Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Community Nursing Home Of Anaconda during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Missing Full-Time DON Coverage: The facility failed to designate an RN to serve as DON on a full-time basis. The DON had resigned, no interim DON was assigned, and the DON was not present during survey observation. Staff acknowledged awareness of the DON coverage requirement and had asked the State Survey Agency for clarification on DON hourly requirements and coverage of the role.
The facility failed to submit required PBJ staffing data to CMS for a quarter, and review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report showed no data was submitted. During interview, an A staff member stated the omission was discovered after it was too late to submit the PBJ.
QAPI Failed to Address Activities Department Deficiencies: The facility failed to identify, investigate, document, and track corrective actions for known activities department issues affecting two residents who were not receiving needed one-to-one visits or activities. A staff member stated activities staff were not completing required visits and had falsified documentation, while QAPI minutes showed no discussion of the activities concerns and the team focused instead on ambulation data review.
Failure to provide and use required PPE during a COVID-19 outbreak. At the entrance, only paper masks were available even though N95 use was posted, and a visitor entered without an isolation mask. Staff were observed wearing N95 respirators incorrectly, including straps not secured and masks worn below the nose. Staff also entered rooms of COVID-19 positive residents without face shields or goggles, and PPE carts outside those rooms did not contain eye protection. The outbreak tracking showed ongoing spread among residents and staff.
Medication Administration Without Orders for Crushed Medications: An LPN crushed and gave medications to two residents without physician orders for crushed meds. The medications were placed in a cup, crushed, mixed with applesauce, and administered based on the facility roster/shift change sheet rather than an order. Staff also stated there were no physician orders for crushed medications for any residents, and another staff member knew some residents were receiving crushed meds but did not know they were being given without orders.
Uncovered Catheter Bag Visible to Others: A resident’s catheter bag was observed hanging from a recliner pocket with the room door open and the bag facing the doorway, making it visible to people passing by. The resident said it was embarrassing, while staff stated catheter bag covers were available and should be used, and that the facility did not have a policy and procedure for covering catheter bags to maintain dignity.
A resident’s preference not to be awakened for breakfast was not honored, as staff continued to bring a breakfast tray despite repeated refusals. The resident said she never ate breakfast and was frustrated that staff would not listen, while staff reported they had been told to deliver a tray regardless of refusal and noted the resident had a history of becoming agitated and throwing trays.
Failure to protect a resident's privacy and confidentiality of medical records occurred when an LPN was administering meds with a medication cart computer left open to the resident's MAR and photo while another resident passed by. The LPN stated the computer should be locked whenever she stepped away, and the facility policy required records to be closed or logged off when not in use.
Incomplete Person-Centered Activity Care Plans: Two residents did not have comprehensive, person-centered care plans that reflected their current activity preferences. One resident who stayed in bed said she wanted reading and quilting, but those interests were not included in her care plan, while another resident who stayed in his recliner said he was not getting his newspaper and only received group activity schedules. Staff described a disconnect between the care plans, Kardex, and activity assessments, and said the CNA-accessible Kardex did not accurately reflect resident preferences.
Improper Crushing of a Do Not Crush Medication: An LPN crushed and administered a resident’s meds, including trazodone, after relying on the shift change sheet and without recognizing that trazodone was on the facility’s DO NOT CRUSH list. Staff stated there were no labels on bubble packs indicating meds not to crush, and an RN stated the facility did not have a crushed-medication policy or procedure.
Two residents who stayed in their rooms were not provided activities aligned with their assessed interests and preferences. One resident said she was left in bed without room activities or the books she liked, while another said he mostly slept in his chair, was not getting his newspaper, and only received limited activity contact. Staff said roombound residents were not getting activities, one-to-one visits had not been done in a long time, and some one-to-one charting was being falsified.
