Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around March 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Corewell Health Rehabilitation & Nursing Center - during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Food service staff failed to maintain proper food storage and ice machine sanitation. Surveyors found an unlabeled container of unidentified food in the walk-in cooler, an improper air gap on an ice machine drain line, and visible soil, black specs, mineral deposits, and brown residue inside multiple ice machines and ice shoots. Interviews showed cleaning responsibilities were split among dietary, maintenance, and EVS, but the dining director did not know about some dining room ice machines and maintenance kept no cleaning logs.
Improper Storage and Labeling of Insulin Pens: The facility failed to store insulin Kwik Pens according to pharmacy and manufacturer directions. In two med carts, opened pens lacked open dates, one opened pen appeared to be used beyond the 28-day limit, one pen had no resident name or open date, and several unopened pens were stored at room temperature instead of refrigerated. An RN and the DON acknowledged the storage and labeling problems, and facility policy required pens to be dated when opened and discarded after 28 days.
Advance Directive Not Completed Timely on Admission: The facility failed to assist a resident with developing and implementing an advance directive upon admission. The resident, admitted with COPD, Parkinson’s disease, HTN, anemia, bipolar disorder, MDD, restless leg syndrome, and chronic pain, had a Full Code order in the EHR and no documented wishes for life-sustaining treatment at the time of review. A POLST was not signed until 12 days after admission, when the resident indicated DNR/No CPR. The SW said the form should be presented on admission, and the resident stated they were not informed of their right to formulate an advance directive.
Failure to report resident fracture of unknown origin: A resident with dementia, severe cognitive impairment, and a history of falls developed pain and was sent to the hospital, where fractures of the pubic rami were identified and a fall was reported. The DON later learned of the possible fracture, the NHA stated the injury was investigated and deemed not reportable, and the facility did not immediately notify the State Agency as required by policy.
Delayed toileting assistance resulted in a resident wetting the bed. The resident required a sit-to-stand lift with two staff for transfers, was cognitively intact, and was able to make needs known, but was left waiting for extended periods after using the call light. Staff acknowledged the resident needed two-person lift assistance and that multiple residents used the lifts after breakfast, and the DON stated staff are expected to assist residents to the toilet in a timely manner.
Failure to provide ordered nebulizer treatments: A resident with heart failure, pneumonia, acute respiratory disease, and COPD reported ongoing SOB and said the nebulizer helped, but staff did not consistently give the PRN ipratropium-albuterol treatment when he asked. The MAR showed the medication was unavailable multiple times, the LPN said the treatment had been switched to PRN, and the unit manager acknowledged the facility should have provided the treatment when requested.
Delayed Notification of STAT Urinalysis Results: A resident with COPD, Parkinson's disease, and other chronic conditions reported burning with urination, and a PA ordered a STAT UA with reflex culture. The specimen was collected and the results were positive for findings indicative of a possible UTI, but the results were not communicated to the ordering provider until several days later. The EHR lacked documentation of result notification or further symptom monitoring, despite the DON stating STAT lab results should be reported promptly to avoid delay in treatment.
Failure to communicate transmission-based precautions for a resident with influenza A. An LPN confirmed staff were to wear PPE when entering the room, but no precaution sign was posted on the door even though PPE was available in a caddy. The resident had multiple diagnoses, including Alzheimer’s disease and COPD, and had severe cognitive impairment. The care plan and facility policy both called for a door sign to identify the required precautions and PPE.
