Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Harbour Manor Health & Living Community during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Failure to Verify Identity of Agency CNA Staff: The facility did not have an effective process to verify the identity and competency of agency CNAs. An agency CNA was found to have worked at two facilities at the same time, and an internal review showed that another CNA had used the first CNA's agency account to accept and work a shift. The facility had no specific agency staffing policies or procedures, and residents on the affected assignment included individuals with significant care needs such as dependence for toileting, dressing, and transfers.
Daily Nurse Staffing Posting Not Current: The facility failed to post current and accurate nurse staffing information each day for residents, representatives, and visitors. The lobby posting was found dated earlier than the observation time and was later updated with current RN, LPN, QMA, and CNA staffing hours. The Facility Scheduler said she usually completed the post after arriving in the morning and that no staff member was available over the weekend to update it, while the Administrator stated the posting was to be updated daily at the beginning of each shift.
An unlocked and unattended Rehab treatment cart was observed containing 18 treatment medications, including ointments, creams, gel, eye drops, powder, and wipes. An LPN confirmed the cart held 18 items, and an RN, the Unit Manager, and the DON stated treatment carts should remain locked when not in use; the facility policy also required all medications and treatment items to be stored in a locked cabinet or room.
A resident with multiple medical conditions, including post-surgical hip fracture, cognitive impairment, incontinence, and unilateral lower extremity impairment, was admitted and did not have a 72-hour care plan meeting or baseline person-centered care plan completed within the required timeframe. The initial care conference occurred nine days after admission. Staff interviews showed that social services typically contacted representatives 24–48 hours after admission and did not routinely document unsuccessful contact attempts, and that the care conference for this resident was delayed to accommodate the representative’s schedule. This practice did not align with facility policy requiring a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission and completion of key care planning elements by the initial IDT care conference.
A cognitively impaired resident with a history of falls and poor safety awareness was transported by a facility driver to an orthopedic office for a follow-up visit, based on hospital discharge orders and facility-entered appointment information that had been changed and not clearly communicated. The driver left the resident at the office without a caregiver, despite office records indicating the resident should be accompanied, and did not notify the facility when informed there was no current appointment. The resident, who arrived confused and agitated, remained unsupervised at the office for an extended period until the facility was contacted, and staff later acknowledged a communication breakdown, lack of discussion of transportation arrangements at care conference, and absence of a transportation policy.
Staff failed to accurately document controlled substance administration and inventory for multiple residents, resulting in mismatches between the controlled medication binder and blister card counts for medications such as pregabalin, hydrocodone-acetaminophen, tramadol, lorazepam, and clonazepam. An LPN acknowledged not recording that morning’s controlled medication doses, and subsequent review showed each affected resident’s binder count was one pill higher than the actual blister card count. The residents involved had complex medical conditions, including cognitive impairment, seizure disorder, Parkinson’s disease, cardiovascular disease, COPD, diabetes, and chronic pain, and facility leadership confirmed that this practice did not follow the policy requiring immediate documentation of controlled drug administration and remaining doses.
Failure to provide transfer and bed-hold notifications: Two residents were transferred to the hospital for acute changes in condition, including coffee ground-like emesis, nausea/vomiting, hematuria, lethargy, and low BP. Although transfer forms and discharge MDSs indicated return was anticipated, the records lacked documentation that the resident or resident representative received the notice of transfer and bed-hold policy, and the transfer observation notes were unsigned. Staff interviews confirmed the documents could not be located and that the record did not identify who received them.
A resident receiving IV antibiotics through a PICC line had an overdue dressing change, with the dressing still dated from the prior week during observation. The ordered weekly dressing change was missed because an RN was busy and forgot, and the resident’s preference for another staff member was documented as the reason it was not completed. The ADON stated staff were expected to follow PICC care standards and document any refusals.
