Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around January 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Logan County Senior Living Inc during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to notify the LTCO for multiple resident hospital transfers and failed to provide written bed hold information to two residents. Residents were transferred for conditions including possible PE, pneumonia, pulmonary edema, bilateral pneumonia with low BP, and severe abdominal pain with UTI and colitis. Records lacked evidence of LTCO notification, and one resident’s chart lacked a bed hold policy and resident or representative signature. Social Services stated the ombudsman had not been notified, and Admin staff said they were unaware the notifications had not been completed.
Failure to use EBP during high-contact care: Two residents with urinary catheters and impaired cognition/decision-making were identified on EBP, but staff provided incontinence care, catheter care, dressing changes, and mechanical lift transfers while wearing gloves only and no gowns. One resident’s room had an EBP sign, while the other did not, and staff stated they were confused about when gowns were required.
Failure to document pneumococcal vaccine offerings and declinations: Four residents had no evidence of being offered or receiving PCV20, and no informed declination or contraindication was documented. An ADNS stated residents were offered pneumonia vaccines on admission and as indicated, but the facility lacked a definitive system to determine eligibility or track whether residents had been offered or declined the vaccine.
A resident with Alzheimer's and severe cognitive impairment was forcibly administered medications by an LN, despite her refusal. The LN used physical force, including holding the resident's shoulders and head, to make her swallow the medications. A CNA intervened, and the incident was reported, leading to the LN's suspension. The facility's failure to adhere to the resident's care plan and abuse prevention policy resulted in psychosocial harm to the resident.
The facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information through the PBJ as required by CMS. PBJ reports indicated multiple days without 24-hour licensed nurse coverage, but a review of payroll data showed that a licensed nurse was on duty. Administrative Staff A confirmed that the corporate staff failed to document the correct hours, and a new employee is now handling data submission.
The facility failed to provide three residents with the correct CMS Skilled Nursing Facility ABN Form 10055, instead giving them form CMS-R-131. This error, verified by Social Services and Administrative Staff, was due to the facility's recent change in ownership and Medicare certification status, putting residents at risk of making uninformed decisions about their skilled services.
The facility failed to develop and implement an individualized dementia treatment plan for a resident with dementia and behaviors. Despite having a care plan, it lacked specific guidance for managing the resident's inappropriate physical and verbal actions. Staff confirmed the absence of person-centered interventions, placing the resident at risk for decreased quality of life.
A facility failed to follow acceptable standards of practice related to wound care for a resident with an infected wound. An administrative nurse did not sanitize the bedside table before placing clean supplies, did not change gloves after cleansing the wound, and improperly stored wound care items without sanitizing them. These actions violated the facility's wound care policy and placed the resident at risk for delayed healing and other complications.
The facility failed to ensure safety assessments for two residents using an electric wheelchair and smoking. One resident, with multiple diagnoses, used an electric wheelchair without a proper safety assessment, leading to several incidents of unsafe operation. Another resident, with nicotine dependence and other conditions, was not assessed for safe smoking practices, despite documented incidents of anger when unable to smoke. These failures placed both residents at risk for preventable accidents and injuries.
The facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health care for a resident diagnosed with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression. Despite documented thoughts of self-harm, the resident's clinical record lacked evidence of follow-up mental health services. Administrative staff confirmed that the required reporting and assessment procedures were not followed, placing the resident at risk for impaired quality of life.
The facility failed to develop and implement an individualized dementia treatment plan for a resident with dementia and behaviors. The care plan lacked specific interventions for managing the resident's inappropriate behaviors, which included physical contact and verbal aggression. Staff responses were limited to redirection and informing the charge nurse, without individualized interventions in place.
The facility failed to notify the physician of out-of-parameter blood sugars for a resident with diabetes mellitus type two. Despite physician's orders to report blood sugar levels outside specified parameters, multiple instances were documented where the physician was not informed. This oversight was confirmed by staff and placed the resident at risk for unnecessary medication side effects and other complications.
