Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Diversicare Of Chanute during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A hospice resident with a history of stroke, depression, anxiety, psychosis, insomnia, and impaired mobility had an established psychotropic regimen including clonazepam, lorazepam (Ativan), and Seroquel to manage terminal agitation and behavioral symptoms. After admission to hospice, an administrative nurse insisted the resident could not receive both clonazepam and Ativan, pressured staff to contact the PCP, and clonazepam was abruptly discontinued without hospice being notified, despite the PCP’s original plan to taper it gradually. Following this change, documentation showed the resident became increasingly agitated, paranoid, confused, and tearful, refused care and medications, attempted unsafe activities such as trying to leave his room and facility, and sustained an unwitnessed fall with a skin tear and low back discomfort, requiring more frequent narcotic pain medication. The resident’s DPOA and hospice staff reported that the resident’s behaviors and anxiety worsened after clonazepam was stopped and that they felt pressured by facility leadership to alter the medication regimen that had previously kept the resident more comfortable.
Failure to Report Resident-to-Resident Abuse Allegation: A resident with dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, and significant cognitive impairment pinched another resident, who also had severe cognitive impairment. The event was documented in the chart, but the incident was not immediately reported to the Administrator or the SA, and the investigation record showed the residents’ representatives and key facility leaders were not notified. The injured resident had no visible bruising or redness on follow-up, but the record lacked further documentation of psychosocial follow-up related to the event.
A resident environment deficiency was identified after surveyors observed damaged room surfaces, peeling paint, exposed wood and sheetrock, broken or dusty blinds, and a hole in one room wall. Common areas also had black, fuzzy-looking substance on A/C vents, a lobby sprinkler head, and hallway ceilings, along with partially hanging lights. Staff were unaware of several conditions, and records showed unclear housekeeping responsibilities for main building areas and vents.
Failure to document informed consent for psychotropic medications was identified for a resident with anxiety, MDD, and insomnia. The EMR showed orders for Latuda, Pristiq, Remeron, and Xanax, but no informed consent documentation was present. An RN stated psychotropic informed consent was expected before initiation or with dose changes, and the facility policy stated residents have the right to be informed in advance about care and treatment.
Failure to provide nail care for a resident with dementia and severe cognitive impairment. The resident required assistance with ADLs, yet was observed with long, dirty fingernails. CNA and CMA staff stated fingernails were cleaned on shower days, and the DON stated that was the expectation.
A facility failed to display accurate and identifiable daily staffing information for 47 residents. Review of the Daily Staffing sheets showed the actual hours worked per shift were not completed, and an Administrative Nurse confirmed the omission. The facility did not provide a policy.
Surveyors observed that food and drink served to residents was not palatable, attractive, or at a safe and appetizing temperature, resulting in a deficiency related to meal quality and service standards.
Several residents reported not receiving their mail on weekends due to the absence of staff responsible for mail delivery on Saturdays. Staff interviews confirmed that mail was only checked and delivered Monday through Friday, with no clear process for weekend delivery, resulting in delayed access to mail for residents.
A resident with lymphedema and cellulitis had maggots found in his leg dressings due to the facility's failure to maintain clean and dry dressings. Despite the resident's concerns, staff did not change the soiled dressings for several days, and there was no protocol for handling such situations. Observations showed unsanitary conditions in the resident's room and improper hygiene practices by staff during wound care.
A resident with a history of muscle weakness and incontinence did not receive the prescribed wound care treatment due to staff failing to apply Dermafoam as ordered by the physician. Instead, an ointment was used, and the staff was unaware of the correct treatment protocol. The facility lacked a policy for following physician orders, leading to a deficiency in care.
A resident with a fractured right fibula and on medications contributing to constipation did not have a bowel movement for five days. The facility failed to monitor and address this issue, as the care plan lacked information on bowel function, and no medication for constipation was administered. Despite the resident's complaints and the facility's process for bowel monitoring, the physician was not notified, leading to a deficiency in care.