A resident with Tetralogy of Fallot, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and COPD received continuous O2 by nasal cannula, but staff observed undated tubing and an empty humidification bottle with white buildup while the concentrator was set at 5 L/min. The resident reported a dry, itchy nose, congestion, and difficulty breathing through his nose, and staff interviews confirmed the humidifier was empty and that O2 supplies and water levels were not being consistently checked.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of combative behavior was physically restrained by an RN, who held the resident's hands and attempted to administer oral medications while the resident screamed and resisted. The incident, witnessed by a CNA, involved the resident spitting out the medication and applesauce, and was reported as staff-to-resident abuse due to the RN's failure to respect the resident's refusal and escalating the situation.
A CNA did not intervene when witnessing an RN attempt to administer medication to a severely cognitively impaired resident who became combative, resulting in the resident being restrained and distressed. The CNA, present for one-to-one observation, did not act to protect the resident, which was contrary to the facility's abuse prevention policy.
A resident with multiple medical conditions and a history of making false accusations required care to be provided by two staff members, as documented in the care plan and CNA assignment sheet. However, a CNA provided care alone, contrary to the care plan intervention, which was confirmed by the DON and other staff during interviews.
The facility failed to ensure proper narcotic count reconciliation for the Rehab 1 medication cart, missing required documentation on several dates. Staff interviews confirmed the absence of necessary signatures and count numbers, posing a potential risk for drug diversion. Despite frequent education on narcotic reconciliation, the facility's policy was not followed, leaving the facility unable to verify if any narcotics were missing.
A resident reported that the Activities Director yelled at her, causing humiliation and distress. Despite the incident being reported to the Physical Therapy staff and allegedly to the Director of Nursing, no investigation was conducted, and the facility's policy on reporting abuse was not followed.
The facility failed to report allegations of sexual abuse involving a resident to law enforcement and adult protection agencies. Despite the resident's report and the facility's policy requiring such notifications, the facility did not contact the police, citing the family's request as the reason. However, a family member later indicated that they did not request the police not to be called.
Failure to Verify Identity and Competency of Agency CNA Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a process to ensure the identity and competency of agency staff. During record review and interviews, it was discovered that CNA 8 was working at one facility while also being documented as working at another facility at the same time on the same date. An internal investigation later found that CNA 8 and CNA 9 had shared a staffing agency account and a banking account, and that CNA 9 had accepted an open shift while logged into CNA 8's agency account and worked the shift at the facility under CNA 8's identity. The incident was identified after corporate payroll review showed the same CNA had worked overlapping shifts at two facilities. Facility and agency records showed that the agency relied on open shift postings and app-based acceptance, and the facility had access only to agency licensure and profiles. The facility had no specific agency staffing policies or procedures in place, and the agency staff member was not required to provide photo identification before the event occurred. The facility later changed its process so agency staff would report to the nurse station and provide photo ID, but the deficiency was based on the lack of an effective identity verification process before the incident. The affected assignment included residents with significant care needs. Resident B had diagnoses including neuromyelitis optica, hypokalemia, and a stage 3 sacral pressure ulcer and was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, personal hygiene, and transfers. Resident C had hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, hypertension, and major depressive disorder and was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, lower body dressing, and transfers. Resident D had Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, and peripheral vascular disease and required substantial assistance with toileting hygiene, personal hygiene, and transfers. The facility interviewed the residents on the assignment and reviewed skin, pain, and psychosocial assessments, which were documented as without concerns.
Daily Nurse Staffing Posting Not Current
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to post current and accurate nursing staff information daily for residents, resident representatives, and visitors. During an observation on 5/18/26 at 9:00 a.m., the nurse staffing posting displayed in the front lobby was dated 5/15/26 and showed staffing hours for RN, LPN, QMA, and CNA positions for a census of 116. At 9:34 a.m. the same day, the staffing post was updated and dated 5/18/26, reflecting a census of 122 and revised staffing hours for RN, LPN, QMA, and CNA positions. During interview, the Facility Scheduler stated she updated the staffing post each morning when she arrived, usually between 8:00 a.m. and 8:30 a.m., except on Mondays when it was completed around 9:00 a.m. She said she used daily schedules to complete the posting and that there was not a staff member over the weekends to complete the task. She also stated she did not prepopulate weekend staffing information because of daily schedule changes such as call-ins. The Administrator stated the nurse staff posting was to be updated daily and posted at the beginning of each shift, and that the facility needed a process to ensure the posting was updated appropriately over the weekends. A facility Staffing Policy dated 6/16/19 stated that direct care staffing information is posted each day pursuant to CMS Requirements of Participation.
