Kansas Christian Home
Inspection history, citations, penalties and survey trends for this long-term care facility in Newton, Kansas.
- Location
- 1035 Se 3rd Street, Newton, Kansas 67114
- CMS Provider Number
- 175467
- Inspections on file
- 13
- Latest survey
- December 4, 2024
- Citations (last 12 mo.)
- 0
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Kansas Christian Home during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with significant medical conditions, including non-weight bearing status and an above-the-knee amputation, was injured when staff failed to follow the care plan for transfers. Instead of using a slide board as instructed, staff performed a stand and pivot transfer, resulting in fractures to the resident's right lower leg. The facility's policy for safe lifting and movement was not adhered to, leading to this deficiency.
The facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in food storage and preparation areas, risking potential foodborne illness. Observations included unsealed bags of rice and flour, expired and undated food items, and improper storage of frozen foods. Kitchen equipment was found dirty, and a floor cleaning machine was stored near clean items. Dietary staff confirmed these issues, violating the facility's food storage policy.
The facility did not conduct annual performance reviews for two CNAs/CMAs, with one evaluation 22 months overdue and another 19 months overdue. Administrative Staff D confirmed the requirement for annual evaluations, but the facility lacked a policy to ensure completion, impacting care for all residents.
The facility failed to serve food at safe and palatable temperatures, as multiple residents reported receiving cold meals. Observations revealed that dietary staff did not consistently monitor or record food temperatures, with items like broccoli and cheesecake served at unsafe temperatures. The facility's electronic temperature monitoring system was unsatisfactory, leading to reliance on a paper system that also failed to ensure proper temperature maintenance.
A resident admitted with conditions such as chronic subdural hemorrhage and muscle weakness did not have a comprehensive person-centered care plan developed within the required timeframe. The care plan was delayed due to oversight by a previous MDS nurse, leading to potential uncommunicated needs and negative impacts on the resident's well-being.
A resident with a history of cerebral infarction, diverticulitis, and anemia experienced true weight loss, which was not addressed in their care plan. Despite physician orders for supplements and snacks, the care plan lacked documentation of these interventions. Facility staff confirmed the oversight, acknowledging the failure to update the care plan as required by policy.
A resident with a history of cerebral infarction and moderate cognitive impairment experienced significant weight loss, but the facility failed to obtain daily weights as ordered by the physician. Despite the order being in place since late March, daily weights were not documented until early June. This oversight in monitoring potentially affected the resident's physical well-being, as staff interviews revealed inconsistencies in documentation and understanding of the care plan.
Failure to Follow Care Plan Results in Resident Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a dependent resident from harm when staff did not follow the resident's care plan, which instructed the use of a slide board for transfers. On the day of the incident, a Licensed Nurse (LN) and a Certified Medication Aide (CMA) assisted the resident, who was in a wheelchair, to use the restroom. Despite the care plan's instructions, the staff performed a stand and pivot transfer instead of using the slide board, resulting in the resident sustaining fractures in her right lower leg. The resident had a history of significant medical conditions, including diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, and a recent surgery on her right ankle due to a fracture. She was non-weight bearing on her right extremity and had an above-the-knee amputation on her left extremity. The care plan specified that the resident required total assistance for transfers and toileting, with the use of a mechanical lift initially, later revised to include a slide board for transfers. During the transfer, the staff heard a popping sound, and the resident complained of pain. An X-ray later confirmed that the resident had sustained a closed, comminuted, non-displaced tibial fracture and a distal fibular fracture. The facility's investigation revealed that the staff did not adhere to the care plan, which led to the resident's injury. The facility's policy for safe lifting and movement of residents was not followed, resulting in the deficiency.
