Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Rockcastle Health & Rehabilitation Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Failure to Timely Report Abuse Allegations: The facility did not report multiple abuse allegations to the SSA within the required 2 hours. One allegation involved a cognitively intact resident reporting that a roommate with severe cognitive impairment was naked and masturbating in the room, and another involved a resident reporting that an RN yelled at her and told her to stop calling the front office. The Administrator determined neither event met the facility’s abuse definition before reporting, rather than treating them as allegations requiring immediate notification.
A resident with multiple medical conditions and moderate cognitive impairment, who was dependent on staff for ADLs, did not receive needed fingernail care. Over several days, observations showed the resident's nails remained long and unclean, despite facility policy and staff expectations. Interviews revealed confusion among CNAs and nursing staff about responsibility for nail care, especially for residents with diabetes, resulting in the resident not receiving appropriate hygiene assistance.
A resident with intact cognition and diagnoses including CKD, emphysema, and COPD had potassium chloride left at the bedside for later self-administration, even though the order did not approve self-administration and the care plan had no self-administration assessment for that medication. The facility’s assessment covered only two inhalers, and an LPN stated she left the potassium per the resident’s request and was not familiar with the assessment process required before leaving a medication at the bedside.
A resident with intact cognition and multiple chronic diagnoses was moved to another room, but the facility did not document the room change or provide written notice explaining the reason, effective date, and new location as required by policy. Staff gave conflicting explanations for the move, including roommate incompatibility and concerns about shared drinks, while the SSD said she sometimes forgot to document room changes and was unaware written notices were required.
A resident with dysphagia, gastroparesis, and severe cognitive impairment received medication via GT without staff first verifying tube placement. An RN crushed and administered the medication through the GT and flushed it before and after, while stating she forgot to check placement. The resident’s orders allowed no food or medication by mouth, and the facility policy required verification of tube placement before enteral medication administration.
Oxygen was not consistently delivered at the physician-ordered rate for a resident with COPD, moderate cognitive impairment, and total dependence for mobility. Staff signed the MAR each shift that oxygen had been given, yet observations showed the concentrator set below and above the ordered 2 LPM via NC. An RN, LPN, DON, and Administrator all stated oxygen should be set and verified according to the provider's order before MAR sign-off.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment, schizophrenia, anxiety, Parkinson’s disease, and Alzheimer’s disease had documented ritualistic and inappropriate sexual behaviors, but staff did not consistently monitor or document the behaviors in the chart or on shift reports. The care plan addressed some behaviors, yet the physician orders did not include all of the identified behaviors, and multiple staff members were unaware of or did not document reports that the resident was naked in shared spaces, masturbating, or urinating in inappropriate places. Roommates reported being offended and distressed by the resident’s repeated nudity and sexualized behavior.
Failure to arrange follow-up specialty appointments and referrals: A resident with difficulty walking, unsteadiness, and muscle weakness had an orthopedic follow-up scheduled and later received cardiology and hematology referrals, but the record showed no evidence the follow-up visit occurred or that the referrals were acted upon. The CS stated she did not follow up, did not reschedule the orthopedic visit after an insurance issue, and had no documentation showing attempts to make the appointments; the DON and Administrator expected timely scheduling and documentation.
A facility exceeded the allowed medication error rate, with 4 errors in 32 opportunities. Errors included an LPN crushing an enteric-coated aspirin, an LPN giving insulin without priming the pen, an LPN preparing the wrong dose of diltiazem ER, and an RN initially preparing the wrong dose of buspirone. Staff interviews showed gaps in medication administration knowledge and inconsistent use of the MAR and medication labels.
Failure to Honor Resident Food Preferences: A cognitively intact resident with a history of malnutrition had a documented dislike for oatmeal, yet continued to receive oatmeal on breakfast trays. The resident filed a grievance about receiving food she did not prefer, and staff interviews confirmed the concern was known, but the DM stated oatmeal was still being sent because the resident had previously eaten it and had an order for fortified foods.
Two residents suffered fractures due to inadequate supervision and improper use of assistive devices. One resident was injured during wheelchair transport and transfer without a gait belt, while another was manually transferred against the care plan, resulting in humeral fractures. The facility failed to follow policies for gait belts and mechanical lifts, leading to these deficiencies.
A facility failed to implement comprehensive care plans for two residents, resulting in significant deficiencies. One resident, requiring a mechanical lift for transfers, was manually transferred by CNAs, leading to bilateral humeral neck fractures. Another resident, with COPD, did not have a respiratory care plan reflecting their continuous oxygen therapy. These incidents highlight lapses in care plan adherence and documentation, impacting resident safety.