Unlocked Rehab Treatment Cart
Penalty
Summary
Drugs and biologicals were not stored in a safe and secure manner on the Rehab Hall treatment cart. During a walk-through observation, the medication treatment cart on the Rehab unit was found unlocked and unattended at 9:45 a.m., and it remained unlocked during a continuous observation until 9:51 a.m. While the cart was unattended, a housekeeping staff member, a laundry staff member, and a CNA were observed nearby. When the cart was later observed with an LPN, it contained 18 treatment medications, including zinc oxide ointment, diclofenac sodium gel, nystatin cream, miconazole cream, fluocinonide eye drops, clobetasol cream, ammonium lactate cream, bacitracin gel, antifungal powder, menthol gel, and hemorrhoid medipads wipes. During interviews, the LPN stated there were 18 treatment medications kept on the Rehab treatment cart, and that the cart should remain locked to prevent access to medications and ensure resident safety. An RN, the Unit Manager, and the DON each stated that treatment medication carts should remain locked when unattended to protect residents, staff, and visitors. The facility policy titled Drug Storage stated that all medications and other drugs, including treatment items, need to be stored in a locked cabinet or room, inaccessible to residents and visitors.
Failure to Complete Timely Baseline Care Plan and Initial Care Conference
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to initiate and conduct a 72-hour care plan meeting and develop a person-centered baseline care plan within the required timeframe following a resident’s admission. The resident, who had diagnoses including a right femur neck fracture post-surgical repair, cognitive symptoms following a cerebrovascular accident, repeated falls, hypertension, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, osteoporosis, and chronic pain, was admitted on an identified date. The admission MDS showed moderate cognitive impairment, wheelchair use for mobility, frequent urinary incontinence, occasional bowel incontinence, and impairment of one lower extremity. The clinical record lacked documentation that a 72-hour care plan meeting was initiated or conducted within the required timeframe, and the initial care conference did not occur until nine days after admission. Interviews with staff revealed that the Social Service Director typically called resident representatives 24 to 48 hours after admission to set up a care conference and generally did not document unsuccessful attempts to reach representatives. The Admission Coordinator reported leaving a voicemail for the resident’s representative on the first available business day after admission due to a holiday, and the Transitional Care Nurse acknowledged that the care conference for this resident was delayed to accommodate the representative’s schedule, who wanted to be present. The facility’s policy required development of a person-centered baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission, including medications, dietary instructions, services, treatments, and pertinent updates by the date of the initial IDT care conference, but this was not completed as required for this resident.
Failure to Supervise Cognitively Impaired Resident During Off-Site Appointment Transport
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure adequate supervision and protection from accident hazards for a cognitively impaired resident during transport to an outside orthopedic appointment. The resident had diagnoses including a right femur neck fracture post-surgical repair, cognitive impairment following cerebrovascular disease, repeated falls, conversion disorder with seizures, osteoporosis, and chronic pain. The most recent MDS showed moderate cognitive impairment, wheelchair use, incontinence, and lower extremity impairment. Progress notes documented multiple recent falls, with root causes identified as poor safety awareness and confusion, and a physician note described the resident as confused and a poor historian. Hospital discharge orders included a follow-up orthopedic appointment, and the facility entered an appointment order; however, there were conflicting orders and a discontinued date that indicated a change in the appointment. On the day of the incident, the resident was transported by the facility’s transportation driver to the orthopedic office for what was believed to be a scheduled appointment. The orthopedic office reported that the resident arrived confused and agitated, without a current appointment, and that the office chart specified the resident should be accompanied by a caregiver. The driver left the resident at the office and went to get something to eat, did not confirm the appointment with the facility, and did not notify the facility when informed there was no appointment. The resident remained at the office unsupervised for approximately 2.5 hours until the facility was contacted and the resident was picked up. Facility staff, including the Unit Manager and Clinical Support Consultant, acknowledged a communication breakdown regarding the cancelled appointment, that the resident was not safe to be unsupervised due to periods of confusion, that transportation arrangements were not discussed at the initial care conference, and that the facility had no policy related to transportation or conduct for resident transport.
