Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around September 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Bridgepointe Health Campus during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with hemiplegia, dementia, schizophrenia, and cerebral infarction was found saturated in urine and still in bed when a family member arrived, and the resident had not received breakfast. Staff said the resident needed help with feeding and a lift with two staff to get up, but assistance was delayed because another staff member was busy and the facility did not always have enough staff during mealtimes.
Two residents who required assistance with oral and denture care did not consistently receive help according to their care plans and needs. One resident with cognitive and physical impairments had no documented denture care for a month and experienced a missing denture incident. Another resident with dementia and dysphagia reported that staff sometimes forgot to remove and soak her dentures overnight, with no documentation of oral care over a 30-day period. Staff interviews confirmed that required oral care was not consistently provided or recorded.
A resident with Parkinson's disease and dementia experienced escalating behaviors, including agitation and aggression, which led to the administration of antipsychotic medication. The facility did not update the care plan following these incidents, failed to monitor for side effects of the antipsychotic, and did not provide or document required oral and denture care after medication administration. Staff interviews and record reviews confirmed lapses in behavioral monitoring and care plan updates, resulting in a deficiency in behavioral health care and services.
Unqualified staff documented insulin administration and wound treatments for two residents. One resident with type II DM and a chronic venous leg ulcer had ordered basal insulin and wound care, and a QMA documented both the insulin injections and wound treatments. Another resident with type II DM, PVD, and a foot ulcer had ordered sliding-scale and bedtime insulin plus a lower-leg dressing change, and QMAs documented the insulin and wound care even though one QMA lacked the required insulin certification. Facility policy and staff interview confirmed QMAs without the proper license could not administer insulin, and the QMA scope of practice excluded advanced wound treatments.
The facility did not make the most recent annual survey results easily accessible as required. Signage directed individuals to a cabinet for survey reports, but only outdated reports were found, and the most recent survey was missing. An LPN confirmed the absence of a written policy for survey result availability and acknowledged the missing report.
A resident was readmitted with a new pressure wound, but appropriate physician orders for wound care were not obtained or implemented for two days. Nursing staff observed the wound and applied an unordered treatment without notifying the physician, resulting in a delay in starting the prescribed wound care regimen.
Delayed Incontinence Care and Meal Assistance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a newly admitted resident who required assistance with incontinence care and feeding received timely care. The resident, who had diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the left non-dominant side, dementia, anxiety, schizophrenia, and cerebral infarction, was found by a family member in bed saturated in urine from her shoulders to her feet and had not yet received breakfast. The family member reported the resident had remained in bed and appeared not to have received routine incontinence care, and that breakfast and lunch were the same meal because breakfast had not been provided when expected. During interviews, staff stated the resident required assistance with feeding and ate in the restorative dining room, but the breakfast tray had been brought to the room and then returned to the kitchen because the resident was still in bed and needed assistance to eat. A CNA stated she checked on the resident early in the morning but did not provide incontinence care until after the family member reported the resident was wet. The CNA also stated the resident required a lift and two staff members to get up, a second staff member was busy, and the facility did not always have enough staff to assist residents during mealtimes. The resident's care plan included assistance with meals as needed, and the record documented perineal and skin care after an incontinent episode later that morning.
Failure to Provide and Document Oral/Denture Care for Residents Requiring Assistance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide assistance with oral and denture care for two residents who required help with activities of daily living (ADLs). For one resident with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, dementia, and muscle weakness, records indicated a need for set-up or clean-up assistance with oral hygiene and partial to moderate assistance with transfers. The resident had upper partial dentures and required staff support for denture care. However, there was no documentation that denture care was provided during the month of November, and an incident occurred where the resident's partial denture went missing and was suspected to have been swallowed, as noted by the resident's spouse and staff. Another resident, diagnosed with dementia and dysphagia, reported that staff did not consistently remove and soak her dentures overnight, sometimes forgetting to do so. This resident required assistance with oral hygiene and had a broken or loosely fitting denture, according to her care plan and MDS assessment. Record review showed no documentation of oral or denture care being provided during a 30-day period. Staff interviews confirmed that CNAs were responsible for providing and documenting oral care, including denture cleaning and overnight soaking, but this was not consistently performed or recorded.
