Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Westminster Village Health & Rehab during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment, stroke history, muscle weakness, and respiratory failure, who was dependent on staff for transfers, was being moved from a wheelchair to a bed using a mechanical lift with assistance from two CNAs. The care plan required use of a mechanical lift with two staff, and facility policy required secure attachment and double-checking of sling straps before lifting. During the transfer, the resident was raised in the lift, one CNA pulled the wheelchair away, a lift strap became detached, and the resident fell to the floor, striking the shoulder and head and sustaining a clavicle fracture and scalp laceration. The Administrator later determined that a strap likely had not been fully engaged on the lift, contrary to the facility’s mechanical lift procedure.
A resident admitted with multiple medical conditions was cognitively intact and had signed a POST form indicating Full Code status. However, the facility incorrectly entered a DNR order at admission and failed to maintain the POST form in the medical record as required by policy, resulting in a discrepancy between the resident's documented wishes and the orders present in the record.
A resident with COPD and CHF was discharged home with Home Health Care, but the facility did not transmit the discharge MDS assessment to the State within the required timeframe. The MDS Coordinator was on leave and was uncertain about transmission requirements, leading to the deficiency.
Two residents with significant dental issues, including broken or missing teeth and loose dentures, were not accurately represented in their MDS assessments. Staff observations and care plans documented these dental problems, but the MDS failed to reflect them, despite ongoing awareness among staff and family members.
A resident with multiple mental health diagnoses, including dementia, did not have a care plan addressing dementia care or specific interventions for their condition. Although care plans were in place for general mental health needs and behaviors, there was no documentation of dementia-specific strategies, despite facility policy requiring such a plan for individuals with confirmed dementia.
Surveyors identified that two residents did not receive appropriate catheter care: one experienced a delay in UTI treatment due to late physician notification and medication procurement, while another was repeatedly observed with a Foley catheter drainage bag and tubing in contact with the floor, contrary to infection control policy.
A resident with heart failure and other complex conditions experienced multiple significant overnight weight gains, but staff did not notify the physician as required by orders and facility policy. Nursing staff and the DON acknowledged lapses in monitoring and reporting these discrepancies.
A resident with chronic respiratory conditions did not have their oxygen tubing and nebulizer equipment consistently dated or properly stored, as required by physician orders and facility policy. Observations showed undated and unbagged equipment left on surfaces, despite staff stating that equipment should be cleaned, dried, and stored in dated bags.
A resident with cognitive impairment and behavioral health needs exhibited ongoing aggression and care refusals, but the facility failed to develop or implement individualized interventions. Care plans and documentation remained generic, and staff did not consistently attempt or record resident-specific strategies during behavioral episodes, leading to the resident's transfer to the ER without evidence of tailored behavioral management.
The facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in food preparation and service, with employees not adhering to proper hygiene practices, such as not covering mustaches, handling food without gloves, and turning off water faucets with bare hands after washing. The kitchen was also found to be in an unsanitary condition, with debris on the floor and unclean equipment.
The facility failed to obtain a supporting diagnosis for an indwelling Foley catheter for a resident who had the catheter placed during a hospital stay. The resident's medical record lacked documentation of a supporting diagnosis and notification to the physician. Additionally, there was no care plan for the catheter, and the facility's policy on catheter care was not followed.
A facility failed to address a significant weight discrepancy for a resident with multiple health conditions. The resident's weight fluctuated notably over several days, but the discrepancies were not documented or addressed as required by physician orders and facility policy. Staff interviews revealed issues with scale calibration and a lack of proper documentation.
The facility failed to ensure post-dialysis assessments were completed for a resident with end-stage renal disease, despite physician orders and facility policy. The deficiency was confirmed through record reviews and interviews with the resident, an LPN, and the DON.
The facility failed to ensure verbal physician's orders were counter-signed per pharmacy recommendations for two residents. Multiple instances of missing physician counter-signatures were noted, including medication changes and dosage reductions. Both residents had limited cognition and multiple diagnoses, highlighting the importance of proper medication management.
The facility failed to ensure that verbal physician's orders for psychotropic medications were signed by the physician for two residents. Both residents had multiple verbal orders for psychotropic medications that were not countersigned by the physician, despite pharmacy recommendations for dosage reductions.
The facility failed to ensure proper storage and labeling of medications, including undated and expired insulin pens for two residents. LPNs and the DON confirmed that insulin should be dated when opened and refrigerated until use, with a 28-day usage period post-opening. Facility policies on medication storage and expiration were provided.