The facility failed to date a resident's Levemir insulin flex pen, which was confirmed by both a licensed nurse and an administrative nurse. The facility's policy requires dating and discarding expired insulin pens, and the failure to do so placed the resident at risk for ineffective medication.
A facility failed to ensure a coordinated plan of care for a resident receiving hospice services. The resident, with multiple diagnoses including heart failure and dementia, was admitted to hospice care but lacked a coordinated care plan between the hospice and the facility. This deficiency was confirmed by staff and placed the resident at risk for inappropriate end-of-life care.
A nurse failed to follow proper infection control measures during wound care for a resident with an infected wound. The nurse did not sanitize the bedside table, change gloves after cleansing the wound, or sanitize the scissors before use. These actions were against the facility's Wound Care policy and placed the resident at risk for further infection and cross-contamination.
The facility failed to ensure residents received their mail on Saturdays. During a resident council meeting, residents reported no mail delivery on Saturdays. Staff confirmed that mail was collected and delivered during the week but were unsure if weekend staff were aware of their responsibilities. The facility's policy required mail delivery within 24 hours, including Saturdays, but this was not followed.
Failure to Notify LTCO and Provide Bed Hold Information During Hospital Transfers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) for multiple resident hospital transfers and failed to provide written bed hold information to two residents when they were transferred to the hospital. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for hospitalization, and the deficiency involved residents R1, R6, R7, R12, and R13. The clinical record for R1, who was admitted to the hospital for possible pulmonary embolism, lacked evidence of LTCO notification for the transfer. R6 was admitted to the hospital for pneumonia, and the record lacked evidence that the family received the bed hold notification or that the LTCO was notified. R7 was admitted to the hospital twice, once for pulmonary edema and later for acute pulmonary edema, and the record lacked evidence of LTCO notification for both transfers. R12’s record documented that the resident had chills, was not feeling well, had diminished lung sounds, and slurred speech before being sent to the emergency room and later admitted with bilateral pneumonia and low blood pressure. R12’s clinical record lacked a bed hold policy and resident or resident representative signature, and it also lacked documentation that staff notified the LTCO of the discharge to the hospital. R13 was sent to the emergency room for severe abdominal pain, elevated blood pressure, and rectal bleeding, and was later admitted with UTI, colitis, and elevated lactate levels; the record lacked documentation that staff notified the LTCO of the discharge to the hospital. Social Service X stated she had not notified the ombudsman of the hospital transfers, and Administrative Staff A stated the ombudsman should be notified when a resident was discharged from the facility and was unaware that it had not been done. The facility’s Transfer or Discharge policy stated that residents or their representatives are to be notified in writing of an impending transfer or discharge and that a copy of the notice must be sent to the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman at the same time.
Failure to Use EBP During High-Contact Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were used for two residents with urinary catheters, R3 and R6, during high-contact care activities. R3 had a diagnosis of neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, a BIMS score of 7 indicating severely impaired cognition, and was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, transfers, and mobility. Her care plan directed staff to use gowns and gloves before high-contact care, including bathing, transfers, hygiene, changing briefs, assisting with toileting, and care of the urinary catheter. On observation, a red paper sign by R3’s door stated she was on EBP precautions, but CNA M and CNA O wore gloves only and did not put on gowns while providing incontinence care, handling the catheter bag, and transferring her with a total mechanical lift. R6 also had neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, a BIMS score of 11 indicating moderately impaired decision-making skills, and was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, showers, lower body dressing, transfers, and mobility. His care plan likewise directed staff to use gowns and gloves for high-contact care and when caring for the urinary catheter, and to ensure EBP signage was visible. On observation, R6’s door did not have EBP signage, although gowns and gloves were available on a storage cart in the room. CNA N, CNA P, and LN G entered the room and wore gloves but not gowns while providing catheter care, personal care, changing an incontinence brief, changing a dressing to the left below-knee amputation site, and preparing him for transfer. Later observations showed CNA N and CNA P again entered R6’s room wearing gloves only and transferred him from bed to his electric wheelchair using a full mechanical lift. CNA P placed the catheter bag on the bed during the transfer. When questioned, staff stated they were confused about when EBP gowns were required or said they did not think a gown was needed unless emptying the catheter bag or because they were not working with the catheter. Administrative Nurse D stated the staff should have worn gowns during high-contact care and acknowledged recent reeducation on EBP.
