Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Pinellas Point Nursing And Rehab Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to maintain the dish machine in a clean manner, with a soiled rag and debris found on top of the machine. Staff confirmed the machine should not be dirty, and the facility's policy requires proper cleaning and sanitation of equipment.
The facility failed to ensure that three residents understood the binding arbitration agreement before signing it. Interviews revealed that the residents were not adequately informed about the agreement or their right to refuse to sign it, despite staff claims of verbal explanations.
The facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment in both the resident laundry room and the resident adaptive equipment storage room. Observations revealed significant damage to the sheet rock in the laundry room and unsecured, deteriorated walls in the storage room. The Environmental Services Director and Nursing Home Administrator acknowledged the issues, and the Maintenance Director mentioned plans to rebuild the laundry room but no set start date.
The facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, impacting two residents, two facility wings, and the emergency supply shed. Observations confirmed the presence of fruit flies and flies, and the Pest Sighting/Evidence Log lacked proper documentation. The Maintenance Director acknowledged that staff were not documenting pest sightings as required, and the pest control vendor had not addressed specific issues reported by residents.
The facility failed to confirm the accuracy of PASRR Level I and did not complete PASRR Level II for three residents. One resident had multiple diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder and dementia but lacked a Level II PASRR. Another resident with bipolar disorder and dementia also did not have a Level II PASRR completed. A third resident had recommendations for individual therapy in their Level II PASRR, but there was no documentation to confirm the therapy was provided. The DON acknowledged these oversights and mentioned the absence of social services personnel.
The facility failed to develop accurate baseline care plans within 48 hours of admission for two residents. One resident's care plan incorrectly indicated a DNR status despite physician orders for Full Code, while another resident's advanced directive care plan was delayed, leading to a lack of timely and accurate care planning.
The facility failed to ensure side effect monitoring of psychotropic medications for two residents. One resident experienced drowsiness and drooling without documented side effect monitoring, while another resident had no behavior or side effect monitoring for multiple psychotropic medications. The DON confirmed that side effects are documented by exception, but the facility's policy requires regular assessment and documentation.
Failure to Maintain Dish Machine Cleanliness
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the dish machine in a clean manner. During an observation, a soiled white rag was found stored on top of the dish machine, which was also covered with crumbs and debris. Staff D, a Dietary Aide, confirmed that the top of the dish machine should not be dirty and the rag should not be on top of the machine. The Certified Dietary Manager also confirmed the dish machine was dirty and stated it had been cleaned two days prior. The facility's policy on kitchen sanitation requires proper cleaning and sanitation of equipment, including placing sanitizing cloths in sanitizing buckets when not in use and changing these buckets every two hours or more frequently as needed.
Failure to Ensure Residents Understood Binding Arbitration Agreement
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that three residents understood the binding arbitration agreement before signing it. Resident #29, who was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15, signed the agreement without an acknowledgment of understanding. During an interview, Resident #29 revealed that no one explained the agreement or informed her that she did not have to sign it. Similarly, Resident #33, also cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 14, signed the agreement without acknowledgment. She could not recall signing the document or being informed that signing was optional. Resident #41, with moderately impaired cognition and a BIMS score of 12, also signed the agreement without acknowledgment and reported that no one explained the agreement or her right to refuse to sign it. Interviews with staff revealed that the facility's administrative assistant and the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) claimed to verbally explain the arbitration agreement to residents and provide them with the option to sign it. However, the residents' medical records lacked documentation of their understanding or acknowledgment of the agreement. The NHA stated that the agreement itself indicates that signing is optional, but this was not effectively communicated to the residents involved.
Facility Fails to Maintain Safe and Sanitary Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment in both the resident laundry room and the resident adaptive equipment storage room. During a tour of the laundry room, it was observed that one dryer door did not stay closed when running with a large load. Additionally, there was significant damage to the sheet rock behind the washing machines, including a large hole and deteriorated sheet rock with rust-colored edging. The Environmental Services Director confirmed that the wall had been in this condition for about seven to eight months, and the Maintenance Director was aware but had not fixed it due to plans to install an industrial washing machine. The Nursing Home Administrator also acknowledged the wall damage, stating it had been present since before his tenure began in June 2023. The Maintenance Director mentioned that there were plans and a budget to tear down and rebuild the laundry room, but no start date had been set. In the same building housing the laundry room, the storage room for resident wheelchairs, positioning devices, walkers, and shower chairs was also found to be in poor condition. The walls of the storage room were not secured to the wall frames, leaving large open areas to the outside. The walls were deteriorated, with large holes and openings towards the floor of the building. The Director of Rehabilitation confirmed that the equipment stored in this room was used by residents when needed. The facility did not have a safe and clean environment policy to provide upon request.
