Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Gladwin Nursing And Rehabilitation Community during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with oxygen dependence, chronic respiratory failure, and moderate cognitive impairment was allowed to leave on LOA despite being assessed as unsafe to go out alone. Staff documented that he required oxygen at all times and used a wheelchair for long distances, yet he was signed out without an active physician order. A family member reported he boarded a city bus, was seen handling a large TV without oxygen, and was later assisted back to the facility.
Infection Prevention and Control Program Deficiencies: The facility failed to maintain an active plan to reduce risk from legionella and other OPPP after observing uncapped and capped water lines in the kitchen and bathing room that were not being flushed, and the MS stated he was unaware of the kitchen lines and that the bathing room lines were not flushed due to lack of easy access. The facility also stored a clean linen cart in a bathing room with a blue mesh cover that would allow airborne droplets to infiltrate, and the cart was positioned partially in front of the toilet and handsink.
The facility failed to consistently conduct and document quarterly care conferences for a resident with cardiomegaly, major depressive disorder, restless legs syndrome, lymphedema, and morbid obesity. Record review showed no evidence of the required quarterly conferences for most of the year, and the SW stated the facility had met with the resident but was poor with documentation. The facility policy required the resident and/or family to be invited to all care conferences after OBRA assessments or as requested.
A resident with respiratory failure, COPD, sleep apnea, and back pain reported repeated problems with staff not placing her oxygen or BIPAP correctly, not holding her urinal, and not providing a properly fitting back brace. She said new staff did not know her care needs and that no one listened to her. Interviews showed the CNA knew the resident often became upset, while the DON and NHA were unaware of several concerns or had not received grievance forms, and the care plans did not clearly address her breathing machine, urinal assistance, or brace needs.
A resident with chronic respiratory failure and repeated falls left the facility AMA after demanding to take his medications the way he wanted. RN documented that he would leave without medications, equipment, oxygen, HHC, or therapy, and he departed with friends without receiving his facility medications or any discharge services. RN and the DON confirmed staff were trained not to provide medications or services when residents leave AMA.
Failure to Provide Written Baseline Care Plan Within 48 Hours: A resident admitted with sepsis, opioid use, spinal stenosis, HF, and glaucoma did not receive a completed written baseline care plan within the required timeframe. The DON completed the baseline care plan, but it was incomplete and did not include medications, therapy frequency, or nursing assistance needs, and there was no documentation that the resident or his advocate received a written copy. The SW said the care conference was delayed and the facility does not provide a written care plan at the conference.
A resident with acute and chronic respiratory failure, COPD, pneumonia, and sleep apnea had an incomplete respiratory care plan and no documented ongoing respiratory assessments. The resident reported staff were removing her breathing machine while she was not fully awake and failing to replace her nasal cannula, and she said this happened daily. She also reported waking up without her breathing machine or oxygen and having to call the facility because her call light was not answered. The DON could not verify the current respiratory equipment, settings, or whether the machine matched hospital recommendations, and the care plan lacked details on when the device was to be used, the assistance needed, and how use was to be monitored.
Failure to Provide Ordered Showers: A resident with sepsis, opioid use, spinal stenosis, heart failure, and glaucoma reported not receiving a shower since admission. A CNA confirmed the resident asked about a shower but was told his shower days were Wednesday and Saturday, and the DON could not find documentation that showers had been offered or that the shower order had been entered correctly.
A resident with acute and chronic respiratory failure, pneumonia, COPD, and sleep apnea was found using O2 at 4 L with her breathing equipment placed out of reach, and she reported staff repeatedly removed her CPAP/BiPAP when she was not fully awake and failed to replace her nasal cannula. She said she woke up without O2, staff did not answer her call light, and she had to call the facility and threaten to call 911 before help came. Record review found no respiratory assessments, no pulmonology follow-up, unclear documentation of whether she had CPAP, BiPAP, or AVAP, and no confirmation that the resident had the hospital-recommended machine or settings.
