Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around August 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Villages Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center, The during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with a nephrostomy catheter was observed with an old dressing showing bloody drainage that had not been changed since return from a hospital stay, despite existing physician orders and facility policies for catheter and wound care. The resident reported no dressing change since hospital discharge. An APRN and the DON stated that protocols and expectations required nurses to follow nephrostomy care orders, including daily or ordered catheter care. Two LPNs acknowledged they did not perform the documented dressing changes and may have inadvertently checked off the tasks, resulting in the nephrostomy dressing not being changed as ordered and without a recorded reason for not following the physician’s orders.
A cognitively intact resident with an indwelling catheter and nephrostomy had physician orders for daily cleansing with normal saline, drying, and bandage application to the nephrostomy site on the night shift and as needed, but the MAR/TAR showed no nephrostomy dressing changes for an extended period, despite these active orders. Later, an order was written to send the resident to the ED for evaluation and treatment of hematuria, after which daily nephrostomy dressing changes began to be documented. The physician reported that nurses were responsible for performing skin and wound care per orders and documenting treatments, and that they did not fulfill these responsibilities in this case.
A resident with a right nephrostomy was observed with an old dressing showing bloody drainage that had not been changed since return from the hospital, despite physician orders for daily site care. Admission documentation failed to record the nephrostomy, even though other records identified it, and there were no nephrostomy site care orders or documented dressing changes for an extended period after admission. Later, when orders for daily cleansing and bandage application were in place, LPNs acknowledged they had not actually performed some documented dressing changes. These actions and omissions were inconsistent with facility policies on indwelling catheter and wound care, which required appropriate assessment, orders, performance, and documentation of treatments.
Failure to Provide Nephrostomy Site Care: A cognitively intact resident with a right nephrostomy had a dressing over the insertion site that was still dated and visibly soiled with bloody drainage during observation. Records showed inconsistent nephrostomy care orders, no documented site care for part of the stay, and an admission assessment that did not identify the nephrostomy in the GU section.
A resident with a Foley catheter was observed wearing a hospital gown instead of personal clothing, despite expressing a preference to wear his own clothes. Staff did not offer or assist the resident with dressing in his personal attire, contrary to facility policy and the resident's care plan, resulting in a failure to maintain the resident's dignity.
A resident with a recent hip fracture and severe malnutrition did not receive post-operative wound care as ordered by the physician, including timely cleaning, dressing changes, and staple removal. Review of the treatment record showed missing documentation for these required interventions, and the DON confirmed that physician orders were not followed as expected.
A resident with impaired mobility and a history of pressure ulcers was not turned or repositioned as required, despite a care plan and facility policy mandating frequent repositioning and use of pressure-reducing devices. The resident remained in the same position for an extended period, leading to the recurrence of a pressure ulcer on the sacrum.
The facility failed to consistently monitor and document weights and supplement intake for three residents with protein-calorie malnutrition, resulting in missed weight records and lack of documentation on supplement consumption, despite care plans and physician orders requiring these interventions. Staff interviews revealed inconsistent practices and communication breakdowns regarding weight monitoring and nutritional assessments.
A resident with an indwelling urinary catheter was observed with the catheter collection bag lying on the floor, contrary to the care plan and facility policy, which require the bag to be properly positioned to promote infection control. The DON confirmed the bag should not be on the floor.
A resident was transferred to the hospital after the spouse called 911, but the physician was not notified of the transfer or the resident's return. The nurse on duty, who was new, did not follow the facility's policy to inform the provider, and there was no documentation of physician notification. Staff interviews confirmed that the expected procedure was not followed, and the physician stated they were not informed as required.
Staff failed to perform hand hygiene before and after administering medications to two residents, including handling a dropped pill with bare hands and returning it to the medication cup. LPNs involved acknowledged not following infection control protocols, and facility leadership confirmed these actions did not meet established policy.
A resident with acute kidney injury, dehydration, and poor oral intake did not consistently receive prescribed IV fluids as ordered. Staff interviews and observations revealed missed or improperly timed IV administration, despite the resident's ongoing risk for dehydration and reliance on supplements and IV therapy. Facility policies required adherence to physician orders for hydration, but these were not followed, resulting in a deficiency.
