Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around October 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Leominster Rehabilitation And Nursing Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Unlabeled inhalers and unlocked medication carts were observed during survey. Surveyors found open, in-use Ventolin HFA, Spiriva, and Trelegy inhalers on medication carts that were not dated, and staff stated the nurse who opens an inhaler is responsible for dating it. Surveyors also observed medication and treatment carts on all units left unlocked and unattended, including a treatment cart in the hallway that contained medicated ointments and other supplies.
A resident’s privacy curtain was observed repeatedly soiled with a dried blood-like substance, and the resident had intact cognition and declined interview. A CNA said the stain had been noticed on the prior shift and identified it as blood from a bloody nose, while the DSS and DON both stated the curtain should have been reported and replaced immediately.
Failure to develop and implement care plans and physician orders affected three residents. One resident with a pacemaker had no documented pacemaker care plan or physician direction, while two residents had ordered interventions not in place: a low air loss mattress for skin care and a soft blue boot for foot drop prevention. Staff and the DON confirmed the ordered devices were expected to be in use, but observations showed they were not applied.
Failure to implement OT splint recommendation for a resident with left hand contracture. The resident had hemiplegia/hemiparesis, severe cognitive impairment, and limited ROM of one UE. OT documented tolerance of a left UE carrot splint and recommendations for splinting/orthotic scheduling, but surveyors observed the resident’s left hand in a tight fist without any orthotic device or brace. Nursing staff reported no overnight treatment in place, and the DON stated the carrot splint was not implemented as recommended.
Failure to complete trauma screening and PTSD care planning: A resident with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and PTSD had no completed trauma assessment in the record, and the care plan did not identify specific triggers for re-traumatization. Staff interviews showed the trauma questionnaire was attempted only once, the RN was unaware of PTSD concerns or triggers, and the DON stated residents with PTSD need timely assessments and individualized care plans with triggers known to staff.
A resident with an indwelling catheter did not receive catheter irrigation as ordered by the physician. Nursing staff failed to clamp the catheter and wait 30 minutes after instilling the acetic acid solution, instead allowing it to drain immediately, contrary to the prescribed procedure. This was confirmed through staff interviews and review of facility policy.
A resident with a G-tube and orders for continuous enteral feeding and scheduled water flushes received incorrect volumes of formula and water when staff placed the formula and water in the wrong pump bags. The error was discovered after a visitor reported the issue, and interviews confirmed that the feeding system had been set up incorrectly, resulting in the resident not receiving nutrition and hydration as prescribed.
A resident was admitted with bilateral nephrostomy tubes, but the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses had the necessary competencies to provide appropriate care. The facility's assessment indicated capability in handling genitourinary conditions, yet competency evaluations for nurses did not include nephrostomy tube care. Interviews with the ADON and DON confirmed the oversight, and no records were kept of staff education on this care after the resident's admission.
The facility failed to ensure the DON did not serve as Charge Nurse when occupancy exceeded 60 residents. The DON worked as Charge Nurse on multiple occasions due to staffing shortages, interfering with her primary responsibilities. This was confirmed by facility records and interviews with the DON.
A resident was not informed about a new antipsychotic medication, Olanzapine, administered after hospitalization, violating their right to participate in their care plan. The facility's policy requires informed consent and discussion of medication risks and benefits, which was not followed. The resident received the medication for 22 days without prior consent, which was only obtained on the last day.
A resident experienced significant weight loss, but the facility failed to notify the Physician or NP as required by policy. Despite the resident's weight being monitored, the NP was not informed of the weight loss, which was identified by the dietitian, leading to a lack of follow-up actions.
The facility failed to update care plans for two residents after falls and did not hold a care plan meeting for another resident. One resident's care plan lacked fall prevention goals after a fall, while another resident used safety equipment without a physician's order or care plan revision. Additionally, a care plan meeting was not documented for a resident following an MDS assessment.
A resident with GERD and IBS did not receive the correct medication due to a failure in transcribing a verbal order from the physician. The DON received the order to switch from Protonix to Prilosec OTC but did not ensure it was entered into the medical record, resulting in the resident continuing on the previous medication regimen.
A resident with dementia in an LTC facility was not provided with activities that matched their preferences and needs, as outlined in their care plan. Despite assessments indicating a need for afternoon activities, music, and social interaction, the resident was often observed alone and without engagement. Staff attempts to provide 1:1 activities were inadequately documented, leading to a deficiency in meeting the resident's activity needs.