Failure to Document Pneumococcal Vaccine Offerings and Declinations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to offer and/or obtain an informed declination or a physician-documented contraindication for the pneumococcal PCV20 vaccination for four reviewed residents. Record review showed that R2, R15, R16, and R27 had no evidence in their medical records that the facility or the resident representative received or signed consent to receive the pneumococcal vaccine, or that an informed declination was obtained. The records also showed that each of these residents had not been offered or received a pneumococcal PCV20 vaccine since admission. During interview, Administrative Nurse D stated that residents were offered pneumonia vaccines on admission and as indicated, and that the resident or resident representative would sign a consent or declination for receiving the vaccine. However, Administrative Nurse D verified that every resident in the building was not reviewed to determine eligibility for the PCV20 vaccine and that the facility did not have a definitive system in place to determine who was eligible, whether they had been offered or declined the vaccination, and that this was something the facility had recently been working on. The facility's pneumococcal vaccine policy stated residents would be assessed for eligibility prior to or upon admission, offered the vaccine when indicated, and have education and documentation completed in the medical record.
Resident Forced to Take Medications Against Will
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to prevent a staff member from physically forcing a resident to take her medications against her will. On the morning of December 15, 2024, a Licensed Nurse (LN) attempted to administer medications to a resident diagnosed with Alzheimer's Disease, anxiety, and major depressive disorder. The resident, who had severely impaired cognition and a history of depression, refused the medications by swatting the nurse's hand away. Despite this clear refusal, the nurse pushed the resident's hands into her lap, removed her coffee cup, and replaced it with a cup of water. The nurse then held the resident's shoulders and attempted to spoon the medications into her mouth, which the resident spit out. The nurse further escalated the situation by grabbing the back of the resident's head, pushing it forward, and pouring water into her mouth in an attempt to force her to swallow the medications. The incident was witnessed by a Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) who intervened by sitting beside the resident and encouraging her to take her medications, which she eventually did. The CNA and another staff member reported the incident to the Administrative Nurse, who suspended the nurse involved pending an investigation. The facility's review of the incident, including camera footage, confirmed the nurse's inappropriate actions and failure to respect the resident's rights and refusal to take medications. The nurse's behavior was characterized by frustration and a lack of adherence to appropriate care protocols, resulting in the resident experiencing fear and potential psychosocial harm. The resident's care plan highlighted her communication problems and potential for sadness, directing staff to allow her time to respond and not to rush her. Despite these directives, the nurse's actions directly contradicted the care plan's guidelines, leading to the deficiency. The facility's policy on abuse prevention emphasizes the residents' right to be free from abuse and neglect, which was violated in this instance. The incident underscores a significant lapse in following established protocols to protect residents from harm.
Failure to Submit Accurate PBJ Data
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information through the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) as required by CMS. The PBJ reports for Fiscal Year 2023 Quarters 2, 3, and 4 indicated multiple days where there was no licensed nurse coverage for 24 hours a day, seven days a week. However, a review of the facility's licensed nurse payroll data for the specified dates revealed that a licensed nurse was indeed on duty for the required hours. This discrepancy was confirmed by Administrative Staff A, who acknowledged that the corporate staff responsible for inputting the data failed to document the correct hours, and a new employee is currently handling the data submission process. The facility's policy on staffing, dated August 2022, states that the facility provides enough nursing staff with the appropriate skills and competency necessary to care for all residents in accordance with their care plans and the facility assessment. The policy also specifies that licensed nurses and certified assistants are available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and that a registered nurse provides services for at least eight consecutive hours every 24 hours. Despite this policy, the facility's failure to submit accurate PBJ data placed the residents at risk for unidentified and ongoing inadequate staffing.
