Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around March 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Park Villa during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility did not employ a full-time Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) as required by its own Nutritional Services Policy, despite serving meals to 31 residents. A dietary staff member without CDM credentials was observed overseeing meal preparation, and both this staff member and an administrative nurse confirmed that the staff member was not certified, although enrolled in CDM classes. The policy specified that a CDM must oversee key functions such as menu planning, diet and diet manual with nutritional evaluations, office procedures for notifying the RD of new elders, food production, and food service, but no certified individual was fulfilling these responsibilities.
Surveyors found that the facility failed to follow professional standards for food storage and temperature monitoring. A freezer had significant ice buildup, and a refrigerator contained unlabeled, undated sliced cheese. Temperature logs for multiple freezers and refrigerators were incomplete over several days, despite policy requiring routine monitoring and documentation. The ice machine area contained extraneous items, including a plastic lid, a metal object on the floor, and a cup on the drain. In dry storage, several open food items, including pasta, noodles, gelatin, and pancake mix, were undated, unlabeled, or unsealed. Dietary staff confirmed these conditions, and the Dietary Manager later described expectations that all food be labeled, dated, and properly sealed per facility policy.
A resident with diabetes, heart failure, muscle weakness, severe cognitive impairment, incontinence, and limited mobility was identified as at risk for pressure ulcers, with care plans calling for turning/repositioning, use of a pressure-reducing device, and extensive staff assistance for ADLs. Despite these documented risks and interventions, the resident, who preferred to remain in a recliner or wheelchair and became less mobile after a foot fracture requiring a walking boot, developed a facility-acquired Stage 2 pressure ulcer on the buttocks. Wound assessments showed the ulcer’s presence and progression over time, indicating that timely and effective preventive measures were not implemented in accordance with the facility’s wound assessment and prevention policy.
Surveyors found expired acetaminophen 650 mg suppository floor stock on the North Hall medication cart, despite facility policy requiring proper labeling, storage, and removal of expired drugs. A CMA and an administrative nurse each confirmed that medication aides or nurses were responsible for checking the cart and discarding expired medications, but the expired suppositories remained available on the cart.
The facility failed to coordinate hospice services within the care plans for two residents receiving hospice. Both residents had severe cognitive impairment and extensive ADL needs, and their MDS assessments documented hospice care. Their care plans included general directions about ADL assistance, pain monitoring, and consulting with hospice or the physician, but omitted key hospice-specific details such as hospice contact information, visit schedules, services to be provided, and what supplies, equipment, and medications hospice would furnish. Clinical record review and interviews with an administrative nurse confirmed that there was no documented coordination between hospice and facility care plans, contrary to the facility’s hospice policy requiring an interdisciplinary plan integrating hospice and facility services.
A resident receiving wound and catheter care was assisted by an RN and a CNA who donned gowns, N95 masks, and gloves before entering the room. After perineal and catheter care, the RN did not change gloves or perform hand hygiene and continued to separate the resident’s labia, adjust clothing, handle the bed pad, reposition the resident, and operate the bed controls with the same soiled gloves. This practice conflicted with the facility’s infection control policy, which requires removal of soiled gloves and handwashing when moving from dirty to clean tasks and after contact with potentially infectious material.
The facility did not employ a full-time certified dietary manager for its 35 residents, as required by its policy. Dietary Staff BB, who was overseeing meal preparation, was not certified and had not started the necessary classes. This placed residents at risk of inadequate nutrition.
The facility's kitchen failed to meet professional food safety standards, with unlabeled and undated food items found in the refrigerator and dry storage, and significant ice buildup in the freezer. A damaged floor tile was also noted. These issues, verified by dietary staff, placed 35 residents at risk for foodborne illness.
The facility failed to evaluate and offer the PCV20 pneumococcal vaccination to residents, as per CDC guidance. Medical records for several residents lacked evidence of consent or informed declination for the vaccine. The facility's immunization policy did not provide guidance on administering the PCV20 vaccine, and staff interviews revealed that forms used for vaccine authorization did not specify which pneumococcal vaccine was being offered.
A facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist identified and reported the absence of a 14-day stop date for a resident's PRN lorazepam, despite the resident's severe cognitive impairment and need for extensive assistance. The resident's care plan lacked documentation for the antianxiety medication, and the CP's monthly review did not address the missing stop date, placing the resident at risk for unnecessary medication use.
A facility failed to ensure a 14-day stop date or specified duration for a resident's PRN antianxiety medication, lorazepam, which was administered without proper documentation or rationale. The resident, diagnosed with Alzheimer's, dementia, and cerebrovascular accident, was at risk for unintended effects due to the lack of compliance with the facility's policy on psychotropic drug use. Observations and interviews confirmed the ongoing administration of lorazepam without a stop date, contrary to the facility's policy.
A facility failed to ensure a coordinated hospice care plan for a resident with Alzheimer's, dementia, and cerebrovascular accident, placing them at risk for inappropriate end-of-life care. The resident's care plan lacked specific instructions on hospice services, and there was no evidence of coordination between the hospice and the facility. An administrative nurse confirmed the deficiency, highlighting the lack of communication and collaboration necessary for appropriate end-of-life care.
Lack of Certified Dietary Manager Overseeing Food and Nutrition Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to employ a full-time certified dietary manager (CDM) to oversee food and nutrition services for 31 residents receiving meals from the facility kitchen. On one observed noon meal, the menu consisted of shrimp, cornbread, cooked sliced squash, rice, and yellow cake with chocolate frosting, and dietary staff member BB was observed overseeing preparation of this meal in the kitchen. During an interview, dietary staff BB confirmed she was not a CDM, stating she had enrolled in but not completed the certification classes. Administrative Nurse D also verified that dietary staff BB did not have dietary manager certification, although she had started the dietary certification classes. The facility’s Nutritional Services Policy, revised 01/21/26, documented that a certified dietary manager would oversee all kitchen procedures, including menu planning, diets and the diet manual with nutritional evaluations, office procedures related to notifying the Registered Dietitian of new elders, food production, and food service, but no such certified individual was in place at the time of the survey.
Failure to Properly Label, Store, and Monitor Food and Equipment Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency in the facility’s food storage, distribution, and service practices based on observations, record review, and staff interviews. In the kitchen, a white upright freezer had approximately one-quarter inch of ice buildup along the inside and shelves, and the kitchen refrigerator contained a plastic bag of sliced yellow cheese that was unlabeled and undated. Review of March temperature logs showed missing morning and evening temperature documentation for multiple units, including a chest freezer in dry storage on numerous dates, a white stand-up freezer on several dates, a double-door refrigerator on several dates, and a single-door refrigerator on multiple dates. April logs also lacked documentation of readings for a double-door freezer on specified dates. The facility’s policies required that frozen foods be stored at 0 to -10°F, produce at 38-44°F, dairy at 35-40°F, and that temperature logs be completed and monitored by the Certified Dietary Manager or designee. Additional observations showed sanitation and labeling issues in and around the kitchen and dry storage areas. The ice machine between the kitchen and storage room had a plastic lid and a metal object on the floor behind it, and a plastic green drinking cup sitting on top of the drain underneath it. Eight 15.5-lb plastic jugs of used cooking grease were observed with numerous grayish-black substances on their tops. In dry storage, surveyors found an approximately one-quarter full 5-lb package of undated pasta Labello egg noodles, an approximately one-quarter full 4.5-lb package of unlabeled, undated, unsealed noodles, approximately three-quarters of a full package of undated strawberry gelatin, and an approximately three-quarters full bag of unsealed buttermilk pancake mix. A dietary staff member verified these findings during the survey, and the Dietary Manager later stated that staff were expected to label and date all food placed in dry storage, refrigerators, or freezers when received and when opened, and ensure items were sealed, labeled, and dated with the open date, as outlined in the facility’s written policies.