A resident with dysphagia and loose dentures was not provided with necessary interventions during a meal, leading to repeated coughing and gagging. Despite the presence of the ADON, the resident continued to eat without proper supervision and assistance, as outlined in their care plan. Staff interviews revealed a lack of awareness and adherence to the resident's care plan, resulting in a failure to ensure safe eating practices.
A resident with nephrostomy tubes did not receive the required flushing as ordered by the physician, due to the facility's failure to enter the order into the electronic medical record. The resident, who had been performing the flushing at home, expressed concerns about potential obstructions. The Director of Nursing admitted the order was incorrectly entered, leading to the absence of necessary orders in the MAR and TAR.
A facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to a resident with mental health needs by not developing an individualized care plan or revising it after the resident expressed suicidal ideation and was hospitalized. The resident, with a history of depression and anxiety, did not receive timely therapy sessions or meet with the social worker upon return. Interviews revealed that the care plan was not updated as required, contributing to the deficiency.
The facility failed to review and address pharmacist recommendations for two residents, one with cognitive impairments and multiple diagnoses, and another receiving various psychotropic medications. The Director of Nursing could not provide evidence of the reviews, indicating non-compliance with the facility's policy.
A resident with depression, anxiety, and alcohol abuse diagnoses was not monitored for adverse effects of antipsychotic medications as required. The facility failed to conduct timely AIMS assessments every three to six months, as per policy, to monitor for tardive dyskinesia. The resident received Olanzapine and Aripiprazole, but no updated AIMS assessment was completed since admission, and no care plan was developed to monitor for side effects. The DON confirmed the oversight.
A resident with cellulitis and other conditions did not have their medicated lotion treatments documented as required. Despite the resident's report of inconsistent application, the facility's TAR lacked signatures for several treatment dates. The DON confirmed the missing documentation, and the ADON later verified that the care was provided but not recorded.
The facility failed to implement proper infection control measures, including not following Enhanced Barrier Precautions for a resident with wounds and a Foley catheter, and not replacing meals for two residents exposed to emesis during dining. Staff acknowledged these oversights, highlighting lapses in infection prevention protocols.
A CNA in an LTC facility was observed sitting with her legs across a resident's lap, encouraging the resident to play with her legs and hair to keep them calm. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and a history of challenging behaviors, was not treated with dignity and respect as per their care plan. The incident was witnessed by the Director of Social Services and the DON, who noted the inappropriate nature of the interaction.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of falls was found using a concave mattress and bed rails without a documented restraint assessment. Despite staff acknowledging the resident's frequent unassisted standing and falls, the facility failed to assess whether these devices restricted the resident's movement, contrary to their policy.
A facility failed to report an alleged abuse incident involving a resident with severe cognitive impairment. A CNA was observed with her legs crossed and extended across the resident's lap, restraining them in their wheelchair. Despite the Director of Nurses recognizing this as a restraint, the incident was not reported to the DPH, as required by the facility's policy.
A facility failed to investigate an alleged restraint incident involving a resident with severe cognitive impairment. A CNA was seen with her legs across the resident's lap, but the facility did not document a formal investigation or determine an outcome, as they did not consider it abuse. The investigation file lacked interviews and a summary, contrary to facility policy.
A facility failed to conduct a Bed Rail Entrapment Assessment for a resident with severe cognitive impairment before using bed rails. The facility's policy requires an evaluation of the resident's sleeping environment and compatibility checks of bed components, but no documentation was found to support that these assessments were completed. The Director of Maintenance confirmed the absence of safety testing documentation after a mattress change, and the DON was unaware of when the bed rails were added.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment was physically abused by a CNA who restrained the resident with his knee and yelled at them during an attempted transfer to bed. The resident's care plan advised against such actions, emphasizing patience and reapproaching if care was refused. The incident was witnessed by two other CNAs, leading to the immediate suspension and termination of the offending CNA.
A facility failed to conduct a Criminal Offender Record Inquiry (CORI) on a CNA before employment, as required by its Abuse Policy. The CNA was employed without a CORI check, which was only performed after an abuse allegation was made against him, leading to his termination. Interviews confirmed the lack of documentation for a CORI check prior to the CNA's employment.