Two residents experienced development and worsening of coccyx and heel pressure ulcers due to the facility’s failure to implement and document ordered preventive and treatment interventions. One resident with severe cognitive impairment and mobility dependence had MASD, a non-blanchable heel, and orders for Triad paste and heel boots that were never documented as applied, no pressure-reducing surfaces or turning program on the MDS, and no skin notes for several days until an LPN discovered an undocumented coccyx ulcer under a foam dressing; later wound assessment showed an unstageable coccyx ulcer and a heel DTI acquired in the facility. Another resident admitted with a small coccyx open area and DVT had an order for barrier cream and a skin risk care plan, but there was no documentation of barrier cream use, the care plan was not updated when a stage 2 ulcer was identified, and multiple subsequent wound treatment orders (Triad paste, oil emulsion/alginate, Manuka Honey, Santyl, Dakin’s) were administered less frequently than prescribed, with delayed initial wound assessment and progression to a larger stage 3 coccyx ulcer requiring hospital transfer. The facility’s own wound and skin management policy requiring routine preventive care, daily CNA skin checks, and nurse skin assessments on bath days was not consistently followed as evidenced by missing documentation and treatment gaps.
The facility failed to maintain proper food safety and sanitation practices. A dietary aide improperly cleaned a thermometer stem with a paper towel instead of alcohol wipes. Resident refrigerators contained unlabeled and undated food items, and kitchen pans were not adequately cleaned or air-dried. The Director of Dining confirmed these practices were against protocol, and the NHA acknowledged the need for adherence to policies.
A resident experienced an incontinent episode after waiting over thirty minutes for assistance with a bedpan, leading to feelings of embarrassment and frustration. The CNA confirmed the delay was due to multiple call lights being on simultaneously. The DON acknowledged the response time should have been quicker, as per the facility's dignity and privacy policy.
A facility failed to promptly notify a resident's representative of a change in condition involving a skin tear requiring treatment. The resident, with severe cognitive impairment and multiple diagnoses, had a skin tear documented on 3/11/25, but the representative was not informed until 3/17/25. Staff interviews revealed that the facility's practice of notifying families during weekly meetings could delay communication, contrary to the facility's policy requiring immediate notification.
A facility failed to obtain tafamidis, a critical medication for a resident with a rare cardiac condition, in a timely manner. Despite the resident's discharge summary indicating the need for this medication, it was not available, and the facility did not adequately follow up with the physician or pharmacy. The issue was only addressed after several days when the physician suggested contacting the resident's family to bring the medication from home.
Food Storage and Ice Machine Sanitation Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area and to keep ice machines clean. On 04/07/2026, surveyors observed a container with unidentified food in the main walk-in cooler that had no date or label. The Dining Director removed the bin to be labeled after it was observed. The report cited FDA Food Code requirements for date marking refrigerated ready-to-eat time/temperature control for safety food held more than 24 hours. Surveyors also observed an improper air gap on the drain line leading from the ice machine in the skilled nursing main kitchen, with the drain line extending below the base of the floor drain. The Dining Director stated it would be fixed immediately. In addition, black specs were observed near the top of the internal shield of the ice machine in the skilled nursing second floor kitchen, and a countertop ice and water machine in the B unit dining area had brown buildup, mineral deposit accumulation on the internal ice shoot, and red and brown dried splash marks along the upper and back side around the ice shoot. A similar countertop ice and water machine in the first floor dining room also had brown buildup on the interior of the ice shoot and brown residue along the bottom and edges of the tray plate. Interviews showed maintenance performed deep cleans every six months, dietary staff wiped down kitchen ice machines monthly or as needed, and environmental services cleaned the exterior daily, but the dining director stated dietary staff did not clean the countertop ice and water machines in the dining rooms. Maintenance staff stated there were no cleaning logs for the ice machines, and the facility record described semi-annual ice machine inspection instructions including cleaning and sanitizing dispensing chutes, drain trays, drain gates, and exterior surfaces.