The facility failed to provide a safe and homelike environment, with loose flooring strips creating fall hazards and a malfunctioning sink requiring rubber bands to turn off the water. Staff interviews revealed a lack of awareness and documentation of these issues, with the resident expressing dissatisfaction with the temporary solution.
A facility failed to provide adequate respiratory care for a resident with COPD, as they did not develop a comprehensive care plan for the resident's oxygen therapy. Despite a physician's order for continuous oxygen at 2 LPM, the resident's oxygen concentrator filter was observed to be dusty over several days. Staff interviews revealed confusion about responsibilities for maintaining the oxygen equipment, with some believing it was the oxygen company's duty, while others stated it should be done by night shift nurses. The DON and Administrator expected filters to be clean, but there was a lack of consistent action to ensure this.
Failure to Timely Report Abuse Allegations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to immediately report allegations of abuse to the State Survey Agency within no more than 2 hours for three residents. Facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation of Property, stated that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment are to be reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, and that the Facility Administrator is responsible for reporting investigation results to applicable State agencies as required by law. Instead of reporting allegations immediately, the facility determined whether the events met its definition of abuse before notifying the State Agency. One allegation involved two residents in the same room. One resident had diagnoses including Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia, cognitive communication deficit, schizophrenia, generalized anxiety disorder, and other Alzheimer's disease, and had a BIMS score of 2/15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The other resident had diagnoses of depression and anxiety disorder and had a BIMS score of 15/15 indicating intact cognition. The cognitively intact resident reported that he observed his roommate naked at the foot of his bed masturbating near the shared closet and stated he was offended and embarrassed by the behavior. The SSD and Administrator were aware of the concern, but the Administrator did not report it to the State Agency because he did not believe it met the definition of sexual abuse and relied on the roommate's recollection of the event. A second allegation involved a resident with intact cognition who reported that an RN yelled at her and told her to stop calling the front office and to quit aggravating others. The allegation was reported to the Administrator shortly after the resident interview, but the facility did not report it to the State Agency within 2 hours. The Administrator later stated he, the DON, and SSD spoke with the resident and the nurse, concluded the incident was not abuse, and considered it a customer service issue rather than an allegation requiring immediate reporting.
Failure to Provide Needed Nail Care for Dependent Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary personal hygiene services to a resident who was dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), specifically in maintaining clean and trimmed fingernails. The resident, who had a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus, muscle weakness, osteoarthritis, and cancer, was assessed as having moderate cognitive impairment and required substantial to maximal staff assistance for personal hygiene. Despite facility policy requiring staff to assist residents unable to perform their own ADLs, multiple observations over several days showed the resident's fingernails remained long, jagged, and unclean. Family members confirmed that the resident's nails needed trimming and expressed that they expected the facility to provide this care. Interviews with CNAs and nursing staff revealed confusion regarding responsibility for nail care, particularly for residents with diabetes. CNAs stated they were responsible for nail care on shower days unless the resident had diabetes, in which case the nurse was to be notified. However, the resident's assigned CNA had not noticed the condition of the nails and had not provided the necessary care, while the nurse had not been alerted to the need. The DON and Administrator both stated their expectation that residents' nails be kept clean and trimmed as allowed, but the resident continued to have untrimmed and unclean nails throughout the period of observation.
Medication Left at Bedside Without Self-Administration Assessment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for self-administration of medications was assessed to determine whether self-administration was clinically appropriate and safe for potassium chloride. The facility policy required a prescriber’s order and an interdisciplinary team assessment of the resident’s cognitive, physical, and visual ability before medications could be self-administered, but R35’s care plan contained no information about self-administration of medications. R35 was re-admitted on 07/10/2025 with diagnoses including pneumonia, chronic kidney disease, emphysema, and COPD, and the quarterly MDS dated 06/23/2025 showed a BIMS score of 14 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. R35 had an order for potassium chloride extended release 20 mEq daily, but the order did not indicate approval for self-administration. During observation on 08/26/2025, a potassium pill was found in a medication cup on R35’s bedside table, and R35 stated nurses left it there for her to take at lunch per her request. R35 said she thought she was approved to keep and administer some medications, but was unsure about the potassium. The LPN who left the medication stated she did so because the resident wanted to take it with food and that she was not familiar with the process for conducting an assessment before leaving a medication at the bedside. The facility’s self-administration assessment addressed only two inhalers and did not include potassium chloride. The DON and Administrator stated staff were expected to follow the facility policy, including completing a self-administration assessment and ensuring an order was in place.