Unlabeled inhalers and unlocked medication carts
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with accepted professional principles and State and Federal requirements. Review of the facility policy stated that medications and biologicals are to be kept in locked compartments, carts are not to be left unattended if open or otherwise available to others, and opened multi-dose vials are to be dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies otherwise. During medication storage observations, surveyors found open, in-use inhalers that were not dated on the East Unit medication cart and on the [NAME] Unit medication cart, including two Ventolin HFA inhalers, one Spiriva inhaler, and one Trelegy inhaler. Nurse #3 stated that each nurse is responsible for labeling inhalers when opened, but these inhalers were not dated when opened. The ADON and DON both stated that the nurse who opens a new inhaler is expected to date it so other nurses know when it expires. The facility also failed to keep medication and treatment carts locked when unattended. At 6:54 A.M., surveyors entered the facility and observed unlocked and unattended medication and treatment carts on all three units, and were able to access the carts where medications were stored. Multiple residents were awake and in the hallways near the carts. At 8:01 A.M. on the South Unit, surveyors observed an unlocked and unattended treatment cart in the hallway and were able to access it; the cart contained medicated ointments and other supplies. During interview, the DON stated her expectation was that medication and treatment carts are locked when unattended and said that at all times the carts are to be locked when unattended.
Soiled Privacy Curtain Not Maintained in Clean Condition
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a clean and comfortable homelike environment for one resident out of a sample of 21 when Resident #40’s privacy curtain was observed soiled with a dried blood-like substance. The resident was admitted in September 2021 with diagnoses including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and chronic kidney disease, and the most recent MDS assessment dated 9/3/25 showed a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. On 11/18/25 at 7:49 A.M., the surveyor observed the resident sleeping in bed and noted the privacy curtain around the bed was soiled with a dried blood-like substance throughout the curtain. The same soiled curtain was again observed on 11/19/25 at 8:07 A.M. and 9:50 A.M. Resident #40 declined to participate in an interview. During interview, a CNA stated she noticed the curtain was stained the prior evening during the 3:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. shift and said there was no one in the facility to notify for it to be changed. The CNA said the substance was blood from a bloody nose and that staff should have asked housekeeping to change the curtain immediately when it was observed. The Director of Social Services said she saw the stained curtain the day before and asked someone to change it, but they did not. The DON also observed the stains and stated staff should have immediately reported the staining and had the curtain replaced.
Failure to Develop and Implement Care Plans and Physician Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a plan of care for one resident with a pacemaker and failed to implement physician orders for two residents. Resident #29 was admitted with diagnoses including cognitive impairment, angina pectoris, and presence of a pacemaker. The record showed severe cognitive impairment on the MDS, and review of the clinical record failed to indicate the type of pacemaker. The physician orders did not include directions for pacemaker care, and the care plan revised 5/6/25 did not include directives for pacemaker care. A nurse stated the resident had not had a pacemaker check since she began working there, and both the nurse and the DON said they would expect a physician order to direct pacemaker care. Resident #4 had diagnoses including kyphosis, dysphagia, hypotension, and altered mental status, with MDS findings showing moderate cognitive impairment and risk for pressure ulcers, including one unhealed stage 3 pressure ulcer. The physician ordered a low air loss mattress for preventive skin care, and the TAR showed the order was signed off as administered every shift in November 2025. However, during multiple observations the resident was in bed and not on an air mattress. A CNA stated the resident had not been on an air mattress, another nurse said an air mattress should be in place if ordered, and the DON stated the mattress should be in place as ordered because it was an intervention for skin care. Resident #51 had diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis, dysphagia, muscle wasting and atrophy, and major depressive disorder, with severe cognitive impairment on the MDS and high risk for pressure ulcers on the Norton Scale. Physician orders directed that the resident's left toes have support at all times and later ordered a soft blue boot to the left foot to assist with foot drop prevention, with skin integrity monitoring during donning and doffing every shift and removal for care. The care plan and Kardex included the boot order, but during observations the resident was in bed without the boot on the left foot, and the boot was observed on the chair throughout survey. Nursing staff and the ADON stated the boot should be on at all times and removed for care, and the DON said it was expected to prevent skin breakdown and foot drop.
Failure to Implement OT Splint Recommendation for Left Hand Contracture
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement OT recommendations for a resident with a contracture to the left hand. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side and other reduced mobility, and the MDS indicated severe cognitive impairment and impairment in range of motion of one upper extremity. The OT discharge summary documented that the resident tolerated a left upper extremity carrot splint for 5+ hours with no signs of pain, redness, or discomfort, and noted skilled interventions focused on education, positioning, and splinting/orthotic scheduling to improve quality of life and prevent further contractures. Survey observations showed the resident’s left hand in a tight fist on multiple occasions, with no orthotic device or brace in place. The resident’s active plan of care did not include interventions for limited ROM in the left hand, and physician orders showed an adaptive equipment order for a left hand splint, remove for care, but no active or discontinued order specifically reflecting the carrot splint recommendation. During interviews, rehab staff stated the carrot splint was an ongoing recommendation being implemented overnight, while nursing staff stated there was no treatment in place overnight and that the resident did not use any orthotic device or brace for the left hand. The DON stated the carrot splint was not implemented as recommended.