Improper Storage and Labeling of Insulin Pens
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to store insulin Kwik Pens in accordance with pharmacy and manufacturer instructions in two medication carts reviewed on Unit A. During inspection of medication cart #3, 8 of 14 insulin Kwik Pens were not stored as labeled. Five opened pens had no open date, so there was no way to determine how long they had been in use. One opened pen had an open date and appeared to still be in use 32 days past the expiration date. One opened pen had no resident name or open date and was approximately half empty, and the LPN stated there was no way to determine which resident it belonged to. One unopened pen was unrefrigerated with no delivery date available to determine how long it had been stored at room temperature. During inspection of medication cart #4, 3 of 4 Kwik Pens were unopened and stored at room temperature even though the pharmacy labels said to keep refrigerated and good for 28 days after opened. The fourth pen was opened and mislabeled, with a handwritten resident name on the cap that did not match the printed pharmacy label. The RN stated a cap may have been switched on that pen and acknowledged that unopened insulin should be refrigerated until opened and then dated. The DON stated the facility should be storing unopened insulins in the refrigerator and dating the pen when opened, and the facility policy also stated insulin pens are to be dated when opened and discarded after 28 days.
Advance Directive Not Completed Timely on Admission
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to assist a resident in developing and implementing an advance directive upon admission. The resident, who had diagnoses including COPD, Parkinson’s disease, hypertension, anemia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, restless leg syndrome, and chronic pain, was admitted with a physician order indicating Full Code. The electronic health record did not contain any documents or statements from the resident regarding wishes or decisions for life-sustaining treatment at the time of review. A Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment document was not received until 12 days after admission and was signed by the resident with Box A checked for Do Not Attempt Resuscitation/CPR/DNR/No CPR/All-Natural Death. The Social Worker stated she was responsible for presenting the advance directive form upon admission, that nursing staff could also complete it during off-hours and weekends, and that the conversation could occur during the initial 72-hour care conference, but she could not explain why it was not completed sooner and agreed it was concerning. The resident stated they were not informed upon admission about the right to formulate an advance directive and said they did not want chest compressions.
Failure to Report Resident Fracture of Unknown Origin
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to immediately report an injury of unknown origin to the State Agency for one vulnerable resident, R83. R83 had a history of dementia, dysphagia, prior fractures, seizures, osteoarthritis of the right knee, and falls, and had a BIMS score of 3/15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The care plan identified impaired daily decision-making related to dementia and a risk for falls related to generalized muscle weakness, a history of falls, and poor safety awareness. During the review period, R83 was observed in bed and later in a wheelchair in the dining room, and was unable to answer questions appropriately about how the hip injury occurred. The record showed that on 03/03/2026, R83 was noted to be trembling, restless, grimacing, and stating that it hurt all over, with pain when touched, and was sent to the hospital for further evaluation. The hospital documented fractures of the right superior and inferior pubic rami and noted a reported fall. The DON stated she learned of a possible fracture on 03/09/2026 and that an investigation was completed, while the NHA stated the facility determined the injury did not need to be reported to the State Agency. The facility policy required State Survey Agency notification within 2 hours or within 24 hours as required by statute to the Michigan Bureau of Health Services.
Delayed Toileting Assistance Resulted in Incontinence
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely toileting assistance for one resident who required a sit-to-stand lift with two staff members for transfers to the bathroom. On 4/07/2026, the resident was observed waiting in the room with the call light on and stated they had been waiting about 10 minutes for help to use the bathroom. A CNA entered, turned off the call light, and said help would return shortly, but the resident was not transferred to the toilet until 9:25 AM. The resident was cognitively intact, able to make needs known, required moderate assistance with toileting, was unable to walk 10 feet, and was not on a toileting program. On 4/08/2026, the resident was again observed waiting for bathroom assistance, with the sit-to-stand lift in the room and no staff present. The resident stated they had been waiting for almost an hour and could not hold it any longer, explaining that this happened most mornings after breakfast and after taking a water pill. At 11:02 AM, the resident stated it was too late and that they had already wet the bed, and incontinence in the bed was observed. An LPN acknowledged the resident required a sit-to-stand lift with two staff members for toileting and stated there were only two lifts on the hall and several residents used them after breakfast. The nurse manager stated the resident had recently declined to a sit-to-stand lift and staff needed to plan for toileting earlier in the morning.