A resident with multiple medical conditions requiring enteral nutrition did not receive tube feedings and water flushes at the physician-ordered rates. Observations showed the feeding pump was set below the prescribed rates for both nutrition and hydration, and staff failed to verify or clarify the correct settings, resulting in the resident not receiving care as ordered.
Two residents receiving oxygen therapy were observed with undated oxygen tubing, despite facility policy and physician orders requiring weekly changes and proper labeling. The DON confirmed that staff are expected to change and date tubing every seven days, but observations showed this was not done, resulting in non-compliance with professional standards for respiratory care.
Surveyors found unsanitary conditions in three nourishment rooms, including splattered and sticky substances on freezers, refrigerators, and microwaves. The Assistant Dietary Manager confirmed that daily cleaning had not yet been checked as required by facility policy.
The facility did not ensure accurate documentation and administration of medications for two residents. One resident's MAR lacked required blood pressure and heart rate documentation before administration of metoprolol, and staff admitted to using placeholders instead of actual vital signs. Another resident's MAR showed IV fluids were given as ordered, but observation and staff interviews confirmed the IV was not administered. These actions did not comply with facility policy or physician orders.
Staff failed to consistently follow infection control protocols, including not wearing required PPE during high-contact care for residents with wounds or G-tubes, neglecting hand hygiene during medication administration and wound care, and improperly handling tube feeding products by leaving them open, undated, and unrefrigerated in resident rooms. These deficiencies were observed across multiple staff roles and confirmed through interviews and record reviews.
Failure to Follow Physician Orders for Nephrostomy Dressing Care
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to follow physician orders for nephrostomy care for one resident. On observation, the resident was seen in bed with a gauze pad and transparent occlusive dressing over a nephrostomy catheter insertion site on the right lower back. The dressing showed a half-dollar sized area of bloody drainage and was dated several days prior to the observation. The resident reported that she had previously been hospitalized due to blood in her nephrostomy drainage bag and dislodgement of the tube, which was reinserted at the hospital, and that the dressing had not been changed since her return. Her admission record showed an admission date in April 2026 with diagnoses including a fracture of the neck of the left femur. Record review and staff interviews showed that there were physician orders and facility policies in place for catheter and wound care, including daily catheter care or as ordered, and treatment of skin impairments. The APRN stated that protocols for catheter care existed and that nurses were expected to follow nephrostomy care orders. The DON stated that the admitting nurse was expected to obtain nephrostomy care orders and that nurses were expected to follow them. However, two LPNs each confirmed they had not performed the nephrostomy dressing changes on the dates documented and suggested they may have inadvertently checked off the task in error. This resulted in the nephrostomy dressing not being changed as ordered, without a documented reason in the medical record for not following the physician’s orders.
Failure to Provide and Document Ordered Nephrostomy Site Care
Penalty
Summary
Nursing staff failed to provide and document ordered nephrostomy site care for a cognitively intact resident with an indwelling catheter and nephrostomy. The resident’s Admission/5-day Medicare MDS dated 4/20/2026 showed a BIMS score of 15/15 and documented the presence of an indwelling catheter and nephrostomy. Physician orders dated 4/27/2026 and 4/28/2026 directed staff to cleanse the nephrostomy site with normal saline, pat the area dry, and apply a bandage daily on the night shift and as needed. Despite these orders, the MAR/TAR from 4/14/2026 through 4/27/2026 contained no documentation of nephrostomy dressing changes. Subsequently, a physician order dated 4/30/2026 instructed that the resident be sent to the ED for evaluation and treatment for hematuria. The MAR/TAR from 5/01/2026 through 5/05/2026 then showed documentation of daily nephrostomy dressing changes. During an interview on 5/06/2026, the physician stated that nurses were expected to perform skin and wound care, follow physician orders, and contact the physician as needed, and that in this case the nurses did not do their due diligence. Facility wound care expectations included that wound care procedures and treatments be performed according to physician orders, maintain proper technique, and be documented in the clinical record when performed.