Sanitation Deficiencies in Food Storage and Preparation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in food storage, preparation, and serving areas, which could lead to potential foodborne illness among residents. Observations revealed several issues, including unsealed bags of rice and flour in the dry goods pantry, an opened container of teriyaki sauce past its expiration date, and a gallon of Worcestershire sauce without an opened or expiration date. Additionally, frozen food was improperly stored directly on the floor of the walk-in freezer. Dietary staff confirmed that these items should have been placed on shelves. Further inspection during an environmental tour uncovered more concerns, such as an unidentified piece of meat in the refrigerator dated several weeks prior, and various expired food items, including thousand island dressing and salsa. The refrigerator also contained undated, wilted, and discolored lettuce. The kitchen equipment was found to be in poor condition, with a dirty oven, a grimy can opener, and a scratched fry pan. A floor cleaning machine was improperly stored near clean serving pans and storage containers. Dietary staff acknowledged these issues, which were in violation of the facility's food receiving and storage policy.
Failure to Conduct Annual Performance Reviews for CNAs/CMAs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct annual performance reviews for two out of five Certified Nurse Aide/Medication Aides (CNA/CMA) reviewed, which is necessary to ensure residents receive adequate care. Specifically, the employment records showed that one CNA/CMA, hired in 1995, had their last performance evaluation 22 months past due, and another, hired in 2018, had their last evaluation 19 months past due. Administrative Staff D confirmed that CNAs/CMAs employed for more than a year should have annual evaluations, but the facility lacked a policy to ensure these evaluations were completed. This deficiency was identified through observation, interviews, and record reviews, affecting the care provided to all residents in the facility.
Failure to Maintain Safe and Palatable Food Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that food and drink were served at safe and palatable temperatures, as required by their policy. Multiple residents reported receiving cold meals, with one resident specifically mentioning that meals served in their room were usually cold. Observations revealed that dietary staff did not consistently monitor or record food temperatures before serving. For instance, broccoli was served at 132 degrees Fahrenheit without prior temperature checks, and cheesecake was left unrefrigerated, reaching temperatures above 50 degrees Fahrenheit, which is above the safe limit of 42 degrees Fahrenheit. Further observations showed that food items like cut carrots and ground chicken were served at 100 degrees Fahrenheit, below the required 135 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility's electronic temperature monitoring system was reportedly unsatisfactory, leading staff to use a paper recording system, which also failed to ensure proper temperature maintenance. A test tray confirmed that scrambled eggs and hash browns were served at 100 degrees Fahrenheit, which was not hot enough, as confirmed by both dietary staff and surveyors. The facility's policy required potentially hazardous foods to be maintained at specific temperatures, which was not adhered to, resulting in the deficiency.
Failure to Timely Develop Comprehensive Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident, identified as R35, within the required timeframe. R35 was admitted with diagnoses including nontraumatic chronic subdural hemorrhage, muscle weakness, and repeated falls. The resident's Admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated intact cognition, minimal depression, and a need for limited assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). However, the comprehensive care plan was not completed within 21 days of admission, as required by the facility's policy. The care plan was only completed in November 2023, several months after the resident's admission, due to oversight by a previous MDS nurse who was no longer employed at the facility. Observations and interviews revealed that R35 was occasionally incontinent of bladder and required assistance with ambulation and toileting. Despite these needs, the care plan documentation was lacking, with no baseline care plan found in the Electronic Health Record (EHR). Staff interviews confirmed that the care plan was essential for understanding the care required by residents. The delay in developing a comprehensive care plan had the potential to lead to uncommunicated needs, which could negatively impact the resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
Failure to Revise Care Plan for Resident's Weight Loss
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to review and revise the care plan for a resident, identified as R1, regarding weekly weights and interventions to prevent further weight loss. R1 had a history of cerebral infarction, diverticulitis, and anemia, and was noted to have a stable weight according to the Nutritional Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 12/14/23. However, by 07/02/24, it was identified that R1 had experienced a true weight loss, which was not due to fluid shifts. Despite this, the care plan dated 07/02/24 did not include interventions for weight loss, such as monitoring weekly weights or documenting the consumption of supplements and snacks ordered by the physician. Interviews with facility staff, including Administrative Nurse E and Dietary Staff BB, confirmed that the weight loss and necessary interventions were not included in R1's care plan. The facility's policy requires that comprehensive, person-centered care plans be developed and revised as residents' conditions change, but this was not adhered to in R1's case. The lack of documentation and revision of the care plan for R1's weight loss was acknowledged by the staff, indicating a failure to communicate and address the resident's changing needs effectively.
