Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Park Lane Nursing Home during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Staff did not initiate CPR for a resident with full code status who was found unresponsive and pulseless. Despite clear documentation of the resident's wishes and physician orders, as well as staff being BLS certified, no resuscitative measures were started. The nurse determined that too much time had passed and declined to begin CPR, in violation of facility policy.
Several residents were not properly offered or educated about the PCV20 pneumococcal vaccine, nor was there documentation of assessment or declination, despite facility policy and CDC recommendations. Staff assumed the vaccine was being offered, but records did not confirm this, and forms lacked clarity on which vaccines were discussed.
Three residents and/or their representatives were not given the required CMS Skilled Nursing Facility ABN Form 10055 with an estimated cost when their skilled services ended. Instead, they received the wrong form without the necessary cost information, contrary to facility policy that mandates advance written notice and cost estimates when Medicare may not cover continued skilled services.
A maintenance staff member was allowed to work and have access to residents without a completed criminal background check, as required by facility policy. Administrative staff confirmed that the necessary documentation was missing and that the process was not followed at the time of hire.
A resident with multiple diagnoses slid out of a manual wheelchair after returning from the ER, and the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation or document witness statements as required. Another resident with a history of stroke and nicotine dependence was allowed to leave the premises to smoke without a completed smoking assessment, contrary to facility policy. Both incidents involved lapses in following protocols for resident safety.
A consultant pharmacist did not ensure that antipsychotic medications prescribed to three residents had approved indications for use, as required by policy and federal guidelines. Seroquel and Zyprexa were administered for diagnoses such as depression, restlessness, and agitation without appropriate documentation or rationale, and monthly reviews failed to address the lack of approved indications.
Failure to Initiate CPR for Full Code Resident
Penalty
Summary
Staff failed to provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to a resident who had a documented full code status and had expressed a desire for resuscitative measures. The resident was found unresponsive, pulseless, and cyanotic by a certified nurse aide (CNA), who immediately called for a nurse. The CNA and another CNA checked for a pulse and found none, but neither was aware of the resident's code status at the time. The nurse on duty arrived several minutes later, assessed the resident, and determined that the time to start CPR had expired, despite knowing the resident was a full code. No resuscitative efforts were initiated by any staff present. The resident's medical record indicated multiple serious health conditions, including pleural effusions, pneumothorax, hypoxemia, heart failure, and atrial flutter. The resident required continuous oxygen and had moderate cognitive impairment, needing assistance with most activities of daily living. The care plan and physician orders clearly documented the resident's full code status and the expectation that CPR would be initiated if the resident's heart or breathing ceased. Staff present at the time of the incident, including two licensed nurses and two CNAs, all held current Basic Life Support (BLS) certification and had participated in recent CPR drills. Despite the facility's policy requiring CPR to be initiated for any unresponsive individual without a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order or clear signs of irreversible death, staff did not begin resuscitative measures. The nurse in charge made the decision not to start CPR, believing it would not be beneficial due to the resident's condition and the time elapsed. This failure to initiate CPR for a resident with full code status constituted a deficiency and placed all residents with similar code status at risk.
Failure to Offer and Document PCV20 Pneumococcal Vaccination per CDC Guidelines
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that several residents were properly offered and educated about the Prevnar 20 (PCV20) pneumococcal vaccination, or assessed and deemed contraindicated, as recommended by the CDC. Record review showed that one resident's consent/declination form did not specify which pneumococcal vaccines were offered, while another resident's documentation lacked evidence that the PCV20 vaccine was specifically offered and declined. Additional residents had received previous pneumococcal vaccines (PPSV23 or PCV13), but there was no documentation that they had been offered or had declined the PCV20 vaccine. Interviews with facility staff revealed assumptions that the PCV20 vaccine was being offered according to CDC guidelines, but there was no supporting documentation to confirm this. The facility's policy required assessment and offering of pneumococcal vaccines upon admission and annually, with education provided to residents or their representatives. However, the records reviewed did not demonstrate compliance with these requirements for the PCV20 vaccine for the affected residents.