A resident with lymphedema and cellulitis received improper wound care, with staff failing to maintain a clean environment and perform appropriate hand hygiene. Dressings were not clean or intact, and supplies were placed on unclean surfaces. The facility's policies for hand hygiene and clean dressing changes were not followed, leading to an unsanitary environment.
A resident at the facility was found to have maggots on their skin during a wound clinic visit, indicating a failure in the facility's pest control program. Observations revealed flies in the resident's room and soaked bandages, with staff interviews highlighting a lack of awareness and communication regarding the pest issue. The facility's pest control policy was not effectively implemented, leading to this deficiency.
The facility failed to administer the physician-ordered amount of oxygen to a resident with COPD and ensure another resident with respiratory failure received oxygen as prescribed. Observations and staff interviews revealed deviations from prescribed oxygen levels and issues with empty oxygen bottles, highlighting a significant lapse in following physician orders.
A resident with atrial fibrillation and dependence on renal dialysis did not receive a physician-ordered anticoagulant medication for 22 days after a fistula placement procedure. The facility failed to document and administer the medication, and did not notify the cardiologist about the procedure. The administrative nurse was unaware of the error until 23 days later, and the facility lacked a policy for following physician orders.
Failure to Follow Hospice-Directed Psychotropic Regimen Resulting in Agitation and Fall
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure a hospice resident received necessary care and his personalized, physician‑ordered medication regimen to manage terminal agitation and promote comfort. The resident had a history of cerebral infarction, depression, anxiety, psychosis, insomnia, impaired balance, lower extremity impairment with a prosthesis, and functional dependence in multiple ADLs. Care Area Assessments identified risks for further ADL decline, falls, incontinence, skin breakdown, pain, increased falls, impaired balance, and worsening depression and anxiety. The resident’s care plan documented he was on hospice for end‑of‑life care related to a terminal cerebral infarction and that staff were to coordinate care with hospice, notify hospice of any change in condition or medication changes, and provide medications as ordered while monitoring for effectiveness and side effects. The resident’s EMR showed he was receiving clonazepam 0.5 mg twice daily for anxiety related to altered mental status and Seroquel for dementia with distressing psychotic features. A provider order then added scheduled lorazepam (Ativan) 0.5 mg three times daily for agitation and irritability and admitted the resident to hospice. On hospice admission, most medications were discontinued, but clonazepam, lorazepam, Seroquel, Tylenol, Lantus, and PRN Tramadol were continued. Shortly afterward, an administrative nurse questioned why the resident had both scheduled Ativan and clonazepam, asserted the resident could not be on both, and required that the primary care provider be called to choose one or the other. A subsequent provider order discontinued clonazepam and continued lorazepam and Seroquel. Hospice was not informed of the discontinuation, and hospice staff later confirmed they had not received an order to stop clonazepam and only learned from facility staff that it had been stopped. Following the abrupt discontinuation of clonazepam, documentation showed the resident became increasingly agitated, confused, and distressed. Nursing notes described the resident becoming upset, refusing medications, expressing paranoid thoughts that staff were trying to poison him, picking up a folding table, threatening to throw it through a door, and requiring repeated staff interventions before eventually taking medications. Additional notes recorded the resident yelling for help, attempting to put on his prosthetic leg to “get some things out of the truck,” refusing care, being visibly upset and tearful, expressing confusion about his location and his daughter’s whereabouts, and having delusions about the Air Force being in the facility. The resident experienced an unwitnessed fall while trying to go downstairs, resulting in a skin tear and apparent discomfort, and he required increased use of narcotic pain medication after clonazepam was stopped. Hospice and the primary care provider later noted that the resident’s agitation and confusion increased around the time clonazepam was discontinued and that the original plan had been to taper clonazepam gradually while adjusting lorazepam, rather than stopping clonazepam abruptly. Interviews further documented that the administrative nurse told hospice and the resident’s DPOA that the resident could not be on both clonazepam and Ativan and indicated that if the DPOA did not agree, the resident could be taken home or the facility’s medical director would be used to discontinue medications. The DPOA reported feeling harassed, bullied, and pressured to have one of the medications discontinued, despite believing the combined regimen of lower‑dose Seroquel, clonazepam, and Ativan best controlled the resident’s behaviors and anxiety. The primary care provider confirmed she had intended to wean clonazepam over one to two weeks while adjusting Ativan but felt pressured by the situation at the facility to discontinue one of the medications sooner than planned. Facility administration later stated that the administrative nurse did not have authority to dictate what medications residents were allowed to take and that it would have been more appropriate to clarify concerns with the prescriber rather than stating the resident could not have the medication. The facility’s psychotropic medication policy stated that psychotropics are to be used only when a practitioner determines they are appropriate for a diagnosed condition and beneficial to the resident, with monitoring and documentation of response, underscoring that the resident’s ordered hospice comfort regimen was not followed as intended.
