Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Parkview Health And Rehabilitation Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility did not employ a full-time Certified Dietary Manager for 43 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The staff member acting as Dietary Manager had not completed the required certification course, contrary to facility policy requiring supervision by a certified dietary manager or equivalent.
Surveyors identified multiple failures in food storage, preparation, and serving practices, including staff not using required beard and mustache covers, unclean fans and shelving, uncovered and unlabeled food items, use of expired sanitizing strips, improper thermometer sanitation, and direct hand contact with eating surfaces of utensils.
The facility did not submit accurate PBJ staffing data to CMS, resulting in reports of low weekend nurse staffing and missing 24-hour licensed nurse coverage, despite internal records showing adequate staffing. The facility also lacked a policy for PBJ submission, and the process was managed by corporate staff with administrative nurse review.
The facility's QAA program did not identify or address numerous deficiencies, including failures in resident dignity, proper documentation, care planning, incident reporting, staff background checks, nurse staffing, medication management, food service, and environmental sanitation. Despite expectations for department heads to report concerns and conduct mock surveys, the facility lacked effective action plans, resulting in widespread unaddressed issues affecting most residents.
A licensed nurse was found to have pre-set multiple resident-labeled medication cups in the medication cart, contrary to facility policy and professional standards. This practice was acknowledged by the nurse and confirmed as inappropriate by administrative staff, as medications are required to be prepared and administered only when the resident is ready to receive them.
Staff did not activate a motion detector floor alarm for a resident requiring supervision, as outlined in the care plan, and failed to keep hazardous chemicals locked in the laundry room. These actions resulted in an environment that was not free from accident hazards, placing residents at risk.
Surveyors found that expired medications, including Docusate sodium, Aspirin, Vitamin B12, and Ibuprofen, were not disposed of as required. A nurse confirmed the expired drugs should have been removed, and an administrative nurse stated that both the night shift and nurses administering medications are responsible for checking and disposing of expired items. Facility policy requires routine inspection and destruction of outdated medications, but these procedures were not consistently followed.
The facility did not offer, obtain informed declination, or document physician contraindication for pneumococcal vaccinations, including PVC20, for several residents. Medical records lacked evidence of consent or refusal, and none of the sampled residents had been offered or received the vaccine since admission, despite facility policy requiring assessment and documentation in line with CDC guidelines.
Staff administered a blood sugar test and insulin injection to a resident at a dining room table in view of others, and failed to cover another resident's urinary drainage bag, violating privacy and dignity standards as outlined in facility policy.
The facility did not provide required Medicare notices, including the ABN and NOMNC forms, to three residents or their representatives when skilled services ended. This failure meant that the residents or their representatives were not properly informed about potential financial liability for services not covered by Medicare, as confirmed by administrative staff and record review.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of falls was placed in a wheelchair with a Lap Buddy restraint without a physician's order, assessment, or care plan documentation. Staff used the device to prevent the resident from standing and falling, but the required medical documentation and justification for restraint use were not present.
A Housekeeping Supervisor was employed without a documented background check, as confirmed by administrative staff and the employee herself. The facility lacked both the required background check documentation and a policy on background checks.
The facility did not promptly report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft, nor did it communicate the results of its investigation to the proper authorities as required.
The facility did not provide required bed hold notifications to two residents during emergency hospital transfers and failed to notify the LTCO of three resident discharges. Documentation and staff interviews confirmed that neither the residents nor their representatives received information about the bed-hold policy, and the ombudsman was not informed of the discharges, contrary to facility policy.
A resident with a history of UTIs and multiple comorbidities was receiving daily prophylactic antibiotics per ongoing physician orders, but the care plan was not updated to reflect this intervention. The care plan addressed incontinence and skin care but omitted the resident's UTI history and antibiotic use, and there was no documented physician rationale for the continued medication. The facility also could not provide a policy on care plan revisions.
A resident with multiple chronic conditions received long-term prophylactic antibiotics without documented physician review or rationale, and the consultant pharmacist failed to identify or report this ongoing use during monthly drug regimen reviews. The care plan lacked documentation of UTI history or antibiotic prophylaxis, and pharmacy reviews did not address the prolonged antibiotic therapy.
A resident with multiple chronic conditions was administered Nitrofurantoin daily for UTI prophylaxis over several months without documented physician review or rationale. The care plan did not indicate a history of UTIs or need for prophylactic antibiotics, and staff could not provide required documentation of antibiotic use review, resulting in the resident receiving unnecessary medication.