Failure to Provide Ordered Nebulizer Treatments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide nebulizer treatments as ordered for a resident who had diagnoses including heart failure, pneumonia, acute respiratory disease, and COPD. The resident was observed sitting in a wheelchair with the nebulizer mask on the floor near the nightstand and stated that the nebulizer was not always given, that he needed it, and that it helped when he was short of breath with movement. He also stated that he had been on the nebulizer at home and in the hospital and that he had asked the nurse for the treatment but did not receive it. Record review showed a PRN order for Ipratropium-Albuterol via nebulizer every six hours as needed for shortness of breath, and the MAR showed the medication was unavailable 11 times in March 2026 with the last documented administration on 3/22/26. The LPN stated the treatment had been switched to PRN and told the resident that when he asked for it. The unit manager confirmed the PRN order and acknowledged the facility should have provided the nebulizer treatment when the resident asked. The resident’s care plan did not include nebulizer and/or breathing treatments, and the facility policy stated nebulizer therapy requires a physician order and that the nebulizer machine is to be kept at bedside in a bag for ordered treatment.
Delayed Notification of STAT Urinalysis Results
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to promptly notify the ordering practitioner of laboratory results for one resident, R118, after a STAT urinalysis with reflex culture was ordered for burning with urination. R118 had a recent admission dated 3/28/2026 with diagnoses including COPD, Parkinson's disease, hypertension, anemia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, restless leg syndrome, and chronic pain. On 4/3/2026, a nursing progress note documented that a CNA reported the resident had a burning sensation when urinating, and the PA ordered a UA with reflex culture STAT. The record contained no further documentation of the laboratory results, provider notification, or additional monitoring of the resident's symptoms. The laboratory specimen was collected on 4/3/2026 and the results were completed on 4/4/2026, with the results showing positive findings indicative of a possible UTI. The Unit Manager confirmed that the results were not communicated to the ordering provider until the afternoon of 4/8/2026. The DON stated that the expectation was for the nurse to call the provider with lab results and seek any further treatment orders, and that STAT results should be communicated timely so there is no delay in treatment. The facility policy also stated that abnormal or critical laboratory findings should be communicated by phone when provider intervention is needed before the next facility visit.
Failure to Post Transmission-Based Precaution Signage for Resident with Influenza A
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to communicate transmission-based precautions for one resident, R48, who had influenza A and was ordered on droplet isolation. On 4/8/2026, R48 was observed in bed in their room with an equipment caddy mounted on the door containing PPE, including gloves, face masks, and gowns, but there was no signage on the door indicating what precautions were in place or what PPE was required to enter the room and provide care. R48’s record showed diagnoses including Alzheimer’s disease, anxiety disorder, COPD, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, type II diabetes, pain, and influenza A added on 4/5/2026. The MDS dated 3/27/2026 showed a BIMS score of 4/15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. During interview, an LPN confirmed that R48 had influenza A and that staff were to wear PPE when entering the room, and also confirmed that no precaution sign was present on the door. The resident’s care plan directed staff to display a precaution sign as directed by Infection Control and to wear a mask and glove while administering care. The Infection Preventionist stated that the facility follows CDC guidelines and facility policy, that influenza A requires droplet precautions, and that a sign should be placed on the resident’s door to indicate the precautions and PPE required. The facility policy stated that signs alert staff and visitors to the type of precautions required by placing a sign on the resident’s room door for droplet and contact precautions.
