Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Seaside Health And Rehabilitation Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with multiple health issues, including dementia and impaired mobility, was found with long and soiled fingernails, indicating a failure by the facility to provide necessary ADL care. Despite being dependent on staff for personal hygiene, the resident did not receive appropriate nail care, as confirmed by staff interviews and observations.
A resident with COPD did not receive oxygen therapy as per the physician's order, which specified a flow rate of 2 L/min. Observations showed the oxygen concentrator set at 1.5 L/min. Staff interviews confirmed the discrepancy, with the CNA and LPN acknowledging the correct order but failing to ensure compliance.
A resident with hemiplegia was unable to reach her call bell due to its placement on the left side of her bed, despite her inability to use her left side. This oversight left her unable to summon help when experiencing severe pain. The facility's policy requires call bells to be within reach, but this was not adhered to, as confirmed by observations and staff interviews.
Failure to Maintain Resident's Personal Hygiene
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary care and services for a resident who was unable to perform activities of daily living independently, specifically in maintaining good grooming and personal hygiene. Observations on two separate occasions revealed that the resident's fingernails were long and soiled. The resident, who has diagnoses including osteoarthritis, cataracts, major depressive disorder, dementia, and anxiety, was documented as dependent on staff for personal hygiene. The resident's care plan indicated a need for assistance with ADLs due to general weakness and impaired mobility, and the facility's policy required that residents unable to carry out ADLs independently receive appropriate support and assistance. Interviews with facility staff, including a CNA and an LPN, confirmed that CNAs were responsible for nail care as part of daily care and on residents' shower days. Despite this, the resident's fingernails were not maintained, indicating a failure to adhere to the facility's policy and the resident's care plan. The facility's policy outlined that residents should receive services necessary to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene, which was not provided in this case.
Failure to Administer Oxygen as Ordered
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident received oxygen therapy according to the physician's order. Observations on multiple occasions revealed that the resident's oxygen concentrator was set at 1.5 liters per minute, despite the physician's order specifying a flow rate of 2 liters per minute. The resident, who has a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and other medical conditions, was not physically capable of adjusting the oxygen flow rate herself. The resident's medical record and care plan indicated the need for continuous oxygen therapy via nasal cannula, with specific instructions to administer oxygen as ordered and monitor oxygen saturations. Interviews with facility staff, including a CNA and an LPN, confirmed the discrepancy between the physician's order and the actual oxygen flow rate. The CNA, who had been with the facility for over eight years, acknowledged the resident's order for 2 liters per minute and described the standard process for checking oxygen flow rates. The LPN, an agency nurse, also confirmed the physician's order after checking the electronic medical record but could not initially recall the specific order for the resident. This oversight in ensuring the correct oxygen flow rate was maintained led to the deficiency identified during the survey.
Inaccessible Call Bell for Resident with Hemiplegia
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident had a means of directly contacting caregivers, as required by their policy. During observations, it was noted that the call bell for a resident was placed out of reach on the left side of the bed, despite the resident's inability to use her left side due to hemiplegia following a cerebrovascular accident. The resident, who was alert and able to express her needs, reported severe pain and was unable to reach the call bell to summon assistance. Photographic evidence confirmed the call bell's placement out of reach. The resident's medical records indicated she had multiple diagnoses, including hemiplegia and contractures on her left side, and was receiving hospice care. Her care plan noted her dependency on staff for all activities of daily living and her chronic pain issues. Despite these documented needs, the call bell was not positioned to accommodate her physical limitations. Interviews with staff revealed that the call bell was typically placed on the right side, but during the survey, it was found on the left, inaccessible to the resident.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 151 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 4 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Daytona Beach
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beach Street Health And Rehabilitation Center | 0.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Carlton Shores Healthcare And Rehabilitation Cente | 1.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
| Blue Palms Health And Rehabilitation Center Of Day | 1.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
| Aviata At South Daytona | 2.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 2 |
| Solaris Healthcare Daytona | 3.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Seaside Health And Rehabilitation Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.