Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around August 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at The Columns Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility did not develop or maintain an effective QAPI program to address falls, as evidenced by a lack of documentation and ongoing activities despite multiple fall incidents with injuries over several months. Both the Administrator and DON confirmed the absence of an effective QAPI process for falls.
Three residents were involved in a series of physical altercations after a resident with behavioral disturbances entered another resident's room and kicked her, leading to further physical exchanges with a third resident who intervened. Staff had previously observed escalating behaviors but did not provide sufficient supervision to prevent the incidents.
A resident with Alzheimer's and other conditions did not receive the prescribed treatment for a skin tear on their right lower leg. The treatment was not administered as ordered, and a nurse failed to change the bandage after the resident became agitated, resulting in an outdated and insufficiently covering bandage.
A resident with moderately impaired cognition and a history of aggression kicked another resident's walker in the dining room, leading to a physical altercation. The incident resulted in a laceration above one resident's eyebrow and a skin tear on the other's arm. The facility's investigation confirmed the events through video surveillance and staff interviews, revealing a failure to protect residents from abuse.
Failure to Implement Effective QAPI Program for Falls
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program was developed, implemented, and maintained in a comprehensive manner specifically for falls. Record review showed that the facility's QAPI policy required a systematic, data-driven approach to quality management, but there was no documentation of ongoing QAPI activities related to falls. Incident logs for three consecutive months revealed multiple fall incidents, including several with injuries, yet there was no evidence that these incidents were systematically addressed through the QAPI process. Further review of the Quality Assessment and Improvement Committee Summary indicated that no effective QAPI program was in place for falls. During interviews, both the Administrator and the DON confirmed the absence of documentation or evidence of an effective QAPI program addressing falls, and the Administrator acknowledged that the facility's QAPI program was not up to standard. This deficiency had the potential to affect all 85 residents residing in the facility.
Failure to Prevent Resident-to-Resident Physical Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect three residents from resident-to-resident physical abuse, as required by its own abuse prevention policy. The incidents involved a resident with moderate dementia and behavioral disturbances who exhibited escalating agitation and aggression. This resident entered another resident's room without permission, despite being redirected multiple times earlier for disruptive and intrusive behaviors in the dining room. The resident attempted to take snacks from another resident, who verbally asked him to leave. When the request was ignored, the intruding resident kicked the other resident in the shin. Following this, a third resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and was a roommate of the aggressive resident, intervened after hearing calls for help. This resident physically struck the aggressive resident in the back and attempted to remove his wheelchair from the doorway. In response, the aggressive resident turned and kicked the intervening resident on the leg. These events were confirmed by video surveillance, resident interviews, and staff accounts, all of which documented the sequence of physical altercations among the residents. The facility's staff had observed the aggressive resident's escalating behaviors earlier in the dining room, including attempts to take other residents' belongings and food, and had redirected him to his room. However, after being left unsupervised, the resident exited his room and initiated the altercation. The staff did not provide adequate supervision or intervention to prevent the resident from entering another resident's room and engaging in physical abuse. The facility's failure to ensure effective supervision and protection resulted in multiple instances of resident-to-resident physical abuse.
Failure to Follow Skin Tear Treatment Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow a resident's person-centered care plan for the treatment of a skin tear. The resident, who has Alzheimer's Disease with Late Onset, Impulse Disorder Unspecified, Generalized Anxiety, History of Falling, and Dementia, was dependent on staff for various activities of daily living. The care plan specified that if the resident received a skin tear, it should be treated per facility policy protocol. A physician's order was in place to cleanse the skin tear on the resident's right lower leg with normal saline, pat dry, and apply Tegaderm every three days until healed. However, the treatment was not administered as ordered. The Treatment Administration Record (TAR) indicated that the treatment was completed on specific dates, but observations revealed that the bandage was not changed as required. On one occasion, a nurse initialed the TAR indicating the treatment was done, but later admitted that she did not complete the dressing change because the resident became agitated, and she forgot to return to complete the task. This resulted in the resident having a blood-stained bandage that was not covering the entire area of the skin tear, and the bandage was dated several days prior to the observation.
Resident-to-Resident Physical Altercation in Dining Room
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from physical abuse by another resident, which is a violation of the resident's right to be free from abuse. The incident involved Resident #4, who has moderately impaired cognition and requires assistance with daily activities, and Resident #5, who also has moderately impaired cognition and a history of aggressive behavior. Both residents were involved in a physical altercation in the dining room, which resulted in injuries to both parties. The altercation occurred when Resident #5, maneuvering through the dining room in a wheelchair, kicked Resident #4's walker to clear a path. This action led Resident #4 to grab Resident #5's wheelchair, prompting Resident #5 to throw a plastic bowl at Resident #4, causing a laceration above the eyebrow. The situation escalated as both residents began hitting each other, resulting in a skin tear on Resident #5's arm. The facility's investigation confirmed the sequence of events through video surveillance and staff interviews. The incident report documented by an LPN and the administrator's review corroborated the physical altercation and the resulting injuries. The facility's policy on abuse, neglect, and resident safety was not effectively implemented to prevent this incident, highlighting a deficiency in ensuring resident safety and protection from abuse.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 37 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Jonesville
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camelot Leisure Living | 15.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 11 | 0 |
| Jena Nursing And Rehabilitation Center, Llc | 16.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 23 | 0 |
| Lasalle Nursing Home | 19.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Plantation Oaks Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 26.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
| Natchez Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center | 26.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 1 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for The Columns Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.