Failure to Accurately Document Controlled Substance Administration and Inventory
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to accurately document controlled substance administration on individual narcotic record sheets in accordance with its policy. During an observation of a medication cart serving 18 residents, an LPN stated she had not documented the controlled medications administered that morning in the controlled medication binder. Review of the binder and comparison with blister card counts for six residents showed consistent discrepancies: for each resident, the number of pills recorded as remaining in the controlled medication binder was one higher than the actual number of pills remaining in the blister card. This included pregabalin and hydrocodone-acetaminophen for one resident, tramadol for two residents, lorazepam for one resident, hydrocodone-acetaminophen for another resident, and clonazepam and pregabalin for a sixth resident. The residents involved had various medical conditions, including severe cognitive impairment, seizure disorder, depression, Parkinson’s disease, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular accident history, anemia, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neurogenic bladder, hyperlipidemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, pain, and cardiomyopathy. Interviews with the Unit Manager and DON confirmed that the expectation and written policy required nurses to document controlled drug administration immediately after dosing, including date, time, dose, nurse signature, and remaining doses. The observed discrepancies and the LPN’s admission that she had not documented the morning controlled medication administrations demonstrated noncompliance with the facility’s controlled substance management policy.
Failure to Provide Transfer and Bed-Hold Notifications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide documentation or notification related to transfer/discharge and bed-hold rights for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. For Resident 5, the record showed diagnoses including dysphagia following cerebrovascular disease with risk for malnutrition, iron deficiency anemia, vitamin B12 deficiency, and abdominal distention. The resident was cognitively intact on the annual MDS. On 4/22/25, the resident had multiple episodes of coffee ground-like emesis and requested transfer to the emergency room; the discharge MDS indicated return was anticipated, and the Resident Transfer Form observation note listed transfer for nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, but it was unsigned. The clinical record did not contain documentation that the resident or resident representative received a copy of the bed-hold policy or notice of transfer. A similar event occurred on 7/23/25 when the resident again had three episodes of coffee ground-like emesis, requested transfer to the emergency room, and was transferred for nausea and vomiting; the discharge MDS again indicated return was anticipated, the transfer observation note was unsigned, and the record lacked documentation of the bed-hold policy and notice of transfer. For Resident 15, the record showed diagnoses including stage IV malignant neoplasm of the middle lobe bronchus or lung, unspecified neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and chronic kidney disease stage 4. The resident had severe cognitive impairment on the significant change MDS. On 9/24/25, the resident was lethargic and unable to be awakened with verbal stimuli, had a blood pressure of 94/65 mmHg, and the NP ordered transfer to the emergency room; a voicemail was left for the family. The discharge MDS indicated return was anticipated, and the Resident Transfer Form observation note listed transfer for hematuria and lethargy, but it was unsigned. The clinical record lacked documentation that the resident or resident representative was provided with a copy of the bed-hold policy and notice of transfer. During interviews, staff described that transfer paperwork should include the notice of transfer and bed-hold policy and that the resident or resident representative should receive these documents, with documentation in the clinical record of who received them and any attempts to contact the responsible party. However, the RN Support stated the check box on the transfer form did not identify who received the documents and could not locate the notice of transfer or bed-hold policies for either resident. The facility policy stated that the resident must be notified in writing of the transfer or discharge and that, prior to a hospital transfer, written information must be provided to the resident and a family member or legal representative specifying the duration of the bed-hold policy.