Failure to Provide Comprehensive Behavioral Health Care and Monitoring
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide comprehensive behavioral health care and services for a resident with multiple diagnoses, including Parkinson's disease, dementia with behavioral disturbance, and anxiety. The resident experienced escalating behaviors such as yelling, hitting at staff, and agitation, which led to the administration of antipsychotic medication (Haldol) on two occasions. Despite these incidents, the resident's care plan was not updated to reflect the escalation of behaviors or the new interventions, and there was no documentation of monitoring for side effects following the administration of antipsychotic medication. Additionally, the facility did not ensure routine care was provided after the administration of Haldol. The resident, who required assistance with denture care, was not documented as having received oral or denture care on the night of or the morning after receiving the medication. This lapse was identified after the resident's partial denture went missing and was suspected to have been swallowed, leading to an emergency department visit. Interviews with staff confirmed that oral care should have been provided and documented, and that behavioral escalations should trigger updates to the care plan and increased monitoring. Record reviews and staff interviews further revealed that required behavioral monitoring, as ordered by the physician, was not consistently documented. The facility's policies required that new or exacerbated behaviors be reviewed and that care plans be updated with effective interventions, including medication reviews for side effects. However, these procedures were not followed in this case, resulting in a deficiency related to the provision of necessary behavioral health care and services.
Unqualified Staff Documented Insulin Administration and Wound Treatments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure care was provided by qualified staff for residents receiving diabetic care and wound care. Resident F had diagnoses including type II diabetes and chronic venous hypertension with an ulcer of the right lower extremity. The resident had physician orders for bedtime insulin glargine and for wound care to the right lower leg, including cleansing the wound, applying collagen Ag, and wrapping with Kerlix. The resident’s wound assessment described a right lower leg wound measuring 8 cm by 2.5 cm by 0.1 cm with moderate serosanguineous drainage. The MAR and TAR showed that QMA 2 documented administration of insulin glargine on multiple dates and documented completion of the ordered wound treatments on two dates. Resident G had diagnoses including type II diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and type II diabetes with foot ulcer. The resident had orders for Humalog sliding scale insulin, bedtime Lantus insulin, and treatment of a left anterior lower leg wound with normal saline cleansing, Prisma, gauze, and tape. The wound observation described the wound as 5.5 cm by 1 cm by 0.1 cm with serosanguineous drainage and full thickness tissue loss. The MAR and TAR showed QMA 2 documented administration of both insulin orders, and QMA 7 documented completion of the wound dressing change. Review of QMA 2’s licensure showed no secondary license to administer insulin, and an LPN stated that QMAs without the insulin license could not administer insulin and could not provide wound treatments for venous and arterial wounds. Facility policy stated a QMA may administer insulin only with state certification, and the Indiana QMA scope of practice excluded treatment of advanced skin conditions.
Failure to Provide Prominent Access to Most Recent Survey Results
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide prominent access to the most recent annual survey results as required. During an observation and record review, signage near the front business office window indicated that the most recent survey results were available in a cabinet near an entrance doorway. However, upon inspection, only survey reports up to June 2024 were found in the cabinet, while the most recent annual survey had been completed in August 2025. Interviews with an LPN confirmed the absence of the most recent survey report and revealed that the facility did not have a written policy regarding the availability of survey results, though staff believed they were following regulations for posting such information.
Delay in Obtaining and Implementing Physician Orders for Wound Care After Readmission
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident was readmitted to the facility from the hospital with a new pressure wound, but physician orders for wound care were not obtained or implemented in a timely manner. Upon readmission, the resident was noted to have a skin impairment covered by a clean, intact dressing, and a wound care nurse was to evaluate the area. The first observation of the sacral wound was documented by a registered nurse, but the physician was not notified, and an unordered treatment was applied. The resident's treatment administration record showed that the appropriate wound care order was not started until several days after readmission. The resident had a medical history including heart disease, anemia, weakness, and dysphagia, and was assessed as being at risk for pressure ulcers. Despite facility policy requiring physician notification and orders for new wounds, there was a two-day delay in obtaining and implementing the necessary wound care orders. Interviews with nursing staff confirmed that the physician should have been notified immediately upon discovery of the new wound, but this did not occur, resulting in a lapse in care for the resident.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 178 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Vincennes
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gentle Care Strategies | 1.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Lodge Of The Wabash | 1.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 18 | 0 |
| Aperion Care Vincennes | 4.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 24 | 0 |
| The Haven Of Bridgeport | 13.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
| Oak Village | 14.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 15 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Bridgepointe Health Campus.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.