Failure to Report Resident-to-Resident Abuse Allegation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure staff immediately reported a resident-to-resident abuse allegation to the Administrator and failed to report the incident to the State Agency. The record showed one resident had diagnoses of dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, and gait and mobility abnormalities, with a BIMS score of 3 indicating significantly impaired cognition. He was dependent on staff for several activities of daily living, used a manual wheelchair, and had a behavioral care area assessment that triggered for physical and verbal abusive behaviors toward staff and other residents, resistance to care, wandering, yelling, and cursing. His care plan addressed limited awareness of safety and personal space but did not include interventions related to physical or verbal behaviors toward other residents. The incident record documented that the resident approached another resident and pinched her on the arm, after which he attempted to hit staff and used expletives. The other resident had severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 4. Her record documented that she was pinched by another resident, and the next day staff examined her arm and found no bruising or redness and no verbal complaints of pain. Her record did not include further documentation of follow-up related to psychosocial impact from the event. The investigation template showed the incident was not reported to the residents’ representatives and that the nurse did not notify the provider, family, Administrative Nurse D, or Administrative Staff A. The facility could not provide witness statements or corrective actions associated with the incident. During interviews, one nurse stated she immediately separated the residents and checked the injured resident’s arm, while Administrative Nurse D initially stated such an event would only be reported if there was an actual injury and that she was not aware the pinching had occurred. Administrative Staff A stated the incident was not reported to the State Agency because he did not think the resident had actually pinched the other resident and, if it did happen, there was no physical injury.
Unsafe and Poorly Maintained Resident Rooms and Common Areas
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, and homelike environment in resident rooms and common areas. During observations, multiple resident rooms had damaged walls, doors, trim, and window blinds, including peeled paint, exposed sheetrock, exposed wood, splintered areas, missing trim-molding, bent blinds, and dusty or broken slats. In one resident room, the wall near the door frame had a hole with loose sheetrock, and several rooms had paint separation, cracking, and peeling where walls met the ceiling. In common areas, surveyors observed four A/C vents in the 200 hallway, an A/C vent and sprinkler head in the lobby, and four A/C vents in the 100 hallway with dark black and gray fuzzy-looking substance on and around the vents and ceiling. Two fluorescent lights in the 100 hallway were partially hanging down from the ceiling. Facility staff, including administrative and maintenance staff, stated they were unaware of some of these conditions and described the substance as concerning and appearing organic. One administrative staff member also stated the facility had a performance improvement project addressing items that do not contribute to a homelike environment, but was unaware of the hole in one resident room. Records showed the facility contracted housekeeping and laundry services to an outside group, but the contract did not list the housekeeping duties covered by the contracted staff. Housekeeping records showed daily cleaning duties for resident rooms only, while administrative staff stated there was no checklist or record maintained for the main building areas and only a calendar tracked responsibility for those duties. Staff statements also reflected uncertainty about who was responsible for cleaning building vents, and one housekeeping staff member stated high-surface dusting was done monthly while another stated vents were cleaned the prior week.