Failure to Complete Trauma Assessment and PTSD Care Planning
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete a trauma screen and develop a comprehensive trauma care plan for a resident with PTSD that identified triggers and interventions. Facility policy required universal trauma screening, an in-depth trauma assessment to identify symptoms and triggers, and individualized care planning to address past trauma and decrease exposure to triggers that may re-traumatize the resident. Resident #40 was admitted with diagnoses including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and chronic kidney disease, and the medical record included a nurse practitioner note listing PTSD among the resident’s active conditions. The record did not show that a trauma assessment was completed. A social services note documented that an attempt was made to complete the trauma questionnaire, but the resident refused and this was the only attempt noted. The active care plan included PTSD-related diagnoses and symptoms but did not identify specific triggers for re-traumatization. During interviews, the Director of Social Services stated the trauma assessment should be completed on all residents and that Resident #40’s PTSD care plan should include specific triggers or note if they could not be identified. A nurse stated she was not aware of PTSD concerns or triggers for the resident, and the DON stated residents with PTSD need timely trauma assessments and personalized care plans with triggers made known to staff.
Failure to Follow Physician's Orders for Catheter Irrigation
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with an indwelling catheter and multiple diagnoses, including Multiple Sclerosis, Dementia, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, did not receive catheter care in accordance with the physician's orders. The physician had ordered daily irrigation of the catheter using 30 ml of 0.25% acetic acid solution, with instructions to clamp the catheter for 30 minutes after instillation, then flush with sterile water. However, nursing staff performed the irrigation by instilling the solution and immediately allowing it to drain into the bag, without clamping the catheter or waiting the required 30 minutes before flushing. This deviation from the prescribed procedure was confirmed during interviews with the nurse responsible for the resident's care, who acknowledged not following the specific order to clamp the catheter and wait before flushing. The Assistant Director of Nurses also confirmed that the nurse had not performed the catheter irrigation as ordered. Facility policy on catheter irrigation was available, but the required steps in the physician's order were not followed for this resident.
Incorrect Administration of Enteral Nutrition Due to Feeding Pump Setup Error
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with a gastrostomy tube (G-tube) was not provided with appropriate treatment and services as prescribed by the physician. The resident, who had diagnoses including Multiple Sclerosis, Dementia, and G-tube status, had specific physician orders for the administration of enteral formula (Jevity 1.5 at 45 ml/hour) and water flushes (200 cc every four hours). Facility policy required staff to be trained and competent in enteral nutrition administration, including verifying the correct rate and volume for tube feedings and flushes. However, the resident's formula and water flushes were placed in the incorrect enteral pump bags, resulting in the resident receiving incorrect volumes of formula and water. The error was identified after a visitor observed the mistake and notified facility staff. Interviews with nursing staff confirmed that the feeding pump tubing, formula, and water flush had been set up incorrectly, leading to the resident not receiving tube feeding and water flushes as ordered. The Assistant Director of Nursing and the Nursing Supervisor both acknowledged that the system had been set up incorrectly, which resulted in the resident not being administered tube feeding and water flushes according to the physician's orders.
Lack of Competency in Nephrostomy Tube Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses had the specific competencies and skill sets to care for a resident with nephrostomy tubes. Resident #372 was admitted with bilateral nephrostomy tubes, a condition that requires specialized care. The facility's assessment indicated that staff could provide care for residents with genitourinary system diseases and special treatments like ostomy care, yet the competency evaluations for Nurses #6, #1, #5, and #4 did not include nephrostomy tube care. The competency evaluations for the nurses showed assessments in various areas such as medication administration, sterile wound care, and tube feeding, but lacked any assessment for nephrostomy tube care. Despite the facility's claim of being able to handle such cases, there was no evidence that the nurses had been evaluated for this specific competency. This oversight was evident as the nurses assigned to care for Resident #372 had not been assessed for their ability to manage nephrostomy tubes. Interviews with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that the competency evaluations did not include nephrostomy tube care. The ADON, who also served as the Staff Development Coordinator, was on vacation during the resident's admission and acknowledged that education on nephrostomy tube care should have been initiated immediately. The DON confirmed that the competency assessments needed to be updated to include nephrostomy tube care, but no records were kept of which staff received the necessary education after the resident's admission.
