Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at The Laurels Of Hudsonville during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident called 911 and reported being abused and held against her will by staff. Two CNAs became aware of the resident's allegations but did not notify the facility's Abuse Coordinator or Administrator, and the incident was not reported to the State Agency as required by facility policy.
Staff failed to maintain the required head-of-bed elevation during tube feeding and did not consistently label tube feeding solutions and hydration bags with the date and time of initiation, as required by facility policy. These deficiencies affected multiple residents with complex medical needs who were dependent on enteral nutrition.
A resident with a history of stroke and total dependence on staff was administered two muscle relaxants, Methocarbamol and Baclofen, at the same time due to a failure to discontinue one medication when the other was started. This medication error was not recognized by nursing staff, resulting in the resident becoming somnolent and unarousable and requiring hospital evaluation.
A resident at a facility developed multiple unstageable pressure wounds on their feet, which were not promptly or adequately addressed, leading to serious infection and delayed healing. Despite being at risk for pressure ulcers, the resident's feet were not properly elevated, and the facility's care plan interventions were insufficient. The wounds were not evaluated by a wound care consultant until three weeks after the consultation was requested, and there was a lack of appropriate treatment orders. Additionally, a wound culture was not ordered when the resident showed signs of sepsis, contributing to the worsening of the resident's condition.
A facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with unstageable wounds, as required by their infection control policy. Observations revealed no signage or PPE available, and staff did not use the necessary PPE during high-contact care. The resident's care plan and order recap report did not reflect the need for EBP, and an RN was unaware of the requirement, indicating a gap in staff training and policy implementation.
A facility failed to administer daily medications to a resident on dialysis days, resulting in missed doses of critical medications. The resident, with conditions such as hemiplegia and end-stage renal disease, did not receive their morning medications on dialysis days, and the facility lacked orders for dialysis in the resident's records. Interviews revealed that the nursing leadership was unaware of the missed doses and did not notify a physician.
A resident with a PEG/J tube experienced repeated clogging incidents due to inadequate care and maintenance by the facility. Despite hospital instructions to flush the tube with warm water and use liquid medications, the facility failed to implement these measures, resulting in multiple emergency department visits. Interviews revealed a lack of staff training and communication regarding PEG/J tube care.
A resident with complex medical needs experienced repeated clogged PEG/PEGJ tubes due to inadequate nursing competency and training, resulting in multiple hospital visits. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff had current skills and assessments for PEG/PEGJ tube care, leading to improper management and tube damage.
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, lacking a current infection tracking report and proper hand hygiene practices. The ADON struggled with the new infection control system, and there was no tracking of employee illnesses. An LPN was observed not changing gloves or performing hand hygiene during a resident's wound assessment, potentially leading to cross-contamination.
A facility failed to appoint a legal surrogate for a resident deemed incapable of making informed medical decisions. Despite the resident's daughter frequently visiting and being expected to provide legal guardian paperwork, it had not been submitted. The Director of Social Services expressed concern and noted the need for a court-appointed guardian if documentation is not provided.
A facility failed to ensure that the responsible party for a cognitively impaired resident was informed of the risks and benefits of an antipsychotic medication and had consented to its administration. Despite a doctor's order for Lurasidone, there was no documentation that the Power of Attorney (POA) had been informed or had consented. The Director of Nursing and Nursing Home Administrator were unable to provide the necessary documentation during the survey.
A resident with dementia and diabetes, who was cognitively intact, had an active leg infection that was not updated in their care plan, leading to potential inconsistent care. The unit manager responsible for updates had left, and the DON and MDS nurse were believed to be responsible. The infection was not discussed in clinical meetings, and the PA only informed a floor nurse about the antibiotics, failing to notify the interdisciplinary team.
A facility failed to assess and monitor a resident with chronic kidney disease, leading to hospitalization due to a suspected UTI. The resident's catheter was not changed as ordered, increasing infection risk. Additionally, another resident's skin conditions were not identified or treated, despite being cognitively intact and reporting issues. The facility's policies on skin management were not followed, resulting in potential deterioration of the resident's well-being.
