Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of October 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Florida Presbyterian Homes Inc during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Infection surveillance was inaccurate and inconsistent. The facility’s reports, line listings, and floor maps did not match for multiple months, with handwritten additions changing infection totals, missing organism and symptom documentation, and no confirmation of infections through testing in the surveillance reports. The ADON/IP said she tracked infections by floor map but no longer tracked antibiotic use for hospital admissions, while the DON said another IP maintained the line listings and that some infections were not mapped; antibiotic logs also did not consistently capture orders due to an EMR issue.
Inaccurate Infection Surveillance and Inconsistent Tracking of Infections and Antibiotic Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an accurate, consistent, and complete infection surveillance system under its Infection Prevention and Control Program. Record review showed that the April 2026 infection surveillance report listed 11 infections, with a handwritten addition increasing the total to 12, while the floor map showed 9 different infections and did not match the report. The surveillance report did not identify organisms, did not state whether residents were symptomatic, and did not confirm infections through testing. The May 2026 report listed 2 infections, but a handwritten entry added another urinary tract/kidney infection; the facility also provided a separate list showing 11 infections total, while the second floor map showed only 2 infections and the first floor map was not provided. The June 2026 report listed 2 healthcare acquired lower respiratory infections, with handwritten additions of 2 more lower respiratory infections and 3 recurrent eye infections, which were also reflected on the mapping. The July 2026 report showed 1 healthcare acquired infection and 3 residents ordered antibiotics, while the tracking map showed 1 respiratory infection on the first floor and 1 urinary tract infection on the second floor. Interviews showed inconsistent participation in surveillance processes by the two designated Infection Preventionists. Staff E, the ADON and Infection Preventionist, stated she was responsible for tracking and trending infections using floor maps, but she no longer tracked antibiotic use for residents admitted from the hospital because of workload, and she reported an electronic medical record glitch that caused antibiotic orders not to be added to the antibiotic log. The DON stated she did not know why Staff E had provided surveillance reports because Staff K maintained the line listings, and she was unaware Staff K had not been included in the infection control interview. The DON also stated hospital acquired infections should be included on the map and said some infections were not mapped because family insisted on antibiotics and it was not a true infection. Review of the infection listings provided by the DON showed multiple antibiotic uses and sensitivities verified by testing across April through July 2026, including several UTIs and C. diff cases, which did not align with the surveillance reports and maps.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 132 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Lakeland
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bridgewalk On Harden Health And Rehabilitation, Ll | 1.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Lakeland Hills Center | 2.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 17 | 0 |
| Vivo Healthcare Lakeland | 2.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Charming Lakes Rehab | 2.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Highlands Lake Center | 3.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Florida Presbyterian Homes Inc.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 2026) and official state health department websites.