Failure to Provide Correct Medicare ABN Forms
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide three residents or their representatives with the correct Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notices (ABN) Form 10055. Instead, the residents received form CMS-R-131, which did not include the necessary information about potential liability for services not covered by Medicare. This error was identified through a review of the records for the three residents, whose skilled services had ended on various dates. The incorrect forms were verified by Social Services and Administrative Staff, who acknowledged the mistake and attributed it to the facility's recent change in ownership and Medicare certification status. The facility's policy, dated September 2022, required that residents be informed in advance of any changes to their bills using the correct ABN form. However, the facility did not adhere to this policy, resulting in the residents being at risk of making uninformed decisions about their skilled services. The failure to provide the correct form meant that the residents did not receive an estimated cost of continued services when discharged from skilled care, which is a critical component of the decision-making process for their ongoing care needs.
Failure to Develop Individualized Dementia Treatment Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement an individualized dementia treatment plan for Resident 22, who had dementia and exhibited behaviors. Despite having a care plan that directed staff to administer medications, communicate capabilities, and document changes in cognitive function, the plan lacked specific guidance for managing R22's behaviors. The resident's medical records documented diagnoses of dementia, mood disorder, depression, and pain, and noted the use of antipsychotic and antidepressant medications. However, the care plan did not include person-centered interventions for R22's dementia-related behaviors, which included inappropriate physical and verbal actions towards staff and other residents. Observations and interviews with staff confirmed that R22 continued to exhibit sexually inappropriate behaviors and verbal aggression, and that staff redirected the resident without a formalized plan in place. The facility's policy required a comprehensive, person-centered care plan to be developed and updated to meet the resident's needs, but this was not done for R22. The care plan was not revised to include specific interventions for the resident's behaviors, despite multiple incidents of inappropriate conduct documented in the nurse's notes. Interviews with staff and administrative personnel verified the absence of person-centered interventions in the care plan, highlighting a failure to address the resident's dementia-related behaviors adequately. This deficiency placed R22 at risk for decreased quality of life due to uncommunicated care needs.
Failure to Follow Wound Care Protocols
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow acceptable standards of practice related to wound care for a resident with an infected wound. The resident, who had multiple diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, Charcot arthropathy, MRSA, neuropathy, chronic kidney disease, and vascular insufficiency, required specific wound care procedures as per physician's orders. However, during an observation, an administrative nurse did not sanitize the bedside table before placing clean supplies on it, did not change gloves after cleansing the wound, and placed the wound cleanser bottle directly on the resident's bed. Additionally, the nurse did not sanitize the scissors before cutting the foam for the wound vacuum and improperly stored the wound cleanser and scissors in the resident's dresser drawer without sanitizing them first. These actions were in direct violation of the facility's wound care policy, which mandates proper sanitization and use of disposable cloths to prevent cross-contamination. The resident's care plan included directives to float the resident's heels on a pillow, use caution during transfers, and monitor the wound for infection. Despite these directives, the administrative nurse's failure to adhere to proper wound care procedures placed the resident at risk for delayed healing and other complications. The nurse acknowledged the potential for cross-contamination and verified the lapses in following the wound care policy, which further highlights the deficiency in providing appropriate treatment and care according to the resident's needs and physician's orders.
