Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Mccormick's Creek Rehabilitation And Healthcare during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to ensure an RN was on site for 8 hours a day and that the DON was not the only RN on duty when census was above 60. Review of staffing records showed that on three days, the only RN working was the DON while the census was 73 residents. The DON stated she covered shifts when other RNs called in and did not clock in when she covered a shift. Facility policy stated the DON may serve as charge nurse only when average daily occupancy is 60 or fewer residents.
Failure to provide appropriate pressure ulcer care occurred when a resident with weakness, quadriplegia, and muscle wasting had chronic right elbow pressure wounds and the chart lacked the ordered OT evaluation for a protective elbow device. The resident was observed in bed with a bandage on the elbow and was seen using that elbow to reposition himself, while a wound specialist documented 3 newly acquired stage 3 wounds to the right elbow. The DON stated the wound was chronic and related to frequent pressure on the elbow, and the facility could not prove the OT evaluation was completed because it lacked access to the former therapy company's charting.
A facility failed to maintain proper catheter care for a resident with a urinary catheter, allowing the tubing and drainage bag to touch the floor on multiple occasions. The resident, who was being treated for a UTI, had a history of UTIs and was on antibiotics. Despite the facility's policy requiring proper catheter care, the care plan lacked documentation on catheter placement, and staff confirmed the tubing should not touch the floor.
RN Staffing and DNS Coverage Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a Registered Nurse was on site for 8 hours a day and that the Director of Nursing Services did not serve as the only RN when the census was over 60 residents. Record review of the December 2025 nursing schedule and Daily Nurse Staffing sheets showed that on 12/6/25, 12/20/25, and 12/21/25, the only RN who worked was the DNS, while the Daily Nurse Staffing Posting showed a census of 73 residents on each of those days. During interview, the DNS stated she had a couple of RNs who would call in and that she was responsible for working shifts when nurses called in; she also stated she did not clock in if she covered a shift. The facility policy dated 2/2025 stated that the DNS may serve as charge nurse only when the average daily occupancy is 60 or fewer residents.
Failure to Provide Ordered OT Evaluation for Elbow Pressure Wounds
Penalty
Summary
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing was not ensured for a resident with weakness, quadriplegia, and muscle wasting and atrophy. The resident was cognitively intact and had upper and lower extremity impairment on both sides in functional range of motion. During an interview, he was observed in bed with a gauze bandage on his right elbow and stated he had a pressure wound on his elbow for a long time; he was also observed using his right elbow to reposition himself throughout the interview. He was later observed in bed on multiple occasions with a bandage on the same elbow. The resident's clinical record included a physician order for OT to evaluate and treat him for a protective elbow device, but the record lacked an OT evaluation for that device. A wound specialist's assessment documented 3 newly acquired stage 3 wounds to the resident's right elbow, including wounds measuring 0.5 cm by 0.6 cm by 0.1 cm, 1 cm by 0.8 cm by 0.1 cm, and 2 cm by 3.2 cm by 0.1 cm. The DON stated the resident's right elbow wound was a chronic wound caused by the resident frequently applying pressure to his right elbow, and the facility could not prove the OT evaluation had been completed because it could not access the former therapy company's charting.
Failure to Maintain Proper Catheter Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain proper care for a resident with a urinary catheter, specifically by allowing the catheter tubing and drainage bag to touch the floor on multiple occasions. This was observed over several days, with the tubing touching the floor or the bottom of a rolling table while the resident was in bed, and the drainage bag touching the floor when the resident was in a wheelchair. The resident, who was being treated for a urinary tract infection (UTI), had a history of UTIs and was on antibiotics at the time of the observations. The facility's policy on indwelling catheter use and removal, which was provided by the Administrator, requires that catheter care be provided in accordance with professional standards, including ensuring that the drainage bag and tubing do not touch the floor. Despite this policy, the care plan for the resident lacked documentation regarding the placement of the catheter tubing or drainage bag. Interviews with facility staff confirmed that the catheter bag or tubing should not touch the floor, yet observations indicated this standard was not consistently met.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 61 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Spencer
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Owen Valley Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center | 3.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Richland Bean Blossom Health Care Center | 5.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 11 | 0 |
| Stonecroft Health Campus | 10.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Majestic Care Of Bloomington | 11.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Aperion Care Monroe | 13.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Mccormick's Creek Rehabilitation And Healthcare.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.