A resident receiving hospice care, who was dependent on staff and had severe cognitive impairment, did not have a care plan that included key hospice information such as contact numbers, visit schedules, and details about supplies and medications. Staff confirmed the absence of this information, despite facility policy requiring coordinated care planning with the hospice provider.
The facility did not maintain proper documentation of the Medical Director's attendance at a required QA&A committee meeting, as the signature was missing from the attendance roster. Staff reported the Medical Director was present, but no signed record was available, and the facility could not provide a QA&A policy.
The facility did not post required daily nurse staffing information for several days, as confirmed by administrative staff and direct observation. The missing postings included details such as the facility name, date, census, and actual hours worked by RNs, LPNs/LVNs, and CNAs, in violation of facility policy.
Lack of Certified Dietary Manager in Food and Nutrition Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to employ a full-time Certified Dietary Manager for 43 residents who receive their meals from the kitchen. During an observation, the staff member identified as the Dietary Manager stated she was still in the process of completing the Certified Dietary Manager course and had not yet obtained certification. The facility's policy requires support staff to work under the supervision of a registered dietitian nutritionist (RDN), certified dietary manager, or director of food and nutrition services, with delegation of tasks based on competency and scope of practice. At the time of the survey, the individual acting as Dietary Manager did not meet the certification requirements outlined in facility policy.
Food Storage and Sanitation Deficiencies in Dietary Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the storage, preparation, and serving of food for 43 residents. Observations included dietary staff with facial hair not wearing beard or mustache covers, and a fan above the microwave area with excessive grey/black lint on the blades and screens, blowing toward the steam table. The dining room refrigerator/freezer contained two uncovered and undated containers of chocolate ice cream. Additionally, a fan near the three-compartment sink was also found with excessive lint, and the lower shelving throughout the kitchen was unclean with food debris and dark particles. The Hydrion QT-40 chemical sanitizing strips used for monitoring sanitizer strength were expired. Further deficiencies were observed in food handling practices. A dietary staff member checked food temperatures without sanitizing the thermometer between foods, and another staff member sorted clean spoons from a dishwasher rack by touching the eating surfaces with bare hands. These actions were verified by dietary staff, who acknowledged that proper procedures were not followed, including the need for beard and mustache covers, labeling and covering food items, cleaning fans and shelving, sanitizing thermometers, and avoiding direct contact with eating surfaces of utensils.
Failure to Submit Accurate PBJ Staffing Data
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to submit complete and accurate direct care staffing information through Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ) as required by CMS. Although CMS PBJ reports for two consecutive fiscal quarters indicated excessively low weekend nurse staffing and a lack of 24-hour licensed nursing coverage on specific dates, a review of the facility's own nursing schedules and coverage records for those periods showed that adequate staffing and licensed nurse coverage were actually maintained. The discrepancy arose because the PBJ data submitted did not accurately reflect the facility's actual staffing levels. Additionally, the facility did not have a policy in place related to PBJ submission, and the process involved corporate staff submitting the data with review by the administrative nurse.
QAA Program Fails to Identify and Address Multiple Facility Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) program failed to identify and address multiple issues affecting 33 out of 44 residents. Deficiencies included failure to treat two residents with dignity, improper completion of beneficiary notices for three residents, and lack of physician orders, assessments, and updated care plans for a resident's use of a lap buddy. The facility did not provide documentation of a background check for a staff member prior to employment, failed to report a resident's fall with fracture and another resident's injury to the State Survey Agency, and did not provide required notifications or bed hold policies to residents or their representatives during transfers and discharges. Additionally, care plans were not revised for appropriate use of prophylactic antibiotics, and safety measures such as floor motion detectors and secure chemical storage were not consistently implemented. Further deficiencies included not ensuring a Registered Nurse was on duty for the required hours, failure to post nurse staffing information, and the pharmacy consultant not reporting the physician's rationale for continued antibiotic use. The facility also failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were not expired, did not employ sufficient staff with appropriate competencies in food and nutrition services, and did not maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen environment. Hospice services information was not integrated into care plans, and the medical director did not sign in on quarterly QAA meetings. Despite department heads being expected to bring concerns to QAA meetings and conducting mock surveys, the facility did not develop or implement effective plans of action to address these issues, as evidenced by the multiple deficiencies cited.