The facility failed to maintain a separation between clean linen and the soiled linen area. An employee acknowledged that clean linens were left uncovered in the soiled laundry area, contrary to the facility's policy.
Injury from Improper Mechanical Lift Transfer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident was mechanically transferred safely, resulting in a fall from a mechanical lift and subsequent injuries. The resident involved had diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, history of stroke, muscle weakness, and respiratory failure, was severely cognitively impaired per a recent MDS, and was dependent on staff for transfers and non-ambulatory. The resident’s care plan required maximum assistance of two staff with a mechanical lift for transfers. During an evening transfer from a wheelchair to a bed using a mechanical lift, two CNAs assisted the resident. According to nursing documentation, the resident fell to the ground, striking her left shoulder on the base of the lift and the back of her head, and exhibited pain behaviors such as grimacing, moaning, and crying. Written statements from both CNAs indicated that they had attached the resident’s sling straps to the lift prior to initiating the transfer. One CNA reported that three straps were hooked on the resident and that she had attached the two bottom straps and one top strap, while the other CNA attached the remaining top strap. When the lift was operated and the resident was in the air, one CNA pulled the wheelchair away, and a strap came undone, causing the resident to fall; the other CNA attempted to catch the resident but was unsuccessful. The Administrator’s investigation concluded that one of the straps likely had not fully engaged on the lift, which was the only explanation offered for why a strap would come loose. The facility’s mechanical lift policy required staff to ensure sling straps were securely attached, properly balanced, double-checked for security before lifting, and that all hooks, clips, fasteners, and strap stability be examined, indicating these procedural steps were not effectively followed during the transfer that led to the fall and injuries.
Failure to Accurately Document and Honor Resident Code Status on Admission
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to accurately document and honor a resident's code status upon admission. The resident, who was cognitively intact and admitted with diagnoses including infection related to a joint prosthesis, methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus infection, and hypertension, had a POST (Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment) form signed at admission indicating Full Code status. However, the physician order entered at the time of admission incorrectly documented the resident as DNR (Do Not Resuscitate), and the POST form was not present in the medical record as required. The care plan referenced the existence of advanced directives and DNR documentation, but did not reflect the resident's actual wishes as indicated on the POST form. The discrepancy was identified during a review of the medical record and confirmed through interviews with facility staff, including the medical record nurse and the DON. The facility's policy required the POST form to be maintained at the front of the resident's medical record, but this was not done, resulting in a failure to ensure the resident's treatment preferences were accurately recorded and accessible.
Failure to Timely Transmit Discharge MDS Assessment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the timely transmission of a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one resident. The resident had been admitted with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and congestive heart failure (CHF), and was discharged back to his home with Home Health Care. The admission MDS assessment indicated no cognitive deficit and a plan for discharge. The discharge MDS assessment was completed on the date of discharge, but there was no documentation that it had been transmitted to the State within the required timeframe. During the investigation, the Administrator stated that the MDS Coordinator was on a leave of absence and, when contacted, was unsure about the transmission requirements for regular Medicare versus Managed Medicare residents. The facility's policy, based on the CMS RAI Version 3.0 Manual, requires that discharge assessments be transmitted no later than 14 calendar days after completion. The lack of timely transmission for the discharge MDS assessment constituted the deficiency.
Inaccurate MDS Coding for Dental Status
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded regarding the dental status of two residents. For one resident, observations revealed broken and missing teeth, but the significant change MDS assessment did not document the presence of obvious cavities or broken natural teeth. The resident's care plan had previously identified a risk for oral and dental problems due to missing teeth and a need for assistance with oral care. Staff interviews confirmed the presence of missing and broken teeth, which were not reflected in the MDS documentation. For another resident, observations during a meal showed that her upper dentures were very loose, frequently falling off her gums and requiring her to push them back with a spoon. Despite this, both the significant change and quarterly MDS assessments failed to document the issue of broken or loosely fitting dentures. The resident had a history of severe cognitive deficit, type 2 diabetes, and protein-calorie malnutrition. Staff interviews indicated that the loose denture had been a persistent problem, known to both staff and the resident's family, but not accurately coded in the MDS. The facility's DON acknowledged awareness of the issue but was unsure why the MDS was not completed correctly, despite the facility's use of the CMS RAI manual for assessment guidance.