A resident with dementia, morbid obesity, and dysphagia experienced significant weight loss, which was not adequately monitored or addressed by the facility. Despite the addition of a nutritional supplement, the care plan lacked specific interventions for weight loss, and there was no evidence of consistent monitoring or medical referrals. The DON and NHA considered the weight loss desirable but failed to provide supporting documentation.
A facility failed to verify feeding tube placement before administering medication to a resident with a PEG tube, contrary to its policy. The LPN did not aspirate stomach contents as required, relying instead on listening for air bubbles. Interviews revealed a lack of adherence to the policy and unclear procedures, risking complications like aspiration pneumonia.
A resident experienced significant weight loss after admission, but the facility failed to identify and report this to the Medical Provider. Despite the resident's weight history showing a substantial decrease, progress notes inaccurately stated no weight loss. The facility's documentation lacked evidence of timely evaluation or intervention by the Medical Provider, and there was no consistent monitoring or referral for the resident's weight loss.
The facility failed to address pharmacy recommendations for two residents, leading to deficiencies in medication management. One resident with dementia and bipolar disorder had unreviewed pharmacy recommendations for lab values and an AIMS assessment. Another resident with a history of stroke had unreviewed recommendations for anticoagulant dosage reduction and nutritional supplement evaluation. These recommendations were not reviewed by the physician until prompted by the surveyor.
A facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for a resident, resulting in potential miscommunication about the resident's healthcare status. An antibiotic order was noted in the EHR for treating the resident's lower legs, but there was no further documentation from nursing staff or medical providers. The ADON and PA acknowledged the lack of documentation, with the PA stating she had not finished documenting the treatment for chronic lower leg venous stasis dermatitis.
Failure to Report Resident's Abuse Allegation to State Agency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency for one resident. The resident, a female recently admitted to the facility, used her phone to call 911 and reported to the dispatcher that she was being held against her will, had been assaulted by staff, was not allowed to make phone calls, and implied that she had been sexually assaulted by staff. A CNA discovered the resident on the phone with 911, spoke to the dispatcher, and explained that the resident was confused and the call was a mistake. Despite being aware of the resident's allegations, the CNA did not notify the facility's Abuse Coordinator. Further interviews revealed that another CNA was also aware of the 911 call and the resident's abuse allegations but did not report the incident to the Administrator/Abuse Coordinator, assuming that the nurse would handle it. The Administrator/Abuse Coordinator was not aware of the incident or the police visit until interviewed by surveyors. The facility's policy requires that all allegations of abuse be immediately reported to the Administrator and appropriate state agencies, but this protocol was not followed in this case.
Failure to Follow Tube Feeding Protocols and Documentation Requirements
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow professional guidelines and its own policies regarding the care of residents receiving tube feedings. For three residents reviewed, staff did not maintain the required elevation of the head of the bed during tube feeding, as care plans and facility policy specified a semi-Fowler's position (30-45 degrees) during and after feeding to prevent aspiration. Observations showed that the head of the bed was consistently below the required elevation, with one resident's bed at 10-20 degrees and another at 12-22 degrees during active tube feeding. Additionally, a CNA interviewed was unaware of the correct bed elevation required for tube feeding care. Further deficiencies were noted in the labeling and documentation of tube feeding solutions and hydration bags. For two residents, the tube feeding solutions and kangaroo flush bags were not labeled with the date and time of initiation, contrary to facility policy and standard practice. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility's standard is to label all tube feeding solutions and hydration bags with the date and time they are started. The affected residents had significant medical conditions, including cerebral palsy, cognitive communication deficits, respiratory failure, Parkinson's disease, and cancer, and were dependent on staff for all care needs.
