Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Southland Health And Rehabilitation during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Failure to Protect Residents from Physical and Sexual Abuse: The facility failed to protect a cognitively intact resident from a physical assault by another resident during a dispute over visiting a severely cognitively impaired resident, resulting in multiple skin tears and abrasions. The facility also failed to protect a resident with dementia and moderate cognitive impairment from a sexual assault allegation involving a housekeeper, where another resident witnessed the housekeeper kiss the resident and the housekeeper later admitted to police that he kissed the resident and touched her hand.
Staff did not consistently follow EBP during wound care and g-tube care for three residents with orders for EBP. An LPN performing wound care did not change gloves or perform hand hygiene between dirty and clean tasks, and two staff members providing g-tube care wore gloves but did not don gowns. The DON confirmed that gown and glove use was expected for high-contact care such as wound care and feeding tube care.
A resident with moderate cognitive impairment was not provided with psychological services or an updated care plan after being sexually abused by a housekeeper. Facility records and staff interviews confirmed that no assessment or referral for mental health evaluation was documented following the incident.
A resident who was cognitively intact and required partial/moderate ADL assistance did not receive bathing consistently. Records showed only one bath documented in each of two months, with no evidence of refusal, and the resident stated baths were not being provided twice weekly as scheduled. The DON confirmed residents were to receive showers twice a week or per preference, noted a period when the EMR was not working properly, and stated there were no facility bathing policies.
Failure to follow through with a pulmonologist’s medication recommendation for a resident with acute and chronic respiratory failure. The resident, who was cognitively intact, reported bringing a Tessalon prescription back to the facility for chronic cough, but the record did not show the dose or frequency, and an LPN stated community prescriptions were passed to the Nurse Manager.
G-tube Discoloration Not Reported or Documented: A resident with a feeding tube and severe cognitive impairment had black discoloration in the interior of the g-tube that had been present for several months. Nursing notes did not mention the discoloration, and an RN confirmed the condition during observation but was unsure whether it had been reported to the NP or MD.
Failure to Protect Residents from Physical and Sexual Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect residents from abuse by other residents and by staff. The report states that four of 60 sampled residents were involved in deficiencies related to resident protection, including a resident-to-resident physical assault and a sexual assault allegation involving a housekeeper. The facility policy titled Abuse Prohibition stated the center intended to preserve each patient's right to be free from mistreatment, neglect, abuse, or misappropriation of property and applied to abuse by staff, other patients, consultants, or volunteers. R125, who was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 13 and used a wheelchair, was involved in a physical altercation with R117 while visiting R63. R117, who was moderately cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 9 and also used a wheelchair, entered R63's room, told R125 to leave, and the two residents argued. R117 admitted he slapped R125, and R125 reported that R117 scratched his neck and face and caused additional skin tears to his left hand when he tried to block the hit. Nursing notes documented multiple skin tears to the left arm, neck, and face, and the police report confirmed the altercation occurred over visitation with R63, who was severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 0. R25, who had dementia and was moderately cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 11 and was dependent on staff for all ADLs, was the subject of a sexual assault allegation involving Housekeeper 1. Another resident, R78, who was cognitively intact, reported seeing Housekeeper 1 enter the room and lean over to kiss R25 on the mouth while the privacy curtain was drawn between the beds. The investigation record states Housekeeper 1 initially denied the allegation but later admitted to police that he kissed R25 on the forehead and touched her hand. R25 denied the allegation when interviewed, and the report notes that the family took her to the emergency room for STD testing, which was negative. The facility terminated Housekeeper 1 after his admission to police.
Failure to Follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions During Wound and G-Tube Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper infection control during gastrostomy tube care and wound care for three residents who had orders for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). The facility policy stated that EBP applies to residents with indwelling medical devices, including feeding tubes, and requires gown and glove use during high-contact care activities. CDC signage reviewed by surveyors also stated that gloves and a gown must be worn for feeding tube care and wound care. For one resident with pressure ulcers to the sacrum and left foot, an LPN provided wound care while wearing gloves and a gown, but did not change gloves between dirty and clean tasks and did not perform hand hygiene between glove changes. The LPN cleaned a bowel movement during the same care episode, removed soiled gloves, washed hands, donned clean gloves, and continued care, but again did not perform hand hygiene before donning clean gloves for dressing application. The LPN stated she did not realize she needed to perform hand hygiene between glove changes and said that was the way she had always done it. For two residents with gastrostomy tube status and care plans/orders for EBP, staff did not follow the expected PPE requirements during g-tube care. One resident was receiving g-tube care from the ADON, who performed hand hygiene and donned gloves but did not wear a gown; the ADON stated she was unsure whether EBP applied because there was no sign on the door and the resident only received a water flush. Another resident was receiving g-tube care from an RN who donned gloves but did not wear a gown; the RN stated she forgot and confirmed she should have worn both gown and gloves. The DON confirmed that staff were expected to wear a gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities, including g-tube and wound care.