Failure to Implement Timely Interventions to Prevent Facility-Acquired Pressure Ulcer
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to initiate timely and adequate interventions to prevent the development and progression of a pressure ulcer for Resident 27, who was identified as at risk for pressure ulcer development. The resident had multiple diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, osteoarthritis, heart failure, and muscle weakness, and had a BIMS score of five indicating severely impaired cognition. Assessments documented that the resident required extensive assistance of one to two staff for bed mobility, personal hygiene, dressing, repositioning, and transfers, and that she had a urinary catheter for constant urinary retention and incontinence. The MDS and care plans identified the resident as at risk for skin impairment, with a history of refusing to lie down to relieve pressure from the buttocks, and indicated she was on a turning/repositioning program with nutritional or hydration interventions and a pressure-reducing device in her chair. A Braden Scale score of 16 further indicated risk for pressure ulcer development. Despite these identified risks and care plan directives, the resident developed a facility-acquired Stage 2 pressure ulcer on the left buttocks. Weekly wound assessments documented the presence and progression of an open area on the left buttocks, with measurements changing over time, including a lateral opening measuring 2.0 cm by 1.0 cm and later a left inner buttocks wound measuring 3.0 cm by 2.0 cm by 0.5 cm depth, and then 2.0 cm by 3.5 cm by 0.8 cm depth. The record noted that the resident became less mobile after sustaining a left 5th metatarsal fracture requiring a walking boot, and that she was incontinent and preferred to sit in a recliner and wheelchair rather than sleep in bed. The facility’s own Wound Assessment, Prevention and Treatment policy required timely skin assessments, Braden evaluations, and immediate implementation of plans to reduce pressure ulcer risk, but the development of a facility-acquired pressure ulcer under these known risk conditions demonstrated that timely preventive interventions were not effectively implemented.
Expired Floor Stock Medication Found on Medication Cart
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency in the facility’s management of medication storage when, during observation of the North Hall medication cart on 04/13/2026 at 08:10 AM, they found four acetaminophen 650 mg suppositories with an expiration date of 3/2026 still present as floor stock. Certified Medication Aide R confirmed at 08:15 AM that medication aides or nurses were responsible for discarding expired medications. On 04/15/2026 at 02:30 PM, Administrative Nurse E also verified that medication aides or nurses were expected to check the medication cart and discard expired medications. The facility’s Medication Labeling and Storage policy, dated 01/22/2026, required that medications be labeled and stored in accordance with facility requirements and State and Federal laws, and that floor stock medications be kept in the original manufacturer’s container with the expiration date and lot number clearly evident, yet the expired acetaminophen suppositories remained on the cart. No specific residents or their medical histories were mentioned in relation to this deficiency, and the findings were limited to the presence of expired stock medication on the North Hall medication cart and staff acknowledgments of their responsibility to remove such medications.
Failure to Coordinate Hospice Services in Resident Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to develop and maintain a coordinated hospice plan of care that integrated hospice services with facility services for two residents receiving hospice. For one resident with Alzheimer’s disease, CAD, and atrial fibrillation, the Significant Change MDS documented severely impaired cognition and extensive assistance needs for bed mobility and transfers, and indicated the resident was receiving hospice services. The resident’s care plan noted a terminal prognosis due to Alzheimer’s, directed staff to adjust ADL care, consult the physician for hospice care in the facility, and monitor and treat pain, but it did not include instructions on hospice services such as hospice staff visit schedules, supplies, medical equipment, or medications covered by hospice. The clinical record showed the resident had been admitted to hospice care months earlier, yet there was no documented evidence of coordination of care between hospice and the facility. For the second resident, diagnosed with PVD, DM, HTN, and atherosclerotic heart disease, the Significant Change MDS showed severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of two and dependence on staff for most ADLs, and documented that the resident received hospice services. The resident’s care plan recorded admission to hospice and directed staff to adjust ADL provision, encourage participation as desired, assess coping, respect wishes, and consult with the physician and hospice for continuing hospice care, as well as monitor for pain and notify the physician and hospice for breakthrough pain. However, the care plan lacked a hospice contact number, information on what supplies, equipment, and medications hospice would provide, and details on when hospice staff would be in the building and what care they would deliver. Observations and staff interviews confirmed these omissions. One resident was observed in bed receiving eye drops from a CMA, and during record review, the Administrative Nurse acknowledged that the facility care plan lacked specific information coordinating with the hospice care plan. For the second resident, the Administrative Nurse verified that the care plan did not contain information regarding hospice visits, phone numbers, or medical supplies provided by hospice, and stated that such information should be on the resident’s care plan. These findings were inconsistent with the facility’s Hospice Services policy, which required an interdisciplinary care plan integrating facility and hospice services, including coordination of services and supplies provided by the hospice provider.