Failure to Administer Medications According to Professional Standards
Penalty
Summary
A female resident with a history of stroke resulting in right-sided paralysis, blindness in one eye, and total dependence on staff for daily care was admitted to the facility. The resident had active orders for two muscle relaxants: Methocarbamol 500 mg three times daily (later increased to 750 mg in the morning) and Baclofen 10 mg three times daily. Both medications were administered concurrently, as documented in the electronic medication administration record. Hospital records indicated that the resident became somnolent and unarousable after receiving both medications, and emergency department staff reported that the facility had been giving both muscle relaxants at the same time. The facility's Director of Nursing confirmed that the error was not recognized by nursing staff, and the prescriber had not discontinued Methocarbamol when Baclofen was started.
Failure to Prevent and Manage Pressure Ulcers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to prevent the development and worsening of pressure injuries for a resident, resulting in serious infection and delayed wound healing. The resident was admitted with multiple health conditions, including chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, and muscle weakness, and was identified as being at risk for pressure ulcers. Despite this, the initial assessments did not document any existing pressure ulcers or skin conditions. However, within a short period, the resident developed multiple unstageable pressure wounds on both feet, which were not promptly or adequately addressed. Observations and interviews revealed that the resident's feet were not properly elevated, and the standard pillow used for elevation was ineffective, leading to the resident's heels resting directly on the mattress. The facility's care plan included interventions such as cueing the resident to reposition, but these were insufficient to prevent the development of pressure injuries. The resident reported difficulty participating in physical therapy due to the wounds, which was a setback in their recovery process. The facility's documentation and treatment of the wounds were inconsistent and delayed. The resident's wounds were not evaluated by a wound care consultant until three weeks after the consultation was requested, and there was a lack of appropriate treatment orders for the open wounds. Additionally, when the resident showed signs of sepsis, a wound culture was not ordered, and the empiric antibiotic therapy may not have been appropriate. The facility's failure to implement effective pressure-reducing interventions and timely wound care contributed to the worsening of the resident's condition.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident reviewed for infection control. The policy effective from April 1, 2024, required the use of EBP in addition to Standard Precautions for residents with infections or colonization with CDC-targeted multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), or those with wounds or indwelling medical devices. The policy specified that signage should be placed on the resident's door and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) should be readily available to staff. However, during observations, no signage or PPE were available for the resident, and staff did not don the required PPE during high-contact care activities. The resident had unstageable wounds on both feet, with dressings that were saturated with drainage. During a dressing change, the Registered Nurse (RN) did not wear a gown, which was required for residents needing EBP. The resident's care plan and order recap report did not reflect the need for EBP. An interview with the RN revealed a lack of awareness about the necessity of EBP for the resident's wound care, indicating a gap in staff training and implementation of the facility's infection control policy.
Failure to Administer Medications Post-Dialysis
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide daily medications for a resident undergoing dialysis, resulting in the resident not receiving their prescribed medications three times a week. The resident, who has diagnoses including hemiplegia, hemiparesis, gastroparesis, and end-stage renal disease, was not administered their morning medications on days they attended dialysis sessions. These sessions occurred every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday, and the resident typically returned to the facility around noon. Despite this schedule, the facility did not have orders for dialysis in the resident's records, and the medications were not administered after the resident's return. The Medication Administration Records (MAR) for August, September, and October revealed that the resident missed multiple doses of various medications, including those for blood pressure, bipolar disorder, acid reflux, allergies, iron supplementation, constipation, anxiety, lactose intolerance, and antiemetic purposes. Interviews with the Director of Nursing and Assistant Director of Nursing indicated a lack of awareness regarding the missed doses and the absence of physician notification. The facility did not provide the resident's daily medications after dialysis, leading to the deficiency noted in the report.