Hospice records and facility documentation did not align for two residents. The paper chart and EHR lacked hospice care plans and med reconciliations, and the facility med lists did not match the hospice med profiles. The residents’ comprehensive care plans also did not include hospice visit frequency, hospice goals, or hospice interventions. Staff said hospice was involved and attended care plan meetings, but there was no documentation showing the care plans were sent to hospice, and staff could not explain the mismatches.
An LPN failed to keep a medication cart locked while passing meds in a resident's room, leaving the cart parked and unlocked in the hallway. The nurse later stated the cart should be locked when not attended, and facility policy required floor stock meds to be stored in a locked cabinet or tamper-evident cart.
A contracted agency staff member worked at the facility for over a year without receiving an annual performance review. Facility staff confirmed that performance reviews were not conducted for agency staff, and the agency did not provide such evaluations. The staff member also did not receive annual education based on performance reviews.
The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for four residents, resulting in unmet activity needs. A resident was observed facing a wall in her wheelchair, while another expressed a desire for more activities and outings. Staff interviews revealed that care plans were generic and not tailored to individual needs, with the activity director not contributing to the plans.
The facility failed to provide adequate activities for residents, with several participating in very few activities over a month. Observations showed residents were often left in their rooms or watching TV programs they did not enjoy. Staff interviews revealed care plans were generic and not tailored to individual interests, with poor documentation of resident engagement. The activity program was acknowledged as weak, needing improvement and more comprehensive care plans.
A resident's dignity was compromised when a staff member wheeled them to the shower room with their lower body exposed. Although the upper body was covered with a bath poncho, the facility's usual practice of ensuring full coverage with an extra blanket was not followed. Staff acknowledged the importance of maintaining resident privacy, aligning with the facility's policy on treating residents with respect and dignity.
A facility failed to consistently consult wound care services and document wound details for a resident with a Stage II pressure ulcer, resulting in prolonged healing. Despite daily care attempts, the wound's status fluctuated without significant progress, and wound care services were consulted only twice over several months. The resident's EHR showed inconsistent documentation of the wound's stage and measurements, failing to meet the facility's quality of care standards.
Missing Full-Time DON Coverage
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to have a designated registered nurse serving as the Director of Nursing on a full-time basis. During observation on 12/15/25 at 9:00 a.m., the DON was not present at the facility. During interview on 12/15/25 at 9:15 a.m., staff member A stated the DON resigned on 12/2/25 and that a new DON would start on 12/29/25, and that no interim DON was assigned because the new DON was expected to begin soon. A facility document titled Survey Information, dated 8/18/25, reflected the DON resignation and the planned start date for the new DON. The facility policy Nursing Services, revised 10/2022, stated that except when waived, the facility must designate a registered nurse to serve as the DON on a full-time basis. An email to the State Survey Agency dated 12/4/25 showed staff member A requested clarification about DON hourly requirements and coverage of position duties, indicating awareness of the DON designation requirement prior to the survey.
Failure to Submit PBJ Staffing Data
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to electronically submit complete and accurate direct care staffing information to CMS based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data. Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report dated 12/9/25 for quarter four (7/1/25-9/30/25) showed the facility did not submit data for that quarter. During an interview on 12/15/25 at 9:15 a.m., staff member A stated the facility did not submit the PBJ for the fourth quarter of 2025 and that once the facility realized the data had not been submitted, it was too late to submit it.
QAPI Failed to Address Activities Department Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the QAPI team identified, reported, investigated, and documented the development, implementation, and evaluation of corrective actions for performance improvement projects related to known activities department deficient practices for 2 residents. During the survey, the facility was found to have failed to provide activities to meet the interests and preferences of residents who remained in their rooms for two residents. A staff member stated there had been difficulty getting the activities department to take charge and work the activities program, and acknowledged that one-to-one visits and activities that should have been completed were not being done. The same staff member stated that after surveyors questioned the one-to-one visits, she interviewed staff and found activities staff had falsified documentation on one-to-one visits by recording that residents refused, were sleeping, or had kicked staff out of the room when they had not attempted the visits. She also stated she had not been auditing completion of one-to-one visits, that the facility only did one performance improvement plan per year, and that the QAPI team chose to work on ambulation-based data review. Review of quarterly QAPI minutes from 1/2020 through 10/2025 showed no information about the activities department concerns, lack of provision of activities, falsification of documentation, or concerns related to residents not receiving activities. The facility policy stated QAPI is a data-driven, proactive approach to improving quality of life, care, and services and includes identifying opportunities for improvement, addressing gaps in systems or processes, developing and implementing improvement or corrective plans, and continuously monitoring effectiveness of interventions.
