Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around August 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Eastgate Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to maintain a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment in 6 of 18 rooms observed. Issues included damaged walls, non-functional lights, stained privacy curtains, protruding hooks and screws, and missing or inaccessible light pull cords. The Executive Director confirmed the need for repair and cleaning.
The facility failed to ensure accurate MDS assessments for two residents. One resident's Foley catheter status was incorrectly documented, and another resident's discharge was inaccurately coded as unplanned. These errors were confirmed by the Executive Director.
The facility failed to hold a care plan meeting in conjunction with the Quarterly MDS assessment for a resident, resulting in the resident and his wife not being informed about his care and discharge plans. The Social Worker confirmed the meeting was overdue, and the facility's policy did not specify the frequency of care plan meetings.
The facility failed to assist a resident in gaining access to vision services by not making necessary appointments, despite the resident's worsening vision and a referral to a retinal specialist. The resident was unaware of any scheduled appointments, and the facility's policy on assisting with vision services was not followed.
The facility failed to ensure that a urinary drainage bag and tubing attached to a urinary catheter were positioned off the floor for a resident. Multiple observations showed the bag and tubing touching or dragging on the floor, contrary to the care plan and facility policy. The resident had diagnoses including obstructive and reflux uropathy and was being treated for a urinary tract infection.
Environmental Deficiencies in Resident Rooms
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure an environment that was safe, sanitary, and comfortable for residents in 6 of 18 rooms observed. Specific deficiencies included damaged bathroom walls in rooms [ROOM NUMBER] and [ROOM NUMBER], non-functional lights and stained privacy curtains in room [ROOM NUMBER], protruding hooks and screws in room [ROOM NUMBER], missing light pull cords in room [ROOM NUMBER], and inaccessible pull cords in room [ROOM NUMBER]. These issues were confirmed during an interview with the Executive Director, who acknowledged the need for repair and cleaning.
Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for two residents. Resident 52's clinical record indicated a diagnosis of obstructive and reflux uropathy and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, with physician orders for a Foley catheter starting on 3/26/24. However, the Admission MDS assessment dated 3/31/24 inaccurately indicated that the resident did not have a Foley catheter during the 7-day look-back period from 3/25/24 to 3/31/24. This discrepancy was confirmed during an interview with the Executive Director on 4/18/24, who acknowledged the incorrect coding of the MDS for Resident 52's catheter status. Similarly, Resident 54's clinical record showed a diagnosis of sepsis and multiple nursing progress notes indicating planned discharge dates and locations. Despite these notes, the Discharge MDS assessment dated 2/5/24 inaccurately indicated that the resident's discharge was unplanned. This error was also confirmed by the Executive Director during the same interview. The facility's policy on Resident Assessment (RAI) Medicare MDS Scheduling, reviewed in 4/2023, did not include provisions for ensuring accurate MDS coding, contributing to these inaccuracies.
Failure to Hold Timely Care Plan Meeting
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a care plan meeting was held in conjunction with the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident 49. During an interview, Resident 49 indicated that he and his wife had not been invited to a care plan meeting for a long time and were not kept informed about his plan of care or discharge plans. The clinical record review showed that the last care conference meeting attended by Resident 49 and his wife was on January 3, 2024. A care plan initiated on March 22, 2024, indicated a discharge goal for Resident 49 to return to the community, but there was no documentation of a care plan meeting being held during the time of the most recent MDS assessment dated March 20, 2024. The Social Worker confirmed that Resident 49 was almost a month overdue for his care plan meeting, which should have been held during the time the MDS assessment was completed. The facility's policy, reviewed in August 2023, did not specify how often care plan meetings should be held. This lack of adherence to the care plan meeting schedule resulted in Resident 49 and his wife not being kept informed about his care and discharge plans.
Failure to Assist Resident in Gaining Access to Vision Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to assist a resident in gaining access to vision services by not making the necessary appointments. Resident 14, who has diagnoses including diabetes type 2 and hypertension, indicated during an interview that her vision was worsening and she needed new glasses. Despite having an eye doctor and being referred to a retinal specialist for diabetic retinopathy and other eye conditions, the resident was unaware of any scheduled appointments. The resident's clinical record confirmed the need for vision services, and a previous assessment had indicated the necessity for ancillary referrals for vision care. The Executive Director (ED) confirmed that the Social Services Director was responsible for setting up optometry referrals but noted that there were no records indicating the resident had refused the referral to the retinal specialist. The facility's policy on Vision and Hearing Services, revised in January 2006, mandates that residents requiring vision services outside the facility should be assisted with the necessary arrangements. However, this policy was not followed, leading to the deficiency noted in the report.
Failure to Properly Position Urinary Drainage Bag and Tubing
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a urinary drainage bag and tubing attached to a urinary catheter were positioned off the floor for Resident 52. Multiple observations were made over several days where the urinary drainage bag and tubing were seen touching or dragging on the floor while the resident was either in her room or rolling around the hallway in her wheelchair. This was contrary to the care plan initiated on 3/26/24, which specified that the tubing or any part of the drainage system should not touch the floor to prevent urinary tract infections. Resident 52's clinical record indicated diagnoses including obstructive and reflux uropathy and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. The resident was also being treated for a urinary tract infection as noted in the Nursing Progress Notes dated 3/31/24. During an interview, a CNA confirmed that the urinary drainage bag and tubing should not be on the floor. The facility's policy, reviewed in 6/2023, also stated that urinary catheters should have a catheter bag cover or a wash basin underneath them to prevent contact with the ground.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 169 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Washington
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hillside Manor Nursing Home | 0.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 31 | 1 |
| Prairie Village Nursing And Rehabilitation | 1.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Villages At Oak Ridge, The | 1.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Poplar Care Strategies | 12.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 16 | 0 |
| Amber Manor Care Center | 13.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Eastgate Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.