Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around September 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Oaks Nursing Home, Inc, The during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Two residents with fall risk interventions involving alarms had their MDS assessments inaccurately coded, failing to reflect the use of these alarms as documented in their care plans and observed by staff. The MDS Coordinator confirmed the discrepancies between the residents' actual status and the MDS coding.
A resident with multiple diagnoses and impaired cognition, who was at risk for pressure ulcers, received a bed cradle as part of their treatment to prevent pressure on the feet. However, the care plan was not updated to include this intervention, despite its use being documented and observed. Staff interviews confirmed the omission and clarified that only the MDSC could revise care plans.
Inaccurate MDS Coding for Use of Alarms
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate completion of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two sampled residents. For one resident with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, metabolic encephalopathy, major depressive disorder, and dementia, the care plan indicated the use of a clip alarm as an intervention for fall risk. However, the resident's Significant Change MDS did not reflect the use of the clip alarm, despite documentation and staff acknowledgment that the device had been in use since the previous year. Another resident, observed multiple times with a personal tabs alarm in place, also had a care plan intervention for a clip alarm due to fall risk. Despite these observations and care plan documentation, the resident's Significant Change MDS was coded to indicate no chair alarm was used. The MDS Coordinator confirmed that the MDS assessments for both residents were inaccurately coded and did not reflect the residents' actual status during the observation period.
Failure to Revise Care Plan to Include Bed Cradle Intervention
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to revise the care plan for one resident to include the use of a bed cradle, an intervention implemented to prevent pressure on the resident's feet. The resident, who had diagnoses including Parkinsonism, diabetes mellitus type II, dementia, and joint contractures, was assessed as having impaired cognition and being dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. The resident was also identified as being at risk for pressure ulcers. Upon admission, the wound care nurse noted boggy heels with redness, and later, redness was observed on the great toes. The wound care nurse documented that treatment included skin prep and the use of a bed cradle. Despite these interventions being implemented, a review of the resident's care plan revealed that the use of the bed cradle was not included as an intervention to prevent pressure on the resident's feet. Observations confirmed the bed cradle was in use, but the care plan had not been updated to reflect this. Interviews with the wound care nurse and the MDS Coordinator confirmed that the omission occurred and that only the MDS Coordinator was authorized to revise care plans.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 60 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Marshallville
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fort Valley Crossing Of Journey Llc | 10 mi | ★★★★★ | 9 | 0 |
| Montezuma Health And Rehabilitation | 10.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Miona Geriatric & Dementia Center | 12.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
| Summerhill Elderliving Home & Care | 14.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 15 | 0 |
| Taylor County Health And Rehabilitation | 15.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Oaks Nursing Home, Inc, The.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.