Sarasota Point Rehabilitation Center

2600 Courtland Street, Sarasota, Florida 34237

120 certified beds · ≈ 102 residents/day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Last survey October 2024 · Provider #106102

CMS FIVE-STAR RATINGS
4/ 5 overall

Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.

Health inspections 3/5
Staffing 4/5
Quality measures 5/5
Part of a 43-facility chain · chain average rating 3.8★
COMPLIANCE AT A GLANCE
Citations, last 12 months
0
100% below the Florida average of 4.3
Serious citations (J–L)
0
no immediate jeopardy–level findings
Fines on record
None
civil monetary penalties
Past typical interval

Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time

22 of ~15 typical months since the last standard survey (October 2024)
Oct 2024 · on cycle Window opens Sep 2025 → ~Jan 2026

Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.

Citation history

Health deficiencies cited at Sarasota Point Rehabilitation Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.

0 in the last 12 months11 all-time 18 inspections on file
Lack of Training and Competency in Dishwasher Sanitization
F
F0812 F812: Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Short Summary

A dietary staff member was found to be untrained and incompetent in testing the sanitizing solution of a low-temp dishwasher. Despite signing the Dishwashing Temperature/Sanitizer log, the staff member was unaware of its purpose and had not received proper training. The Certified Dietary Manager and facility administrator could not provide documentation of the staff member's training and competency.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Failure to Update Care Plan for Elopement Risk
D
F0657 F657: Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Short Summary

A resident at risk for elopement had an alert bracelet initially placed on her ankle, but a physician's order later specified it should be on her walker. The care plan was not updated to reflect this change, leading to a discrepancy. Staff confirmed the care plan did not match the physician's order.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Failure to Apply Compression Hose as Ordered
D
F0684 F684: Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Short Summary

A resident with heart failure and edema was not provided with compression hose as ordered by the physician. Despite documentation indicating the hose were applied, observations and interviews revealed they were not offered, leading to swollen legs. Staff admitted to not following the care plan and inaccurately documenting treatment.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Medication Errors with Transdermal Patches
D
F0760 F760: Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Short Summary

Two residents experienced significant medication errors involving transdermal pain patches. One resident had a Lidocaine Patch applied incorrectly and left on for too long, while another resident's MAR inaccurately documented the application of a Lidocaine Patch that was not used. The facility's policy on medication documentation was not followed.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Environmental Deficiencies in Facility
E
F0921 F921: Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
Short Summary

The facility failed to ensure a safe and sanitary environment, with issues such as cracked tiles, missing handrails, and damaged walls observed in multiple areas. Despite recent hallway repainting, resident rooms were neglected, and maintenance staff were overwhelmed with repairs. The Administrator acknowledged that the disrupted surfaces could pose infection control issues.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Citation watch

Track new serious citations across Florida

Get a heads-up on the newest immediate-jeopardy (J–L) citations in Florida — where surveyors are focused right now.

Free · about one email a month

What surveyors are citing around you — mapped

In the Assessment

All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence

Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.

assistocare.com/survey-prep
Risk areas — ranked
1F689Accident hazards & supervision82
2F880Infection prevention & control74
3F812Food safety & sanitation61
4F656Comprehensive care plans49

Illustrative

In the Assessment

What surveyors actually found near you

We read the 133 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 10 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.

assistocare.com/survey-prep
Findings near you
Gulf Coast Village · 1.6 mi F689J

Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.

Cypress Cove · 4.2 mi F812D

Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.

Illustrative

In the Assessment

A prioritized, do-first checklist

Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.

assistocare.com/survey-prep
Self-audit checklist — do-first orderPer risk area
Walk supervision coverage on the memory-care unit at shift changeDo first
Audit fall-risk care plans for residents flagged high-riskF689
Verify kitchen temperature logs for the last 30 daysF812

Illustrative

$129 Built specifically for Sarasota Point Rehabilitation Center from its own record and your local survey environment. 100% money-back within 48 hours. Get the full Assessment

Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.

Nursing homes near Sarasota

How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.

Facility Distance Overall rating Citations, 12 mo Serious (J–L)
Aviata At Sarasota 0.5 mi ★★★★ 4 0
Sarasota Health And Rehabilitation Center 0.8 mi ★★★★ 2 0
Aviata At Beneva 1.7 mi ★★★★ 16 4
Birchwood Health And Rehabilitation Center 1.8 mi ★★★★★ 8 0
Indian Beach Nursing And Rehab Center 2.1 mi ★★★★ 5 0
Survey Readiness Assessment

Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns

Built specifically for Sarasota Point Rehabilitation Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.

Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