Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Moundridge Manor during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A facility failed to provide adequate supervision and safety interventions for two residents, resulting in significant injuries. One resident, with a high fall risk, fell twice outside, sustaining a laceration and rib fractures. Another resident, not assessed for handling hot liquids, spilled hot coffee, causing second-degree burns. The facility's policies for fall risk assessments and care plans were not adequately followed, leading to these incidents.
The facility failed to serve palatable food during a noon meal, as two residents received ground meat at an unsafe temperature of 132°F, below the required 140°F. Dietary staff did not initially check the temperature, and it took two microwave reheating attempts to reach a servable temperature. This failure to adhere to the facility's food temperature policy placed residents at risk for foodborne illness.
A facility failed to coordinate hospice care for a resident with cancer, heart failure, and obesity. The care plan lacked details on hospice services, despite policy requirements for a coordinated plan. An administrative nurse confirmed the deficiency, risking inappropriate end-of-life care.
Inadequate Supervision and Safety Measures Lead to Resident Injuries
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision and safety interventions for a resident, R10, who was at high risk for falls. Despite being aware of R10's fall risk, the facility did not implement sufficient measures to prevent further incidents after R10 experienced a fall while outside alone. R10, who had diagnoses including dementia, hemiplegia, Parkinson's disease, and diabetes, fell a second time while outside, resulting in a laceration to his right palm requiring sutures and multiple right rib fractures. The facility's interventions, such as visual checks every 30 minutes and painting caution signs, were insufficient, and R10 was not consistently provided with a call light pendant for emergencies. Another resident, R17, was not assessed for his ability to safely handle hot liquids, leading to an incident where he spilled hot coffee on himself, resulting in second-degree burns. R17, who had hemiplegia and diabetes, preferred to drink his coffee without a lid and at a high temperature. The facility failed to implement or document any safety interventions or education regarding the risks of handling hot liquids without a lid. As a result, R17 sustained burns to his left upper thigh, groin, palm, and forearm. The facility's policies required fall risk assessments and the implementation of care plans to prevent accidents, but these were not adequately followed. The lack of proper assessment and intervention for both residents placed them at risk for injury and increased pain. The facility's failure to provide a safe environment and adequate supervision led to significant injuries for both R10 and R17.
Failure to Serve Palatable and Safe Food
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to serve palatable food during the noon meal for two residents who received ground meat, placing them at risk for foodborne illness and decreased quality of life. During the observation of the noon meal, it was noted that seven portions of ground hamburger were placed on the steam table to be served. Dietary staff did not check the temperature of the ground meat after removing it from the oven. When prompted by the surveyor, the dietary staff measured the temperature and found it to be 132 degrees Fahrenheit, which is below the required holding temperature. The facility's policy requires hot food items to be held at a temperature of 140 degrees or above to ensure safety and palatability. The dietary staff was unaware of the correct holding temperature and initially suggested reheating the meat in the microwave. It took two attempts to reheat the meat to a servable temperature of 165 degrees Fahrenheit. The Certified Dietary Manager confirmed that the ground hamburger meat should not have been served if it was not at the appropriate temperature, indicating a failure to adhere to the facility's food temperature policy.
Failure to Coordinate Hospice Care for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a coordinated plan of care for a resident receiving hospice services, identified as R42. The resident's electronic health record indicated diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of the prostate, left ventricular failure, and morbid obesity. Despite being admitted to hospice care, the facility's care plan lacked specific instructions on the services provided by hospice, including visits, supplies, medical equipment, medications covered, and the hospice provider's contact information. This deficiency was confirmed by an administrative nurse who verified the absence of specific information on the facility care plan that coordinated with the hospice care plan. The facility's policy required a timely agreement with the hospice, detailing the services provided and ensuring communication between the facility and hospice provider. However, the facility did not adhere to this policy, as evidenced by the lack of a coordinated care plan for R42. The hospice services policy outlined the responsibilities of the unit manager to work with hospice representatives to coordinate care, but this was not effectively implemented, placing the resident at risk for inappropriate end-of-life care.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 149 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Moundridge
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pine Village | 1.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Schowalter Villa | 7.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Bethesda Home | 9.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Bethel Health Care Center | 12.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Pleasant View Home | 13.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Moundridge Manor.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.