Failure to Ensure Safety Assessments for Electric Wheelchair and Smoking Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the environment was free of accident hazards for two residents, R9 and R18. R9, who had diagnoses including diabetes mellitus type two, COPD, CHF, hypertension, and weakness, was using an electric wheelchair without a proper safety assessment. Despite multiple incidents of confusion and unsafe operation of the wheelchair, including running over another resident's feet and bumping into furniture and doorways, the facility did not document an assessment of R9's ability to safely use the electric wheelchair. The facility's policy required such an assessment, but it was not conducted, placing R9 at risk for injury. R18, who had diagnoses including nicotine dependence, diabetes mellitus type two, mood disorder, edema, and COPD, was also not properly assessed for safe smoking practices. Although R18's care plan required supervision while smoking and documented that her smoking supplies were stored in the medication cart, there was no evidence in the EMR that the facility assessed her ability to smoke safely. R18 had several documented incidents of becoming upset and angry when staff could not take her outside to smoke, but the facility did not complete a smoking safety assessment as required by their policy. The facility's failure to conduct necessary safety assessments for both the use of an electric wheelchair and smoking practices resulted in an environment with accident hazards, placing both residents at risk for preventable accidents and injuries. The facility's policies on assistive devices and smoking required comprehensive assessments, which were not followed in these cases.
Failure to Provide Necessary Behavioral Health Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health care and services for a resident diagnosed with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression. The resident's Admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated a mood score of 16, suggesting moderate to severe depression, and documented thoughts of self-harm. Despite these indicators, the resident's clinical record lacked evidence of follow-up mental health services, psychotherapy notes, or documentation from social service staff regarding the resident's statements or behaviors. Observations revealed the resident in a state of neglect, with unkempt hair and dressed in a nightgown, indicating a lack of proper care and attention to her mental health needs. Administrative staff confirmed that the Social Service Designee (SSD) did not inform the Director of Nursing (DON) or other relevant staff about the resident's suicidal thoughts, as required by the facility's Suicide Threats policy. This policy mandates immediate reporting and assessment of any suicide threats, followed by appropriate actions such as notifying the attending physician and monitoring the resident's mood and behavior. The facility's failure to adhere to this policy and provide timely mental health interventions placed the resident at risk for impaired quality of life due to untreated and ongoing mental health concerns.
Failure to Implement Individualized Dementia Treatment Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement an individualized dementia treatment plan for a resident (R22) who had dementia and exhibited behaviors. R22's medical records documented diagnoses of dementia, mood disorder, depression, and pain. Despite these diagnoses, the care plan lacked specific interventions for managing R22's dementia-related behaviors. The resident's behaviors included inappropriate physical contact and verbal aggression towards staff and other residents. The care plan only directed staff to administer medications, communicate with the resident and family, and document changes in cognitive function, without providing specific guidance for handling the resident's behaviors. Observations and interviews with staff revealed that R22 continued to exhibit inappropriate behaviors, such as smacking a CNA's buttocks and making inappropriate remarks. Staff responses to these behaviors were limited to redirecting the resident and informing the charge nurse, without any individualized interventions in place. The facility's dementia policy required a resident-centered care plan and appropriate interventions for behavioral and psychiatric symptoms, but this was not implemented for R22. This deficiency placed the resident at risk for abuse and decreased quality of life.
Failure to Notify Physician of Out-of-Parameter Blood Sugars
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the physician of out-of-parameter blood sugars for one resident, identified as R18. R18 had a documented history of diabetes mellitus type two, mood disorder, edema, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The resident's care plan directed staff to administer diabetes medication as ordered and to document side effects and effectiveness. Physician's orders specified that staff should notify the physician if R18's blood sugar was less than 70 ml/dL or greater than 170 ml/dL. However, the Treatment Administrative Record for February and March 2024 showed multiple instances where R18's blood sugar levels were out of the specified parameters, and the physician was not notified. This failure was confirmed by Administrative Nurse D and Licensed Nurse G, who verified that the physician was not informed of the out-of-parameter blood sugars and that the Treatment Administration Record did not indicate the blood sugar parameters for R18. The facility's Diabetes Clinical Protocol required the physician to order desired parameters for monitoring and reporting information related to blood sugar management. Despite this protocol, the facility did not adhere to the physician's orders, placing R18 at risk for unnecessary medication side effects and other related complications. Observations confirmed that R18 was ambulatory and had intact cognition, making the oversight particularly concerning. The deficiency was identified through a combination of record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, highlighting a significant lapse in the facility's adherence to prescribed medical protocols for managing diabetes in residents.