DON Serving as Charge Nurse Despite High Occupancy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the Director of Nursing (DON) did not serve as the Charge Nurse when the facility had an average daily occupancy of greater than 60 residents. This deficiency was observed on multiple occasions during the Quarter Three Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report period and in the four weeks prior to the survey start date. Specifically, the DON was found to have worked as the Charge Nurse on four dates during Quarter Three, including two weekends, and on three additional dates in the weeks leading up to the survey. The facility's daily census reports confirmed that the resident occupancy exceeded 60 on all these occasions. Interviews with the DON revealed that she was called in to work as a Charge Nurse when scheduled nurses did not show up or called out, and replacements could not be found. The DON acknowledged that working as a Charge Nurse interfered with her ability to fulfill her responsibilities as the DON. The facility's records, including Daily Nursing Attendance Reports and the DON's time cards, corroborated the instances where the DON served in dual roles, highlighting a staffing issue that led to the deficiency.
Failure to Inform Resident of New Medication Treatment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to inform a resident about a new medication treatment and the associated risks and benefits, violating the resident's right to participate in their plan of care. The resident, who was cognitively intact, was not informed about the administration of Olanzapine, an antipsychotic medication, upon their return from hospitalization. The facility's policy requires that residents and their representatives be involved in medication management and informed about the risks and benefits of psychotropic medications, which was not adhered to in this case. The resident received Olanzapine daily for 22 days without prior informed consent, which was only obtained on the last day of administration. Interviews with the physician and the Director of Nursing revealed that the medication was prescribed and administered without discussing it with the resident, and the consent process was not followed as per the facility's policy. The physician independently decided to discontinue the medication without input from nursing or psychiatric services, further indicating a lack of communication and adherence to protocol.
Failure to Notify Physician of Significant Weight Loss
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the Physician or Nurse Practitioner (NP) of a significant change in condition for a resident, specifically regarding a significant weight loss. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy, bipolar disorder, and developmental delay, experienced a weight loss of 11.8% in less than 180 days. The facility's policy required notification of the physician for significant weight changes, but there was no documented evidence that the physician or NP was informed when the dietitian identified the weight loss. The resident's weight was monitored as per physician's orders, with weights recorded on specific dates. However, there was a lack of communication to the NP about the resident's weight loss, which was confirmed during an interview with the NP. The NP stated that typically the Director of Nursing or nursing staff would communicate such changes, but in this case, the weights were not reported, preventing any potential follow-up actions that might have been warranted.
Care Plan Deficiencies and Lack of Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the care plans for two residents were assessed and revised appropriately, and did not hold a care plan meeting for another resident. For one resident, the care plan was not updated with measurable goals for fall prevention after the resident sustained a fall. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including encephalopathy, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and muscle weakness, was found on the floor after a fall, having hit their head. Despite this incident, the care plan did not reflect an assessment of the fall or any new interventions to prevent future falls. Another resident, admitted with cognitive impairment, depression, insomnia, and muscle weakness, was observed using mattress bolsters and floor mats, but there was no physician's order or care plan revision to include these safety measures. The facility's nurse confirmed that such measures should have been documented and assessed every shift, but this was not done for the resident. Additionally, a third resident, who was cognitively intact, did not have evidence of a care plan meeting following a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. The Director of Social Services acknowledged that there was no documentation of a care plan meeting, which should have included the resident and/or their representative, as well as the interdisciplinary team.
Failure to Transcribe Verbal Medication Order
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide services that met professional standards of quality for a resident due to a lapse in transcribing a verbal medication order. The Director of Nursing (DON) received a verbal order from the resident's physician to change the medication from Protonix 40 mg twice daily to Prilosec OTC 20 mg daily. However, this order was not transcribed into the resident's medical record, resulting in the resident not receiving the updated medication as prescribed. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), continued to receive the previous medication regimen. The DON acknowledged the oversight, stating that the verbal order was given to another nurse to transcribe, but it was not documented, and the resident did not receive the correct medication. This failure to implement the physician's order was identified during a review of the active physician's orders and confirmed through interviews with the DON.
Failure to Provide Resident-Centered Activities
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide activities that met the needs and preferences of a resident diagnosed with dementia, who was admitted in December 2023. The resident was assessed as severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of zero. The resident's activity assessment indicated preferences for afternoon activities, reading materials, music, news, social interaction, and favorite activities. However, observations and interviews revealed that these preferences were not adequately addressed. During multiple observations, the resident was found either sleeping in bed or seated alone without any engagement in activities or access to preferred items like a television or radio. The resident's representative expressed concerns about the resident being bored and the staff's inability to keep the resident engaged. The activity care plan noted the resident's dependence on staff for cognitive stimulation and social interaction, yet there was a lack of documented participation in activities from September 6 to September 9, 2024. Interviews with staff, including a CNA and the Activities Director, indicated attempts to engage the resident with 1:1 activities and tools like a fidget board. However, there was insufficient documentation of these activities, and the Activities Director could not provide specifics about a cognitive game reportedly provided on September 10, 2024. The lack of consistent and documented activity engagement highlights the facility's failure to meet the resident's individualized activity needs as outlined in their care plan.