Failure to Monitor Resident's Weight as Ordered
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to obtain daily weights for a cognitively impaired resident, identified as R1, who had an order for daily weights due to a significant weight loss. The resident had a history of cerebral infarction, diverticulitis, and anemia, and was noted to have moderately impaired cognition. Despite the physician's order for daily weights starting on 03/28/24, the facility did not document any daily weights until 06/07/24, which was a significant delay in monitoring the resident's weight. The resident experienced a notable weight loss, with records indicating a decrease of 16 pounds since 03/13/24, and further weight loss was documented in subsequent months. The resident's weight fluctuated significantly, with a documented weight of 161.2 lbs on 04/07/24, dropping to 138.0 lbs by 07/01/24. The facility's failure to adhere to the physician's order for daily weights potentially compromised the resident's physical well-being, as the weight loss was not adequately monitored or addressed in a timely manner. Interviews with facility staff revealed inconsistencies in the documentation and understanding of the resident's care plan. Licensed Nurse H and Administrative Nurse E acknowledged the oversight in daily weight documentation and the lack of a clear physician order for weekly weights. Additionally, the facility did not provide a policy regarding weight loss and adherence to physician orders, further highlighting the deficiency in the resident's care management.
Latest citations in Kansas
Surveyors found that the facility failed to maintain sanitary food storage, handling, and dishwashing practices in the kitchen. Clean dishes were stored upright instead of inverted, and numerous food items in coolers, freezer, pantry, and spice racks were undated, missing the year, had unreadable dates, or showed visible mold, while some bags and containers were left open or unsealed. A dietary staff member handled ready-to-eat foods such as bread and butter with bare hands and repeatedly washed hands with water only, without soap or sanitizer, while preparing pureed meals for a resident. The low-heat dish machine repeatedly operated below the facility’s stated minimum wash temperature, as documented on the temperature log. These practices were inconsistent with the facility’s own food storage policy and staff’s stated expectations for glove use, labeling, sealing of food, dish storage, and dishwashing temperatures.
The facility did not employ a full-time Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) as required by its own Nutritional Services Policy, despite serving meals to 31 residents. A dietary staff member without CDM credentials was observed overseeing meal preparation, and both this staff member and an administrative nurse confirmed that the staff member was not certified, although enrolled in CDM classes. The policy specified that a CDM must oversee key functions such as menu planning, diet and diet manual with nutritional evaluations, office procedures for notifying the RD of new elders, food production, and food service, but no certified individual was fulfilling these responsibilities.
Surveyors found that the facility failed to follow professional standards for food storage and temperature monitoring. A freezer had significant ice buildup, and a refrigerator contained unlabeled, undated sliced cheese. Temperature logs for multiple freezers and refrigerators were incomplete over several days, despite policy requiring routine monitoring and documentation. The ice machine area contained extraneous items, including a plastic lid, a metal object on the floor, and a cup on the drain. In dry storage, several open food items, including pasta, noodles, gelatin, and pancake mix, were undated, unlabeled, or unsealed. Dietary staff confirmed these conditions, and the Dietary Manager later described expectations that all food be labeled, dated, and properly sealed per facility policy.
Surveyors found that staff did not consistently follow EBP, hand hygiene, and clean laundry handling practices. During tracheostomy care for a resident, a nurse wore gloves and a mask but did not don a gown or change gloves before placing clean gauze and the trach cannula. In a separate case, after completing wound care for another resident, the same nurse manipulated a suprapubic catheter tubing while still holding wound supplies and then left the room without performing hand hygiene. Additionally, a housekeeping/laundry staff member removed residents’ personal items from a covered cart and carried them over the shoulder between halls without keeping the items covered. These actions did not follow facility policies requiring targeted gown and glove use for high-contact care, proper hand hygiene around invasive devices and dressings, and keeping laundry carts covered between rooms.