Failure to Provide and Use Required PPE During COVID-19 Outbreak
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure required PPE was available and properly used during a COVID-19 outbreak. At the entrance, the facility was posted as being in outbreak status, but only paper masks were available in the vestibule and no N95 respirators were provided for visitors. A visitor was observed entering the building and walking through the facility to a staff member’s office without an isolation mask, and a nurse later entered a resident’s room while performing a blood draw on a resident who was on airborne precautions for active COVID-19, wearing only a paper mask. The nurse stated she did not see the small signage indicating N95 use and that only paper masks were provided at the entrance. Staff were also observed wearing N95 respirators incorrectly. One staff member was in an office without a mask while talking with another staff member, another was holding an N95 on her face without securing the top strap, and another had the top of the respirator below the nose. Additional observations showed staff wearing N95s with the upper strap hanging in front of the face or the respirator sitting below the nose. One staff member stated he had recently been trained on proper N95 use but could not breathe with the top strap over his head and therefore wore it with the strap down until he was around a resident. The facility also failed to ensure face shields or protective eyewear were worn in rooms of residents who had tested positive for COVID-19 and remained on contact and droplet precautions. Staff were observed passing medications and assisting with meals in the rooms of confirmed COVID-19 positive residents without face shields or goggles, and PPE carts outside or inside those rooms did not contain any face shields or goggles. The facility’s outbreak tracking showed the outbreak began on 12/2/25 and, by 12/18/25, there were 11 total cases, including three residents and eight staff, with four resident cases identified during the survey period.
Medication Administration Without Orders for Crushed Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that medication error rates were not 5 percent or greater. During medication administration observations, staff member B crushed and administered medications to resident #7 without a physician's order for crushed medications. The medications crushed for this resident were citalopram hydrobromide 20 mg, acetaminophen 500 mg, and sennosides-docusate sodium 8.6-50 mg, all placed in a plastic medication cup, crushed, and mixed with applesauce before being given. During a separate observation, staff member B also crushed and administered medications to resident #13 without a physician's order for crushed medications. The medications crushed for this resident were cholecalciferol 1,000 unit tablets, oxybutynin chloride 5 mg, sennosides-docusate sodium 8.6-50 mg, and trazodone hydrochloride 50 mg, which were also placed in a plastic medication cup, crushed, and mixed with applesauce. Staff member B stated there were no orders for crushed medications for residents #7 and #13 and that she relied on the facility's roster/shift change sheet to know which residents' medications to crush. Staff member A stated there were no physician's orders for crushed medication for any residents, and staff member D stated she knew some residents were receiving crushed medications but did not know they were being administered without physician's orders.
Uncovered Catheter Bag Visible to Others
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure catheter bags were covered for one resident who used a catheter, and the uncovered bag was visible to others passing by the resident’s room. During an observation, the resident was sitting in a recliner with the room door open, and the catheter bag was hanging from the recliner pocket, facing the doorway and visible from the hall. The bag was observed half full of dark yellow urine on one occasion and about one-quarter full on another occasion. When asked about the catheter bag and dignity, the resident stated, "It's whatever" during the first observation and later stated, "It's a bit embarrassing." Staff interviews showed that two catheter bag covers were available in the supply closet and that they were supposed to be used for residents with catheters. One staff member stated the cover would rip and fall off, but said he would put a catheter cover on the resident’s bag. Review of the resident’s care plan showed the catheter was to be positioned below the level of the bladder and facing away from the entrance of the room door. A staff member also stated the facility did not have a policy and procedure for covering catheter bags to ensure a resident’s dignity is maintained.