Failure to Ensure Safe Eating Practices for Resident with Dysphagia
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a safe environment free from accidental hazards for a resident with dysphagia during a meal. The resident, who had a diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease and dysphagia, required continual supervision and assistance with eating, as outlined in their care plan. However, during a breakfast observation, the resident was not provided with necessary interventions such as securing dentures with adhesive, encouraging small bites, and ensuring the resident did not continue eating while coughing. The resident was observed eating scrambled eggs without their dentures being secured, leading to repeated coughing and gagging episodes. Despite the presence of the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) in the dining room, the resident continued to eat without the recommended supervision and interventions. The ADON intervened only after the resident's dentures were visibly loose and instructed a Certified Nurses Aide (CNA) to remove them, but did not follow the care plan's instructions to encourage safe eating practices. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of awareness and adherence to the resident's care plan. The CNA was unaware of the morning oral care provided to the resident and did not ensure the use of denture adhesive, which was available in the resident's room. The Speech Language Pathologist confirmed the resident's need for continual supervision and specific interventions during meals, which were not implemented during the observed breakfast.
Failure to Provide Nephrostomy Tube Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate care for a resident with nephrostomy tubes, as staff did not flush the tubes as ordered by the physician. The facility's policy and professional standards require that nephrostomy tubes be flushed to prevent blockage and infection. However, the resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of the bladder and was under palliative care, reported that the facility staff did not perform the necessary flushing of the nephrostomy tubes. The resident expressed concerns about potential obstructions due to the lack of flushing, which he had been doing twice daily at home. Upon review, it was found that the physician's order to flush the nephrostomy tubes was not entered into the facility's electronic medical record (EMR) upon the resident's admission. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the order was incorrectly entered, resulting in the absence of the necessary orders in the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment Administration Record (TAR). This oversight led to the failure to provide the required nephrostomy tube care for the resident.
Failure to Update Care Plan for Resident with Mental Health Needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to a resident diagnosed with mental disorders, specifically failing to develop an individualized care plan to address the emotional and psychosocial needs of the resident. The resident, who had a history of depression, anxiety, and alcohol abuse, expressed suicidal ideation and was hospitalized. Upon return, the facility did not revise the care plan to incorporate findings from the comprehensive assessment or to include targeted and individualized interventions. The facility's policy required that new onset or changes in behavior be documented and that the care plan be consistent with current standards of practice. However, the care plan for the resident was not updated after the expression of suicidal ideation, hospitalization, and re-admission. The resident reported not meeting with the facility's social worker upon return and only recently starting therapy sessions, indicating a lack of ongoing assessment and monitoring of the resident's emotional and psychosocial needs. Interviews with the Director of Social Services and the Director of Nursing revealed that the care plan was not reviewed or revised as required. The Director of Social Services acknowledged that supportive visits were not documented, and the Director of Nursing confirmed that the care plan should have been updated following the resident's return from the hospital. This lack of documentation and failure to update the care plan contributed to the deficiency in providing appropriate care for the resident.
Failure to Address Pharmacist Recommendations for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to review and address the Pharmacist Medication Review recommendations for two residents, leading to a deficiency in compliance with their own policies. For one resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including Encephalopathy, Bipolar Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder, and Muscle Weakness, the facility did not verify or confirm that the pharmacist's recommendations made in October and December 2023 were reviewed or addressed. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged the absence of these recommendations in the resident's record and indicated that they would need to contact the pharmacy to obtain them, as they were not available at the time of the survey. Similarly, for another resident with diagnoses of Depression and Anxiety, the facility did not verify or confirm the review or addressing of pharmacist recommendations made on multiple occasions between September 2023 and May 2024. The resident was cognitively intact and received various psychotropic medications, including antipsychotics, antianxiety, antidepressants, hypnotics, and opioids. The DON was unable to provide evidence of the pharmacy reviews for the specified dates, indicating a failure to adhere to the facility's policy of timely communication and follow-up on pharmacist recommendations.