A resident with hemiparesis, chronic osteomyelitis, and intervertebral disc disorder with radiculopathy experienced a fall in his room, was found on the floor near a heater with pain and bruising, and was later confirmed by mobile X-ray to have a nondisplaced fracture of the left superior pubic ramus. Despite this, the subsequent quarterly MDS documented no falls since the prior assessment and did not code the event as a fall with major injury, even though the care plan and progress notes described the fall and resulting fracture. An administrative nurse later acknowledged that the falls section of the MDS had been coded in error, contrary to facility policy and RAI manual requirements for accurate resident assessment.
A resident with severe morbid obesity, vascular dementia, anxiety, and a history of falls, but intact cognition per BIMS, was repeatedly assisted in a wheelchair by staff without foot pedals in place. On multiple observed occasions, staff pushed and turned the resident in the wheelchair while the resident held his feet off the floor and a sock was seen dragging on the floor. Interviews showed staff uncertainty and inconsistency regarding the requirement for foot pedals when assisting the resident, despite the resident’s documented fall risk and a facility falls policy requiring interventions to reduce fall risk.
A resident with Alzheimer’s disease, CKD, BPH, obstructive uropathy, and urinary retention had a suprapubic catheter that staff repeatedly secured incorrectly. During catheter care, two nurses cleaned the abdominal insertion site but attached the Stat-lock to the resident’s thigh, anchoring the tubing to the leg instead of the abdomen. Nursing leadership stated they expected leg anchoring and noted the catheter policy did not specify Stat-lock placement, even though the facility’s suprapubic catheter competency checklist explicitly directed that the tubing be secured to the abdomen.
A resident with dementia, severe cognitive impairment, and depression experienced unplanned weight loss after the RD documented a slow weight-loss trend and recommended house supplement shakes TID with added calories to meals. The facility entered and carried out the supplement order only once daily, and staff confirmed the resident received a shake only on second shift. Weight documentation showed a large, unverified increase followed by a re-weigh that demonstrated a 3.16% loss over a short period, and nursing staff did not promptly recognize or recheck the significant weight discrepancy. The RD was not informed that her TID recommendation had been effectively reduced to once daily, and the facility’s own weight-loss prevention processes were not followed.
A resident with chronic respiratory failure, a tracheostomy, and oxygen therapy orders did not have an Ambu bag or emergency tracheostomy kit readily available at the bedside, despite care plan directives for respiratory care, suctioning, and emergency response if the tracheostomy tube came out. Surveyors observed on multiple occasions that only oxygen and suction were present in the room, while the Ambu bag and emergency supplies were stored on a covered cart in the hallway under a Hoyer lift, requiring movement of equipment before use. Staff, including CNAs, an LN, and an administrative nurse, confirmed that emergency tracheostomy supplies were kept in the hallway or medication room and not at the bedside, and that they were instructed to call 911 rather than attempt reinsertion of the tracheostomy tube, even though the facility’s respiratory care policy required services in accordance with professional standards and the resident’s care plan.
A resident with diabetes, heart failure, muscle weakness, severe cognitive impairment, incontinence, and limited mobility was identified as at risk for pressure ulcers, with care plans calling for turning/repositioning, use of a pressure-reducing device, and extensive staff assistance for ADLs. Despite these documented risks and interventions, the resident, who preferred to remain in a recliner or wheelchair and became less mobile after a foot fracture requiring a walking boot, developed a facility-acquired Stage 2 pressure ulcer on the buttocks. Wound assessments showed the ulcer’s presence and progression over time, indicating that timely and effective preventive measures were not implemented in accordance with the facility’s wound assessment and prevention policy.
