Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Larksfield Place during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions by improperly installing the ice machine's drainage tube, which lacked the required air gap and fed directly into a debris-filled floor drain. This oversight was confirmed by dietary staff, and the facility's policy on ice machine maintenance was not adhered to.
A resident with type II diabetes and intact cognition was inaccurately documented as discharged to an acute hospital in the MDS, despite records and a physician's order indicating discharge to home. This discrepancy was confirmed by an administrative nurse, highlighting a deficiency in the facility's assessment and documentation processes.
A resident with dementia, severely cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for mobility, was observed with improper wheelchair positioning, as her right foot dangled above the footrest. Facility staff, including CNAs and a licensed nurse, were either unaware or did not address the issue, despite the facility's policy requiring proper footrest use.
A facility failed to ensure the safety of a resident's toilet safety rail, which was loose and missing a rubber boot, despite the resident's severe cognitive impairment. Additionally, a resident with Parkinson's disease fell from a lift chair due to increased confusion, and the facility did not conduct a required lift chair assessment following a significant change in the resident's condition. These deficiencies highlight lapses in equipment maintenance and resident safety assessments.
A facility failed to consistently monitor and care for a resident with a urinary catheter, resulting in penile erosion. Despite a care plan and physician's orders, the resident's condition was not adequately documented or treated, with missed catheter care and lack of wound measurement. Observations revealed improper treatment, contributing to the deficiency.
A resident with a malignant brain tumor did not receive the correct dose of Temozolomide as prescribed. The facility administered 200 mg instead of the ordered 240 mg due to a possible mishap with the medication capsules. The resident expressed concerns about the medication administration, and staff confirmed the error.
The facility failed to provide appropriate catheter care for two residents with indwelling urinary catheters. One resident's catheter bag was observed resting on the floor and not fully enclosed in a dignity bag, while another resident's leg bag lacked a protective cap on the drain spout. These deficiencies were contrary to the facility's policies and could lead to contamination and infection.
Improper Ice Machine Drainage
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the preparation and serving of food to its residents, specifically concerning the ice machine used to supply ice. During an inspection, it was observed that the ice machine's drainage tube was improperly installed, feeding directly into the floor drain without the required air gap. This floor drain contained small pieces of trash and debris, which could potentially lead to contamination. Dietary staff confirmed that the drainage tube should indeed go into the floor drain, but the lack of an air gap was not addressed. The facility's policy on Ice Machine Safety, which was undated, stated that the ice machine should be maintained and cleaned by the Environmental Service Staff, but this requirement was not met, leading to the deficiency.
Inaccurate Discharge MDS for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) for a resident, identified as R70, regarding their discharge status. The resident, who had a diagnosis of type II diabetes mellitus and a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating intact cognition, was initially admitted to the facility from an acute hospital. The resident's goal was documented as discharging to the community with home health support. However, the Discharge MDS inaccurately recorded the resident as being discharged to an acute hospital, while the electronic medical record (EMR) and a physician's order indicated that the resident was discharged to home on the same date. The discrepancy was confirmed during an interview with Administrative Nurse F, who stated that the resident did not discharge to an acute hospital but instead went home. The facility utilized the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) for completing MDSs, yet failed to ensure the accuracy of the discharge information for this resident. This inaccuracy in the discharge MDS represents a deficiency in the facility's assessment and documentation processes.
Improper Wheelchair Positioning for Resident with Dementia
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper wheelchair positioning for a resident diagnosed with dementia, who was severely cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for mobility and transfers. The resident's electronic medical record indicated a consistent need for staff assistance with wheelchair mobility. Observations over two days revealed that the resident's right foot was consistently dangling above the footrest, and her left ankle was crossed over her right ankle while seated in her wheelchair. This improper positioning was noted in various locations within the facility, including the commons area and near the nurses' desk. Interviews with facility staff, including CNAs and a licensed nurse, revealed a lack of awareness and action regarding the resident's improper wheelchair positioning. CNAs acknowledged that the resident's feet did not reach the footrests, while the licensed nurse had not noticed the issue. An administrative nurse suggested that therapy should evaluate the resident to determine if her feet should reach the footrests. The facility's policy on wheelchair mobility and use of footrests, which mandates that residents' feet should be placed flat on the footrests, was not adhered to, resulting in the deficiency.
