Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Holiday Resort during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to provide timely and adequate notification to residents and their representatives about a facility-initiated closure, giving only three days' notice instead of the required 30 days. Records lacked evidence of compliance with notification requirements, placing all 51 residents in immediate jeopardy to their health and safety, including those with developmental disabilities and quadriplegia.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and dependent on staff for ADLs was observed with untrimmed and dirty fingernails. Despite facility policy requiring clean and clipped nails, staff failed to maintain the resident's nail hygiene. A CNA noted the resident's nails should be cleaned on bath days, and the Administrative Nurse expected staff to keep nails trimmed and clean.
A resident with lymphedema and venous ulcers experienced pain and redness due to improper application of compression wraps. Despite notifying the charge nurse of discomfort, staff failed to examine or adjust the wraps, leading to a deficiency in care. The facility's policy on skin integrity was not followed, resulting in potential skin damage.
Failure to Provide Timely Transfer and Discharge Notices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely and adequate notification to residents and their representatives regarding a facility-initiated closure. The facility notified all 51 residents of the impending closure only three days before the closure date, which did not meet the federally required 30-day advance written notice. This notice should have included the reason for the transfer or discharge, the effective date, the specific location to which the resident is to be transferred or discharged, and an explanation of the right to appeal the transfer or discharge to the State. Additionally, the notice should have contained contact information for the State entity that receives appeal hearing requests, information on how to obtain an appeal form, and details for obtaining assistance in completing and submitting the appeal hearing request. The facility's records, including Electronic Health Records (EHR) and communication notes, lacked evidence of compliance with these notification requirements. For instance, several residents' records did not show that they were provided with a written thirty-day notice of involuntary discharge with all federally required components. In many cases, the communication notes indicated that calls were made to residents' representatives, but these notes often lacked critical details such as the discharge date, physician notification, and plans for a safe and orderly discharge from the facility. The deficiency placed all 51 residents in immediate jeopardy to their health and safety, as they were at risk for an unsafe transfer or discharge, potential sadness or depression, and likely negative impacts on their psychosocial well-being. The facility's failure to meet the notification requirements for involuntary discharge and transfer notices was a significant oversight, affecting all residents, including those with developmental disabilities and quadriplegia.
Failure to Maintain Resident's Nail Hygiene
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate care and services for a dependent resident in relation to proper fingernail trimming and hygiene. The resident, who has diagnoses including urinary incontinence and vascular dementia, was assessed with severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Observations revealed that the resident's fingernails contained a brown substance and were approximately one-eighth inch in length. A family member noted that the resident had fragile skin and scratched at a rash on his body. During morning care, a CNA confirmed the resident's nails were dirty and should be trimmed and cleaned on bath days. The CNA mentioned that the resident could become uncooperative with care but was more cooperative when family was present. An interview with the Administrative Nurse indicated an expectation for staff to maintain residents' nails in a trimmed and clean manner. The facility's policy on dignity instructed staff to provide grooming, including clean and clipped nails, as residents wish to be groomed.
Improper Application of Compression Wraps Leads to Resident Discomfort
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper application of compression wraps for a resident, leading to potential skin damage. The resident, who had diagnoses including lymphedema, chronic venous hypertension, and a venous ulcer, was observed with compression wraps applied to both lower extremities. The resident was at risk for pressure ulcer development and had existing pressure and venous ulcers. A physician's order required the application of Tubigrip and light ace wrap to both lower extremities, along with heel protector boots. However, during an observation, it was noted that the resident experienced pain and redness below the right knee, which was not addressed by the staff despite the resident notifying the charge nurse of her discomfort during the night. Upon examination by Administrative Nurse D, a 14 cm red, slow-blanching, indented area was found on the resident's upper calf, indicating improper application of the compression wrap. The resident's complaint of discomfort was not acted upon by the staff, as they did not examine or adjust the pressure bandage. The facility's policy on skin integrity, which requires care consistent with professional standards to prevent pressure ulcers, was not adhered to, resulting in the deficiency. The staff's inaction in addressing the resident's reported discomfort and failure to maintain the compression wrap properly led to the deficiency noted in the report.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 35 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Emporia
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emporia Presbyterian Manor | 0.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 16 | 0 |
| Flint Hills Care And Rehabilitation Center | 1.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Chase County Care And Rehab | 18.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 19 | 0 |
| Diversicare Of Council Grove | 22.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Osage Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 25.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Holiday Resort.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.