Failure to Perform Hand Hygiene and Change Gloves Between Perineal and Other Care Tasks
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a failure to follow the facility’s infection control policy for hand hygiene and glove use during care for Resident 6. On 04/15/26 at 10:21 AM, the resident was observed resting in bed when a licensed nurse and a CNA donned gowns, N95 masks, and gloves before entering the room to assess a wound on the resident’s buttocks and provide catheter care. The resident was uncovered and noted to have no incontinent brief on. The CNA separated the resident’s buttocks and identified an open area approximately 0.3 cm long by 0.2 cm wide, then performed catheter care by cleansing the tubing from the insertion site down with a wet soapy washcloth followed by a dry washcloth. After this care, the licensed nurse assisted in repositioning the resident and, without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene, separated the resident’s labia, then used the same soiled gloves to pull down the resident’s front blouse, place hands on the cloth bed pad to help pull the resident up in bed, pull the sheet and blanket over the resident, place the bed control in the resident’s hand, and adjust the head of the bed. The nurse then removed and discarded the gloves, gown, and mask in a trash can. The nurse confirmed she had not changed gloves after assessing the resident’s labia and acknowledged she should have. The facility’s Infection Control Policy, revised 01/19/26, directed staff to remove soiled gloves, wash hands, and change gloves after contact with infectious material and before leaving the resident’s environment, and to wash hands immediately with antimicrobial soap. An administrative nurse stated she would expect staff to change gloves and wash hands when providing care, especially when moving from dirty to clean tasks.
Failure to Employ Certified Dietary Manager
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to employ a full-time certified dietary manager for its 35 residents, which was a requirement to ensure adequate nutrition services. During the survey, it was observed that Dietary Staff BB was overseeing meal preparation in the kitchen, despite not being a certified dietary manager. Dietary Staff BB confirmed that he had not started the certified dietary manager classes, and Administrative Staff A verified that Dietary Staff BB lacked the necessary certification. The facility's policy for the Dietary Supervisor Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) position required successful completion of the state's CDM certification course, among other qualifications. However, the facility did not adhere to this policy, as evidenced by the employment of Dietary Staff BB, who did not meet the certification requirements. This oversight placed the residents at risk of not receiving adequate nutrition, as the facility did not have a qualified individual to manage the dietary needs of its residents.
Food Safety Deficiency in Facility Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards for food service safety, as observed in the kitchen. During an inspection, it was noted that the refrigerator contained unlabeled and undated food items, including a half-full plastic bag of chicken strips, a plastic bag with five hamburger patties, an uncovered metal pan of blueberry crisp, and an unsealed plastic bag of yellow cheese slices. Additionally, the dry storage area housed unlabeled and undated five-pound plastic bags of white cake mix and Devil's Food cake mix, both half full. The chest-style deep freezer in the dry storage area had a significant ice buildup of approximately one-quarter to one-half inch all around the inside. These conditions were verified by Dietary Staff CC and Dietary Manager BB, who acknowledged the need for proper labeling, dating, and sealing of food items. Further observations revealed a maintenance issue in the dry storage room, where a floor tile in front of the white chest deep freezer was damaged, with missing pieces in the lower and upper corners. The facility's Dietary Purchases, Receipt, and Storage Policy, revised in October 2022, mandates that all products be labeled with the date received. The failure to comply with these standards placed the 35 residents who received meals from the facility's kitchen at risk for foodborne illness, as the food was not stored, prepared, distributed, and served according to professional safety standards.