Failure to Date Insulin Pen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to date a resident's insulin flex pen, specifically Levemir, which is a long-acting insulin. During an observation, it was noted that the insulin pen for Resident 11 lacked an open date. Licensed Nurse H confirmed that nurses are required to date the flex pens when opened and discard them when expired. Administrative Nurse E also verified that the pens should be labeled with the resident's name and discarded if expired or outdated. According to Medlineplus.gov, Levemir pens must be discarded after 42 days of use. The facility's Insulin Administration policy mandates verifying the type of insulin, dosage, strength, method of administration, and expiration date before administration. The failure to date the insulin pen placed the resident at risk for ineffective medication.
Failure to Coordinate Hospice Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a coordinated plan of care for a resident receiving hospice services. The resident, who had diagnoses including heart failure, stage 3 kidney disease, anxiety, and dementia with behavioral disturbance, was admitted to hospice care but lacked evidence of coordination between the hospice and the facility. The resident's care plan documented a holistic approach to care by collaboration between hospice and nursing facility staff, but the facility had not received the hospice care plan from the hospice provider, and there was no communication book or external document available for review in the Electronic Health Record (EHR). This lack of coordination was confirmed by Administrative Staff A, who verified that the facility lacked a hospice care plan for the resident since her admission to hospice. Observations revealed that the resident required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) and had severely impaired cognition. Despite the resident's significant needs, the facility did not have a coordinated care plan that included the hospice plan of care. The facility's policy required a written agreement with the hospice contractor outlining responsibilities and ensuring coordinated care, but this was not in place. This deficiency placed the resident at risk for inappropriate end-of-life care.
Inadequate Infection Control Measures During Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate infection control measures during wound care for Resident 79. During an observation, Administrative Nurse D did not sanitize the bedside table before placing clean supplies on it. The nurse also placed the wound cleanser bottle directly on the resident's bed and did not change gloves after cleansing the wound. Additionally, the nurse did not sanitize the scissors before cutting the foam for the wound vacuum and placed the used wound cleanser and scissors inside the resident's dresser drawer without proper sanitization. These actions were verified by the nurse, who acknowledged the potential for cross-contamination. The facility's Wound Care policy, dated October 2010, directed staff to establish a clean field using a disposable cloth, sanitize nozzles and bottle tops with alcohol, and wipe reusable supplies with alcohol before returning them to storage. The nurse's failure to follow these procedures placed Resident 79, who had an infection in a wound, at risk for continued wound infection, cross-contamination, and other infectious diseases.
Failure to Deliver Mail on Saturdays
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure residents received their mail on Saturdays. During a resident council meeting, residents reported that there was no mail delivery on Saturdays. Activity Staff Z confirmed that administration staff retrieved the mail during the week from a mailbox outside the facility, with the key located in the nurse's station. Administrative Staff A verified that the mail was collected during the week and delivered to residents by Social Service staff but was unsure if weekend staff were aware of their responsibility to collect and deliver mail on Saturdays. The facility's policy, dated May 2017, stated that mail should be delivered to residents within 24 hours of delivery, including Saturdays. However, this policy was not followed, resulting in residents not receiving their mail on Saturdays.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the citations issued around you in the last 12 months — including the immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Oakley
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citizens Medical Center Ltcu | 20.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Colby Operator, Llc | 20.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Sheridan County Hospital Ltcu | 40 mi | ★★★★★ | 21 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Logan County Senior Living Inc.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.