Failure to Implement Ordered Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Treatment for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to implement ordered pressure ulcer prevention and treatment interventions, resulting in the development and worsening of pressure ulcers in two residents. One resident was re-admitted with diagnoses including cervical spine surgery, diabetes, and metabolic encephalopathy. An admission skin assessment documented no ulcers or skin treatments, but a subsequent assessment identified MASD in the groin and scrotum, a non-blanchable and discolored left heel, and an order for protective heel boots and Triad paste to the coccyx. There was no documentation that the Triad paste or heel boots were ever applied. The resident’s MDS later showed severe cognitive impairment, extensive assistance needs for mobility, and one unstageable DTI, with no pressure-reducing bed or chair and no turning/repositioning program documented. A care plan for risk of skin breakdown was initiated with interventions such as floating heels, pressure-reducing mattress and cushion, and assistance with turning and repositioning, but there were no progress notes or skin assessments for this resident’s skin from mid-December until late December. On a later date, an LPN discovered a foam dressing on the resident’s coccyx during incontinence care and, upon removal, observed an area with eschar and additional open areas along the bilateral buttock region at the tailbone. There were no measurements or detailed descriptions of these wounds at that time, and a treatment order for Manuka Honey to the coccyx was documented as being administered only twice despite being ordered three times weekly. The LPN who found the dressing stated they had not known of any wound prior to that and confirmed there were no prior notes or treatment orders for the coccyx. The DON confirmed there were no skin assessments or treatment orders for the coccyx until that date and that this lack of documentation was not consistent with facility protocol. Another LPN later admitted to having applied the foam patch to the coccyx two days earlier after noticing an ulcer, but stated they became too busy and failed to chart the finding or notify the physician, acknowledging this was not in line with protocol. An initial wound care note several days later documented an unstageable coccyx pressure ulcer with extensive eschar and a DTI on the left heel, and an RN confirmed these pressure ulcers were acquired in the facility and that there had been a delay in prevention and treatment. The second resident admitted with multiple diagnoses including osteoarthritis of the left knee and DVT. Shortly after admission, an RN documented a dime-sized open area on the coccyx, and an order was written for barrier cream as needed after incontinence care, along with a care plan for risk of skin breakdown that included frequent turning and repositioning, use of barrier cream, and pressure-reducing surfaces. There was no documentation that the barrier cream was applied to the coccyx wound. The resident’s MDS later indicated intact cognition, extensive assistance needs for mobility, and one stage 2 pressure ulcer, but the care plan was not revised to reflect actual skin breakdown. No additional progress notes or assessments for the coccyx ulcer were documented until nine days after admission, when a specific Triad paste treatment was ordered. MAR review showed that this treatment was given only three times instead of the prescribed six times over three days, and the order was then discontinued. Subsequent treatment orders for this resident’s coccyx ulcer were repeatedly changed, including orders for oil emulsion and alginate dressings three times weekly and Triad paste to the periwound area, but MARs showed that these treatments were administered less frequently than ordered before being discontinued. An initial wound care note two weeks after admission documented a stage 3 coccyx wound with necrotic tissue and specific measurements. Later, a Manuka Honey and alginate regimen three times weekly was ordered, but again MARs showed missed treatments. A subsequent daily Santyl and alginate regimen was documented as administered on most but not all ordered days, with no PRN treatments documented, and then changed to a Dakin’s solution plus Santyl and alginate regimen. A later wound care note documented a larger stage 3 coccyx pressure ulcer with increased dimensions and depth, and the resident was transferred to the hospital for worsening of the pressure ulcer. An RN acknowledged that the resident admitted with a small open area on the coccyx that progressed to a larger stage 3 ulcer, confirmed that no skin treatments were documented until nine days after admission, and noted gaps in the MAR where ordered treatments were not administered. The facility’s Wound and Skin Management Policy required prevention of avoidable pressure ulcers, necessary treatment and services, routine preventive care including turning, pressure reduction devices, good skin care, and daily CNA skin assessments with prompt reporting of new breakdowns, as well as nurse validation and skin assessment on bath/shower days, which were not consistently carried out as documented in these cases.