Failure to Provide Ordered Nephrostomy Care and Accurate Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide adequate and appropriate health care related to nephrostomy care for one resident with an indwelling nephrostomy catheter. On observation, the resident was noted sitting up in bed with a gauze pad and transparent occlusive dressing over the right lower back nephrostomy insertion site that had a half-dollar sized area of bloody drainage and was dated several days earlier. The resident stated that she had previously gone to the hospital because there was blood in her nephrostomy drainage bag and the tube had been pulled out, and that the dressing had not been changed since her return from the hospital. The resident’s records showed an admission date of 4/14/2026 with diagnoses including a left femur neck fracture, other artificial openings of urinary tract status, and local skin and subcutaneous tissue infection. Her most recent MDS documented that she was cognitively intact (BIMS 15/15) and had both an indwelling catheter and an ostomy (right nephrostomy). The Medical Certification for Medicaid LTC Services also documented a right nephrostomy. However, the Nursing Admission Assessment documented that she did not have a catheter and contained no documentation of the nephrostomy. From 4/14/2026 through 4/27/2026 there were no physician orders for nephrostomy site care and no nephrostomy dressing changes documented on the MAR/TAR during that period. Physician orders later included instructions to empty the nephrostomy bag every shift and, beginning 4/27/2026 and again on 4/28/2026, to cleanse the nephrostomy site with normal saline, pat dry, and apply a bandage daily on night shift and as needed. MAR/TAR review from 5/01/2026 through 5/05/2026 showed documentation of daily nephrostomy dressing changes, but two LPNs interviewed admitted they had not actually performed the dressing changes on specific dates despite having checked them off. The DON stated that the expectation was for the admitting nurse to obtain nephrostomy care orders and for nurses to follow those orders. Facility policies on indwelling catheters and wound care required appropriate documentation, daily care as ordered, admission skin/pressure risk assessment, identification of pre-existing conditions, and performance and documentation of wound care per physician orders, which were not consistently followed in this case.
Failure to Provide Nephrostomy Site Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident who required nephrostomy services received care consistent with professional standards of practice. Resident #2 was cognitively intact, had diagnoses including other artificial openings of the urinary tract status and local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, and had a right nephrostomy documented in the medical certification and MDS. During observation, the resident was sitting up in bed with a gauze pad and transparent occlusive dressing over the nephrostomy insertion site on the right lower back; the dressing had a half-dollar sized area of bloody drainage and was dated 4/30/2026. The resident stated that she had recently gone to the hospital because there was blood in the nephrostomy drainage bag and the tube had been pulled out, and that the hospital reinserted the nephrostomy tube. Record review showed physician orders for nephrostomy care, including cleansing with normal saline, patting the area dry, and applying a bandage daily and as needed, but the order was discontinued and later re-entered. The chart documented no nephrostomy site care orders from 4/14/2026 through 4/27/2026 and no nephrostomy dressing changes during that period. The MAR/TAR documented daily nephrostomy dressing changes from 5/01/2026 through 5/05/2026, but the observed dressing remained dated 4/30/2026 and had not been changed since the resident returned from the hospital. The nursing admission assessment documented that the resident did not have a catheter and did not include the nephrostomy in the genitourinary section.
Failure to Honor Resident's Preference for Personal Clothing
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when a resident was observed lying in bed on an air mattress, wearing a hospital-style gown with a white blanket over his legs, and his personal clothing placed on the back of his wheelchair. The resident had a Foley catheter in place and stated during an interview that he preferred to wear his own clothes but was not given the option to get dressed that morning. He believed staff did not want to dress him due to the catheter tube. Subsequent observation later in the day confirmed the resident remained in a hospital gown. Review of the resident's care plan indicated that assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), including dressing, should be provided as needed. The facility's policy also required staff to provide ADL care with dignity, privacy, and respect, unless otherwise indicated by the resident. The Director of Nursing confirmed that it was her expectation for residents to be dressed in their personal clothing unless they preferred otherwise. The failure to offer or assist the resident with dressing in his personal clothing, despite his preference and the facility's policy, resulted in a lack of dignity and respect for the resident.