Failure to Document Informed Consent for Psychotropic Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure informed consent was documented for psychotropic medications for one resident. Resident 3 had diagnoses of anxiety, major depressive disorder, and insomnia, and the electronic medical record showed physician orders for Latuda 40 mg by mouth daily for major depressive disorder, Pristiq 100 mg by mouth daily for depression, Remeron 15 mg by mouth daily for insomnia, and Xanax 0.25 mg by mouth twice daily for anxiety, all ordered on 07/28/25. The resident's EMR lacked documentation of informed consent for these medications. During interview on 09/22/25 at 03:11 PM, the Administrative Nurse stated the expectation was for nursing staff to complete a psychotropic informed consent with any dose change or before the initiation of a psychotropic medication. The facility policy for Resident's Rights and Quality of Life, effective 05/01/12, stated that all residents have the right to be informed in advance about care and treatment and any changes in care or treatment.
Failure to Provide Nail Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide nail care for one sampled resident, R5, who had a diagnosis of dementia and severe cognitive impairment with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of three. Her quarterly MDS documented that she required partial to moderate assistance with showering and setup assistance for personal hygiene, and her care plan stated that she had dementia and required assistance with all ADLs. During observation, R5 was seated in her wheelchair in the doorway of the dining room and had long, dirty fingernails. Staff interviews indicated that fingernail cleaning was expected to occur on residents’ shower days, but the resident’s fingernails were observed dirty and unclean at the time of survey.
Daily Staffing Sheets Not Completed
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to display accurate and identifiable staffing information on a daily basis for the 47 residents who resided in the facility. Review of the Daily Staffing sheets from 08/22/25 through 09/21/25 showed that the actual hours worked per shift were not completed on the staffing sheets. On 09/22/25 at 12:41 PM, Administrative Nurse D confirmed that the Daily Staffing sheets lacked the actual hours worked per shift. The facility did not provide a policy.
Failure to Provide Palatable and Properly Tempered Food and Drink
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that food and drink provided to residents was palatable, attractive, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature. Surveyors observed that the food and beverages did not meet these standards during their review. The deficiency was identified based on direct observation of the meals served to residents, noting issues with the quality, presentation, and temperature of the food and drink.
Failure to Ensure Timely Delivery of Resident Mail on Weekends
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide residents with reasonable access to receive their mail, specifically on Saturdays. Multiple residents reported that while they received mail Monday through Friday, mail was not delivered to them on Saturdays because the staff responsible for mail delivery did not work weekends. One resident noted that he received mail at his nearby house on Saturdays and expected the same at the facility. Staff interviews confirmed that the mail was checked and delivered only on weekdays, and there was confusion among staff regarding who was responsible for mail delivery on weekends. Activity staff and administrative staff both stated they did not work on Saturdays, and mail accumulated over the weekend was delivered on Mondays. Facility policy affirms residents' rights to send and receive mail, but the policy did not address timely delivery of mail received on Saturdays. Observations and staff interviews indicated that no system was in place to ensure mail was delivered to residents on Saturdays, resulting in delayed access to their correspondence. The deficiency was identified through direct observation, resident interviews, and staff statements, all confirming the lack of weekend mail delivery.
Failure to Maintain Clean Dressings and Proper Hygiene
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident, who was diagnosed with lymphedema, venous insufficiency, and cellulitis, had clean and dry dressings on his lower extremities. On a scheduled appointment, it was discovered that the resident's dressings were soaked with urine and fluid, and maggots were found on his right lower extremity. The dressings had not been changed since they were applied four days prior, despite the resident voicing concerns about the condition of his wraps to a licensed nurse the night before his appointment. The facility lacked additional orders to guide staff on actions to take if the dressings became soiled, wet, or loose. The resident's care plan and physician orders required that his lymphedema wraps be kept clean, dry, and intact, with outpatient therapy scheduled to change the dressings on specific days. However, the facility staff failed to monitor and address the condition of the wraps adequately. Documentation indicated that the wraps were not clean, dry, or intact on several occasions, yet no action was taken to rectify the situation or notify the physician for further instructions. The resident's condition was further compromised by the lack of a clear protocol for staff to follow when the dressings were not maintained as required. Observations revealed that the resident's room was unsanitary, with soiled dressings and gauze on the floor, and flies present, contributing to a foul odor. Staff members were observed handling the resident's dressings and performing wound care without adhering to proper hygiene protocols, such as changing gloves and performing hand hygiene. The facility's failure to maintain the resident's dressings and follow appropriate hygiene practices placed the resident at risk for further skin impairment and the presence of maggots in the wound areas.