Inadequate PEG/J Tube Care Leads to Repeated Clogging Incidents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper care and maintenance of a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastric/Jejunum (PEG/PEG/J) tube for a resident, resulting in multiple incidents of tube clogging and several emergency department visits. The resident, who had diagnoses including hemiplegia, gastroparesis, and end-stage renal disease, experienced significant issues with the PEG/J tube, including abdominal distention and bile leakage. Despite hospital discharge instructions to flush the tube with 50 mL of warm water after all tube feeds and medications, the facility did not implement these instructions in a timely manner, leading to repeated clogging incidents. The facility's records revealed a lack of documentation and education for nursing staff regarding the care of the resident's PEG tube. There were multiple instances where the tube became clogged, and the facility failed to follow hospital instructions to prevent clogging, such as using liquid medications and ensuring proper flushing techniques. The resident's family and hospital staff repeatedly provided instructions to the facility, but these were not effectively communicated or implemented by the nursing staff. Interviews with facility staff, including a registered nurse and the Assistant Director of Nursing, highlighted a lack of knowledge and training regarding PEG/J tube care. The registered nurse admitted to not knowing about the availability of a clot buster medication and not having received a skills competency evaluation. The Assistant Director of Nursing acknowledged that the facility did not have complete hospital records and that the nursing staff was not informed of hospital instructions. This lack of communication and training contributed to the ongoing issues with the resident's PEG/J tube care.
Inadequate Nursing Competency in PEG/PEGJ Tube Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that nursing staff had the appropriate competencies and skills to care for residents with Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastric/Jejunum (PEG/PEGJ) tubes, leading to repeated incidents of clogged tubes and multiple hospital visits for one resident. The review of nursing staff files revealed that none of the five nursing staff members had current competency skills and assessments related to PEG/PEGJ tube care. This lack of training and competency resulted in the resident experiencing several instances of clogged tubes, requiring emergency department visits for replacement or unclogging. The resident in question had significant medical conditions, including hemiplegia, gastroparesis, and end-stage renal disease, and relied on a PEG/PEGJ tube for nutrition. Despite the resident's complex needs, the nursing staff, including RN I, lacked the necessary training to manage the PEG/PEGJ tube effectively. RN I admitted to not knowing how to properly manage the tube, which led to a split tube due to excessive pressure and ineffective use of medication to unclog the tube. The Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed that RN I was re-educated on PEG/PEGJ tube care after these incidents, but no other nurses received similar education.
Inadequate Infection Control and Hand Hygiene Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by the lack of an appropriate infection surveillance system for tracking and trending infections. During an interview and record review, it was revealed that the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Infection Preventionist/Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) did not have a current infection control tracking report for July and August 2024. The ADON was unable to provide a current list of residents on antibiotics and admitted to difficulties in using the new infection control system. Additionally, the facility's mapping of infections did not correlate with the resident infection line listing, and there was no tracking of employee illnesses despite a high number of staff call-offs due to sickness. The facility's infection prevention program was further compromised by inadequate hand hygiene practices during a wound assessment. An LPN was observed assessing a resident's skin condition without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene after touching contaminated areas. The LPN acknowledged the failure to remove gloves and perform hand hygiene after assessing the resident's anal area, which could potentially lead to cross-contamination and infection spread. The facility's infection prevention policy, last revised in October 2023, outlines the need for surveillance of infections, implementation of control measures, and prevention of infections. However, the facility did not adhere to these guidelines, as evidenced by incomplete data collection, lack of infection tracking, and inadequate hand hygiene practices. The failure to maintain a comprehensive infection control program and ensure proper hand hygiene during resident care poses a risk to the health and safety of all residents and staff.
Failure to Designate Legal Surrogate for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to designate a legal surrogate for healthcare decision-making for a resident who was reviewed for advance directives. The resident was admitted to the facility and was determined by two physicians to be incapable of making her own informed medical decisions. Despite this, the facility's electronic medical records did not show any legal surrogate appointed to represent the resident. During an interview, the Director of Social Services reported that the resident's daughter, who frequently visits, was supposed to provide paperwork proving her status as the legal guardian but had not yet done so. The Director expressed concern over the lack of appropriate documentation and indicated the need to pursue a court-appointed guardian if necessary.