Failure to Provide Post-Operative Wound Care per Physician Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide post-operative wound care according to physician orders for one resident who was admitted with a displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. Physician orders specified a wound care regimen that included cleaning the right hip with hibiclens on day 5 post-operation, removing the aquacel dressing and cleaning the surgical site with hibiclens and 4 by 4s on day 10 post-operation, and removing staples and applying steri strips for two weeks. Review of the resident's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for May 2025 showed no documentation that these orders were followed as directed. During an interview, the Director of Nursing confirmed that the expectation is for all physician orders to be followed or for the physician to be notified if orders are not carried out. The Director also acknowledged that the resident's staples should have been removed on the specified date according to the orders. Facility policy requires wound care procedures and treatments to be performed according to physician orders and for the physician to be contacted for order changes or to notify of changes in skin condition or refusals of care.
Failure to Prevent Recurrence of Pressure Ulcer Due to Inadequate Repositioning
Penalty
Summary
A resident with a history of pressure ulcers and multiple risk factors, including impaired mobility, incontinence of bowel and bladder, and a recent femur fracture, was observed lying on his back in bed on an air mattress for an extended period. During two separate observations on the same day, the resident remained in the same position, and he reported that he had not been turned since the previous night and was experiencing pain and developing a sore. Upon further observation by nursing leadership, the resident's lower back was found to be bright red with a small open area on the left side of the sacrum, consistent with a pressure ulcer. The resident's care plan included interventions such as regular turning and repositioning, use of a pressure-reducing mattress, and monitoring for skin breakdown. Despite these documented interventions, staff failed to implement the required turning and repositioning schedule, as confirmed by the resident's statement and direct observation. The facility's policy and wound care consult also emphasized the need for ongoing pressure reduction and repositioning, but these measures were not consistently followed, resulting in the recurrence of a pressure ulcer.
Failure to Monitor and Document Nutritional Status and Supplement Intake
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to recognize, evaluate, and address the nutritional needs of residents at risk for or experiencing impaired nutrition, as evidenced by the lack of consistent weight monitoring and documentation for three residents with diagnoses including severe protein-calorie malnutrition. For one resident, there was only a single weight recorded after admission, with no subsequent weights documented, despite care plans and facility policy requiring regular weight monitoring. The resident was on enteral feedings due to dysphagia and esophageal cancer, and the Registered Dietitian (RD) acknowledged not bringing the missing admission weight to anyone's attention. Interviews revealed inconsistent practices and a lack of a set frequency for obtaining weights, with staff relying on ad hoc communication rather than systematic monitoring. Another resident experienced a significant weight loss of 15% over three months, with no weights documented for two consecutive months. The resident was at risk for malnutrition, had a therapeutic diet, and was prescribed a house nutritional supplement, but there was no documentation of the percentage of supplement consumed. The RD and nursing staff described a process where weights and supplement intake were to be monitored and communicated, but gaps in documentation and follow-through were evident. The resident reported dissatisfaction with the food and was unaware of the extent of their weight loss. A third resident, also diagnosed with protein-calorie malnutrition, had no documented weights for two months and no records of supplement intake, despite orders and care plans specifying these interventions. Staff interviews confirmed that weights should be obtained upon admission, monthly, and as needed, but acknowledged communication breakdowns and missing documentation. The facility's own policy required weights to be recorded upon admission and monthly, with the RD reviewing all admission weights for possible intervention, but these procedures were not consistently followed for the residents reviewed.
Failure to Maintain Proper Placement of Urinary Catheter Collection Bag
Penalty
Summary
During an observation, a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter was found lying in bed with the catheter collection bag placed on the floor. The resident's care plan specified that the catheter bag should be kept below bladder level, covered for dignity, and that catheter care should be provided as ordered. The facility's policy also required staff to ensure proper placement of catheter tubing and collection bags to promote infection control and prevent contamination. The Director of Nursing confirmed during an interview that the catheter bag should be hanging on the bed frame and not on the floor. These findings indicate that staff failed to follow both the resident's care plan and facility policy regarding the proper placement and handling of the urinary catheter collection bag.