Unsanitary Food Storage, Handling, and Dishwashing Practices in Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency in the facility’s failure to maintain sanitary conditions for food storage and preparation in the kitchen. During an initial kitchen tour, they observed multiple clean containers and plates on the drying rack not inverted, leaving eating surfaces exposed. Numerous food items in the kitchen cooler, walk-in cooler, freezer, pantry, and spice rack were either undated, missing the year, had unreadable dates, or were past labeled use-by dates. Examples included cheese and ham slices with only month and day, multiple large containers of sauces, dressings, olives, cherries with visible black mold on the rim and lid, parmesan cheese, syrups, soy sauce, wing sauce, and green beans all lacking complete or legible dating. Additional findings included rusted and peeling cooler racks, open and unsealed bags of frozen foods and pantry items, and a rice bin with a handwritten prep date missing the year. Further observations showed improper food handling and hand hygiene practices by dietary staff. One dietary staff member handled ready-to-eat foods, including butter and bread for toast, with bare hands and then placed the toast on a tray for a resident. On another occasion, a partially wrapped package of cheese slices in the cooler was found without any date. The same dietary staff member was observed washing hands under running water without using soap or sanitizer on three separate occasions while pureeing food for lunch. The facility did not provide a hand hygiene policy specific to dietary staff when requested. Surveyors also reviewed the operation of the low-heat Ecolab dishwasher and its temperature logs. At the time of observation, the wash temperature was 102°F, and the April temperature log showed multiple days with wash temperatures below the documented minimum of 120°F at which the supervisor should be notified. Administrative and dietary staff later confirmed that gloves should be worn when handling ready-to-eat foods, all stored food should be sealed and labeled with month, day, and year, dishes should be inverted, and the dishwasher wash cycle should be at least 120°F. The facility’s existing Food Storage policy required staff to label all food items with the name and date opened or use-by date and to discard food past expiration, but survey findings showed these practices were not consistently followed in the kitchen.
Lack of Certified Dietary Manager Overseeing Food and Nutrition Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to employ a full-time certified dietary manager (CDM) to oversee food and nutrition services for 31 residents receiving meals from the facility kitchen. On one observed noon meal, the menu consisted of shrimp, cornbread, cooked sliced squash, rice, and yellow cake with chocolate frosting, and dietary staff member BB was observed overseeing preparation of this meal in the kitchen. During an interview, dietary staff BB confirmed she was not a CDM, stating she had enrolled in but not completed the certification classes. Administrative Nurse D also verified that dietary staff BB did not have dietary manager certification, although she had started the dietary certification classes. The facility’s Nutritional Services Policy, revised 01/21/26, documented that a certified dietary manager would oversee all kitchen procedures, including menu planning, diets and the diet manual with nutritional evaluations, office procedures related to notifying the Registered Dietitian of new elders, food production, and food service, but no such certified individual was in place at the time of the survey.
Failure to Properly Label, Store, and Monitor Food and Equipment Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency in the facility’s food storage, distribution, and service practices based on observations, record review, and staff interviews. In the kitchen, a white upright freezer had approximately one-quarter inch of ice buildup along the inside and shelves, and the kitchen refrigerator contained a plastic bag of sliced yellow cheese that was unlabeled and undated. Review of March temperature logs showed missing morning and evening temperature documentation for multiple units, including a chest freezer in dry storage on numerous dates, a white stand-up freezer on several dates, a double-door refrigerator on several dates, and a single-door refrigerator on multiple dates. April logs also lacked documentation of readings for a double-door freezer on specified dates. The facility’s policies required that frozen foods be stored at 0 to -10°F, produce at 38-44°F, dairy at 35-40°F, and that temperature logs be completed and monitored by the Certified Dietary Manager or designee. Additional observations showed sanitation and labeling issues in and around the kitchen and dry storage areas. The ice machine between the kitchen and storage room had a plastic lid and a metal object on the floor behind it, and a plastic green drinking cup sitting on top of the drain underneath it. Eight 15.5-lb plastic jugs of used cooking grease were observed with numerous grayish-black substances on their tops. In dry storage, surveyors found an approximately one-quarter full 5-lb package of undated pasta Labello egg noodles, an approximately one-quarter full 4.5-lb package of unlabeled, undated, unsealed noodles, approximately three-quarters of a full package of undated strawberry gelatin, and an approximately three-quarters full bag of unsealed buttermilk pancake mix. A dietary staff member verified these findings during the survey, and the Dietary Manager later stated that staff were expected to label and date all food placed in dry storage, refrigerators, or freezers when received and when opened, and ensure items were sealed, labeled, and dated with the open date, as outlined in the facility’s written policies.