A resident with CHF, cardiomyopathy, MDD, DM2 with neuropathy, and seasonal allergic rhinitis had a pharmacy recommendation to discontinue loratadine, and the physician response indicated acceptance. However, the order remained active as PRN loratadine and the MAR showed the medication was still administered multiple times. The DON confirmed the recommendation had not been accurately addressed and could not produce documentation supporting continued use.
A bathing room used by residents in the Main hallway and [NAME] Hallway A was observed to be missing a pull cord for the shower call light, limiting access for residents who may fall or be unable to reach the wall-mounted call light. The MS stated he was not aware the pull cord was missing, though he confirmed the call light itself was functional.
A resident with dementia and poor hand control suffered a second-degree burn after spilling hot coffee, due to the facility's failure to follow its hot liquid safety policy, inadequate assessment, and lack of supervision. Staff were unclear on temperature requirements and supervision protocols, and documentation was inconsistent, leading to the incident.
Two residents experienced significant incidents—one involving a physical assault resulting in facial injuries and another sustaining a second-degree burn from a hot liquid spill—that were not reported to the State Survey Agency or local law enforcement as required by facility policy. Leadership interviews confirmed awareness of the events and the lack of timely reporting, with no policy-based justification for the omissions.
A resident returned home from a respite stay with unexplained bruising and swelling. Despite reports from the resident's DPOA and hospice staff, the facility failed to initiate an investigation into the injuries, as required by their policy. Interviews revealed that the Administrator and DON did not take necessary actions to investigate the incident.
The facility failed to ensure call light systems were within reach for two residents, both with dementia and high fall risk. One resident was observed with the call light out of reach, leading to an unwitnessed fall, while another had the call light on the floor. Care plans required call lights to be accessible, but the facility lacked a specific policy on their placement.
The facility failed to implement proper infection control precautions for two residents. One resident, with severe cognitive impairment, did not have staff wearing gowns during high-contact care activities as required. Another resident, with a MRSA infection, was initially placed under incorrect precautions, and an LPN was observed handling a PICC line without PPE. These lapses highlight deficiencies in adhering to infection control protocols.
Unsafe leave of absence for resident requiring oxygen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow its policy to ensure a safe leave of absence for one resident. The resident had diagnoses including dependence on oxygen, osteoarthritis, depression, and chronic respiratory failure, and an MDS assessment showed a BIMS score of 12, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. A progress note documented that the resident asked about taking the city bus and stated plans to go out again, while the writer noted the resident was not safe to go out by himself because he required oxygen at all times and used a wheelchair for long distances due to shortness of breath. The record showed the resident later reported being on a leave of absence for several hours, and the facility was unsure of what occurred while he was out. The Social Service Director stated the resident had been assessed as not safe to go out alone and that his sister usually transported him, but also stated the resident could make his own decisions and could not be stopped from leaving. A family member reported the resident boarded a city bus to travel home, was seen loading a 65-inch television into his truck without oxygen, and was assisted back to the facility by a neighbor. Review of the physician orders showed no active order for a leave of absence when he left, although a CNA reported signing him out for a leave of absence and said he was only supposed to go to the bank and grocery store and return.
Infection Prevention and Control Program Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to have an active and ongoing plan for reducing the risk of legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP). On 01/06/2026 at 11:12 AM, two water lines were observed coming out of the floor under a stainless-steel counter in the kitchen. One line did not provide water to any equipment and was capped at the end, with the line extending over 12 inches from the point it came out of the floor. The other line branched into two areas, with one branch capped off over 6 inches from the point it branched off and the other branch feeding the coffee maker. During an interview at 2:40 PM, the Maintenance Supervisor stated he was unaware of these lines and had not been flushing them. In the [NAME] Hallway B bathing room, two capped water lines were observed coming out of the wall during an observation at 2:50 PM. The Maintenance Supervisor stated the tub had been removed within the past year and that the lines were not being flushed because there was no easy access to flush them. Review of the Water Pathogen Risk Reduction policy showed that routine reassessment is required annually and when there are changes that could impact risk. In a separate observation at 3:20 PM in the [NAME] Hallway A bathing room, a linen cart with clean linens was stored with a blue mesh covering that would allow infiltration from airborne droplets from the toilet being flushed, handwashing, or possible bodily fluids. The cart was stored partially in front of the toilet, allowing access to the toilet and the handsink across the wall from the cart. The Maintenance Supervisor stated the cart was stored in the bathing room when the shower or toilet were not in use.
