Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around April 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Maranatha Care Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Surveyors identified multiple deficiencies in food safety and sanitation, including unlabeled and undated food items, soiled kitchen equipment and surfaces, incomplete temperature logs for dishwashers and refrigeration units, and staff and volunteers not wearing required hair restraints in food prep areas. These lapses were confirmed through staff interviews and review of facility policies, which were not consistently followed.
A facility failed to review a resident's POLST after a significant change in condition. The resident, with chronic kidney disease and dementia, had a POLST indicating DNR and comfort-focused treatment. After the resident's health improved and hospice services ended, the facility did not review the POLST with the family, who would have revised it to reflect the resident's desire to live. Staff interviews revealed that the POLST was not reviewed during a care conference, despite expectations to do so.
A resident with chronic kidney disease, dementia, and malignant neoplasm was inadequately monitored during antibiotic treatment for a UTI. The facility failed to consistently document the effectiveness of the treatment and monitor vital signs as required. Staff interviews revealed expectations for monitoring were not met, and the facility's policy lacked specificity on monitoring frequency, leading to inconsistent care.
A nursing assistant failed to perform proper hand hygiene and glove use during toileting and incontinence care for two residents. The assistant did not sanitize hands before donning or after doffing gloves, citing a lack of accessible sanitizer. Facility policy mandates hand hygiene before and after using personal protective equipment.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and dementia was found with multiple bruises and a skin tear of unknown origin. Despite staff observations and reports to the DON, the facility failed to report these injuries to the State Agency immediately as required by policy, leading to a delay in reporting.
Deficient Food Safety, Sanitation, and Staff Compliance in Dietary Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper food safety practices in several key areas, including food storage, sanitation, temperature monitoring, and staff compliance with hair restraint policies. During multiple observations, surveyors found numerous food items in the walk-in refrigerator and kitchenettes that were not properly labeled or dated, including containers of unknown liquids, cooked meats, vegetables, and dairy products. Staff interviews confirmed that the expectation was for all opened or cooked food items to be labeled and dated, but this was not consistently followed. Additionally, partially used food items, such as whipped topping, were found uncovered and undated in resident area refrigerators. Sanitation issues were also identified throughout the main kitchen and resident floor kitchenettes. Observations revealed soiled surfaces, including pan lids, divider bars, and beverage stations, with visible residues and unknown substances. The ice and water machines had cloudy dispenser chutes and brownish substances inside, and cleaning logs or checklists were not maintained as required by facility policy. Staff interviews acknowledged these lapses and confirmed that cleaning tasks were not systematically tracked or documented. Temperature monitoring logs for dishwashers, refrigerators, and freezers were incomplete, with numerous missing entries and some recorded temperatures below required levels. Staff responsible for these logs confirmed the importance of accurate record-keeping but failed to ensure compliance. Furthermore, several staff members and volunteers were observed in food preparation areas without proper hair coverings, and some were unaware of the facility's hair restraint policy. Facility policies reviewed by surveyors clearly required labeling, dating, sanitation, temperature monitoring, and hair restraint compliance, but these standards were not consistently met.
Failure to Review POLST Following Change in Condition
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) for a resident was reviewed and/or revised following a significant change in condition. The resident, who had diagnoses of chronic kidney disease, dementia, and malignant neoplasm of the sigmoid colon, was noted to have moderately impaired cognition. The POLST, signed by the resident's health care agent and family member, indicated a do not attempt resuscitation (DNR) status and comfort-focused treatment. However, after the resident's health improved and they no longer qualified for hospice services, the facility did not review the POLST with the family member during a care conference, despite the family member's indication that they would have revised the POLST to reflect the resident's desire to live. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the POLST was expected to be reviewed during care conferences, especially following a change in condition. However, the registered nurse present at the care conference was unsure if the POLST was reviewed, and the social services staff member admitted to not completing the necessary documentation to confirm the review. The director of nursing confirmed that staff were expected to review the POLST during care conferences and upon significant changes in the resident's status, but this was not done in this case.
Inadequate Monitoring of Antibiotic Treatment for Resident with UTI
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adequately monitor and evaluate the response to antibiotic treatment for a resident identified as R1, who was being treated for a urinary tract infection (UTI). R1 had a significant medical history, including chronic kidney disease, dementia, and malignant neoplasm of the sigmoid colon, with moderately impaired cognition. The resident was prescribed Keflex and Macrobid for the UTI and urine retention, respectively, but the facility did not consistently document the effectiveness of these treatments or monitor the resident's vital signs as required. The report highlights that the facility's staff, including LPNs and RNs, were expected to implement infection monitoring protocols, which included obtaining vital signs every shift and documenting the medication's purpose and effectiveness. However, the progress notes for R1 lacked consistent monitoring and evaluation throughout the antibiotic course. Interviews with various nursing staff revealed that there was an expectation to monitor the resident for at least seven days, but this was not adhered to, as evidenced by the lack of documentation and vital sign monitoring. The Director of Nursing (DON) and a nurse practitioner confirmed that the facility had a standard practice for monitoring infections, which was not followed in this case. The facility's policy on antibiotic stewardship required documentation at the start and end of an antibiotic regimen and monitoring for any changes in condition. However, the policy did not specify the frequency of monitoring, contributing to the inconsistency in monitoring R1's response to the antibiotics. The DON acknowledged the documentation issues and recognized it as a learning opportunity for the staff.
Failure in Hand Hygiene and Glove Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper glove use and hand hygiene during assistance with toileting and incontinence care for two residents. One resident required extensive assistance with personal hygiene, and during a toileting session, the nursing assistant (NA-A) donned gloves without performing hand hygiene, assisted the resident, and then removed the soiled gloves without sanitizing her hands before continuing to assist the resident. The NA-A only washed her hands after completing the care and before exiting the room. Another resident also required extensive assistance with personal hygiene. During incontinence care, NA-A again donned gloves without performing hand hygiene, removed soiled gloves, and donned clean gloves without sanitizing her hands in between. The NA-A completed the care and sanitized equipment before washing her hands. The NA-A later stated that she normally uses hand sanitizer before and after glove use but did not do so due to the unavailability of sanitizer within reach. The facility's policy requires hand hygiene before and after donning and doffing personal protective equipment.
Failure to Report Injuries of Unknown Origin Timely
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that injuries of unknown origin were reported to the State Agency (SA) immediately, within the required two-hour timeframe, for a resident with severe cognitive impairment and a diagnosis of dementia. The resident, who required substantial to maximum assistance for all personal care and transfers and was non-ambulatory, was found with multiple bruises and a skin tear of unknown origin. Despite the presence of these injuries, the facility did not report them to the SA immediately as required by policy. The injuries included bruising on the left upper inner arm, left palm, left shoulder, and a skin tear on the left knee. Documentation of these injuries was inconsistent and lacked detailed descriptions and measurements in several instances. On multiple occasions, staff members, including an LPN and an RN, observed and reported the injuries to the Director of Nursing (DON), who then delayed reporting to the SA. The DON observed the injuries on the morning of 3/25/24 and made the report to the SA later that afternoon. The facility's policy directed that allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source, should be reported immediately within state and federal guidelines. However, the DON did not report the injuries immediately, assuming the resident likely had an unwitnessed fall, which led to the delay in reporting to the SA.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,020 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 33 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Brooklyn Center
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saint Therese At Oxbow Lake | 2.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 16 | 0 |
| Woodlake Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center | 2.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
| North Ridge Health And Rehab | 2.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| The Villas At Osseo Llc | 3.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| The Estates At Fridley Llc | 3.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Maranatha Care Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.