Overdue PICC Dressing Change
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow professional nursing standards for PICC line dressing changes for a resident receiving IV antibiotics for an MRSA infection. The resident was fully dressed and seated upright in a specialty bed with an IV pole beside the bed, and the PICC line was located in the right upper arm. The clear dressing over the PICC insertion site was dated 11/24/25 during the 12/3/25 observation. The resident’s record showed diagnoses including unspecified local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, fusion of the cervical and thoracic spine, and weakness, and the resident was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for all ADLs. The resident had orders for PICC line dressing changes every Monday on day shift, with needle-free valve changes during each dressing change, and for normal saline flushes every shift. The December 2025 medication administration history showed the dressing change due on Monday, 12/1/25, was not completed because the resident preferred another staff member to change it. During interview, RN 8 stated she had been asked to change the dressing but was busy and forgot, and said other nursing staff should have noticed the dressing was overdue and attempted to change it. The ADON stated the expectation was for staff to follow professional nursing standards, that PICC dressings were to be changed every seven days, and that staff should have assessed the site, recognized the dressing was past due, and documented any refusals.
Oxygen Therapy Supplies Not Maintained
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident who required continuous oxygen therapy. Resident 110 had diagnoses including Tetralogy of Fallot, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and COPD, and his current order was for continuous oxygen at 3-5 liters per minute by nasal cannula with weekly and PRN changes of the oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle. During multiple observations, he was wearing a nasal cannula while seated in a recliner, but the oxygen tubing was undated, the concentrator was set to 5 liters per minute, and the humidification bottle was empty with a white discoloration resembling coarse salt on the sides and bottom. The resident stated he could not recall when staff last checked his oxygen level or changed his tubing, and he reported dry, itchy nose, congestion, and difficulty breathing through his nose. The record showed the resident’s care plan included oxygen administration and monitoring for hypoxia, and the medication administration history indicated the tubing and humidification bottle change was documented as completed on 11/30/25. During interview, an LPN stated she checked oxygen levels, respiratory vitals, tubing cleanliness, and water level in the humidification bottle when a resident wore oxygen, and confirmed the humidification bottle was completely empty. The Unit Manager stated oxygen tubing changes were set for Sunday nights, that the tubing had been changed appropriately when checked on Monday, and that nurses should check the water humidification on each shift, especially because the resident used oxygen at 5 liters per minute and the water would be used more quickly.
Resident Physically Restrained and Forced Medication Administration by RN
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a registered nurse (RN) physically restrained the hands of a severely cognitively impaired resident and attempted to administer oral medications while the resident was screaming and resisting. The resident, who had diagnoses including encephalopathy, memory deficit, and a history of combative behaviors, was under one-to-one observation due to unsafe and combative actions. During the medication administration, the resident became combative, yelled, and refused the medication, but the RN continued to attempt administration, resulting in the resident spitting out the medication and applesauce. A certified nursing assistant (CNA) witnessed the incident and reported that the RN escalated the situation instead of stopping the attempt. The incident was documented in the resident's clinical record and reported to facility leadership. The facility's policy on abuse prevention emphasizes maintaining an abuse-free environment and ensuring staff are knowledgeable about individual resident care needs, including rotating staff for residents with challenging behaviors. The actions of the RN in physically restraining the resident and forcing medication administration were identified as staff-to-resident abuse, as they did not respect the resident's right to refuse care and contributed to the resident's distress.
Failure to Intervene During Observed Resident Abuse
Penalty
Summary
A staff member (CNA) failed to intervene when witnessing another staff member (RN) attempting to administer medication to a severely cognitively impaired resident who became combative during the process. The RN sat on the resident's bed, held the resident's hands, and placed medication in the resident's mouth while the resident was screaming and subsequently spat out the medication and applesauce. The CNA, who was providing one-to-one observation for the resident at the time, did not intervene or attempt to protect the resident, later stating that the incident happened too quickly for her to act. The resident involved had significant medical conditions, including encephalopathy, anemia, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, dysphagia, stage 4 chronic kidney disease, pain, and memory deficit, and was assessed as severely cognitively impaired. The facility's policy required any individual observing or suspecting resident abuse to promptly report the incident after ensuring the resident's safety. However, the CNA did not take immediate action to protect the resident during the incident, resulting in a failure to implement the facility's abuse prevention policy.