Failure to Provide Written Notice for Room Change
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide written notification before changing a resident’s room, including the reason for the change, for 1 of 40 residents sampled for room change. The facility policy titled, Room/Roommate Change Notification Policy, required notice to be given before an intra-facility transfer except in limited circumstances, and required the notice to include the reason for transfer, the effective date, and the location of the new room. The policy also stated the interdisciplinary team was to participate in room relocation decisions and that the notice was to be documented in the electronic medical record. Resident #3 was admitted in 2018 and most recently readmitted in 2024. The resident’s diagnoses included hemiparesis and hemiplegia following a cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side, type 2 diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and PTSD. The resident’s MDS assessment showed a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition, and the care plan noted the resident should be fully informed in advance about care and treatment and any changes. The resident was relocated to another room on 08/19/2025, but review of the resident’s social services progress notes and resident progress notes found no documentation of the room change and no documentation that the resident received written notice. During interview, the resident stated she had been moved out of her room about a week earlier and said the move was related to her former roommate buying her drinks. The former roommate stated she had bought drinks for the resident on her own free will and that the resident had not asked her to do so. Staff gave conflicting accounts of why the move occurred, with one nurse stating she had been told the resident was moved because she took drinks from the roommate, while an LPN stated the resident had previously expressed interest in a room change because the roommate kept her awake at night. The SSD stated she sometimes forgot to document room changes and was unaware she was supposed to give residents written notices. The DON and Administrator stated the room change had been discussed, but neither could clearly recall the reason, and the Administrator expected documentation in the chart to support the move.
Failure to Verify GT Placement Before Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure services were provided to prevent complications of a gastrostomy tube for one of two sampled residents, R49, when staff did not check GT placement before administering medication through the tube. R49 was admitted with diagnoses including dysphagia following a stroke and gastroparesis, had severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 5/15, was dependent on staff for eating, and received most nutrition and water through tube feeding. The resident’s care plan identified enteral nutrition, and the physician orders indicated no food or medication by mouth, but there was no order to check GT placement before medication administration. During observation, RN11 prepared crushed medication mixed with water, flushed the GT with 30 ml of water, administered the medication through the GT, and flushed again without checking tube placement first. RN11 stated she had been taught to check placement by listening for air but forgot to do so because she was nervous. The DON stated she would need to read and verify the facility policy for checking GT placement before medication administration, and the Administrator stated he expected staff to follow the facility’s policy and physician’s orders before giving medication via GT.
Oxygen Delivered at Incorrect Flow Rate
Penalty
Summary
Safe and appropriate respiratory care was not provided for a resident with COPD when oxygen was not consistently delivered at the physician-ordered rate of 2 LPM via nasal cannula. The resident was admitted and later re-admitted with diagnoses including COPD, type 2 diabetes mellitus, muscle weakness, osteoarthritis, and cancer. The resident's significant change MDS showed moderate cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 9 out of 15 and dependence on staff for all mobility. The care plan directed staff to administer oxygen as ordered and observe oxygen precautions. The MAR for August 2025 showed a physician order from 05/23/2025 for oxygen at 2 LPM via nasal cannula as needed, with staff signing each shift that oxygen had been given from 08/25/2025 through the day shift on 08/29/2025. However, observations showed the resident receiving oxygen at 1.5 LPM on one occasion and the concentrator set at 3 LPM on another. During interview, an RN stated staff were to follow the physician's order for the LPM of oxygen, and an LPN stated nurses were to set the concentrator to the ordered amount and check it each shift, adding that the resident was unable to adjust it independently. The LPN later observed the concentrator set at 2.5 LPM despite the order for 2 LPM. The DON and Administrator stated it was their expectation that oxygen be delivered as ordered and that nurses verify the rate before signing the MAR.
Failure to Monitor and Document Resident Behavioral Health Symptoms
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide behavioral health care and services for a resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple psychiatric and neurologic diagnoses, including Parkinson’s disease with fluctuations, cognitive communication deficit, schizophrenia, generalized anxiety disorder, and Alzheimer’s disease. The resident’s care plan and physician orders addressed some behaviors, including agitation, anxiousness, restlessness, hallucinations/delusions, sadness, tearfulness, self-isolation, yelling, combativeness during care, ritual behaviors, urinating in inappropriate places, and inappropriate social and sexual behaviors. However, the record showed that multiple behaviors were not consistently monitored or documented, including ritual behaviors involving undressing to toilet and washing at the sink, urinating in inappropriate places, and inappropriate sexual behaviors. The resident’s treatment administration history for the relevant period contained no documentation of those additional behaviors, and progress notes from the resident’s admission through the later review period contained no further documentation of sexual behaviors or the ritualistic behavior of removing clothing until one note described the resident taking off clothing when toileting and repeatedly cleaning his genitals at the sink before dressing again. The physician order report did not include orders to monitor those additional behaviors each shift, despite the care plan identifying them. Staff interviews showed that several staff members were aware the resident sometimes removed clothing or performed hygiene rituals, but many were not aware of reported sexual behaviors or resident complaints, and some stated behaviors were not reported to them or were not documented. The resident’s behaviors affected roommates. One roommate stated he was tired of seeing the resident naked in the room and reported that the resident would play with himself. Another roommate stated the resident walked around naked almost every other day and came out of the bathroom naked or without pants. A third roommate stated the resident walked around naked and urinated in the sink and on the floor. The administrator acknowledged awareness of concerns about the resident’s sexual behaviors and ritualistic tendencies, but also stated there was no documentation of a conversation with one roommate about the resident’s masturbatory behavior. The medical director stated there had been mention of masturbatory behaviors, but nothing was documented to his knowledge, and the DON stated behaviors should be monitored in accordance with policy, while also stating the facility did not have a policy related to monitoring resident behaviors.