Failure to Adhere to Professional Standards in Medication Preparation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to meet professional standards of quality in medication administration. During an observation of the medication cart on the long-term care unit, four handwritten, resident-labeled medication cups containing various medications were found pre-set in the top drawer. A licensed nurse admitted to pre-setting these medications and acknowledged awareness that this practice was not permitted. The facility's policy requires medications to be administered by licensed staff as ordered and in accordance with professional standards to prevent contamination or infection. An administrative nurse confirmed that medications should not be pre-set before the resident is ready to take them.
Failure to Activate Resident Alarm and Secure Hazardous Chemicals
Penalty
Summary
Staff failed to ensure a safe environment free from accident hazards by not activating a motion detector floor alarm for a resident with macular degeneration and a history of pain, who required supervision and assistance with transfers and ambulation. The resident's care plan specifically instructed staff to ensure the motion alarm was on whenever the resident was in his room. However, observations revealed the alarm was not activated while the resident was present, and staff confirmed the alarm should have been on according to the care plan. Additionally, chemicals including disinfectants, laundry bleach, lime scale remover, and detergent were found unsecured in an unlocked laundry room on the dementia unit. Labels on these chemicals indicated they could cause harm if ingested, inhaled, or if they came into contact with skin or eyes. Staff and consultants verified that these chemicals should have been stored in a locked room, as required by facility policy, to prevent resident access and minimize accident hazards.
Expired Medications Not Disposed of Timely
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed that the facility failed to dispose of expired medications in a timely manner. During an inspection of the East medication room, several expired stock medications were found, including Docusate sodium, Aspirin, Vitamin B12, and Ibuprofen, all past their respective expiration dates. A licensed nurse confirmed that these expired drugs should have been disposed of, and an administrative nurse stated that the night shift is responsible for checking the medication cart for expired medications, with each nurse administering medications also expected to check and dispose of expired items. The facility's policy requires that all medications be stored according to manufacturer recommendations and that medication rooms are routinely inspected for discontinued, outdated, defective, or deteriorated medications. The policy also specifies that such medications are to be destroyed in accordance with the facility's procedures. Despite these policies, expired medications remained in the medication room, indicating that the required checks and disposals were not consistently performed.
Failure to Offer and Document Pneumococcal Vaccinations per CDC Guidelines
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to offer, obtain informed declination, or secure physician-documented contraindication for pneumococcal vaccinations, including the PVC20, for five sampled residents. Review of the clinical medical records for these residents showed no evidence that the residents or their representatives received or signed a consent to receive or decline the pneumococcal vaccine. Additionally, none of the five residents had been offered or received the pneumococcal vaccine since their admission to the facility, as confirmed by their electronic health records. An administrative nurse confirmed that immunization status is assessed upon admission and that the Web IZ portal is used to check prior immunizations. The nurse also stated that consent forms are provided to residents or their representatives for signature. However, she acknowledged that due to workload and issues with insurance coverage for the vaccine, she had not completed the process for some residents. The facility's policy requires offering pneumococcal immunization in accordance with CDC guidelines, assessment upon admission, and documentation of consent or refusal, but these steps were not followed for the sampled residents.
Failure to Maintain Resident Dignity During Care Procedures
Penalty
Summary
Staff failed to maintain and enhance resident dignity and respect by administering a finger stick blood sugar test and an insulin injection to a resident at the dining room table, in full view of other residents and visitors. During the observation, a licensed nurse performed these procedures while two other residents and two staff were seated at the same table, and seven additional residents were present in the dining room. Additionally, staff did not place a privacy bag on another resident's urinary drainage bag, leaving it exposed. These actions were verified by a nurse consultant, who confirmed that such procedures should not be conducted in public areas and that privacy should be maintained. The facility's own policy requires staff to protect and promote residents' rights, treat each resident with respect and dignity, and maintain privacy during care and procedures.