Failure to Provide Mental Health Services After Sexual Abuse Incident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide medically-related social services to a resident following an incident of sexual abuse involving a housekeeper. Clinical record review, facility document review, and staff interviews revealed that after the resident, who was moderately cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 11 out of 15, was kissed by a housekeeper, there was no evidence in the resident's electronic medical record of psychological services being provided. The resident's care plan did not address the sexual assault or the resident's inability to consent to the act at the time of the incident. Interviews with facility staff confirmed that the social worker was responsible for assessing residents after allegations of abuse and making referrals for mental health evaluation, as well as updating care plans to monitor for psychological stress. However, the social worker was not employed at the time of the incident, and no assessment or referral was documented. The lack of documented intervention and care planning following the incident constituted a failure to meet the psychosocial needs of the resident as required.
Inconsistent bathing assistance for a resident requiring ADL support
Penalty
Summary
Failure to provide ADL assistance occurred for one resident who was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 out of 15 and who required partial/moderate assistance with ADLs. The resident’s record showed that bathing was not provided consistently: the physical functioning instructions for 5/2025 documented only one bath on 5/6/2025, and the record for 6/2025 documented only one bath on 6/10/2025. In both months, there was no evidence that the resident refused bathing. The resident’s care plan dated 6/9/2025 indicated the resident required assistance with functional mobility with ADLs. During interview, the resident stated she had not received baths consistently twice a week and was supposed to receive baths on Tuesdays and Fridays. The DON confirmed that residents were to receive showers twice a week or per resident preference, stated there was a time when the electronic medical records were not working properly, and was unable to provide a date for that issue. The DON also stated the facility tried to provide showers twice a week or more or less and reported there were no facility policies for bathing.
Failure to Follow Pulmonologist Medication Order
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure coordination of care for one resident, R118, by not following through with a consultant pulmonologist’s medication recommendation. R118 was re-admitted with a diagnosis of acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and had a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The care plan noted a history of acute and chronic respiratory failure. A review of the After Visit Summary from the pulmonology appointment indicated Tessalon capsules were ordered to treat the resident’s cough, but the documentation did not show how many capsules were to be taken or how often they were to be administered. A nurse note also documented that the pulmonologist ordered Tessalon capsules for the resident’s cough. During interview, the resident stated she brought the prescription from the community pulmonologist to the facility after the appointment, and an LPN stated that when a resident brought in a community prescription, it was given to the Nurse Manager.
G-tube Discoloration Not Reported or Documented
Penalty
Summary
Appropriate gastrostomy tube management was not ensured for one sampled resident with a feeding tube. Resident 193 was admitted with gastrostomy status and had a quarterly MDS showing a BIMS score of 0 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment and the presence of a feeding tube. The care plan, revised 2/2/2024, included interventions to assess feeding tube placement, patency, and residual every shift and before and after fluids or medications, flush the tube with water as ordered, and maintain enhanced barrier precautions. A review of nursing progress notes from August 2024 to the present did not mention discoloration of the gastrostomy tube, and a nurse practitioner progress note dated 7/16/2025 documented that the g-tube was in place without describing its condition. During an observation on 8/6/2025, the resident was lying in bed at a 45-degree angle, and RN1 assessed the gastrostomy tube and confirmed black discoloration in the interior of the tube that had been present for several months. RN1 stated she was not sure whether anyone had reported it to the NP or MD, but said it should have been reported.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 121 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 6 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Peachtree City
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fayetteville Center For Nursing & Healing Llc | 7.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 7 | 0 |
| Ansley Park Health And Rehabilitation | 10 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Christian City Rehabilitation Center | 10.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Fairburn Heights Of Journey Llc | 11.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 9 | 0 |
| Newnan Health And Rehabilitation | 11.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 7 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Southland Health And Rehabilitation.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.