Failure to Document Quarterly Care Conferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to consistently conduct and document quarterly care conferences for one resident, R8, who was admitted with diagnoses including cardiomegaly, major depressive disorder, restless legs syndrome, lymphedema, and morbid obesity. Review of the electronic medical record on 01/06/2026 showed no evidence that the required quarterly care conferences were held in 2025 for R8 until August 19, 2025. During interview and record review, the Social Worker stated that care conferences are scheduled quarterly and could not locate any care conferences for R8 prior to August 19, 2025, while also stating that the facility had met with R8 but was "terrible with documentation." The facility policy stated that the resident, resident representative, and/or family members as requested by the resident will be invited to attend all care conferences and review and request revisions to the care plan following OBRA assessments or as requested.
Failure to Address Resident Grievances
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to address grievances for one resident who was her own responsible party and had diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure, pneumonia, COPD, and sleep apnea. The resident was observed in bed using oxygen at 4 liters via an oxygen concentrator, with the concentrator and breathing machine placed at the end of the bed out of her eyesight and reach. She reported that staff took off her breathing machine when she was not fully awake and did not put her nasal cannula in place, and she said this was a daily problem. The resident also reported that new staff did not know how to provide her care, including one nurse refusing to hold her urinal for her. She stated she did not currently have a back brace that fit properly and said she kept asking when she would get a brace because she could not tolerate being out of bed long due to back pain. She was described as very upset and said she got very worked up because no one listened to her. A behavior note documented an incident in which an agency CENA assisted with the urinal, told the resident she would return to empty it, and the resident then screamed, threw the urinal, and stated she could not use it without staff assistance. During interviews, a CNA said the resident frequently became upset when new staff did not provide the care she needed and that licensed nurses were aware of the concerns. The DON denied knowledge of the resident being upset about staff not holding her urinal until the progress note was reviewed, and then confirmed the resident could not hold her own urinal and staff needed education. The DON also did not know anything about the resident's back braces, and the NHA stated he had not received concern forms from the resident and was still investigating her allegation that she had been left without oxygen. Review of the care plans showed BIPAP use, transfer assistance, and pain-related issues, but there was no indication of when the BIPAP was to be used, how much assistance she needed with it, that she used a urinal, or that a back brace had been issued or used. The facility grievance policy required prompt action and keeping the resident informed, but no grievance/complaint forms were provided for the resident.
Failure to Provide Medications or Discharge Support for AMA Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident’s transfer/discharge met his needs and preferences and that he was prepared for a safe discharge when R45 left against medical advice. R45 was admitted with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure and repeated falls. On 10/12/2025, he demanded discharge so he could take his medications the way he wanted, and RN B documented that if he left AMA he would be discharged without medications, equipment, oxygen, home health services, or therapy. R45 left the facility with friends at 11:50 AM without medications or services. RN B later confirmed that when residents leave AMA, staff had been trained that they go without anything, and that no attempt was made to meet R45’s discharge needs. RN B also stated that R45 had medication at the facility but was not given those medications upon discharge. The DON confirmed staff had been trained not to attempt to provide medication or services when residents discharge AMA, and Regional Nurse A stated she would like to see an attempt to provide as much support and services as possible in AMA discharge situations.
