Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around March 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at John J Hainkel Jr Home And Rehabilitation Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to conduct accurate comprehensive assessments for several residents. One resident's MDS assessment did not reflect their prescribed puree diet and swallowing issues, despite clinical records and observations confirming these needs. Additionally, three other residents had incomplete sections on their MDS assessments regarding functional abilities, which were confirmed by the Medicare Case Manager.
The facility failed to implement fall prevention interventions for two residents, as fall mats were not placed as required by their care plans. Additionally, a resident requiring nectar-thickened liquids had access to thin liquids, contrary to their dietary needs. Staff interviews confirmed these deficiencies.
A resident diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder did not receive a required PASARR Level II evaluation. The facility's policy mandates screening for serious mental disorders, but no evidence of such an evaluation was found in the resident's records. Interviews confirmed the oversight.
Inaccurate Comprehensive Assessments for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct accurate comprehensive assessments for four residents, as required by regulations. Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment did not have the necessary sections on functional abilities completed. Similarly, Resident #46 and Resident #64's MDS assessments were missing required sections on functional abilities, which should have been completed during their respective quarterly and annual assessments. These omissions were confirmed by the Medicare Case Manager during an interview. Resident #22's case highlighted discrepancies between the clinical records and the MDS assessment. Despite having a diagnosis of dysphagia and being on a prescribed puree mechanically altered diet with nectar-thickened liquids, Resident #22's MDS indicated no swallowing issues and no mechanically altered diet. Observations and interviews confirmed that Resident #22 was indeed on a puree diet with nectar-thickened liquids, contradicting the MDS assessment. This inconsistency was acknowledged by the Medicare Case Manager, who confirmed the inaccuracies in the MDS documentation.
Failure to Implement Fall and Dietary Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement identified interventions for residents at risk for injuries related to falls. Resident #93, who was cognitively intact, had a care plan that included the use of a fall mat next to the bed while in bed. However, observations revealed that the fall mat was consistently rolled up and placed between the wall and the dresser, rather than being positioned on the floor as required. Interviews with staff and the resident confirmed that the fall mat was not consistently placed as per the care plan. Similarly, Resident #94, who had severely impaired cognition, was also at risk for falls and had a physician's order for a fall mat to be placed at the bedside while in bed. Observations showed that the fall mat was not in place and was instead leaning against the wall. Staff interviews confirmed that the fall mat should have been placed next to the bed as an intervention to prevent falls. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure that thin liquids were not accessible to Resident #22, who required nectar-thickened liquids due to dysphasia and severely impaired cognition. Observations revealed that a water bottle containing thin liquids was accessible on the resident's nightstand, contrary to the prescribed dietary intervention. Staff interviews confirmed that thin liquids should not have been accessible to the resident, indicating a failure to adhere to the prescribed dietary plan.
Failure to Conduct PASARR Level II Evaluation for Resident with Bipolar Disorder
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident with a new diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder was referred for a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II evaluation as required. According to the facility's policy, all applicants to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility must be screened for serious mental disorders or intellectual disabilities. Additionally, the facility is required to notify the state-designated mental health or intellectual disability authority when a resident experiences a significant change in mental or physical condition. However, the facility did not adhere to this policy for Resident #71, who was diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder on 11/18/2024. Resident #71's clinical record showed no evidence of a completed Level II PASARR following the new diagnosis. The resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, suggesting moderate cognitive impairment. Interviews with the social worker and the administrator confirmed that a Level II PASARR was not completed for Resident #71, despite the new diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder, which was a requirement according to the facility's policy.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 146 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 4 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near New Orleans
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covenant Home | 0.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Chateau De Notre Dame Community Care Center | 2.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Wynhoven Community Care Center | 2.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Marrero Healthcare Center | 2.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Jefferson Healthcare Center | 3.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for John J Hainkel Jr Home And Rehabilitation Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.