Failure to Administer PCV20 Vaccination
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to evaluate the eligibility of residents for the pneumococcal PCV20 vaccination and did not offer or obtain informed declination or physician-documented contraindication for the vaccine, as per the latest CDC guidance. This deficiency was identified through a review of clinical medical records for five residents, which lacked evidence of consent or informed declination for the PCV20 vaccine. The facility's immunization policy was undated and did not provide guidance on administering the PCV20 vaccine, only mentioning the PCV13 and PCV23 vaccines. Interviews with facility staff revealed that residents were offered pneumonia vaccines upon admission, but the forms used did not specify which pneumococcal vaccine was being authorized. Administrative staff confirmed that the consultant pharmacist would identify eligible residents for the PCV20 vaccine, noting that all but two residents had not received it. This oversight placed residents at risk of pneumococcal infection and related complications, as the facility did not adhere to CDC recommendations for pneumococcal vaccinations.
Failure to Ensure Proper Medication Review and Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported the absence of a 14-day stop date or required physician documentation for the ongoing as-needed (PRN) antianxiety medication for Resident 10. The resident's electronic health record (EHR) showed diagnoses of Alzheimer's, dementia, and cerebrovascular accident, with severely impaired cognition and extensive assistance needed for daily activities. Despite these conditions, the resident's care plan did not document the use of antianxiety medication or its indication. The physician's order for lorazepam, an antianxiety medication, lacked a stop date, and the CP's monthly review did not address this omission. Observations and interviews revealed that the resident received lorazepam PRN without a stop date, and the administrative nurse confirmed that the pharmacist's monthly reviews did not include a recommendation for a stop date. The facility's Consult Pharmacist Services Provider Requirements mandated regular monthly reviews of each elder's medication regimen, incorporating federally mandated standards of care. However, the CP failed to identify and report the lack of a stop date for the PRN lorazepam, placing the resident at risk for unnecessary antipsychotic medication with side effects.
Failure to Ensure 14-Day Stop Date for PRN Antianxiety Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a 14-day stop date or a specified duration with rationale for a resident's ongoing as-needed (PRN) antianxiety medication, lorazepam. The resident, who had diagnoses of Alzheimer's, dementia, and cerebrovascular accident, was at risk for unintended effects related to psychotropic drug medications. The resident's Electronic Health Record (EHR) and Care Plan lacked documentation for the antianxiety medication and the indication for its use. The Physician's Order directed the administration of lorazepam every six hours as needed for anxiety but did not include a stop date or specified duration. The facility's policy on Unnecessary Drugs and Psychotropic Drug Use required that PRN psychotropic medications be limited to 14 days unless a longer timeframe was deemed appropriate by the attending physician. However, the resident's consultant pharmacist monthly reviews did not identify the PRN lorazepam with no stop date. Observations and interviews confirmed that the resident received lorazepam PRN without a stop date, placing the resident at risk for adverse side effects.
Lack of Coordinated Hospice Care Plan for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a coordinated plan of care for a resident receiving hospice services, which placed the resident at risk for inappropriate end-of-life care. The resident, who had diagnoses of Alzheimer's, dementia, and cerebrovascular accident, was admitted to hospice care but lacked evidence of coordination between the hospice and the facility. The resident's care plan documented the need for hospice services due to a terminal prognosis but did not include specific instructions on the services provided by hospice, such as staff visits, supplies, medical equipment, and medications covered by hospice. The facility's hospice policy emphasized the importance of a coordinated and comprehensive approach to end-of-life care, involving regular communication and collaboration with the interdisciplinary team and the resident's family. However, the facility did not have a communication book or external document to facilitate this coordination. An administrative nurse confirmed the lack of specific information on the facility care plan that coordinated with the hospice care plan, highlighting the deficiency in ensuring appropriate end-of-life care for the resident.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 24 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Clyde
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sunset Home Inc | 14.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Linn Community Nursing Home | 17.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 7 | 0 |
| Belleville Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center | 19.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 17 | 0 |
| Advena Living Of Clay Center | 20.5 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Clay Center Presbyterian Manor | 21.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Park Villa.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.