Failure to Follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions, Hand Hygiene, and Laundry Handling Practices
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, specifically related to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), hand hygiene, and handling of clean laundry. During tracheostomy care for Resident 2, a licensed nurse performed hand hygiene, donned gloves, and wore a mask but did not don a gown as required under EBP and did not change gloves before placing clean gauze or the tracheostomy cannula. In a separate wound care observation for Resident 6, the same nurse performed hand hygiene and applied a gown and gloves before care, but after completing the wound care and while holding gauze and wound cleanser, the nurse inspected and manipulated the resident’s suprapubic catheter tubing and then left the room without performing hand hygiene. Additional deficiencies were observed in the handling of clean laundry. A housekeeping/laundry staff member placed a covered cart with residents’ personal items in one hall, then removed items from the cart and carried them over the shoulder to another hall without using the cart and without keeping the items covered between rooms. Interviews with nursing and administrative staff confirmed that wound care supplies should be kept in residents’ rooms or bagged and taken to the wound nurse, that hand sanitizing should be performed before and after wound care and after contact with catheters or tubing, and that staff are expected to wear gown, gloves, and mask at minimum for EBP. The housekeeping supervisor also stated that laundry staff are expected to keep the cart covered between rooms. These practices did not align with the facility’s written policies on EBP and hand hygiene, which require targeted gown and glove use during high-contact care and hand cleansing before and after resident contact, after contact with blood or body fluids, after removing PPE, and before procedures involving invasive devices or dressing care.
Inaccurate MDS Coding of Fall With Major Injury
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident 13, resulting in an incorrect coding of the resident’s fall history and injury status. Resident 13’s electronic medical record documented multiple diagnoses, including hemiparesis/hemiplegia, chronic osteomyelitis, and intervertebral disc disorder with radiculopathy. The quarterly MDS dated 03/24/26 recorded a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicated the resident required supervision for walking 10 feet and partial assistance for walking 50 feet, and documented that the resident had no falls since the previous MDS assessment. However, this conflicted with clinical documentation and the resident’s care plan and progress notes. On 01/16/26, progress notes showed that staff responded to the resident’s call light and found him on the floor next to his heater, lying on boxes, papers, and his bedside table. The resident complained of back and left hip pain, had swelling behind his left ear from hitting the heater, redness on his left cheek, and reported tenderness with weight-bearing on his leg. A mobile X-ray later confirmed a nondisplaced fracture of the left superior pubic ramus, and the provider assessed the resident the same day. The care plan documented that the resident continued to act independently despite education to use the call light, and the resident later reported to therapy staff that he had falls and was working to get stronger after his last fall. During interviews, an administrative nurse acknowledged that the resident had a fall resulting in a hip fracture that should have been coded on the MDS as a fall with major injury, and that the falls section of the MDS had been coded in error, contrary to the facility’s policy to complete the MDS according to federal regulations and the RAI manual.