Resident Preference for Breakfast Refused by Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to honor a resident’s preference not to be woken up in the morning and not to be given a breakfast tray. The resident stated she repeatedly told staff not to bring her breakfast because she had never eaten breakfast and was not going to start, but staff continued to wake her and deliver a tray anyway. At the time of observation, the breakfast tray was sitting on her bedside table uneaten, and the resident said the repeated tray delivery was frustrating and made her angry. Staff stated the resident had not eaten breakfast since admission and that they had been told by the kitchen she must receive a tray even if she refused it. Staff also stated the resident became very angry and had a history of throwing trays at staff. The care plan reflected a personal history of refusing breakfast, and a nurse’s note documented that the resident was offered her tray twice and refused both times. Staff further stated the resident was not offered breakfast at a later time, but was offered a snack before lunch, and there was no documentation of resident education offering an altered meal schedule.
Failure to Protect Resident Record Privacy During Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure staff member B protected a resident's right to privacy and confidentiality of her medical record during medication administration for resident #9. During an observation on 12/17/25 at 7:43 a.m., staff member B was administering medications in resident #9's room while the medication cart was parked outside the room, and the computer on top of the cart was open to resident #9's medication listing with her picture visible. At that time, another resident exited her room and passed directly next to the medication cart. During an interview later that morning, staff member B stated the computer on the medication cart should be locked each time she stepped away so a resident's record could not be seen by others. The facility's confidentiality policy stated that the patient record shall be kept closed when not in use and that, if an electronic health record is used, no other individual should be able to read the screen and the computer should be logged off when not in use.
Incomplete Person-Centered Activity Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan that included residents’ preferences for 2 sampled residents. Resident #2 stated during observation and interview that she no longer got out of bed and did not have activities available in her room. She identified interests including reading and quilting, but those activities were not offered to her. Her care plan, dated 11/10/25, stated she had little or no interest in activities and noted only that she enjoyed watching television in her room, visiting in her room with friends and family, and going on outings with her family as able. Her activity assessment, dated 11/12/25, listed preferences such as pets, TV/movies, and youth visits, but these interests were not reflected in the comprehensive care plan. Her Kardex, dated 12/16/25, listed a variety of activities including 1:1 activity, arts and crafts, ball toss/beanbag toss, barber, bingo, and others, but these were also not noted on the comprehensive care plan. Resident #6 was observed resting in a recliner with the television on and stated he did not come out of his room, did not receive visits from activity staff except for delivery of a group activity schedule, and was not receiving his newspaper in the mornings. His comprehensive care plan, dated 10/15/25, included diversional activities such as conversation, newspapers, TV, and structured group activities to decrease exit seeking behavior and promote safety, and stated he enjoyed reading the paper with coffee and watching the news. During interviews, staff stated they were not aware the care plan showed he enjoyed the newspaper with coffee, that the facility did not always receive a newspaper, and that CNAs could not see the resident care plan. Staff also stated the Kardex and care plan did not reflect resident preferences accurately, that the activities department used quarterly activity assessments instead of the care plan, and that there was a disconnect between the care plans, Kardex, and assessments used by different departments.
Improper Crushing of a Do Not Crush Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure staff member B followed medication administration best practices when administering medications to resident #13 during an observed medication pass. Staff member B prepared the resident’s medications by placing cholecalciferol 1,000 unit tablets, oxybutynin chloride 5 mg tablets, sennosides-docusate sodium 8.6-50 mg tablets, and trazodone hydrochloride 50 mg tablets into a plastic medication cup, crushing them, and mixing them with applesauce before giving them to the resident. During interviews, staff member B stated she relied on the facility’s roster/shift change sheet to know which residents’ medications should be crushed and said there were no labels on bubble packets indicating medications should not be crushed. She stated she knew not to crush extended-release medications but otherwise would not know which medications should not be crushed, and later stated she was unaware trazodone for resident #13 was listed on a DO NOT CRUSH medication listing. Staff member A also stated she did not know trazodone was on the DO NOT CRUSH list, while staff member D confirmed trazodone was on that listing. Staff member A further stated the facility did not have a policy or procedure for crushed medications. Review of the PharMerica Oral Medications That Should Not Be Crushed or Altered document dated 2/2023 showed trazodone as a medication that should not be crushed.