Failure to Arrange Follow-Up Specialty Appointments and Referrals
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to assist with and provide medically related social services for one resident by not ensuring follow-up appointments and referrals were made and kept as needed. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including difficulty walking, unsteadiness on feet, and muscle weakness, and had intact cognition with a BIMS score of 15/15. The care plan directed staff to provide services according to the plan of care to enhance optimum wellbeing and prevent hospitalizations. Progress notes showed new orders to schedule an orthopedic referral, and later documented that the resident returned from an orthopedic appointment with a follow-up appointment scheduled for May. Additional progress notes documented that the resident went to a nephrology appointment and returned with referrals for cardiology and hematology, and later notes still referenced a hematology referral. However, the record contained no evidence that the resident was seen for the follow-up orthopedic appointment or that the cardiology and hematology referrals were acted upon. During interviews, the resident stated the orthopedic appointment had not been rescheduled after an insurance issue, and the Central Supply/Transporter stated she did not follow up, did not reschedule the orthopedic appointment, and was unaware of the cardiology and hematology referrals. Staff interviews showed appointments were typically entered into a binder and the CS gathered the information, but there was no documented evidence that the appointments had been attempted or scheduled for this resident.
Medication Administration Errors Exceeded Allowed Rate
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5 percent. Surveyors identified 4 medication errors in 32 opportunities, resulting in a 12.5 percent error rate. The errors involved 4 of 5 residents observed during medication pass, including residents with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, diabetes mellitus, COPD, hypertension, and anxiety/depressed mood. Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration General Guidelines stated that medications are to be administered in accordance with prescriber orders and that long-acting, extended release, or enteric-coated dosage forms should generally not be crushed. For one resident with Alzheimer's disease, the MAR included an order for delayed release/enteric coated aspirin 81 mg daily. During observation, an LPN crushed all of the resident's medications, including the enteric coated aspirin, and placed the crushed medications together in a cup. The nurse stated the aspirin did not have a warning label and that she had no access to a list of medications that should not be crushed. After crushing the medications, she read the card and saw it said not to crush, then discarded the medications and started over. For another resident with diabetes, an LPN administered NovoLog insulin without priming the FlexPen first. The nurse stated she had not been taught to prime the insulin pen and was unaware it needed to be primed. For a resident ordered diltiazem extended-release 240 mg, an LPN prepared only one capsule before being stopped, then acknowledged the resident should receive two capsules. For a resident ordered buspirone 10 mg three times daily, an RN removed a 5 mg tablet, placed one tablet in the cup, and committed to giving only one tablet before being stopped and correcting the dose after rereading the label. The DON stated medication pass observations were not completed yearly on each nurse and were only completed when there was a need, and the Administrator stated he expected staff to follow facility policy, best practice, and pharmacy recommendations.
Failure to Honor Resident Food Preferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accommodate the food preference of one resident who was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 14/15 and had a history of moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. The resident’s clinical record included a documented dislike of oatmeal cereal, added in December 2024, and the resident later voiced a grievance that she was receiving food she did not prefer. The grievance investigation noted the resident had concerns with food items not liked and stated the expected result was that she would receive items she preferred. Despite this, the resident continued to be served oatmeal on breakfast trays. During an observation, the resident’s breakfast included a bowl of oatmeal, and she stated she did not want it. On another occasion, she again reported receiving oatmeal at breakfast. Interviews with the SSD, DM, CNA, DON, and Administrator confirmed the resident had complained about food preferences, that dietary staff were involved, and that the resident’s preferences should have been updated, but the DM stated she was not aware the resident did not like oatmeal and that oatmeal was still being sent because the resident had previously eaten it and had an order for fortified foods.