Failure to Provide Written Baseline Care Plan Within 48 Hours
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide one resident and his representative with a written and completed baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission. The resident was a [AGE]-year-old male admitted with diagnoses including sepsis, opioid use, spinal stenosis, heart failure, and glaucoma. He was his own responsible party and had an emergency contact. During an interview, the resident stated he had concerns about his care and discharge plans and said he had not received a care plan since admission. The social worker stated the facility tries to hold a care conference within 72 hours, but due to the holiday the conference did not occur until after the resident had already been admitted for several days, and she said the facility does not provide a written care plan at the care conference. Review of the baseline care plan showed it was completed by the DON, but it was incomplete, with sections left blank for therapy orders and therapy services, and it did not list medications, the frequency of therapy visits, or any nursing assistance needed. The record also did not show that the resident’s advocate was contacted or that the resident or advocate was provided a written copy of the baseline care plan. The DON confirmed she did not contact the advocate and did not provide a copy of the baseline care plan to the resident or his advocate.
Incomplete Respiratory Care Plan and Monitoring
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive respiratory care plan for R30, a female resident with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure, pneumonia, COPD, and sleep apnea. R30 was observed in bed using oxygen at 4 liters via an oxygen concentrator, with the concentrator and breathing machine placed at the end of her bed out of her eyesight and reach. She reported that staff were taking off her breathing machine when she was not fully awake and not putting her nasal cannula in place for her oxygen, and she stated this was a daily problem. R30 told staff that on the morning of the event her breathing machine was off and she was not on oxygen, and she said her call light was not answered so she called the facility and threatened to call 911 if someone did not come immediately to apply her oxygen. Review of her phone log showed a call to the facility at 5:13 a.m. The DON could not find respiratory assessment documentation in the EMR, could not determine when the breathing machine had last been assessed, and could not confirm what machine was in use or whether it matched hospital-recommended AVAP settings. The existing care plan only stated that BiPAP was to be used and preset by the supplier, with no details about when it was to be used, how much assistance was needed, how to monitor use during sleep, or how to monitor the machine if it came off.
Failure to Provide Ordered Showers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide showers as ordered for one resident who was unable to perform activities of daily living independently. The resident was an [AGE]-year-old male admitted with diagnoses including sepsis, opioid use, spinal stenosis, heart failure, and glaucoma, and he was his own responsible party. He reported that he had not had a shower since admission and said that when he requested one, he was told his shower days were Wednesday and Saturday. A CNA confirmed the resident asked about a shower and stated she told him his shower days were Wednesday and Saturday, but she did not know why he had not received one since admission. The DON reviewed the record and could not find documentation that the resident had been offered a shower since admission, stated showers were assigned by room and should have been offered on Wednesday and Saturday during day shift, and found the shower order had not been entered correctly. The DON was aware the resident did receive a shower after the surveyor inquired about the lack of showers, but no documentation was provided showing showers were attempted during the first week of admission.
Failure to Assess and Monitor Resident Respiratory Equipment and Oxygen Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to assess, monitor, and effectively treat the respiratory condition of a resident with acute and chronic respiratory failure, pneumonia, COPD, and sleep apnea. The resident was observed in bed using oxygen at 4 liters via an oxygen concentrator, with the concentrator and breathing machine placed at the end of the bed out of her eyesight and reach. She reported that staff were taking off her breathing machine when she was not fully awake and not putting her nasal cannula back in place, and she said this was a daily problem. The resident stated that on the morning of the event her breathing machine was off and she was not on oxygen, and that staff did not respond to her call light. She called the facility and said she would call 911 if someone did not come immediately to put her oxygen on. Her outgoing phone log showed a call to the facility at 5:13 AM, and she was in bed at that time with oxygen at 4 liters. A late-entry progress note documented that she reported calling the facility twice, waking up with her CPAP in her hand, and feeling anxious because she felt she needed air. Record review showed no respiratory assessment documentation in the EMR, no evidence that she was being followed by a pulmonologist, and no clear documentation of when her breathing machine had last been assessed or what machine she was currently using. The physician note referenced BiPAP, the nurse note referenced CPAP, and hospital records reviewed by the DON indicated an AVAP machine with specific settings recommended in September 2025. The facility could not confirm that the resident had the recommended machine or that it was set to the recommended settings, and the care plan did not specify when the device was to be used or how much assistance she needed with setup and use.