Failure to Conduct Timely AIMS Assessment for Resident on Antipsychotics
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from the risks of side effects resulting from the unnecessary use of psychotropic medications. Specifically, the facility did not conduct timely monitoring for adverse consequences and side effects using the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessment. The facility's policy on psychotropic medication use requires adequate monitoring for efficacy and adverse consequences, including the administration of the AIMS assessment every three to six months to monitor for tardive dyskinesia. However, the medical record review revealed that an updated AIMS assessment had not been completed for the resident since August 2023, despite the resident receiving antipsychotic medications such as Olanzapine and Aripiprazole. The resident, who was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including depression, anxiety, and alcohol abuse, was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. The resident received Olanzapine and Aripiprazole as prescribed, but the facility failed to develop a plan of care to monitor for adverse consequences and side effects related to the antipsychotic medication use. During an interview, the Director of Nursing acknowledged that an AIMS assessment should have been completed every six months and confirmed that it had not been done for this resident.
Failure to Document Medicated Lotion Treatments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for a resident, specifically regarding the documentation of medicated lotion treatments. The resident, who was admitted with conditions including the need for assistance with personal care, adult failure to thrive, and cellulitis of the lower extremities, was prescribed Lac-Hydrin Twelve External Lotion to be applied twice daily. However, the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) did not reflect the administration of this treatment on several occasions, as observed by surveyors. During interviews and observations, the resident reported that the medicated lotion was not consistently applied as ordered. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the TAR lacked signatures for the specified dates, indicating that the treatments were not documented as provided. The Assistant Director of Nurses later confirmed that the care was given, but the nurses had forgotten to sign off on the TAR, which was against the facility's policy and professional standards.
Infection Control Deficiencies in Resident Care and Dining
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by two specific deficiencies. Firstly, the facility did not adhere to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with wounds and a Foley catheter. Despite physician orders requiring the use of gown and gloves during high-contact activities such as wound care, a nurse was observed performing wound care without wearing a gown, thereby not following the prescribed EBP. The nurse acknowledged the oversight, and the Infection Preventionist confirmed that the EBP should have been followed due to the resident's high risk of infection. Secondly, the facility did not adequately protect two residents from potential infection risk during a dining incident. When another resident expelled emesis at the same table, the staff removed the soiled items and disinfected the area but did not offer to replace the meals of the two residents seated nearby. Although the Director of Nursing offered to move the residents to another table, the meals were not replaced, which was acknowledged as an oversight by both the Infection Preventionist and the Director of Nursing.
Inappropriate Interaction with Cognitively Impaired Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident with severe cognitive impairment was treated with dignity and respect. On the specified date, a CNA was observed sitting next to the resident in a wheelchair with her legs outstretched and crossed over the resident's lap. The CNA encouraged the resident to play with her legs and hair as a means to keep the resident calm. This action was witnessed by the Director of Social Services and the Director of Nurses, who both noted the inappropriate nature of the interaction. The resident, who had been admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease, dementia, and schizoaffective disorder, was known to exhibit behaviors such as yelling, hitting, and resisting staff. The resident's care plan suggested distraction with tasks or activities as a strategy to manage these behaviors. However, the CNA's method of distraction was deemed undignified and potentially inappropriate, as it involved physical contact that could be misconstrued. The incident was reported by multiple staff members, and the CNA acknowledged her actions, stating she was trying to keep the resident occupied.
Failure to Assess Restraint Use for Cognitively Impaired Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident with severe cognitive impairment was free from the use of physical restraints. The resident, who had diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, dementia, and a history of falls, was observed lying on a concave/perimeter mattress with bed rails in the upright position. Despite the facility's policy requiring a restraint assessment to determine if such devices restricted the resident's freedom of movement, no documentation was found to support that an assessment had been completed for the bed rails or the concave mattress. Interviews with staff revealed that the resident frequently attempted to stand unassisted and had a history of falls, yet the necessary assessments to determine if the mattress and bed rails were acting as restraints were not conducted. The Director of Nurses (DON) acknowledged that a restraint assessment should have been completed but could not provide documentation to support that it had been done for the bed rails or the concave mattress. The DON stated that the concave mattress was intended to prevent falls and remind the resident to stay in bed, but there was no evidence of a completed assessment to confirm whether these devices restricted the resident's ability to get out of bed. Despite the DON's claim that the resident could easily get up with the devices in place, the lack of documented assessments indicates a failure to comply with the facility's policy on restraint use.