Failure to Maintain Effective Pest Control Program
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, impacting two residents and two facility wings, as well as the emergency supply shed. Resident #7, who is cognitively intact, reported fruit flies and roaches in her room. Observations confirmed the presence of fruit flies, and the resident mentioned that pest control had never sprayed her room. The Pest Sighting/Evidence Log showed only two pest issues since December 2023, with no documentation of fruit flies. The Maintenance Director acknowledged that staff were not documenting pest sightings as required, and the pest control vendor visits monthly but had not addressed the specific issues reported by residents. Resident #44 also experienced issues with flies and fruit flies in his room, and similar observations were made in the East Wing hallway and during medication pass observations. The Director of Nursing confirmed the presence of fruit flies and flies throughout the building. Additionally, the emergency supply shed was found to have black oblong droppings, which the Maintenance Director initially attributed to lizards. However, the Pest Sighting/Evidence Log had no prior documentation of droppings in the shed, and the pest control service invoices did not include the emergency food supply shed in their serviced locations. The facility's pest control policy requires maintaining a written record of pest sightings and remedial actions, which was not adequately followed.
Failure to Complete and Confirm PASRR Assessments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to confirm the accuracy of the Pre-Admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I and did not complete a PASRR Level II for three residents out of sixteen sampled. Resident #4 was admitted with multiple diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, dementia, and anxiety. Despite these diagnoses, the facility did not have a PASRR Level II on file for this resident. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged the oversight and mentioned that the social services position responsible for PASRR was vacant, leaving her to handle the task alone. The DON confirmed that a Level II PASRR should have been completed for Resident #4 based on the current PASRR and the resident's conditions and diagnoses. Resident #13 was admitted with diagnoses of bipolar disorder and dementia. The Level I PASRR indicated no mental illness diagnoses and recommended a Level II PASRR, which was not completed. The DON confirmed that the PASRR was not accurate and that there was no Level II assessment for Resident #13. She stated that social services and herself were responsible for ensuring PASRRs are accurate and complete, but the facility did not have social services personnel at the time. Resident #29 had a Level II PASRR completed, which recommended psychiatric medication management and individual therapy. While psychiatric services were provided for medication management, there was no documentation indicating that individual therapy was being provided as recommended. The DON was unsure if the resident was receiving individual therapy and could not provide documentation to confirm it. The facility did not provide a policy related to PASRRs when requested.
Failure to Develop Accurate Baseline Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure baseline care plans were developed and accurate for two residents within 48 hours of admission. Resident #105 was admitted with diagnoses including cerebrovascular disease and a history of transient ischemic attack. The care plan indicated a DNR status, but the physician's orders and hospital records showed the resident was a Full Code. The discrepancy was confirmed during interviews with the resident's family member, the DON, and the MDS Coordinator/RN, who admitted the care plan was not reviewed for accuracy until the ARD date approached. The DON updated the care plan only after speaking to the POA, revealing a lack of timely and accurate care planning upon admission. Resident #205 was admitted with diagnoses including cardiac arrest, malignant neoplasm of the prostate, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and end-stage renal disease. The physician's order indicated Full Code, but no advanced directive care plan was in place until several days after admission. During an interview, Resident #205 expressed his desire for life-saving measures, and it was confirmed that no care plan meeting had occurred since his admission. The DON acknowledged that baseline care plans are created based on admission data but did not include advanced directives, leading to a delay in creating an accurate care plan for Resident #205.
Failure to Monitor Side Effects of Psychotropic Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure side effect monitoring of psychotropic medications for two residents. Resident #33 reported feeling drowsy and tired, which she attributed to her Parkinson's medication. During an interview, she was observed drooling, a symptom confirmed by an LPN. Despite these observations, there was no documentation of side effects in Resident #33's medical record. The Director of Nursing (DON) stated that side effects are only documented by exception, meaning if no side effects are observed, nothing is recorded. However, the progress notes for Resident #33 did not contain any documentation of symptoms or side effects related to her medications, even though adjustments were made to her Parkinson's medications due to drooling and other symptoms. The Pharmacy Consultant emphasized the importance of regular side effect monitoring for psychotropic medications to prevent conditions like tardive dyskinesia, but no such monitoring was evident in the records reviewed for Resident #33. Additionally, the care plan for Resident #33 included interventions for monitoring cognitive function and side effects, but these were not followed as per the documentation reviewed. The lack of consistent side effect monitoring for Resident #33's psychotropic medications represents a significant deficiency in care. Resident #39 was observed making facial expressions as if crying and was later seen with a red face and moaning. Her medical record showed multiple psychotropic medications prescribed for anxiety, major depressive disorder, dementia, and mood disorders. However, there was no behavior or side effect monitoring documented for these medications in her Medication Administration Record (MAR) for several months. The DON confirmed that behavior monitoring should be in place for certain medications and that side effects are documented by exception. The facility's policy on psychotropic medication assessment and monitoring requires regular assessment and documentation of side effects, but this was not adhered to in the case of Resident #39. The absence of documented side effect monitoring for Resident #39's psychotropic medications indicates a failure to comply with the facility's own policies and standards of care.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 373 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 23 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Saint Petersburg
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bay Pointe Nursing Pavilion | 0.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Addington Place At College Harbor | 1 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Westminster Suncoast | 1.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Alpine Health And Rehabilitation Center | 2.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 18 | 0 |
| South Heritage Health & Rehabilitation Center | 2.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 9 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Pinellas Point Nursing And Rehab Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.