Failure to Provide Individualized Activities for Roombound Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide activities to meet the interests and preferences of two residents who remained in their rooms. One resident stated she was "just laying here playing dead" and reported that she no longer got out of bed, did not have activities in her room, and was not offered the modern romance and adventure books she used to enjoy reading. Her care plan reflected that she enjoyed watching television in her room, visiting with friends and family in her room, and going on outings with family as able, and her activity assessment listed preferences such as pets, TV/movies, and youth visits. Another resident was observed resting in a recliner with the television on and stated he did not do much but sleep in the chair, did not know what activities were available to him, and was not receiving newspapers in the morning anymore. He reported that activities staff only dropped off a schedule of group activities and sometimes coloring materials, and that he did not come out of his room or receive visits from activities except for those limited contacts. His care plan reflected a need for pleasant diversional activities such as conversation, newspapers, TV, and structured group activities, and noted that he enjoyed reading the paper with coffee and watching the news. Staff interviews confirmed that residents who stayed in their rooms were not receiving activities. Staff stated the facility did not receive the newspaper regularly, CNAs only had access to the Kardex, and residents who did not leave their rooms were not getting activities. Staff also stated one-to-one visits had not been completed in a long time, and that one-to-one charting was being falsified by documenting residents as refusing, sleeping, or unavailable when attempts had not actually been made. The facility policy required an ongoing program of facility-sponsored group, individual, and independent activities based on each resident's assessment and care plan.
Hospice Records and Care Plans Did Not Align
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain collaborative records for hospice residents’ medication administration and care plans that aligned with the hospice agency for two residents. For one resident, the paper chart and EHR contained no hospice documents, including no hospice care plan or medication reconciliation. The hospice medication profile listed multiple medications that were not on the facility medication list, including medications for bone reabsorption, vitamin supplementation, anticoagulation, depression, GERD, yeast infections, constipation, insomnia, hypokalemia, memory, CVA, and edema. The resident’s comprehensive care plan also did not include the frequency of hospice staff visits, hospice goals, or hospice interventions. For the second resident, the paper chart and EHR also contained no hospice documents, including no hospice care plan or medication reconciliation. The facility’s EHR order summary listed medications that were not on the faxed hospice medication profile, including PRN medications for constipation and cough. The resident’s comprehensive care plan likewise did not reflect the frequency of hospice staff visits, hospice goals, or hospice interventions. During interview, staff stated hospice visited residents, attended care plan meetings, and that the facility sent updated care plans to hospice, but there was no documentation showing the care plans were sent. Staff also could not explain why the hospice and facility orders and care plans did not align.
Unlocked Medication Cart Left in Hallway
Penalty
Summary
Staff member B failed to ensure that medications were secured in a locked storage medication cart, leaving the cart accessible in the hallway while medications were being passed in a resident's room. During an observation on 12/17/25 at 7:43 a.m., staff member B was seen administering medications in a resident's room while the medication cart remained parked outside the room and was not locked. During an interview later that morning, staff member B stated the cart should be locked when a nurse was not by it and acknowledged that she had left the cart unlocked in the hallway earlier that morning. Facility policy titled Medication Floor Stock, last revised 8/17, stated that medications in floor stock shall be stored in either a locked cabinet or a tamper evident cart, and that responsibility for security rests with the supervising licensed practitioner or supervising nurse overseeing the unit.