Deficiencies in Food Safety and Sanitation Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to proper food safety and sanitation practices, as observed during a survey. A dietary aide was seen using a paper towel to clean a thermometer stem between checking the temperatures of various prepared foods, contrary to the facility's protocol of using alcohol wipes. This improper cleaning method was confirmed by the Director of Dining, who acknowledged that alcohol wipes should have been used. Additionally, the facility did not ensure that items stored in resident refrigerators were properly labeled with the resident's name and expiration date. Observations revealed several unlabeled and undated food items in the resident refrigerators and freezers, including ice cream, sandwiches, and beverages. Furthermore, the facility did not maintain cleanliness in the kitchen's pot and pan storage area. Three sheet pans were found stacked together with water droplets on them, and one pan was not adequately cleaned, containing sticky substances. The Director of Dining confirmed that the pans should have been allowed to air dry before stacking. The facility's policy on food brought in from outside was not followed, as resident food items were not labeled or dated, and refrigerator and freezer temperatures were not consistently monitored. The Nursing Home Administrator acknowledged the expectation for in-house policies and procedures to be followed, but no additional documentation or information was provided during the exit conference.
Delayed Response to Call Light Results in Resident's Incontinence
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely assistance to a resident, identified as R11, who required a bedpan, resulting in the resident experiencing an incontinent episode. On the morning of March 17, 2025, R11 activated the call light for assistance but had to wait over thirty minutes before a staff member responded. During this time, R11 had a bowel movement in bed, which led to feelings of embarrassment, frustration, and anger. R11, who has a history of anxiety, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, and overactive bladder, expressed that this incident was particularly distressing as they do not typically have bowel movements on themselves. The assigned CNA, identified as K, confirmed that multiple call lights were on simultaneously, which delayed the response to R11's request for a bedpan. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the response time should have been within fifteen to twenty minutes and understood the resident's upset feelings. The facility's policy on dignity and privacy emphasizes that residents should be cared for in a manner that promotes dignity and self-worth, which was not upheld in this instance.
Failure to Timely Notify Resident Representative of Change in Condition
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the Resident Representative (RR) in a timely manner regarding a change in condition for a resident, identified as R24, who had a skin tear requiring treatment. R24's clinical record indicated a diagnosis of dementia, pressure ulcer of the sacral region-stage 4, congestive heart failure, and cerebral infarction, with severe cognitive impairment. The resident's spouse was listed as the responsible party, and the son was the RR. On 3/11/25, a wound care progress note documented an acute skin tear on R24's right midline buttock, which required treatment. However, the RR was not informed of this change until 3/17/25, when the resident's husband was updated during a visit to the facility. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the family should have been notified immediately of any changes in the resident's condition. The Unit Manager acknowledged that the clinical record should have documented family notification, but the only evidence of such was a progress note dated 3/17/25. The wound care nurse indicated that the facility's practice of notifying families during weekly wound and nutrition meetings could delay communication. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the nurse should have attempted to contact the resident's spouse when the wound was discovered. The facility's Change of Condition Policy mandates prompt notification of the resident, provider, and representative of any changes in condition, which was not adhered to in this case.
Failure to Obtain Critical Cardiac Medication in a Timely Manner
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to obtain a critical medication, tafamidis, for a resident with a rare cardiac condition in a timely manner. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including sepsis, cognitive communication deficit, and organ-limited amyloidosis, was prescribed 61 mg of tafamidis daily. Despite the hospital discharge summary indicating the need for this medication, it was not available in the facility's medication system, and the pharmacy reported it as a specialty medication not covered by insurance. The facility staff did not follow up adequately with the physician or the pharmacy to resolve the issue promptly. The Unit Manager acknowledged the lack of documentation regarding follow-up actions for the medication issue. The Lead Pharmacist confirmed that the facility was informed about the medication's unavailability and provided a contact number for further assistance. It was not until several days later that the physician was informed of the situation and suggested contacting the resident's family to bring the medication from home. The Director of Nursing later stated that the nursing staff should have acted more swiftly in addressing the medication's unavailability, especially given its importance for the resident's condition.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,096 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 6 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Dearborn
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allegria Village | 1.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
| Fairlane Senior Care And Rehab Center | 3.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 14 | 0 |
| Optalis Health And Rehabilitation Of Allen Park | 4.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Optalis Health And Rehabilitation Of Dearborn Heig | 5.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 20 | 0 |
| Heritage Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 5.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 26 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Corewell Health Rehabilitation & Nursing Center -.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.