Failure to Follow Care Plan for Paired Staff During Resident Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow a care plan intervention for a resident who required care to be provided by staff in pairs due to a history of making false accusations against staff members. On the night shift of 12/26/24, the resident, who was cognitively intact and had multiple medical diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, diabetes with polyneuropathy, depressive disorder, and dysphagia, reported to staff that a CNA had touched him inappropriately during incontinence care. The resident's care plan, updated on 4/28/23, specifically required that care be provided by two staff members at all times, an intervention that was also listed on the CNA Assignment Sheet and confirmed by other CNAs during interviews. Despite this documented intervention, the DON confirmed that the CNA provided care to the resident alone while another CNA was in the hallway, thus not adhering to the care plan requirement. The CNA involved did not indicate in their written statement whether another staff member was present during care. This failure to follow the care plan intervention was identified during interviews and record reviews, and was cited as a deficiency related to the facility's obligation to implement and follow individualized care plans.
Failure to Reconcile Narcotic Counts on Rehab 1 Cart
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper shift-to-shift narcotic count reconciliation for one of the medication carts, specifically the Rehab 1 cart. During an observation, it was found that the Nurse Narcotic Sign in/out Sheet lacked reconciliation numbers for controlled medications on several dates. Interviews with staff, including LPNs and the Rehab Unit Manager, confirmed that the required signatures and count numbers were missing for October 17, 18, 19, and 20, 2024. This omission was identified as a potential opportunity for drug diversion, as the absence of count verification made it impossible to determine if any narcotics were missing. The facility's policy on Controlled Substance Reconciliation mandates that the quantity of controlled substances and the number of accompanying count sheets be verified at the end of each nursing shift. Despite frequent education provided to staff regarding the importance of complete narcotic reconciliation, the required documentation was not completed as per policy. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the deficiency, noting the lack of count numbers on the Nurse Narcotic Sign in/out Sheets for the specified dates, which left the facility unable to ascertain if drug diversion had occurred.
Failure to Investigate Allegation of Verbal Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete an investigation of an allegation of verbal abuse involving Resident D. During an interview, Resident D reported that the Activities Director (AD) yelled at her loudly, accusing her of rejecting another resident from sitting at her table. This incident left Resident D feeling humiliated, embarrassed, and hurt, causing her to cry for several days. Despite this, the AD did not follow up with Resident D or apologize. Resident D, who has diagnoses including major depressive disorder and morbid obesity, was cognitively intact and able to communicate effectively, as indicated by her quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. Physical Therapy staff (PT) 2 reported that Resident D was extremely upset when she recounted the incident and that PT 2 had informed her supervisor, who then reported it to the Director of Nursing (DON). However, during an interview, the DON indicated she was unaware of the allegation. The facility's policy requires immediate reporting of any alleged mistreatment, neglect, or abuse to the Indiana Department of Health, but this procedure was not followed in this case.
Failure to Report Allegations of Sexual Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report allegations of sexual abuse involving a resident to law enforcement and adult protection agencies. The incident involved Resident B, who reported an allegation of staff-to-resident sexual abuse during incontinent care by CNA 1. The facility's investigation into the allegation lacked documentation of notification to law enforcement or adult protection agencies. Despite the resident's report and the facility's policy requiring such notifications, the facility did not contact the police, citing the family's request as the reason. However, a family member later indicated that they did not request the police not to be called. Interviews with the Administrator, Director of Nursing, and Corporate Consultant confirmed that law enforcement was not notified. The facility's current policy, dated 10/14/2014, mandates reporting any reasonable suspicion of a crime against a resident to local law enforcement and state agencies within 24 hours. The failure to report the incident as required by the policy resulted in a deficiency citation related to Complaint IN00428301.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 870 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 7 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Noblesville
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Riverwalk Village | 0.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 20 | 0 |
| Prairie Lakes Health Campus | 4.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Maple Park Village | 5.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
| Bridgewater Healthcare Center | 5.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
| Mcgivney Health Care Center | 5.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 17 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Harbour Manor Health & Living Community.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.