Failure to Complete Annual Performance Review for Agency Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct annual performance reviews for an agency staff member who had been contracted for over 12 months. Interviews with facility staff revealed that performance reviews were not performed for agency staff, and the agency itself did not provide such evaluations. Staff confirmed that the contracted staff member had been working at the facility since the COVID period, and no documentation of a performance review was available upon request. Additionally, the agency staff member reported not receiving annual education based on performance reviews, as these were not conducted.
Failure to Implement Comprehensive Care Plans for Resident Activities
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans that addressed the activity preferences and physical abilities of four residents. Resident #15 was observed sitting in her wheelchair facing a wall, with limited engagement in activities. Despite her care plan indicating the need for simple, structured activities, there was no evidence of such activities being provided. Resident #14, who is dependent on staff for all care areas, was noted to have an outdated activity assessment and limited participation in group activities, contrary to her preference for independent activities. Resident #4 was observed sleeping in the activities room while other residents engaged in card games, indicating a lack of personalized activity planning. Resident #10 expressed a desire for more activities and outings, but her care plan did not reflect her preferences for bingo, puzzles, and arts and crafts. Staff interviews revealed that care plans were generic and not tailored to individual resident needs, with the activity director not contributing to the care plans. This lack of comprehensive and individualized care planning led to unmet activity needs for the residents involved.
Inadequate Resident Activities and Care Planning
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate group and individual activities to meet the interests and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of four residents. Resident #15, who is mostly nonverbal, was observed sitting in her room facing the wall and participated in only 7 activities over 28 days. Resident #14, who enjoys animals and medical shows, was observed watching cartoons she did not like and participated in only 4 activities over the same period. Resident #4 was observed sleeping in his room and in the activities room, participating in only 6 activities. Resident #10 expressed a desire for more activities and outings, having participated in only 5 activities. Interviews with staff revealed that care plans were generic and not specific to residents' interests. Staff admitted to not documenting one-on-one visits or when residents refused activities. The activity director did not contribute to care plans, and the overall activity program was acknowledged as weak, with a need for more comprehensive care plans and activities tailored to residents' needs, including those with dementia. The facility was working on improving the program and bringing back volunteers post-COVID.
Resident Dignity Compromised During Shower Transfer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide dignity for a resident during a transfer to the shower room. During an observation, a staff member was seen wheeling a resident in a bath chair with the resident's lower body exposed and visible underneath the shower chair, while the upper body was covered by a bath poncho. Interviews with staff members revealed that the usual practice was to ensure residents were covered before being moved out of their rooms, with an extra blanket used if necessary. Staff members acknowledged the importance of maintaining resident privacy and expressed discomfort at the thought of being uncovered in a similar situation. The facility's policy on Resident Rights emphasizes treating each resident with respect and dignity, promoting their quality of life, and protecting their rights.
Inconsistent Wound Care Consultation and Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to consistently consult wound care services and adequately document the wound measurements, severity, and characteristics for a resident with a pressure ulcer. This deficiency resulted in the resident's Stage II pressure ulcer remaining unhealed for four months, with little improvement or intervention. The wound initially appeared approximately a year ago, and despite daily wound care attempts by staff, the wound's status fluctuated without significant progress. Staff interviews revealed that wound care services were consulted only twice over several months, and there was no consistent follow-up or updated wound care orders unless the wound status changed. The resident's electronic health record (EHR) showed inconsistent documentation of the wound's stage and measurements over several months. The wound assessments lacked consistent staging and detailed measurements, with some entries missing crucial information. The facility's document titled 'Quality of Care' indicated that residents with pressure ulcers should receive necessary treatment and services to promote healing and prevent new ulcers, but this standard was not met in the case of the resident's left buttock wound.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 37 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Anaconda
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivy At Deer Lodge | 21.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
| Copper Ridge Health And Rehabilitation Center | 23.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 17 | 0 |
| Continental Care And Rehabilitation | 24 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Southwest Montana Veterans Home | 24 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Crest Nursing Home | 24 mi | ★★★★★ | 9 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Community Nursing Home Of Anaconda.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.