Failure to Provide Correct ABN Form and Cost Estimate for Non-Covered Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide three residents or their representatives with the correct Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) Form 10055 when their skilled services were ending. Instead, the residents received the CMS-R-131 form, which is not the appropriate form for this situation, and the forms provided did not include the required estimated cost of continued services. The facility's policy required that residents be informed in advance, in writing, when Medicare may not pay for skilled services, including an estimate of the potential financial liability if they chose to continue receiving those services. Record review confirmed that the incorrect forms were given to the residents, and the necessary cost information was omitted. Administrative staff verified that the correct ABN form was not used and that the estimated cost was not provided as required. This failure occurred at the time when the residents' skilled services were being terminated, which is a triggering event for issuing the correct ABN form according to facility policy.
Failure to Complete Required Criminal Background Check for Employee
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct a required criminal background check for one of its employees, specifically a maintenance staff member who had been working at the facility since May 2020. During a review of staffing records, it was found that there was no evidence of a completed criminal background check for this employee. The facility's policy mandates that background checks, including criminal conviction investigations, must be completed for all employees with direct access to residents before they begin employment. However, the required documentation for this maintenance staff member was not available, and the business office manager responsible for the process at the time of hire was no longer employed at the facility. As a result, the maintenance staff member was allowed access to residents without confirmation of their criminal history or any findings of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment by a court of law. This oversight was confirmed by administrative staff during the survey, who acknowledged the absence of the background check and the lapse in following established procedures.
Failure to Investigate Fall and Ensure Smoking Safety
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to thoroughly investigate and address the causative factors of a fall involving a resident with multiple diagnoses, including intellectual disabilities, epilepsy, anxiety, and restless leg syndrome. The resident, who was nonambulatory and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living, slid out of a manual transport wheelchair after returning from the emergency room. Although the care plan specified the use of a Panacea tilt chair for positioning and safety, staff left the resident in a manual wheelchair, and the incident was unwitnessed. The investigation into the fall was incomplete, lacking written witness statements and a review of camera footage, and did not fully determine the cause of the fall or document all investigative steps as required by facility policy. Another deficiency was identified regarding a resident with a history of stroke, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, and nicotine dependence. This resident, who used a wheelchair and had contractures of the right hand, was allowed to leave the facility premises to smoke cigarettes without a completed smoking assessment at the time of admission. The facility's policy prohibited resident smoking on the premises, yet the resident was observed independently leaving the building to smoke, with staff confirming that a smoking assessment was not completed until the day of the survey. The lack of timely assessment and supervision failed to ensure a safe environment and compliance with the facility's smoke-free policy. Both deficiencies were based on direct observations, interviews, and record reviews, which revealed lapses in following established protocols for fall investigation and smoking safety. The facility did not provide adequate documentation or assessment to prevent further incidents or to ensure resident safety in accordance with its own policies.
Consultant Pharmacist Failed to Ensure Approved Indications for Antipsychotic Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility's consultant pharmacist failed to ensure that antipsychotic medications prescribed to three residents had an approved indication for use, as required by facility policy and federal guidelines. For one resident with diagnoses including insomnia, depression, anxiety, dementia, and paranoid personality disorder, Seroquel was administered for depression without an approved diagnosis or indication. The pharmacist's monthly reviews did not request or document an appropriate rationale for the use of this antipsychotic, and administrative staff confirmed that depression is not an approved diagnosis for Seroquel. Another resident with a history of viral encephalitis, major depressive disorder, insomnia, and anxiety was prescribed Seroquel for restlessness and agitation. The consultant pharmacist requested an approved diagnosis three months after the order was written, but did not obtain one. Administrative staff verified that restlessness and agitation are not approved indications for antipsychotic use, and the pharmacist did not secure an appropriate diagnosis from the physician. A third resident, diagnosed with dementia with mood and behavioral disturbance, Alzheimer's disease, and major depressive disorder, was prescribed Zyprexa for psychosis related to major depressive disorder. The consultant pharmacist's monthly regimen reviews did not include a recommendation for a CMS-appropriate indication for the antipsychotic. The care plan and physician's order referenced major depressive disorder as the reason for use, but administrative staff confirmed that the pharmacist had not identified or recommended an appropriate diagnosis for the medication. In all three cases, the lack of an approved indication for antipsychotic use was not addressed by the consultant pharmacist, contrary to facility policy and regulatory requirements.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the citations issued around you in the last 12 months — including the immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Scott City
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wichita County Health Center Ltcu | 24.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Ranch House Senior Living Llc | 33.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Garden Valley Retirement Village | 35 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Park Lane Nursing Home.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.