Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at The Oaks At Belmont during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Failure to follow Contact Precautions for a resident with conjunctivitis occurred when CNAs entered the resident’s room without gown or gloves, provided meal setup and hands-on assistance, and left without hand hygiene before going to another resident. The DON stated staff should have worn gown and gloves before entry and performed hand hygiene before exit, and noted staff appeared to be confusing Contact Precautions with EBP.
The facility failed to adhere to food safety standards, with improper cooling of food items and inadequate cleanliness of food-contact surfaces. Sausages and cheese sauce were not cooled properly, and various kitchen equipment and utensils had debris accumulation. Additionally, the dishwashing machine did not meet required temperature and pressure specifications.
The facility failed to maintain infection control during incontinence care for two residents, as CNAs did not perform hand hygiene between glove changes. One CNA continued care tasks without changing gloves after cleaning a resident, leading to potential cross-contamination. Staff interviews confirmed the need for hand hygiene between glove changes, but oversight in observing incontinence care was noted.
Failure to Follow Contact Precautions for Resident With Conjunctivitis
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly implement Contact Precautions for a resident with conjunctivitis. Resident #56 had a physician order for Contact Precautions with special instructions for conjunctivitis, and signage at the room indicated that anyone entering the room must clean their hands, wear gloves before room entry and discard them before room exit, and wear a gown before room entry and discard it before room exit. During observation, a CNA entered the resident’s room carrying the lunch tray, adjusted the resident’s belongings, and set up the meal without wearing a gown or gloves, then left the room without performing hand hygiene before going to another resident’s room and delivering another lunch tray. A second CNA later entered the same resident’s room, asked the resident to wake up and eat lunch, rubbed the resident’s back, and helped adjust the resident in the chair without wearing a gown or gloves. That CNA also exited the room without performing hand hygiene. The DON stated the resident had been placed on Contact Precautions that morning and that staff should have donned a gown and gloves before entering the room and performed hand hygiene before exiting, and also noted staff were likely confusing Contact Precautions with Enhanced Barrier Precautions.
Food Safety and Sanitation Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to prepare and store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, as observed during a kitchen tour. The Assistant Food Service Director (AFSD) indicated that the facility routinely cools food and maintains a log for cooled items. However, the log did not reflect any items currently cooling. Sausage links from breakfast service were found tightly covered in saran wrap in a cooler, with condensation inside the wrap and a temperature over 70F, indicating improper cooling. Additionally, two pans of cheese sauce were found tightly covered with saran wrap and condensation, with a temperature over 120F, not being cooled with an ice wand as required. The facility also failed to maintain cleanliness of food-contact surfaces and equipment. During the kitchen tour, dried debris was found on the underside rim of a mixer, and dust and food debris were observed on stored pans. The expediting cart used for baking equipment had excessive flour and crumb debris, and the clean utensil drawer contained mechanical scoops with stuck-on food debris. The under-counter microwave and preparation counter near the Robo-Coup had dried debris, and some puree molds had stuck-on food debris from previous uses. The dishwashing machine was not operating according to the manufacturer's specifications. The machine's data plate required a minimum wash cycle temperature of 160F and a final rinse of 180F, but observations showed the wash gauge ranged from 145F-150F. The rinse pressure was inconsistent, and the machine had a missing glass cover on the rinse gauge, leaking water, and a rusted pressure gauge. The facility did not record the pressure gauge readings, and the log indicated appropriate temperatures were checked in the morning, despite the observed deficiencies.
Infection Control Deficiency in Incontinence Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain proper infection control measures during incontinence care for two residents, leading to potential cross-contamination and infection spread. For Resident #6, Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) E and L were observed performing incontinence care without practicing hand hygiene between glove changes. They donned gloves before starting the care, removed soiled briefs, cleaned the resident, and applied cream without washing hands or using hand sanitizer between glove changes. This lack of hand hygiene was confirmed by interviews with other staff members, who stated that hand hygiene should be performed between glove changes. For Resident #28, CNA E was observed providing incontinence care without discarding gloves after cleaning the resident. The CNA continued to apply a clean brief, handle cream, and adjust the resident's bedding and call light without changing gloves. This oversight was acknowledged by CNA E, who admitted forgetting to remove gloves after the care. The Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist and the Director of Nursing reported that although education and audits on hand hygiene had been conducted, they had not observed staff during incontinence care to ensure compliance with infection control measures.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 299 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 5 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Belmont
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan Veteran Homes At Grand Rapids | 4.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Medilodge Of Grand Rapids | 5.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 1 |
| Optalis Health & Rehabilitation At Leonard | 5.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 14 | 0 |
| Corewell Health Rehabilitation & Nursing Center - | 5.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Corewell Health Grand Rapids Hospitals Rehabilitat | 6 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for The Oaks At Belmont.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.