Failure to Report Alleged Abuse Involving Restraint
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse involving a resident with severe cognitive impairment who had been attempting to stand unassisted. The incident involved a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) who was observed by the Director of Social Services and the Director of Nurses with her legs crossed and extended across the resident's lap, effectively restraining the resident in their wheelchair. Despite the Director of Nurses acknowledging the situation as a form of restraint, the incident was not reported to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (DPH) as required by the facility's policy. The facility's policy mandates that all reports of resident abuse, including the use of restraints, be reported to local, state, and federal agencies. However, the Director of Nurses did not consider the incident to be an abuse allegation and therefore did not report it. The Administrator also did not report the incident, citing the resident's good spirits and the belief that the CNA's legs were not actually on the resident. This oversight resulted in a failure to comply with the reporting requirements outlined in the facility's policy.
Failure to Investigate Alleged Restraint Incident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation after being made aware of an allegation of a possible restraint involving a resident with severe cognitive impairment. The resident, who was dependent on staff for care due to conditions such as Parkinson's disease and dementia, was allegedly restrained by a CNA who placed her legs across the resident's lap. Despite the Director of Social Services and the Director of Nursing witnessing the incident and expressing concern, the facility did not document a formal investigation or determine an outcome, as they did not consider the incident to be abuse. The facility's investigation file lacked documentation of interviews with the resident or other residents who might have witnessed the incident. Additionally, there was no investigation summary or evidence of a completed investigation. The Director of Nursing and the Administrator both acknowledged that no formal investigation was conducted, as they did not view the incident as an allegation of abuse. This lack of action and documentation is contrary to the facility's policy, which requires thorough investigation and reporting of all allegations of abuse or neglect.
Failure to Conduct Bed Rail Entrapment Assessment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete a Bed Rail Entrapment Assessment for a resident with severe cognitive impairment before using two quarter rails in the upright position. The facility's policy requires an interdisciplinary team evaluation of the resident's sleeping environment and a compatibility check of bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails. Despite these requirements, there was no documentation to support that the necessary assessment was conducted for the resident, who had diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease, dementia, and a history of falling. The resident's care plan indicated the use of two quarter side rails for mobility and transfers, but the facility did not document a risk assessment for entrapment. During an observation, the Director of Maintenance confirmed the absence of documentation for safety testing of the bed rails after a concave mattress was added to the resident's bed. The only available test results were from before the mattress change. The Director of Nurses was unaware of when the bed rails were added and acknowledged that they should have been tested with both the previous and new mattresses. This oversight indicates a failure to adhere to the facility's policy and ensure the resident's safety.
Resident Subjected to Physical Abuse by CNA
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involved a resident with severe cognitive impairment who was subjected to physical abuse and mental anguish by a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) at the facility. The incident occurred when the resident, who was dependent on staff for care, refused to transfer to bed. In response, CNA #1 physically restrained the resident by placing his knee on the resident's lap and hand, despite the resident's protests that he was being hurt. This action was witnessed by two other CNAs, who reported that CNA #1 was also yelling at the resident and asserting authority by claiming to be the 'captain.' The facility's policies clearly state that residents have the right to be free from abuse, including physical restraint not required to treat medical symptoms. The resident's care plan indicated that staff should avoid invading personal space, use a calm voice, and reapproach if the resident refused care. However, CNA #1 did not adhere to these guidelines and instead used excessive force and verbal aggression, leading to the resident's distress. The incident was reported to the Nursing Supervisor, who took immediate action by suspending CNA #1 and contacting the police. The resident involved had a history of Alzheimer's Disease, depression, and paranoid personality disorder, which contributed to his/her cognitive impairment and potential for combative behavior. Despite this, the facility's policies and the resident's care plan emphasized the importance of patience and reapproaching the resident later if care was refused. The failure to follow these protocols resulted in the substantiated allegation of abuse, as confirmed by the facility's investigation and the statements of the involved staff members.
Failure to Conduct CORI Check on CNA Prior to Employment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its Abuse Policy by not conducting a Criminal Offender Record Inquiry (CORI) on a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) prior to his employment. According to the facility's policy, background checks are required to prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. However, the CNA in question was employed without a CORI check, which was only conducted after an abuse allegation was made against him. Interviews with the Director of Human Resources and the Administrator confirmed the absence of documentation supporting a CORI check for the CNA before his employment. The Director of HR acknowledged that the CORI was conducted only after the abuse allegation surfaced, leading to the CNA's termination. This oversight indicates a failure in the facility's process to ensure the safety and protection of its residents by not following established protocols for employee background checks.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 481 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Leominster
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Life Care Center Of Leominster | 1.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 15 | 0 |
| Fitchburg Rehabilitation And Nursing Center | 2.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Fitchburg Healthcare | 4 mi | ★★★★★ | 17 | 0 |
| Highlands, The | 4.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 9 | 0 |
| River Terrace Rehabilitation And Healthcare Ctr | 4.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Leominster Rehabilitation And Nursing Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.