Failure to Notify Physician of Resident Hospital Transfer and Return
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the physician when a resident was transferred to and returned from the hospital. According to nursing progress notes, the resident's wife requested a hospital transfer and called 911, with facility staff only becoming aware when paramedics arrived. There was no documentation in the medical record indicating that the resident's physician was notified of either the transfer or the return from the hospital. Interviews with staff revealed that the nurse on duty was new and did not know to call the physician, instead contacting the previous Director of Nursing. Other staff confirmed that the expected procedure was to notify the physician and document the notification, but this was not done. The Director of Nursing and other staff stated that the facility's policy requires notification of the physician, family, and documentation of any significant change in condition, including hospital transfers. The physician confirmed that they were not notified and expected to be informed of such events. The facility's written policy also specifies that the primary physician should be updated about changes in condition, and if unavailable, the medical director should be contacted. The failure to notify the physician and document the notification represents a deviation from both facility policy and standard practice.
Failure to Perform Hand Hygiene During Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
Staff failed to perform proper hand hygiene during medication administration for two residents. In one instance, an LPN entered a resident's room, used a blood pressure cuff, and administered oral medications without performing hand hygiene before or after the procedure. The LPN also handled equipment and medication cups without cleaning hands between tasks or after leaving the resident's room. The LPN confirmed during an interview that hand hygiene was not performed as required. In another case, a different LPN prepared oral medications, entered a resident's room without performing hand hygiene, and handed the medication cup to the resident. When the resident dropped a pill on her shirt, the LPN picked up the pill with bare hands and placed it back into the medication cup, rather than using gloves and discarding the pill. The LPN acknowledged not following proper hand hygiene or glove use. Facility policy and interviews with the DON and unit manager confirmed that staff are expected to perform hand hygiene before and after medication administration and to use gloves and discard dropped pills, but these procedures were not followed.
Failure to Ensure Proper Hydration for Resident with AKI and Poor Oral Intake
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when the facility failed to ensure proper hydration for a resident with a history of acute kidney injury (AKI), dehydration, significant weight loss, variable oral intake, and diuretic use. The resident had a physician's order for intravenous (IV) sodium chloride solution to be administered three times a week to address hydration needs. Observations and interviews revealed that the resident was not receiving IV fluids as ordered, with staff noting that the IV was not started as scheduled and that sometimes night nurses administered fluids earlier than ordered. On one occasion, the resident was not hooked up to IV fluids in the morning, and the unit manager confirmed that the scheduled IV was not administered the previous night. The resident was also observed to have poor oral intake, often refusing meals and not consuming adequate fluids, which was acknowledged by staff as a reason for providing supplements and IV fluids. Despite these interventions, the resident was not observed to be receiving IV fluids during multiple observations, and documentation inconsistencies were noted regarding the administration of the IV fluids. The facility's policies required medications and hydration to be provided as ordered, but these were not consistently followed, resulting in a failure to maintain the resident's hydration status as prescribed.
Failure to Administer Enteral Nutrition and Hydration as Ordered
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with a history of metabolic encephalopathy, diabetes, obesity, and dysphagia, who was dependent on enteral nutrition, did not receive tube feedings and water flushes as ordered by the physician. Multiple observations over two days showed the resident's feeding pump was consistently set at 45 ml/hr for Glucerna 1.5 and 30 ml/hr for water flush, instead of the physician-ordered 60 ml/hr for Glucerna 1.5 and 55 ml/hr for water. The resident's medical records and dietary notes confirmed the prescribed rates, which were intended to meet the resident's full nutritional and hydration needs due to their NPO status and risk for malnutrition. Staff interviews revealed that nursing staff were unaware of the correct settings and did not verify or clarify the physician's orders when discrepancies were noted. The LPN acknowledged the error after checking the orders, and the Unit Manager was not informed of any changes. Even after the feeding rate was corrected, the water flush remained incorrect. The facility's policy required verification and adherence to physician orders for enteral feedings, which was not followed in this instance.