Failure to Implement Dementia-Specific Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a care plan specifically addressing dementia care and resident-specific interventions for a resident with multiple mental health diagnoses, including unspecified dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. The resident's medical record showed care plans for verbally abusive behaviors and mental health needs, but there was no care plan that directly addressed dementia or Alzheimer's disease, nor was there mention of a bipolar diagnosis. The interventions listed in the existing care plans focused on general mental health support, such as assessing needs, providing supportive counseling, and involving family, but did not include dementia-specific strategies. A review of the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment confirmed cognitive impairment, yet the medical record lacked evidence of a care plan tailored to dementia care. During an interview, the Social Services Director acknowledged the absence of a dementia care plan and stated that one should have been implemented at admission. The facility's current policy requires the interdisciplinary team to create a resident-centered care plan for individuals with confirmed dementia, but this was not done for the resident in question.
Delayed UTI Treatment and Improper Catheter Care Identified
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely treatment for a urinary tract infection (UTI) for a resident with a history of severe cognitive impairment and an indwelling catheter. Laboratory results indicating the presence of two types of bacteria in the urine were received by the facility, but there was no documentation that the physician was notified or that antibiotics were ordered until several days later. Interviews with staff revealed that the process for notifying the physician and obtaining antibiotics was not followed as expected, resulting in a delay of four days before treatment was initiated. The delay was attributed to a lack of immediate action to obtain the medication from the emergency drug kit or through a back-up pharmacy service, despite facility policy requiring timely access to medications. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure proper catheter care for another resident with an indwelling Foley catheter. Multiple observations over several days showed the resident's catheter drainage bag and tubing in direct contact with the floor while the resident was in a recliner. This was confirmed by the Director of Nursing, who acknowledged that the drainage bag and tubing should not be on the floor, in accordance with the facility's infection control policy. The deficiencies were identified through record review, staff interviews, and direct observation. The issues included both a lack of timely medical intervention for a UTI and repeated failures to maintain catheter equipment in a sanitary manner, as required by facility policy and standard infection control practices.
Failure to Notify Physician of Significant Weight Changes
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to address significant weight discrepancies for one resident with multiple medical conditions, including heart failure, a femur fracture, and vascular parkinsonism. The resident was under physician orders for daily weights and required notification to the physician if there was a weight gain of 3 pounds or more overnight or 5 pounds in one week. Despite this, multiple instances were documented where the resident experienced weight gains ranging from 3.6 to 12 pounds in less than 24 hours, and there was no evidence in the record that the physician was notified as required by the orders. Interviews with nursing staff and the Director of Nursing revealed that while staff were generally aware of the need to re-weigh residents or notify the physician in the event of significant weight changes, these actions were not consistently documented or performed. The DON acknowledged that monitoring of weight discrepancies had lapsed due to other responsibilities, and the facility's policy required reporting significant weight changes to the nurse supervisor and in accordance with professional standards, which was not followed in these instances.
Improper Storage and Management of Respiratory Equipment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper storage and management of respiratory equipment for a resident with significant respiratory diagnoses, including COPD, chronic respiratory failure, and pulmonary fibrosis. Multiple observations revealed that oxygen tubing and nebulizer equipment were not consistently dated or stored in accordance with facility policy and physician orders. Specifically, oxygen tubing was found undated and unbagged, draped over the concentrator, and nebulizer equipment was repeatedly observed unbagged and left on the bedside or overbed table. Some equipment was found in bags, but the bags or tubing were not always dated as required. Review of the resident's medical record confirmed orders for regular changing and proper storage of oxygen tubing and nebulizer equipment, with specific instructions to change tubing and humidifier bottles weekly and to document these changes. Interviews with LPNs indicated that equipment should be cleaned, air dried, and stored in dated bags, but observations did not consistently reflect this practice. The facility's policy also required tubing to be replaced per manufacturer and facility schedule, documented, and stored in plastic bags with dates, which was not consistently followed for this resident.
Failure to Develop and Implement Resident-Centered Behavioral Health Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a resident-centered behavior management care plan and did not identify or attempt individualized interventions during behavioral episodes for a resident with a history of behavioral health needs. The resident, who had diagnoses including encephalopathy, mood disorder, and mild cognitive impairment, exhibited ongoing agitation, verbal and physical aggression, and care refusals from the time of admission. Documentation repeatedly lacked evidence of specific interventions tailored to the resident’s needs, and staff notes often did not describe what was attempted or the effectiveness of any interventions during episodes of aggression or care refusal. Care plans and progress notes reviewed for the resident were generalized and did not include individualized strategies to address the resident’s behaviors, despite frequent incidents of aggression, care refusal, and false accusations towards staff. Interventions listed, such as care in pairs, reapproaching after 10-15 minutes, and offering to call the resident’s wife, were not tailored to the resident’s specific triggers or needs. Staff interviews confirmed that interventions were not effective, and there was uncertainty among staff about where to find or how to implement appropriate interventions. The intervention binder referenced by the facility contained only generic strategies and was not helpful in managing the resident’s behaviors. Despite the resident’s escalating behaviors, including physical aggression towards staff, the facility did not document the development or implementation of new, resident-specific interventions prior to transferring the resident to the emergency room for psychiatric evaluation. The records also lacked documentation that the resident was a danger to himself or others, as the behaviors were directed solely towards staff. The facility’s policy required individualized assessment and care planning for behavioral health needs, but this was not reflected in the care provided or documented for the resident.
