storage and labeling protocols, as observed during a survey. In the walk-in refrigerator, a plastic bag of sliced turkey meat was found open to air with a use-by date that had already passed. The Kitchen Supervisor acknowledged that all refrigerated foods should be stored in sealed containers and discarded by the use-by date. Additionally, in the walk-in freezer, several opened food items, including diced potatoes, hash browns, breakfast sausage, diced chicken, and tater tots, were stored in plastic bags open to air without labels indicating the date opened or use-by date. The hash browns and diced chicken were noted to be freezer burned and were discarded by the Kitchen Supervisor during the observation. In the dry storage room, a canned product with a dent along the seal was stored with other canned foods available for use. The Kitchen Supervisor admitted that dented cans were usually placed on the first row of the rack, but due to the lack of labeling, a dented can was mistakenly stored with other usable cans. Interviews with the Kitchen Supervisor, Registered Dietitian (RD), and Food Service Director revealed that the facility received food deliveries twice a week, and staff were expected to monitor food storage for proper packaging and labeling. The RD conducted monthly sanitation rounds and re-educated staff when concerns were identified. The Administrator confirmed that the dietary department should store foods according to regulatory requirements.
Deficiency in Annual Dementia Training for Nurse Aides
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide required annual training in dementia management and care for cognitively impaired residents for three nurse aides (NAs) reviewed. NA #4, NA #5, and NA #6, who were employed at the facility, did not receive this specific training as part of their annual education. The Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) acknowledged the absence of documentation for this training and admitted to not populating the necessary training modules in the electronic training management system, without providing a specific reason for this oversight. The Administrator expressed an expectation that all NAs receive the required annual training, including dementia management and care for cognitively impaired residents. However, she was unable to locate any documentation to confirm that this training had been provided to the NAs in question. The deficiency was identified through a review of records and staff interviews, highlighting a gap in the facility's training program for nurse aides.
Failure to Provide Correct Portions and Consistency of Pureed Foods
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a four-ounce portion of pureed beef taco meat per the approved menu and did not prepare pureed foods according to the recipe for a resident with a diet order for pureed textured foods. During a lunch meal tray line observation, it was noted that the resident received a 3 1/5-ounce portion of pureed beef taco meat with an applesauce consistency instead of the required four-ounce portion. Additionally, the pureed bean and corn salsa and cilantro lime rice were not prepared with the correct consistency as per the recipe instructions. The cook responsible for preparing the meal did not have a recipe to refer to and used an incorrect method to prepare the pureed foods, adding water and thickener without measuring. Interviews with the dietary staff revealed that the recipe binder did not include all necessary recipes for pureed foods, and the Registered Dietitian (RD) had not ensured that all texture modification recipes were included. The Patient Ambassador, who was responsible for compiling the recipe binder, admitted to not including recipes for pureed foods. The Kitchen Supervisor and Food Service Director acknowledged the oversight in recipe availability and preparation. The RD and Administrator both stated that recipes should be followed to ensure correct portions and texture modifications are served to residents.
Failure to Provide Written Notification for Hospital Transfers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide written notification to the responsible party (RP) regarding the reasons for hospital transfers of a resident with severe cognitive impairment. The resident was transferred to the hospital multiple times for conditions such as hypotension, fever, and altered mental status. Despite these transfers, there was no documentation that written notices were provided to the RP, although phone notifications were made. The facility's administrator confirmed that the RP was notified by phone, and a transfer/discharge form was sent with the resident to the hospital, but no written notice was mailed to the RP, which was against the regulatory expectations.
Inaccurate and Inconsistent Nurse Staffing Data Posting
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to post daily nurse staffing data accurately and consistently at the beginning of shifts, as required. Observations on 9/15/24 revealed that the staffing data posted was for the previous day, and the actual staff present did not match the posted data. Additionally, records reviewed with the Staffing Coordinator showed missing or inaccurate postings on several occasions, including missing records for 8/3/24 and 8/17/24, and incorrect data for 8/12/24 and 8/20/24. The Staffing Coordinator admitted to errors in recording the shift dates and acknowledged the absence of records for certain days. Interviews with staff, including the Staffing Coordinator and a charge nurse, indicated a lack of adherence to the procedure of posting staffing data at the beginning of each shift. The charge nurse admitted to forgetting to post the data on 9/15/24, despite being aware of the responsibility. The Administrator expected the nursing staff to collaborate in posting accurate staffing data and maintaining records for 15 months, but this expectation was not met, leading to the deficiency.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 156 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 4 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Greensboro
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guilford Health Care Center | 0.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Maple Grove Health And Rehabilitation Center | 1.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Linden Place Center For Nursing And Rehabilitation | 2.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 12 | 0 |
| Greenhaven Health And Rehabilitation Center | 2.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 2 |
| Heartland Living & Rehab At The Moses H Cone Memor | 3 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Kindred Hospital East Greensboro.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.