Pharmacy Recommendation Not Properly Addressed for Loratadine
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a licensed pharmacist’s monthly drug regimen review recommendation was accurately addressed for one resident. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including chronic systolic congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, major depressive disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, and seasonal allergic rhinitis. A consultation report dated 10/22/2025 recommended discontinuing Loratadine, and the physician response showed acceptance of that recommendation with a physician signature dated 10/28/2025. Progress notes on 10/28/2025 also documented that pharmacy recommended stopping Loratadine to avoid adverse reactions attributed to daily long-term use, and that the doctor gave okay to discontinue the medication and the resident was aware. Despite that documentation, the resident’s physician orders on 1/7/2026 showed an active order for Loratadine 10 mg once daily PRN starting 10/28/2025. The electronic MAR showed Loratadine 10 mg was administered on 11/1/2025, 11/2/2025, 11/29/2025, and 12/27/2025. During interview and record review on 1/7/2026, the DON stated the consultation report recommendation had not been accurately addressed and was unable to produce documentation that Loratadine should have been continued. The facility policy stated that the facility should independently review each resident’s medication regimen directly from the medical record and with the interdisciplinary care team to rule out medication dispensing or administration errors.
Missing Pull Cord in Bathing Room Call Light System
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate access to the call light system in the [NAME] Hallway A bathing room because there was no pull cord for the call light in the shower. During an observation on 01/06/2026 at 3:45 PM, surveyors noted that the shower did not have a pull cord, which limited accessibility for residents who may have fallen or could not reach the call light on the shower wall. In an interview at the same time, the Maintenance Supervisor stated he was not aware the pull cord was missing and confirmed that the call light was functional. He also stated that the [NAME] Hallway A bathing room is generally used by residents in the Main hallway and [NAME] Hallway A.
Failure to Implement Hot Liquid Safety Policy Results in Resident Burn
Penalty
Summary
A resident with a history of dementia, metabolic encephalopathy, diabetes mellitus type 2, and falls, who was on hospice care, sustained a second-degree burn after spilling hot coffee on himself. The facility failed to implement its hot liquid policy and did not accurately assess or provide adequate supervision for the resident, despite the resident's documented poor hand control and moderate to severe vision impairment. The resident's hot food/liquid assessment indicated high risk, but only a cup with a lid was recommended, and no other safety interventions were put in place. On the day of the incident, the Assistant Director of Nursing provided the resident with coffee, which was poured from a pot and prepared with cream and sweetener, then given to the resident with a lid. The staff member left to get coffee for another resident, during which time the resident spilled the coffee, resulting in burns to the inner thigh. Initial care involved applying a cold washcloth and later Silvadene cream, but there was no evidence of a wound assessment or additional treatment orders in the medical record. Subsequent documentation confirmed the presence of partial-thickness burns with blisters and open areas. Interviews and observations revealed that staff were not consistently aware of or following the facility's hot liquid temperature policy, with coffee temperatures exceeding the policy limit. Staff also lacked clarity on supervision requirements and the use of special equipment for high-risk residents. The Director of Nursing was unable to provide incident or accident reports for the burn and could not explain discrepancies in the resident's assessment documentation. Additionally, other residents had not been evaluated for hot liquid safety prior to being served, and staff were not consistently monitoring or documenting hot liquid temperatures as required.