Failure to Provide Required Medicare Coverage and Liability Notices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide required Medicare notices to three residents or their representatives regarding the end of skilled services and potential financial liability for services not covered by Medicare. Specifically, one resident or their representative did not receive the completed Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) form 10055, and two other residents or their representatives did not receive either the ABN form 10055 or the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form 10123. These forms are intended to inform beneficiaries that Medicare may not pay for certain skilled therapy services and to outline their options and potential financial responsibilities. The lack of these notices was confirmed by administrative staff during the survey. The facility's policy required timely issuance of these notices, including hand delivery and proper documentation, to ensure residents and their representatives were aware of Medicare eligibility, coverage, and any changes in charges. The policy also specified that the Business Office Manager or designee was responsible for issuing these notices and that the current CMS-approved versions of the forms must be used. Despite these requirements, the facility did not provide the necessary forms to the affected residents or their representatives when skilled services ended, as verified through record review and staff interviews.
Failure to Obtain Physician Order and Assessment for Use of Lap Buddy Restraint
Penalty
Summary
A resident with diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance, transient ischemic attack, traumatic subdural hematoma, muscle weakness, and unsteadiness was observed using a Lap Buddy device in a wheelchair. The resident's medical record documented severely impaired cognition and a history of multiple falls, with care plans addressing fall risk but lacking any mention of the Lap Buddy. During observation, staff placed the Lap Buddy across the resident's lap to prevent him from standing and falling, as he had previously attempted to ambulate independently. The resident was able to remove the device when prompted by staff, but otherwise it was used to restrict his movement. The facility failed to provide a physician's order, an assessment, or a care plan for the use of the Lap Buddy as a restraint. The resident's electronic medical record did not contain documentation supporting the use of the device, and staff interviews confirmed that the device was used to prevent the resident from standing due to fall risk. The facility's policy requires that restraints only be used with proper medical justification and documentation, which was not present in this case.
Failure to Conduct Background Check for Housekeeping Supervisor
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct or provide documentation of a background check for the Housekeeping Supervisor, who had been employed since 1979, left, and was rehired in 1991. Review of background check records showed no evidence that a background check was completed for this staff member. Administrative staff confirmed the absence of documentation, attributing it to the long tenure of the employee. The Housekeeping Supervisor was observed working in the facility, and during an interview, confirmed her employment history. Additionally, the facility was unable to provide a policy regarding background checks for staff.
Failure to Timely Report Suspected Abuse, Neglect, or Theft
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and did not report the results of the investigation to the proper authorities. This deficiency was identified based on the facility's lack of prompt action in notifying the appropriate agencies when an incident of suspected abuse, neglect, or theft occurred. The report indicates that the required notifications and investigation results were not communicated as mandated.
Failure to Provide Bed Hold and Ombudsman Notifications During Resident Discharge and Transfer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide required Bed Hold Notifications to two residents at the time of their emergency transfers to the hospital. In both cases, the residents had significant medical histories, including heart failure, osteoarthritis, pain, Parkinson’s disease, diabetes, depression, and repeated falls. Documentation showed that neither the residents nor their representatives received information about the facility’s bed-hold policy at the time of transfer, as required by the facility’s own policy and federal regulations. Administrative staff confirmed that the notifications were not provided during interviews. Additionally, the facility did not notify the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) of the discharges for three residents. Review of records and staff interviews revealed that the last notification to the ombudsman had been made several months prior, and there was no evidence that the ombudsman was informed of the recent discharges. This was despite the facility’s policy stating that such notifications should be made, either at the time of transfer or via a monthly list. The documentation and interviews indicated that the facility’s processes for both bed-hold notification and ombudsman notification were not followed for the residents involved. The lack of timely and appropriate notifications was confirmed by administrative staff and was not in accordance with the facility’s written policies.
Failure to Revise Care Plan for Prophylactic Antibiotic Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to revise the care plan for a resident with a history of urinary tract infections (UTIs) to include the ongoing use of prophylactic antibiotics. The resident's electronic medical record documented multiple diagnoses, including chronic kidney disease, anxiety disorder, dehydration, hypertension, restlessness, agitation, dementia, and anemia. The resident's Minimum Data Set indicated moderately impaired cognition, occasional incontinence, and the use of several medications, including an antibiotic. The care plan addressed incontinence risk and skin care but did not mention the resident's history of UTIs or the use of prophylactic antibiotics. Physician orders consistently directed staff to administer Nitrofurantoin daily for UTI prevention over several months, with no documented stop date or physician rationale for the ongoing use. The administrative nurse confirmed the care plan should have included the prophylactic antibiotic use for the resident's UTI history. Additionally, the facility was unable to provide a policy regarding care plan timing and revisions when requested.