Failure to Maintain Sanitary Conditions in Food Preparation and Service
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to prepare and serve food in a sanitary manner, as observed during multiple kitchen and dining room inspections. Employees were found not adhering to proper hygiene practices, such as not covering their mustaches with beard covers, handling food without gloves, and turning off water faucets with bare hands after washing. Additionally, the kitchen was observed to be in an unsanitary condition, with debris on the floor, unclean equipment, and missing dishwasher temperature logs for specific periods. During dining observations, several employees, including the Dietary Director and CNAs, were seen washing their hands for less than the required 20 seconds and turning off the water faucet with their bare hands. This improper hand hygiene practice was repeated multiple times, even after touching potentially contaminated surfaces like hair. The Dietary Director and other staff members were also observed serving food without gloves and touching the inside of plates with bare hands. The facility's policies on sanitation and hand hygiene were not followed, as evidenced by the unsanitary conditions in the kitchen and improper handwashing techniques. The Dietary Director acknowledged the lack of proper cleaning and was unable to provide a cleaning schedule. The facility's handwashing policy, which requires using a paper towel to turn off the faucet, was not adhered to by multiple staff members, leading to potential contamination during food preparation and service.
Failure to Obtain Supporting Diagnosis for Indwelling Foley Catheter
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to obtain a supporting diagnosis for an indwelling Foley catheter for one resident. The resident indicated that the catheter was placed during a hospital stay but could not recall the reason for its placement. Upon return from the hospital, the facility did not obtain a supporting diagnosis because they were waiting for a follow-up appointment with urology. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the physician referred them to urology for the diagnosis, and there was no documentation of a supporting diagnosis in the resident's medical record. Additionally, the medical record lacked documentation of notification to the physician requesting a supporting diagnosis for the catheter. The resident's medical record included various diagnoses such as a displaced fracture of the lower end of the right femur, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, atrial fibrillation, major depressive disorder, urine retention, and dysuria. However, there was no care plan for the indwelling Foley catheter, and the Minimum Data Set indicated the resident did not have a diagnosis of neurogenic bladder, renal failure, or urinary obstruction. The facility's policy on catheter care required documentation of clinical indications for catheter use, which was not followed in this case.
Failure to Address Significant Weight Discrepancy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to address a significant weight discrepancy for a resident with multiple health conditions, including unspecified diastolic heart failure, cerebral infarction, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The resident's weight fluctuated significantly between 3/18/24 and 3/22/24, with weights recorded as 175.4 pounds, 153.8 pounds, 154.8 pounds, 155.4 pounds, and 153.2 pounds, respectively. Despite a physician's order to notify the doctor of a 3-pound weight gain in 24 hours or a 5-pound gain in one week, the record lacked documentation that these discrepancies were addressed. The most recent dietary/nutrition note was dated 12/16/23 and did not reflect the recent weight changes. During interviews, staff indicated that residents were usually weighed by nursing staff and that significant weight differences should be re-weighed and reported. One LPN mentioned that one of the scales needed recalibration, but it was unclear which one. The Assistant Director of Nursing acknowledged that the weight difference should have been documented and re-weighed, attributing the discrepancy to a potential error due to scale issues. The facility's policy on weighing and measuring residents, revised in March 2011, emphasized the importance of calibrated scales and reporting significant weight changes to the nurse supervisor.
Failure to Complete Post-Dialysis Assessments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a post-dialysis assessment was completed for a resident who required dialysis services. Resident 23, who had diagnoses including end-stage renal disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and hemiplegia, was noted to be on dialysis as per a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. The resident had physician orders for dialysis three times a week and for checking the bruit and thrill in the right upper arm every shift. Despite these orders, the review of dialysis communication forms for February and March 2024 revealed that post-dialysis assessments were not completed on multiple dates. Interviews with the resident, an LPN, and the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the post-dialysis assessments were not consistently performed, and the DON was unaware of this lapse in procedure. The resident indicated that while an assessment was done on the day of the interview, it was not always performed when returning from dialysis. The facility's policy, revised in February 2023, required documentation of the catheter's location, condition of the dressing, whether dialysis was done, any report from the dialysis nurse, and observations post-dialysis. The failure to complete these assessments as per the policy and physician orders led to the deficiency noted in the report.