Failure to Report Suspected Abuse and Neglect to Authorities
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report two separate incidents involving suspected abuse and neglect to the appropriate authorities as required by policy and regulation. In the first incident, a resident with severe mental impairment physically assaulted his roommate, who also had significant cognitive impairment, by hitting him with a water mug while the roommate was in bed. The assaulted resident sustained cuts, bruises, and a scratch, requiring evaluation and treatment at an emergency room. Although the incident was reported to the State Survey Agency, there was no notification to local law enforcement, contrary to facility policy and federal requirements. Documentation confirmed that the Nursing Home Administrator decided not to notify the police due to the mental condition of the residents, despite acknowledging that policy did not provide an exception for mental capacity. In the second incident, another resident, who was on hospice care and had dementia and metabolic encephalopathy, sustained a second-degree burn to his right thigh from a hot liquid spill. The injury was significant, with redness, blisters, and open areas measuring several centimeters. The Assistant Director of Nursing provided the resident with coffee, and shortly after, the resident was found with the spilled coffee and a burn on his thigh. The incident was not reported to the State Survey Agency, and there was no incident or accident report created at the time. The Director of Nursing, who started after the incident, was unaware of the event until later and confirmed that the injury was not reported as required. Both incidents demonstrate a failure to follow the facility's abuse and neglect reporting policy, which mandates immediate reporting of suspected abuse, neglect, or injuries of unknown source to the State Survey Agency and local law enforcement. Interviews with facility leadership confirmed awareness of the incidents and the lack of required reporting, with no justification found in policy for the omissions. The deficiencies were identified through record review and staff interviews, with documentation supporting the lack of timely and appropriate notification to authorities.
Failure to Investigate Injury of Unknown Origin
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to initiate an investigation into an allegation of an injury of unknown origin for a resident who was admitted for a two-day respite stay under hospice care. The resident, who had Alzheimer's and Parkinson's, returned home with a swollen lip and bruising that were not present before the stay. The resident's durable power of attorney (DPOA) reported these injuries to the facility, and a hospice nurse assessed the injuries, noting bruising and swelling. Despite these reports, the facility did not initiate an investigation as required by their Abuse Prevention Program Policy. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of action in response to the reported injuries. The Medical Records Manager acknowledged receiving the complaint and forwarding it to the Administrator, who then delegated the follow-up to the Social Worker. However, no investigation was initiated by the Administrator or the Director of Nursing, as required by the facility's policy. The Director of Nursing did not interview staff or investigate the incident, despite being informed of the concerns. The facility's policy mandates immediate investigation of injuries of unknown origin, which was not adhered to in this case.
Failure to Ensure Call Light Accessibility for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that call light systems were within reach for two residents, leading to a deficiency in accommodating the needs and preferences of each resident. Resident #142, an elderly female admitted for a hospice respite stay with a diagnosis of vascular dementia, was observed twice with the call light out of reach, tucked between the mattress and footboard. This resident was at high risk for falls, as indicated by a recent fall risk assessment, and had sustained an unwitnessed fall prior to the observations. The care plan for Resident #142 included interventions such as keeping the call light within reach and reminding the resident to use it for assistance, which were not adhered to. Similarly, Resident #30, an elderly female with dementia and recent fall-related injuries, was observed with the call light on the floor, out of reach. The care plan for this resident also specified that the call light should be within reach and that the resident should be encouraged to use it. Despite these care plan interventions, the facility did not have a specific policy in place regarding the placement of call lights, as confirmed by the administrator. This lack of adherence to care plans and absence of a specific policy contributed to the deficiency identified by the surveyors.
Failure to Implement Proper Infection Control Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and Contact-Based Precautions for two residents, leading to deficiencies in infection control. For one resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and required assistance with all activities of daily living, the facility did not ensure that staff wore gowns during high-contact care activities as indicated by the signage on the resident's door. Despite the clear instructions, Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) were observed wearing only gloves during a transfer, contrary to the posted requirements. This oversight was due to a misunderstanding by the CNAs, who believed gowns were unnecessary for the resident's condition. Another resident, admitted with a MRSA infection in the right foot, was initially placed under Enhanced Barrier Precautions instead of the more stringent Contact Precautions required for their condition. An LPN was observed handling the resident's PICC line without donning any personal protective equipment, despite the presence of a sign indicating the need for EBP. The Infection Control Preventionist later acknowledged the error in precaution level, which was corrected after the initial observation. These lapses in following proper infection control protocols highlight the facility's failure to adhere to established guidelines for preventing the spread of infections.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 42 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Gladwin
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gladwin Pines Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 2.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 16 | 0 |
| Medilodge Of Clare | 18.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| The Villa At West Branch | 22.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| North Woods Nursing Center | 22.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 13 | 0 |
| King Nursing & Rehabilitation Community | 23.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Gladwin Nursing And Rehabilitation Community.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.