Failure to Identify and Report Long-Term Prophylactic Antibiotic Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported the long-term use of prophylactic antibiotics for a resident with multiple chronic conditions, including chronic kidney disease, anxiety disorder, hypertension, dementia, and anemia. The resident's medical record showed ongoing administration of Nitrofurantoin for urinary tract infection (UTI) prophylaxis, with physician orders repeatedly renewed without a documented rationale or review of the continued need for the medication. The care plan did not include a history of UTIs or the use of prophylactic antibiotics, and there was no documentation in the physician's progress notes justifying the ongoing use of Nitrofurantoin. Monthly pharmacy drug regimen reviews failed to mention the resident's prolonged antibiotic use, and administrative staff were unable to provide documentation of a monthly antibiotic log review for the resident. The CP reportedly reviewed antibiotic use only every six months, contrary to the facility's policy and regulatory requirements for monthly drug regimen reviews. This lack of appropriate review and reporting placed the resident at risk for inappropriate medication use.
Failure to Ensure Drug Regimen Free from Unnecessary Antibiotics
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident’s drug regimen was free from unnecessary antibiotics. A resident with multiple diagnoses, including chronic kidney disease, anxiety disorder, hypertension, dementia, and anemia, was prescribed Nitrofurantoin for urinary tract infection (UTI) prophylaxis. The resident’s care plan did not document a history of UTIs or the use of prophylactic antibiotics. Despite this, physician orders continued the daily administration of Nitrofurantoin for several months without a documented rationale or stop date. The electronic medical record lacked evidence of physician review or justification for the ongoing use of the antibiotic. Additionally, the facility was unable to provide documentation of monthly antibiotic use review for the resident, as required by their Antibiotic Stewardship Program Policy. Administrative staff could not locate physician progress notes supporting the continued use of Nitrofurantoin, and the monthly antibiotic log was not provided upon request. These actions and omissions resulted in the resident receiving an antibiotic without documented need or oversight, constituting a failure to ensure the drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications.
Failure to Document and Communicate Hospice Care Details
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure an effective communication process between the hospice provider and the facility for a resident who was admitted to hospice care. The resident, who had diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of the breast and bones and severe cognitive impairment, was dependent on staff for most activities of daily living. The care plan documented the resident's admission to hospice and included general instructions for staff regarding pain management, family time, and notification of hospice for significant changes. However, the care plan did not include essential information such as the hospice provider's contact number, details about supplies, equipment, and medications to be provided by hospice, or the schedule and nature of hospice staff visits. Record review confirmed the absence of this critical information, and staff interviews verified that the care plan lacked documentation regarding hospice visits, phone numbers, and medical supplies. The facility's policy required coordination of a plan of care with the hospice provider, but this was not reflected in the resident's care plan. As a result, there was no clear documentation of the services hospice would provide or how to contact them, which could impact the resident's care.
QA&A Committee Lacked Required Documentation of Medical Director Attendance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a Quality Assessment and Assurance (QA&A) Committee with the required membership in attendance, as evidenced by the absence of the Medical Director's signature on the attendance roster for one of the quarterly meetings. Although the Administrative Nurse stated that the Medical Director was present at the meeting, there was no signed documentation to confirm this. Additionally, when requested, the facility was unable to provide a QA&A policy. These findings were based on a review of the QA&A committee attendance records and staff interviews, and involved a facility with a census of 44 residents and a sample of 12 residents.
Failure to Post Daily Nurse Staffing Information
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that daily nurse staffing information was posted as required, resulting in a deficiency. Observations on three consecutive days revealed that the postings of daily staff nursing hours were not present. The facility had a census of 44 residents, and a sample of 13 residents was included in the review. Administrative staff confirmed that the scheduler was responsible for posting the daily nursing staff hours and verified that the information was not posted on the days of the onsite survey. The facility's policy required daily posting of nurse staffing information, including facility name, current date, resident census, and the total number and actual hours worked by RNs, LPNs/LVNs, and CNAs per shift.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the citations issued around you in the last 12 months — including the immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Osborne
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Downs Care And Rehab | 8.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Smith Center Health And Rehab | 18.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Sunporch Of Smith County | 23 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Solomon Valley Manor | 30.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Hilltop Lodge Health And Rehabilitation Center | 30.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 12 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Parkview Health And Rehabilitation Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.