Failure to Follow Physician Orders for Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate wound treatment for a resident, identified as R4, who had a medical history of muscle weakness, edema, and frequent incontinence leading to moisture-associated skin damage (MASD). Despite physician orders to apply Dermafoam to R4's bilateral upper back thigh wounds, the facility staff did not follow these orders. On a specific date, a Licensed Nurse (LN) applied Dermaseptin ointment instead of the prescribed foam dressing, indicating a failure to adhere to the treatment plan. The LN admitted to never having applied foam to those wounds before and was unaware of the correct treatment protocol. Further investigation revealed that the facility lacked a policy regarding adherence to physician orders, contributing to the oversight. Administrative staff confirmed that the Dermafoam should have been in place at all times and not treated as a PRN dressing. Additionally, another LN who worked the night shift was unaware of the treatment required for R4's thigh wounds, highlighting a communication gap among the staff. The resident, R4, reported that the foam dressing had been off since the previous night, and she was unsure if the nursing staff was aware of this. This series of actions and inactions led to the deficiency in providing the necessary wound care as per the physician's orders.
Failure to Monitor and Address Constipation in Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to monitor and address the bowel functioning of Resident 3, who had a medical history of a fractured right fibula and required assistance with personal care. Despite receiving medications such as Ultram and Bumex, which can contribute to constipation, there was no documentation of bowel movements for five days from June 20 to June 24, 2024. The facility's records, including the Baseline Care Plan and Care Plan, lacked information regarding bowel function, and there was no medication administered for constipation during this period. The facility's process for bowel monitoring involved CNAs reporting bowel movements daily, with alerts generated if a resident had not had a bowel movement in three days. However, this process was not effectively followed for Resident 3. Interviews with staff revealed that the facility had standing physician orders for constipation that could be activated if needed, but these were not utilized for Resident 3. The Licensed Nurse and Administrative Nurse were unaware of any actions taken to address the lack of bowel movements, and the physician was not notified as required by the facility's policy. Resident 3 expressed experiencing significant constipation and stated that at home, she took Miralax to manage her condition. Despite complaints of constipation reported by the CNA to the Licensed Nurse, no action was taken to address the issue, resulting in a deficiency in the facility's care for Resident 3.
Inadequate Infection Control During Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by the improper handling of a resident's wound care. The resident, who had a medical history of lymphedema, venous insufficiency, and cellulitis, was observed with dressings that were not clean, dry, or intact. The resident's room was unsanitary, with dressings and gauze on the floor, and flies present, contributing to a foul odor. The staff did not follow proper procedures for maintaining a clean environment, as evidenced by the presence of a tied-up plastic bag and a pile of wraps and gauze on the floor. During the dressing change, the licensed nurse (LN) failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene and did not use a clean dressing change procedure. The LN used the same contaminated gloves to clean the resident's legs after removing soiled dressings and did not perform hand hygiene before applying new gloves. Additionally, the LN placed treatment supplies directly on surfaces without a barrier and used a trash can to prop the resident's foot during the dressing change, which is against the facility's policy. The LN also failed to address the leaking dressings promptly and did not have an order for what to do if the wraps were not clean, dry, or intact. The facility's policies for hand hygiene and clean dressing changes were not followed, as the LN did not wash hands after removing gloves, did not use a barrier for dressing supplies, and did not dispose of dressings that touched unclean surfaces. The administrative nurse confirmed that hand hygiene should be performed during dressing changes, and a barrier should be used for dressing supplies. The failure to adhere to these policies resulted in an unsafe and unsanitary environment, increasing the risk of infection transmission.
