Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Waterford, The during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to ensure accurate MDS assessments for two residents. One resident's vision was inaccurately assessed as adequate despite having macular degeneration, while another resident's discharge status was incorrectly documented as being to a hospital instead of home. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged both inaccuracies.
A facility failed to administer blood pressure medications as per physician orders for a resident, holding the medications without specified parameters or notifying the physician. The resident was on amlodipine and metoprolol, and the MAR showed the medications were held on several occasions with low blood pressure readings but lacked documentation of physician notification. An RN acknowledged the absence of documented parameters and physician notification.
A resident with macular degeneration was not provided with necessary vision interventions, despite her inability to read activity calendars, meal menus, or personal mail. The MDS assessment inaccurately coded her vision as adequate, and staff interviews confirmed awareness of her impairment but revealed no interventions were in place. The resident expressed willingness to try interventions, highlighting the facility's oversight.
A resident tested positive for Influenza A three days post-admission, but the facility failed to report the outbreak to the Florida DOH. The infection preventionist did not report the case, believing the exposure occurred in the hospital and the facility's policy required two or more residents to exhibit illness for reporting. This inaction led to a deficiency as it did not comply with the facility's policy and state guidelines.
Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Vision and Discharge Status
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two residents. Resident #32 was inaccurately assessed regarding her vision status. Although the MDS assessment indicated that her vision was adequate, interviews with the resident and staff revealed that she was visually impaired due to macular degeneration and unable to read regular print. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged using a larger print sample for the assessment and admitted to the inaccuracy, as she believed the resident's ability to walk and communicate her needs indicated adequate vision. Resident #44's discharge status was inaccurately documented in the MDS assessment. The resident was discharged home with family, as planned, with arrangements for home health care and family support. However, the MDS assessment incorrectly recorded the discharge as being to a short-term general hospital. The MDS Coordinator was informed of this discrepancy and acknowledged the need to update the assessment.
Failure to Administer Medications Per Physician Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to administer medications as per physician orders for one resident, as evidenced by holding blood pressure medications without specified hold parameters or documented physician notification. The resident was receiving amlodipine and metoprolol, both affecting blood pressure, but the orders lacked any physician-directed parameters for holding these medications. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed that the medications were held on multiple occasions in January and February 2025, with recorded blood pressures that were low, but without any documented reason or physician notification. During an interview, a Registered Nurse (RN) stated that medications were typically held if the systolic blood pressure was below 110, but acknowledged the absence of documented parameters and physician notification in this case.
Failure to Provide Vision Interventions for Resident with Macular Degeneration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary interventions to enhance vision for a resident with macular degeneration, leading to a deficiency in care. The resident, who was admitted to the facility with a condition that impaired her ability to see fine details, reported being unable to read the activities calendar, meal menus, or personal mail. Despite the resident's expressed difficulty and the importance of participating in activities and making independent choices, no interventions were provided to assist her vision. The MDS assessment inaccurately coded her vision as adequate, based on her ability to walk and communicate her needs, rather than her actual visual impairment. Interviews with facility staff, including the MDS Coordinator, Director of Lifestyle, and a CNA, confirmed awareness of the resident's visual impairment but revealed a lack of implemented interventions. The Director of Lifestyle acknowledged the need for a large print calendar, while the CNA noted the resident's difficulty with the TV remote control. The Dietary Assistant also confirmed the resident's need for assistance with menu choices. The resident expressed willingness to try interventions to aid her reading, highlighting the facility's oversight in addressing her visual needs.
Failure to Report Influenza Outbreak
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an Influenza outbreak to the Florida Department of Health (DOH) for a resident who tested positive for Influenza A. According to the facility's policy, an outbreak should be reported when two or more residents exhibit illness, or if there is one lab-confirmed case with other respiratory infections indicating a potential outbreak. The resident, who was admitted to the facility, tested positive for Influenza A three days post-admission. Despite the positive test result and the presence of symptoms such as a congested cough and general malaise, the infection preventionist did not report the outbreak to the DOH, citing that the resident may have been exposed in the hospital setting prior to admission. The facility's policy, as well as CDC guidelines, require notification of suspected or confirmed influenza outbreaks to local and state health departments. The infection preventionist's decision not to report was based on the belief that the resident's exposure occurred outside the facility, and the policy's threshold of two or more residents exhibiting illness was not met. This inaction led to a deficiency as the facility did not adhere to the reporting requirements outlined in their own policy and state guidelines, potentially delaying public health intervention.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 148 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 5 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Juno Beach
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prosper Health And Rehabilitation Center | 1.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Nursing Center At La Posada, The | 1.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Gardens Court | 2.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
| Luxe At Jupiter Rehabilitation Center (the) | 3.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| North Lake Care Center And Rehab | 4.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 11 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Waterford, The.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.