Failure to Obtain Consent for Antipsychotic Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the responsible party for a cognitively impaired resident, who was receiving antipsychotic medication, was informed of the risks and benefits associated with the medication and had consented to its administration. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including bipolar disorder and dementia with psychotic disturbance, had a Power of Attorney (POA) in place for medical decisions. Despite the presence of a doctor's order for the antipsychotic medication Lurasidone, there was no documentation in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) indicating that the POA had been informed or had consented to the medication's use. During the survey, the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) were unable to provide documentation that the POA had been informed of the risks and benefits or had consented to the medication at the time it was started. Although a physician's note dated several months after the medication's initiation mentioned a risk/benefit analysis, it did not confirm that the POA had been informed or had consented. As of the survey's conclusion, no further documentation was provided to address this deficiency.
Failure to Update Care Plan for Resident's Active Skin Condition
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to update the care plan for a resident with an active skin condition, resulting in the potential for inconsistent care. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including dementia and diabetes, was cognitively intact as indicated by a BIMS score of 15. Despite being treated for a leg infection, the care plan only noted a potential for impaired skin integrity and did not reflect the active condition. This oversight was discovered during a review of the care plan, which had not been updated since June 2023. Interviews with facility staff revealed a breakdown in communication and responsibility for updating care plans. The unit manager, who typically handled updates, had recently left, and the responsibility was believed to have shifted to the DON and MDS nurse. However, the ADON confirmed that the infection had not been discussed in clinical meetings, and the PA had not communicated the treatment to the interdisciplinary team, only notifying a floor nurse about the initiation of antibiotics. The facility's policy required care plans to be updated with significant changes, which was not adhered to in this case.
Failure to Monitor Resident Conditions and Skin Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly assess, monitor, document, and notify the physician of changes in condition for a resident with chronic kidney disease and an overactive bladder, leading to the resident's hospitalization. The resident's family observed signs of distress and requested a urinary tract infection (UTI) test, but the facility did not promptly obtain a physician's order or conduct the necessary assessments. The resident exhibited symptoms of anxiety, confusion, and incontinence, yet vital signs were not documented, and the physician was not notified. The facility's failure to change the resident's foley catheter as ordered further contributed to the risk of infection. Another deficiency involved the facility's failure to identify and treat skin conditions for a resident with dementia and diabetes. Despite a cognitive assessment indicating the resident was intact, the resident reported painful skin issues that had not been evaluated. Upon examination, the resident had reddened and raw areas on the inner thighs, abdominal folds, and near the anus, which had not been identified during weekly skin assessments or daily care. The Physician's Assistant was unaware of these conditions, indicating a lack of communication and documentation by the nursing staff. The facility's policies on skin management and wound care were not followed, as evidenced by the lack of documentation and failure to notify medical providers of new skin conditions. The Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the absence of records regarding the resident's skin concerns prior to the date of the survey. This oversight resulted in the potential for deterioration of the resident's skin conditions and compromised their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
Failure to Monitor and Address Significant Weight Loss
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adequately assess and monitor the nutritional status of a resident who experienced significant weight loss. The resident, admitted with diagnoses including dementia, morbid obesity, vitamin deficiency, and dysphagia, lost 33 pounds (12.3%) within the first month of admission and a total of 62 pounds (22.69%) over several months. Despite the significant weight loss, the facility's electronic medical records (EMR) did not show consistent monitoring or timely interventions, such as referrals to a medical provider. The care plan did not specifically address the weight loss, and although a nutritional supplement was added, there was no evidence of ongoing evaluation or adjustment of the care plan. Interviews with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) revealed that they considered the weight loss desirable, yet they failed to provide documentation supporting this claim. A Registered Dietician's progress note from July indicated significant weight loss triggers but did not include a referral to a medical provider. The EMR review from October to August showed a lack of ongoing nutritional monitoring or documentation of referrals for the resident's weight loss. As of the survey exit, no further documentation was provided by the facility to demonstrate that the weight loss was appropriately addressed.