Failure to Use Wheelchair Foot Pedals When Assisting a Resident
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide an environment free of accident hazards by not ensuring the use of wheelchair foot pedals when staff assisted a resident in a wheelchair. The resident had diagnoses including severe morbid obesity, vascular dementia, anxiety, and noncompliance, and had a BIMS score of 15 on multiple MDS assessments, indicating intact cognition. The resident’s assessments and Falls Care Area Assessment documented a history of falls within the previous months and identified the resident as being at risk for falls. The care plan documented that the resident was at risk for falls, had experienced a fall, and that his back locked up at times requiring the use of a wheelchair. On one observed occasion, a CNA pushed the resident in a wheelchair without foot pedals attached as he was brought from outside smoking back to his room, during which the resident crossed and held his feet off the floor. On another observed occasion, a nurse turned the resident in his wheelchair and assisted him to the dining room without foot pedals, during which the resident’s sock was half off and dragged on the floor, and the resident again held his foot off the floor. During interviews, one nurse expressed uncertainty about whether the resident should be assisted in the wheelchair without foot pedals, while a CMA stated the resident used foot pedals when being assisted but not when self-propelling. Administrative nursing staff confirmed that staff should not assist the resident in the wheelchair without foot pedals. The facility’s falls policy stated that residents would be assessed for fall risks and interventions implemented to reduce those risks.
Improper Securing of Suprapubic Catheter Tubing
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide appropriate care and treatment for a resident with a suprapubic catheter by not securing the catheter tubing according to current standards of practice and the facility’s own competency checklist. The resident had multiple urologic and cognitive conditions, including Alzheimer’s disease with severely impaired cognition (BIMS score of four), chronic kidney disease stage three, benign prostatic hyperplasia, obstructive uropathy, and urinary retention, and was documented as having an indwelling catheter. The care plan included an order from the resident’s urologist directing staff not to remove the catheter and directed staff to apply Skin-prep prior to attaching a Stat-lock for the suprapubic catheter. On two separate observations, licensed nurses assessed and cleaned the suprapubic catheter site on the resident’s abdomen but attached the Stat-lock to the resident’s left upper thigh, securing the tubing from the abdomen to the leg. One nurse confirmed the Stat-lock was attached to the thigh and stated they were unaware that a Stat-lock could be adhered to the abdomen. The administrative nurse stated she expected the Stat-lock to be anchored to the leg and acknowledged that the facility catheter policy did not specify Stat-lock placement for a suprapubic catheter. However, she also stated that the facility’s suprapubic catheter replacement competency checklist, which she had previously reviewed, directed that the catheter tubing should be anchored to the abdomen. The competency checklist documented that the catheter tubing should be secured to the abdomen, but this was not followed in practice.
Failure to Implement Dietitian’s TID Supplement Order and Validate Significant Weight Changes
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure adequate nutritional maintenance for Resident 27 by not implementing the registered dietitian’s recommendation for house supplement shakes three times daily and by not appropriately monitoring and validating significant weight changes. Resident 27 had dementia with severe cognitive impairment, chronic pain, unspecified intellectual disabilities, and major depressive disorder, used a wheelchair, and required set-up or clean-up assistance for eating. The MDS documented a weight of 123 lbs with no weight loss or gain at that time, and the care plan included nutrition-focused interventions such as providing diet as ordered, snacks between meals, monitoring for loss of appetite while on Remeron, and providing supplements as ordered. On 03/03/26, the dietitian documented that the resident had slow, unplanned weight loss related to a decline in energy and recommended offering a house supplement three times a day and adding extra sugar, cream, and butter to foods and fluids to increase energy intake and promote weight stability. Despite this recommendation, the electronic task list from 03/16/26 to 04/13/26 showed the resident was only offered and received a supplement drink once daily in the afternoon. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident received a supplement only on second shift around 2:00 PM, and an administrative nurse acknowledged she had missed the dietitian’s TID recommendation and entered the order for only once daily. Weight records showed a documented weight of 123.4 lbs on 04/01/26 and an implausible weight of 168.0 lbs on 04/10/26, which was not recognized or rechecked at the time by nursing staff. A subsequent re-weigh on 04/15/26, using the wheelchair tare method, yielded a resident weight of 119.5 lbs, reflecting a 3.9 lb (3.16%) loss from 04/01/26. Administrative staff later stated that the 168 lb weight should have been immediately reported and rechecked, and that whoever weighed the resident should have reviewed the previous weight and performed a re-weight if there was a significant change. The facility’s weight loss prevention policy required nutritional interventions and RD consultation for residents with poor or declining intake or weight loss, but the RD was not informed that her TID supplement recommendation had been effectively reduced to once daily.