Failure to Ensure Physician Counter-Signatures on Verbal Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure verbal physician's orders were counter-signed per pharmacy recommendations for two residents. For Resident 37, the pharmacist recommended a dose reduction for Effexor, but the form lacked documentation of a counter signature by the physician. Resident 37 had multiple diagnoses, including type 2 diabetes, vascular dementia, epilepsy, hypertension, and hypothyroidism, and was on several medications. The quarterly Minimum Data Set indicated the resident had limited cognition, highlighting the importance of proper medication management and oversight. For Resident 11, multiple instances of missing physician counter-signatures were noted. These included changes in medication from Omeprazole to Pantoprazole, a reduction in Prozac dosage, instructions for Pulmicort use, and linking a bipolar diagnosis with an order for Seroquel. Resident 11 had diagnoses including COPD, type 2 diabetes, anxiety disorder, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, and major depressive disorder. The annual Minimum Data Set also indicated limited cognition. The facility's policy on verbal orders, dated February 2020, stated that verbal orders should be counter-signed by the physician during their next visit, which was not adhered to in these cases.
Failure to Ensure Physician's Signature on Verbal Orders for Psychotropic Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that verbal physician's orders for psychotropic medications were signed by the physician for two residents. Resident 47, who had diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and borderline personality disorder, had several verbal orders for psychotropic medications that were not countersigned by the physician. These included orders for olanzapine, buspirone, and sertraline, with pharmacy recommendations for dosage reductions that were verbally disagreed upon but lacked the necessary physician's counter signature. Similarly, Resident 16, who had diagnoses including anxiety disorder, depression, and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, also had multiple verbal orders for psychotropic medications that were not countersigned by the physician. These included orders for sertraline and Xanax, with pharmacy recommendations for dosage reductions that were verbally disagreed upon but lacked the required physician's counter signature. During an interview, the Administrator indicated a lack of awareness regarding a policy for pharmacy recommendations and verbal orders. The facility's policy, provided by the Administrator, stated that verbal orders should only be given in emergencies or when the attending physician is not immediately available, and that the practitioner should review and countersign verbal orders during their next visit. However, this policy was not followed in the cases of Residents 47 and 16.
Improper Medication Storage and Labeling
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled properly and did not dispose of expired medications for two of three medication carts reviewed. On one occasion, an undated and opened Lispro insulin pen and a Lantus insulin pen with an open date of 2/22/24 were found in the 200 hall second medication cart, both labeled for Resident 47. The Lantus insulin pen should have been discarded as it was past the 28-day usage period. LPN 7 confirmed that insulin pens should be dated when opened and discarded after 28 days. Resident 47's records indicated a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus and included physician orders for Humalog and Lantus insulin pens with specific administration instructions. In another instance, an unopened and non-refrigerated Lispro insulin pen labeled for Resident 14 was found in the 200 hall first cart. LPN 10 acknowledged that unopened insulin should be refrigerated until used but was unaware of how long the pen had been in the cart. The DON confirmed that insulin should be dated once opened and refrigerated until then, with a 28-day usage period post-opening. Resident 14's records also indicated a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus with a physician order for insulin Lispro injection solution to be administered per sliding scale with meals. The facility's policies on medication storage and expiration dating were provided, indicating insulin should be refrigerated until opened and discarded 28 days after opening.
Failure to Maintain Separation Between Clean and Soiled Linen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a separation between clean linen and the soiled linen area. During an observation of the soiled laundry area, several barrels containing linens were uncovered and placed against the wall in front of the washing machines, which were in use with soiled laundry. An employee indicated that the linens and clothing within the barrels had been washed and were clean, and she was waiting to put them into the dryer. The employee acknowledged that the lids had not been placed on the barrels to protect the clean linen and that the barrels containing the washed clean linen were within the soiled laundry area. The facility's policy, titled 'Laundry and Bedding, Soiled,' dated September 2022, indicated that clean linen should be protected from dust and soiling during transport and storage and should be stored separately from soiled linens at all times.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 193 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 4 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Terre Haute
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Southwood Healthcare Center | 1 mi | ★★★★★ | 24 | 2 |
| Springhill Village | 1 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Westridge Health Care Center | 1.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
| Majestic Care Of Deming Park | 3 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 2 |
| Cobblestone Crossings Health Campus | 3.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Westminster Village Health & Rehab.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.