Failure to Verify Feeding Tube Placement Before Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper verification of feeding tube placement before administering medication to a resident, as per professional standards and facility policy. The resident in question, identified as Resident #72, was admitted with diagnoses including dementia and dysphagia, necessitating the use of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube for nutrition. The facility's policy required verification of tube placement by aspirating stomach contents before medication administration, a step that was not followed during the observed incident. During an observation, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) administered medication to Resident #72 via the PEG tube without verifying the tube's placement by aspirating stomach contents. The LPN admitted to checking the placement earlier in the day but did not do so before the medication administration observed. Instead, the LPN relied on listening for air bubbles while flushing the line, which is not in accordance with the facility's policy. Interviews with the LPN and the Assistant Director of Nursing revealed a lack of adherence to the facility's policy and a lack of clarity regarding the procedure for verifying PEG tube placement. The facility's policy, aligned with professional guidelines, emphasizes the importance of verifying tube placement to prevent complications such as aspiration pneumonia, which can occur if the tube is not correctly positioned in the stomach or small intestine.
Failure to Address Significant Weight Loss in Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to identify and address a significant weight loss in a resident, referred to as R38, who was admitted with diagnoses including dementia, morbid obesity, vitamin deficiency, and dysphagia. From the date of admission, R38 experienced a weight loss of 33 pounds, or 12.3%, within less than a month, and a total weight loss of 69.8 pounds, or 25.85%, by June of the following year. Despite this significant weight change, there was no documentation in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) indicating that the weight loss was identified and reported to the Medical Provider. Progress notes from medical provider encounters inaccurately stated that there was no weight loss, which was inconsistent with the resident's weight history. The facility's documentation did not reflect any timely evaluation or intervention by the Medical Provider regarding the resident's weight loss. Although a nutritional supplement was added to the resident's diet in December, there was no evidence of consistent monitoring or referral to the Medical Provider. The Registered Dietician's progress note, dated eight months after the initial nutrition note, acknowledged significant weight loss triggers but also failed to indicate a referral to the Medical Provider. The facility did not provide additional documentation to show that the significant weight change had been adequately monitored or addressed by the Medical Provider by the time of the survey exit.
Failure to Address Pharmacy Recommendations for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to address pharmacy recommendations for two residents, leading to deficiencies in medication management. Resident R38, who was admitted with diagnoses including dementia, dysphagia, and bipolar disorder, had pharmacy medication reviews conducted in January and July of 2024. However, these recommendations were not reviewed by the physician. Specifically, a recommendation from January 2024 for lab values to be obtained and a July 2024 recommendation for an updated Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessment were not acted upon until requested by the surveyor. Similarly, for Resident R59, who was admitted with a history of stroke, pharmacy medication reviews in July and August of 2024 were not reviewed by the physician. Recommendations included reducing the dosage of an anticoagulant and questioning the need for a nutritional supplement based on lab values. These recommendations were not reviewed by the physician until prompted by the surveyor. The facility's policy requires that pharmacy recommendations be reviewed and acted upon by the attending physician, but this process was not followed, leading to the identified deficiencies.
Incomplete Medical Records for Resident's Treatment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for a resident, leading to potential miscommunication and an unclear picture of the resident's healthcare status. Specifically, the electronic health record (EHR) for a resident showed an antibiotic order to treat the resident's lower legs, but there was no further documentation from nursing staff or medical providers regarding the skin condition. This lack of documentation was identified during a review of the resident's EHR. Interviews conducted during the investigation revealed that the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) acknowledged the absence of documentation from the Physician's Assistant (PA) regarding the resident's lower leg infection and evaluation. The PA confirmed that she began treating the resident with antibiotics for chronic lower leg venous stasis dermatitis but had not yet completed the documentation in the EHR. The facility's policy on documentation expectations requires that all facts and pertinent information related to treatment and resident condition be documented in a timely and organized manner.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 432 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 7 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Hudsonville
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Oaks At Jamestown | 2.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
| Mission Point Nursing & Physical Rehabilitation Ce | 6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Medilodge Of Wyoming | 6.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Allendale Nursing And Rehabilitation Community | 7 mi | ★★★★★ | 17 | 0 |
| Heritage Nursing And Rehabilitation Community | 8.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 19 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for The Laurels Of Hudsonville.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.