Emergency Tracheostomy Equipment Not Readily Available at Bedside
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure that emergency respiratory equipment, specifically an Ambu bag, was readily available at the bedside for a resident with a tracheostomy in the event of accidental extubation or respiratory distress. The resident had diagnoses including sleep apnea, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, obesity, dysphagia, malignant neoplasm of the nasopharynx, and required oxygen therapy and tracheostomy care. The resident was cognitively intact, used a wheelchair, and required varying levels of assistance with ADLs. The care plan documented that the resident received breathing treatments, required staff reminders to notify them when treatments were finished, and that staff were to provide oxygen via tracheostomy mask and suction as indicated. The care plan and physician orders also directed staff to call 911 and send the resident to the ER if the entire tracheostomy tube came out, and to follow the facility’s Emergency Protocol Health policy. Surveyor observations on multiple occasions showed that while oxygen and suction were available at the bedside, there was no Ambu bag in the resident’s room. Instead, the Ambu bag and emergency supplies were stored on a covered cart in the hallway under a Hoyer lift, with a battery charger on top, requiring staff to move equipment and wheel the cart into the room before use. Staff interviews confirmed that the emergency tracheostomy supplies and Ambu bag were not kept at the bedside and were instead located in the hallway or medication room. Nursing staff stated that all nurses were CPR-qualified and that hospice residents with tracheostomies had bedside emergency kits because hospice provided them. An administrative nurse reported that tracheostomy care competencies were done annually and explained that there was no emergency kit or Ambu bag at the bedside because the physician had instructed staff not to reinsert the tracheostomy if it came out, but to call 911 immediately. The facility’s Respiratory Care policy stated that necessary respiratory care and services would be provided in accordance with professional standards of practice, the resident’s care plan, and resident choice.
Failure to Implement Timely Interventions to Prevent Facility-Acquired Pressure Ulcer
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to initiate timely and adequate interventions to prevent the development and progression of a pressure ulcer for Resident 27, who was identified as at risk for pressure ulcer development. The resident had multiple diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, osteoarthritis, heart failure, and muscle weakness, and had a BIMS score of five indicating severely impaired cognition. Assessments documented that the resident required extensive assistance of one to two staff for bed mobility, personal hygiene, dressing, repositioning, and transfers, and that she had a urinary catheter for constant urinary retention and incontinence. The MDS and care plans identified the resident as at risk for skin impairment, with a history of refusing to lie down to relieve pressure from the buttocks, and indicated she was on a turning/repositioning program with nutritional or hydration interventions and a pressure-reducing device in her chair. A Braden Scale score of 16 further indicated risk for pressure ulcer development. Despite these identified risks and care plan directives, the resident developed a facility-acquired Stage 2 pressure ulcer on the left buttocks. Weekly wound assessments documented the presence and progression of an open area on the left buttocks, with measurements changing over time, including a lateral opening measuring 2.0 cm by 1.0 cm and later a left inner buttocks wound measuring 3.0 cm by 2.0 cm by 0.5 cm depth, and then 2.0 cm by 3.5 cm by 0.8 cm depth. The record noted that the resident became less mobile after sustaining a left 5th metatarsal fracture requiring a walking boot, and that she was incontinent and preferred to sit in a recliner and wheelchair rather than sleep in bed. The facility’s own Wound Assessment, Prevention and Treatment policy required timely skin assessments, Braden evaluations, and immediate implementation of plans to reduce pressure ulcer risk, but the development of a facility-acquired pressure ulcer under these known risk conditions demonstrated that timely preventive interventions were not effectively implemented.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release May 27, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.