Failure to Maintain Effective Pest Control Program
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, resulting in a resident having maggots identified on their skin. On a visit to a wound clinic, two maggots were discovered on the resident's right lower extremity by Consultant Staff GG while removing urine and fluid-soaked dressings. The dressings had been in place since 06/13/24, and the maggots were found on 06/17/24. The facility's progress notes did not document the presence of maggots upon the resident's return from the clinic. Observations on 06/24/24 revealed flies in the resident's room, a foul odor, and soaked bandages, indicating a lack of effective pest control measures. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of awareness and communication regarding the pest issue. Housekeeping Staff U noted flies in the resident's room but did not take action due to a lack of resources. Maintenance Staff V was unaware of any fly issues or maggots and stated that concerns should be communicated through the TELS system. Administrative Staff A was not informed of the maggot issue until the surveyor's arrival. The facility's pest control policy, dated 09/01/14, was not effectively implemented, as evidenced by the presence of flies and maggots in the resident's environment.
Failure to Administer Oxygen as Prescribed
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to administer the physician-ordered amount of oxygen to Resident 5 (R5) and ensure Resident 1 (R1) received oxygen as prescribed. R5, diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), had a physician order for oxygen at three liters per minute via nasal cannula. However, observations on multiple occasions showed the oxygen concentrator set between 3.5 to 4.0 liters. Licensed Nurse H admitted to increasing the oxygen flow without verifying the current physician order, which was still set at three liters per minute. This discrepancy was confirmed by Administrative Nurse D, who emphasized the importance of following physician orders for oxygen administration. Resident 1 (R1), diagnosed with acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and heart failure, had a physician order for oxygen at two liters per minute via nasal cannula as needed to maintain oxygen saturation above 90 percent. However, during a physician visit, R1's oxygen tank was found empty, resulting in an oxygen saturation level of 80 percent. Observations and interviews revealed that R1 frequently experienced issues with empty oxygen bottles, both in the facility and during transportation to appointments. Staff members, including a Certified Medication Aide and Maintenance Staff, confirmed that R1 often returned from dialysis with an empty or improperly set oxygen bottle. Administrative Staff A and Nurse G acknowledged the issue and noted that the facility's policy required ensuring residents had enough oxygen before leaving the building. The facility's policy on oxygen guidelines, dated 01/01/22, stated that oxygen should be provided according to a physician's order, including the dose and rate of administration. The facility failed to adhere to this policy for both R5 and R1, resulting in deviations from the prescribed oxygen levels. This failure was corroborated by multiple staff members and documented observations, highlighting a significant lapse in following physician orders and ensuring proper oxygen administration for residents with respiratory needs.
Failure to Administer Physician-Ordered Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to start a physician-ordered medication for a resident (R1) with diagnoses of atrial fibrillation and dependence on renal dialysis, resulting in 22 days without the ordered medication. The resident was supposed to start taking apixaban (Eliquis), an anticoagulant, after a fistula placement procedure. However, the facility did not document or administer the medication until 23 days after the initial order. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for February and March 2024 lacked instructions for administering apixaban until March 15, 2024, and the medication was only administered starting March 16, 2024. The facility also failed to notify the cardiologist about the fistula placement and the need to restart the medication. Interviews and record reviews revealed that the facility's administrative nurse was unaware of the medication error until March 18, 2024. The facility lacked a policy for following physician orders, and the process for handling new orders upon a resident's return from an appointment was not followed. The charge nurse and medical records staff were responsible for ensuring new orders were noted and brought to the morning meeting, but this did not occur in R1's case. The family member of R1 also reported multiple calls questioning whether the medication had been restarted, indicating a communication breakdown within the facility.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 40 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Chanute
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heritage Health Care Center | 1.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
| Medicalodges Iola | 18.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 7 | 0 |
| Prairie Mission Retirement Village | 19.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Neodesha Care And Rehab | 20.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 21 | 0 |
| Yates Operator, Llc | 20.8 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Diversicare Of Chanute.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.