Deficiencies in Equipment Safety and Resident Assessments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the safety of a resident's toilet safety rail, which was found to be extremely loose and missing a rubber boot where it met the floor. This deficiency was observed on multiple occasions, and despite the resident's severe cognitive impairment and dependence on staff for toileting hygiene, the issue was not addressed. Housekeeping and maintenance staff were responsible for checking the safety rails monthly but had not noticed the missing rubber boot. The facility's policy required that resident equipment be maintained in good condition, which was not adhered to in this case. Another deficiency involved a resident with Parkinson's disease who was at high risk for falls. The resident's lift chair was identified as a safety risk, yet the facility failed to conduct a lift chair assessment following a significant change in the resident's condition. The resident experienced increased confusion and fell from the lift chair, which was in a fully extended position. Despite the resident's history of falls and impaired mobility, the facility did not complete the necessary assessments to ensure the resident's safety with the lift chair. The facility's policy required lift chair assessments upon admission, after a fall, or upon a significant change in condition. However, staff did not complete an assessment after the resident's significant change in condition, leading to the resident's fall. The failure to conduct timely assessments and ensure the safety of equipment contributed to the deficiencies identified in the report.
Failure to Monitor and Treat Penile Erosion in Resident with Urinary Catheter
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure consistent monitoring and care for a resident with a urinary catheter, leading to penile erosion. The resident, who had a history of urinary retention, renal failure, and other medical conditions, was assessed to require assistance with toileting needs and had a urinary catheter in place. Despite having a care plan that included specific instructions for catheter care and wound management, the facility did not adequately monitor the resident's condition, resulting in a split in the urethra caused by the catheter. The resident's medical records indicated that catheter care was to be provided every shift, with additional care for the penile erosion. However, the resident refused night shift catheter care on multiple occasions, and staff failed to document the effectiveness of the treatment. Interviews with nursing staff revealed that the wound did not appear to improve, and there was a lack of consistent measurement and documentation of the wound's condition. The facility's policy required the use of an electronic wound app for documentation, but this was not utilized in a timely manner. Observations showed that the resident's wound was not properly treated, as steri strips were missing, although the catheter was anchored. The facility's failure to monitor the resident's penile erosion and ensure the effectiveness of the treatment contributed to the deficiency. The lack of proper documentation and follow-up by the wound nurse and other staff members further exacerbated the issue, as the resident's condition was not adequately addressed.
Medication Administration Error for Chemotherapy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that staff followed physician orders for medication administration for a resident diagnosed with a malignant brain tumor and a post-operative femur fracture. The resident, who had normal cognitive function, was prescribed Temozolomide, a chemotherapy medication, at a dose of 240 mg daily on an empty stomach for five days. However, the Medication Administration Record revealed that the resident received only 200 mg on one of the days, contrary to the physician's order. Interviews with the resident and nursing staff confirmed the discrepancy in the medication dosage. The resident expressed concern about not receiving the correct dose and reported not receiving her medication before breakfast as required. The nursing staff acknowledged the error, attributing it to a possible mishap where one of the 100 mg capsules was dropped and discarded, leading to an incorrect dose being administered. The facility's policy required medications to be administered as ordered by the physician, which was not adhered to in this instance.
Inadequate Catheter Care for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate catheter care for two residents, R47 and R58, with indwelling urinary catheters. For Resident R47, who had severe cognitive impairment and a neurogenic bladder, the facility did not ensure that the catheter bag was kept off the floor and fully enclosed in a dignity bag. Observations on multiple occasions revealed that the catheter bag was either resting directly on the floor or only partially covered by a dignity bag, contrary to the facility's policy that required catheter drainage bags to be covered when the resident was out of the room or in their chair. For Resident R58, who had normal cognitive function but required assistance with toileting due to urinary retention and other medical conditions, the facility failed to provide a sanitary enclosed urine collection bag. The resident's leg bag was observed without a protective cap on the drain spout, which could lead to contamination. This was confirmed by an administrative nurse who discovered that the wrong leg bags had been supplied. The facility's policy required appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections, which was not adhered to in this case.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 386 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 9 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Wichita
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Great Plains Post Acute | 0.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 17 | 0 |
| Legacy At College Hill | 1.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 17 | 1 |
| Catholic Care Center, Inc | 2.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 1 |
| Center At Waterfront Llc | 2.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 19 | 0 |
| Regent Park Rehabilitation And Healthcare | 2.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 21 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Larksfield Place.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.