Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at St Charles Health Campus during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with cognitive impairment and a recent fracture developed new unstageable pressure ulcers after staff failed to obtain adequate physician orders following removal of a non-removable brace and did not routinely assess or update the care plan for a newly identified wound. The facility did not consistently document physician notifications or perform required wound assessments, resulting in lapses in pressure ulcer prevention and care.
A cognitively impaired resident with severe mobility limitations experienced multiple falls due to inadequate supervision and failure to implement effective interventions. Despite being non-weight bearing and requiring assistance, the resident attempted self-transfers, leading to falls. The facility's care plans were not consistently updated with new interventions following each incident, and there was a lack of documentation confirming the implementation of existing measures like toileting schedules and alarm checks.
Two residents were found with medications on their bedside tables without proper assessments or care plans for self-administration. The facility failed to ensure that these residents were assessed for their capability to self-administer medications, and the nursing staff did not consistently follow the facility's policy for periodic assessments and documentation.
A facility failed to provide a SNFABN and NOMNC to a resident before the end of Medicare services. The resident's notice indicated coverage ended due to lack of progress in therapy, but the required notices were not given as the resident was declining and hospice services were being considered. Facility policy mandates these notices be issued in advance.
The facility failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment in a shower room and two bathrooms. Observations revealed odors, missing paint, frayed duct tape on handrails, cracked tiles, and a loose doorknob. Staff interviews indicated awareness of some issues, but deficiencies persisted due to inadequate maintenance follow-up.
Failure to Prevent and Assess Pressure Ulcers Due to Inadequate Physician Orders and Wound Monitoring
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate pressure ulcer prevention and care for a resident with multiple risk factors, including a recent tibial fracture, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and severe cognitive impairment. Upon admission, the resident was already at moderate risk for pressure ulcers and had an unhealed unstageable pressure ulcer on the left great toe. The resident was placed on non-weight bearing orders and had a non-removable splint applied to the left lower extremity. However, the resident repeatedly removed the splint and dressings, and the facility did not obtain timely or adequate physician orders or instructions following the removal of the non-removable brace. This led to the development of an unstageable pressure ulcer on the left heel. After the splint was removed at an orthopedic appointment, a new pressure ulcer was identified on the left heel. The facility staff replaced the non-removable splint themselves without further physician guidance, and the area was not reassessed as required. Additionally, a wound care clinic later identified a new unstageable pressure ulcer on the top of the left foot. Despite this diagnosis, the facility failed to routinely assess this wound or create a specific plan of care to address it. Weekly wound assessments were not completed for the top of the left foot wound, and the care plan was not updated to include this new pressure ulcer. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the wound on the top of the left foot was initially assessed as a scabbed area and not entered into the wound management program, resulting in a lack of routine assessments. Documentation also showed that the facility did not consistently follow up with the orthopedic physician's office after the resident removed the splint and did not document all attempts at physician notification. The facility's own policy required daily skin inspections and close monitoring when casts and splints are present, but these measures were not fully implemented for this resident.
Inadequate Supervision and Intervention for Cognitively Impaired Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for a cognitively impaired resident, identified as Resident G, who experienced multiple falls. Resident G had severe cognitive impairment, was non-weight bearing on the left leg, and required staff assistance for mobility and toileting. Despite these needs, the facility did not implement new interventions following falls to prevent further incidents. The resident's care plan included interventions such as a toileting schedule and sounding alarms, but there was a lack of documentation indicating these interventions were consistently followed or effective. Resident G experienced three falls during her stay at the facility. The first fall occurred when she attempted to transfer herself to the toilet, resulting in a fracture. Although a toileting schedule was added to her care plan, there was no documentation to confirm its implementation. The second fall happened when the resident attempted another self-transfer to the toilet, leading to an intervention that she should not be left unattended in her wheelchair. The third fall was unwitnessed, and the alarm did not sound, indicating a failure in the alarm system, which was supposed to be checked each shift. The facility's staff, including the DON and RN, acknowledged the resident's tendency to attempt to get up on her own and the need for constant supervision. However, the care plans were not adequately updated with effective interventions following each fall. The facility's Fall Management policy required care plans to be revised after falls, but this was not consistently done, contributing to the repeated incidents.
Failure to Assess Residents for Self-Administration of Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents who were self-administering medications were properly assessed for their capability to do so. This deficiency was observed in two residents, Resident 39 and Resident 12, during medication administration. For Resident 39, medications including an albuterol sulfate inhaler, a fluticasone nasal spray, and an Asmanex inhaler were found on the bedside table without a care plan for self-administration. The clinical records lacked a current Self Administration of Medication Assessment, and the nurse on duty did not acknowledge the medications or ensure they were stored appropriately. Similarly, Resident 12 had medications such as an albuterol sulfate inhaler, a Ventolin inhaler, a Flonase nasal spray, and Tums on their bedside table. The clinical records did not include a care plan for self-administration, and the last assessment for self-administration was outdated. The resident indicated they used these medications independently without notifying the staff, and there was no specific order for self-administration in the clinical records. Interviews with the nursing staff and the Director of Nursing revealed a lack of clarity and consistency in the assessment and documentation process for residents self-administering medications. The facility's policy required periodic assessments and a care plan for self-administration, but these were not consistently implemented or documented for the residents involved.
Failure to Provide Required Medicare Notices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary documentation to ensure a resident or responsible party was issued a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) and Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) before the proposed end of services for one resident. During a review of Medicare Part A discharge notices, it was found that the notice for a resident indicated the last day covered was due to a lack of progress in therapy related to an overall decline in condition. However, the Social Service Director indicated that a SNFABN and NOMNC were not provided because the resident was declining and the family was considering hospice services. The facility's policy requires that a NOMNC be issued two calendar days prior to the actual discharge from Medicare, and a SNFABN should be issued when services may not be covered under Medicare.
Facility Fails to Maintain Clean and Homelike Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment in one shower room and two bathrooms, as observed during a survey. In the bathroom of one room, a strong odor of bowel movement was noted, along with missing paint by the toilet paper holder. In another room, the handrail by the toilet was wrapped with frayed duct tape and non-slip pads, which were remnants from a previous resident. The Director of Nursing was unaware of these conditions until the survey. Additionally, the shower room on the 200 Hall had cracked and missing tiles, a dark brown substance along the grout, and a loose doorknob. There was also a brown substance around the toilet base, and the call light string was missing. Interviews with staff revealed that the Maintenance Director was aware of some issues, such as the cracked tiles, and had plans to address them. However, he was not aware of the loose doorknob. The maintenance process involved checking work orders daily, but the issues persisted. Housekeeping staff indicated that rooms were cleaned daily, and any maintenance issues were supposed to be reported through a work order system. Despite these procedures, the deficiencies remained unaddressed at the time of the survey.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 120 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Jasper
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timbers Of Jasper The | 0.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Serenity Spring Senior Living At Northwood | 0.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Cathedral Health Care Center | 1.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Brookside Village Inc | 3.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
| Waters Of Huntingburg, The | 7.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 19 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for St Charles Health Campus.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.