Failure to Date Oxygen Tubing During Oxygen Therapy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards for two residents who were receiving oxygen therapy. During observations, both residents were found using nasal cannulas for oxygen administration, but the oxygen tubing in use was not dated as required. The electronic medication administration record and physician's orders specified that oxygen tubing and bags should be changed and dated weekly, specifically every Thursday during the midnight shift. However, during multiple observations, the tubing for both residents lacked any date, indicating that staff did not follow the established protocol for labeling and dating oxygen equipment. Interviews with the Director of Nursing confirmed that nurses are expected to change, label, and date the oxygen tubing every seven days, in accordance with facility policy. The facility's written policy on oxygen administration also requires that weekly tubing changes be documented and that the tubing be appropriately dated to demonstrate compliance. The failure to date the oxygen tubing as observed for both residents directly contravened these documented procedures and expectations.
Unsanitary Conditions in Nourishment Rooms
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed that the facility failed to maintain kitchen equipment in a clean and sanitary condition in three out of four nourishment rooms. Specifically, there were brown and red splattered substances on the interior base of the freezer and an orange sticky substance on the inside walls of the microwave in one nourishment room. In another nourishment room, a brown splattered substance was found on the back wall of the refrigerator, food buildup was present on the microwave oven plate, and opaque splatters were noted on the exterior front glass of the microwave. In a third nourishment room, brown splattered substances were observed on the lower refrigerator drawers and a brown sticky buildup was found on the interior base of the freezer. The Assistant Dietary Manager confirmed during interview that the nutrition rooms should be cleaned daily and acknowledged that rounds to check cleanliness had not yet been completed that morning. Review of the facility's kitchen sanitation policy indicated that kitchen areas and equipment are required to be kept clean and in good repair.
Failure to Accurately Document and Administer Medications as Ordered
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain complete and accurately documented medical records for two residents in relation to medication administration. For one resident prescribed metoprolol with specific parameters to hold the medication if systolic blood pressure was less than 110 or heart rate below 60 BPM, the Medication Administration Record (MAR) did not include documentation of the resident's heart rate or blood pressure prior to administration on multiple occasions. Nursing staff reported that vital signs were sometimes entered later or marked as 'NA' as a placeholder, contrary to facility expectations and policy, which require documentation of vital signs before administering cardiac medications. For another resident with physician orders for intravenous sodium chloride solution three times a week for acute kidney injury and dehydration, the MAR indicated the IV fluid was administered, but observation and staff interviews revealed the IV was not actually given as ordered. Staff noted that sometimes IV fluids were started earlier than ordered, or not at all, and the Unit Manager confirmed that the IV fluid was not hung as documented. Facility policies require medications and services to be administered and documented as prescribed, but these requirements were not met in these cases.
Failure to Adhere to Infection Control Protocols and Safe Handling of Medical Products
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to infection prevention and control protocols in several observed instances. Staff did not follow posted Enhanced Barrier Precautions signage, such as failing to wear gowns and gloves when required for residents with wounds or devices like G-tubes. In one case, a disposable gown was left hanging in a resident's room, and staff were unaware of its purpose or the need for proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE). Multiple staff members, including CNAs and LPNs, entered rooms or provided care without donning appropriate PPE, despite clear signage and physician orders indicating the need for enhanced precautions due to conditions such as recent C. difficile infection, surgical wounds, or G-tube presence. Hand hygiene practices were not consistently followed during medication administration and wound care. An LPN was observed retrieving and administering medication to a resident without performing hand hygiene after touching multiple surfaces, including a medication dispensing machine and secured doors. During wound care, the Assistant Director of Nursing did not change gloves or perform hand hygiene between cleaning the wound and applying ointment and a new dressing, contrary to established infection control procedures. Additionally, the facility did not properly handle or store tube feeding products according to manufacturer recommendations. Observations revealed that tube feeding bottles were left open, undated, and uncovered in resident rooms, and staff did not ensure that these products were refrigerated or used within the recommended timeframe. These lapses were confirmed by staff interviews and were not in accordance with facility policy or manufacturer guidelines.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 203 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 4 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Lady Lake
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chatham Glen Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center | 0.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Lady Lake Specialty Care Center And Rehab | 1.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 2 |
| Freedom Pointe Health Center | 3.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 7 | 0 |
| Buffalo Crossings Healthcare & Rehabilitation Cen | 6.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Club Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center At The V | 6.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Villages Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center, The.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.