Failure to Prevent Accidents and Injuries Due to Inadequate Supervision and Assistive Device Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and use of assistive devices to prevent accidents and injuries for two residents. One resident, who had a history of leg amputation and other health issues, suffered two fractures while residing at the facility. The first incident occurred when the resident was being transported in a wheelchair without the right foot pedal, causing his leg to drop and fracture. The second incident happened during a transfer to a wheelchair without using a gait belt, resulting in a tibial fracture. The facility did not report the incidents to the State Survey Agency, and there was no documented investigation for the first incident. Another resident, who was nonverbal and required total care, was transferred manually instead of using a mechanical lift as per the care plan. This resulted in bilateral humeral neck fractures. The facility's investigation revealed that the fractures were caused by the manual transfer performed by a CNA who did not follow the care plan. The resident was later found with bruising and swelling, and an x-ray confirmed the fractures. The facility's policies and procedures for using gait belts and mechanical lifts were not followed, leading to these deficiencies. The CNAs involved in the incidents did not adhere to the care plans, and there was a lack of proper supervision and training. The facility's failure to implement effective systems and ensure staff compliance with care plans resulted in significant injuries to the residents.
Failure to Implement Comprehensive Care Plans Leads to Resident Harm
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for two residents, leading to significant deficiencies. For one resident, the care plan required the use of a mechanical lift with two staff members for transfers. However, on two occasions, CNAs transferred the resident manually, contrary to the care plan. This resulted in the resident sustaining bilateral humeral neck fractures, which were later confirmed by x-ray. The facility's investigation concluded that the fractures were caused by the manual transfer, and the CNA responsible was terminated for not following the care plan. Another resident was admitted with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and required continuous oxygen therapy. Despite this, the facility failed to develop a respiratory care plan that included the resident's oxygen usage. Observations confirmed that the resident was on oxygen therapy as ordered, but the care plan did not reflect this requirement. Interviews with the DON and Administrator revealed an expectation that all physician orders, including oxygen therapy, should be included in the care plans, but this was not done for the resident. The deficiencies highlight a failure in the facility's processes to ensure that care plans are comprehensive and adhered to by staff. The lack of adherence to the care plan for the first resident resulted in physical harm, while the omission of a respiratory care plan for the second resident indicated a gap in the facility's documentation and care planning processes. These incidents underscore the importance of accurate and complete care plans to ensure resident safety and well-being.
Failure to Maintain Safe and Homelike Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for its residents, as evidenced by several observations and interviews. During an initial tour, it was noted that the flooring at the entrances to the East Wing and another wing had yellow/black strips that were loose and cracked, creating a potential fall hazard. Additionally, in one resident's room, the hot water knob on the sink was in disrepair, requiring the use of rubber bands to turn it off, which was ineffective as water continued to run. The resident expressed dissatisfaction with this makeshift solution, stating it did not feel homelike. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of awareness and action regarding these issues. The Maintenance Assistant admitted to not noticing the loose tape despite frequent walks over it and acknowledged the fall hazard it posed. The Director of Nursing and the Administrator both recognized the risks associated with the flooring and the sink issue but noted that the resident had refused maintenance work on the sink. However, there was no documentation of such refusals. The Administrator was unaware of any work orders for the flooring issue, indicating a communication gap in addressing maintenance problems.
Failure to Provide Adequate Respiratory Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for a resident, identified as Resident 242, who required oxygen therapy. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Despite a physician's order for continuous oxygen therapy at two liters per minute via nasal cannula, the facility did not develop or implement a comprehensive respiratory care plan for the resident's oxygen usage. Observations over several days revealed that the resident was wearing oxygen, but the oxygen concentrator's filter was covered in dust, indicating a lack of maintenance. Interviews with staff, including a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), a Registered Nurse (RN), the Director of Nursing (DON), and the Administrator, revealed inconsistencies in the understanding and execution of responsibilities regarding the maintenance of oxygen equipment. The LPN and RN believed the oxygen company was responsible for changing filters, while the DON stated that cleaning should occur during night shifts and as needed. The Administrator expected nurses to clean filters during routine rounds. The failure to maintain clean oxygen filters could potentially lead to respiratory distress and improper oxygen delivery, although the DON stated that a dusty filter posed no risk to the resident.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 26 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Brodhead
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockcastle Regional Hospital And Respiratory Care | 5.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| The Terrace Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 14.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Berea Health And Rehabilitation | 15.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Stanford Crossing | 16.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 17 | 2 |
| Landmark Of Lancaster Rehabilitation And Nursing C | 17.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Rockcastle Health & Rehabilitation Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.