Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of August 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Chateau At Moorings Park, The during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with no opioid prescriptions was found unresponsive and later tested positive for fentanyl, prompting EMS intervention and a police investigation. Despite the unexplained presence of fentanyl and no evidence of access to opioids, facility leadership did not report the incident as suspected abuse or neglect to the State Survey Agency, citing uncertainty about the source.
The facility did not ensure that all staff, including the Director of Facilities, were eligible for employment based on background screening. Despite policies requiring removal of staff with a 'Not Eligible' status, the Director of Facilities remained active and had access to the building and residents after being deemed ineligible, due to a lack of monitoring for staff not on the skilled nursing roster.
The facility's kitchen operations were found deficient in food safety and sanitation standards. Staff failed to wear appropriate hair restraints, and sanitizing solutions were not at required levels. Personal items were improperly stored in food areas, and food temperatures were not maintained at safe levels, posing a risk for foodborne illnesses.
Two residents at high risk for falls experienced multiple incidents without appropriate updates to their care plans. Despite repeated falls, the facility did not revise interventions or document specific dates for changes, contrary to their policy. The DON and MDS Coordinator acknowledged the lack of updates, highlighting a failure to address the residents' needs effectively.
A resident was found with unsecured over-the-counter medications at their bedside, contrary to the facility's policy requiring secure storage. There was no physician's order or assessment for self-administration. Staff interviews revealed confusion about medication storage requirements, with the DON and ADON providing conflicting information. The Consultant Pharmacist confirmed that medications should always be secured.
Failure to Report Suspected Abuse or Neglect After Unexplained Fentanyl Exposure
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an alleged violation that could constitute abuse or neglect to the State Survey Agency after a resident was found unresponsive and later tested positive for fentanyl, despite having no physician orders for opioid medications. The resident, a male with multiple diagnoses including dementia, atrial fibrillation, and hemiplegia, was dependent for all care and non-ambulatory, but had intact cognitive skills. On the day of the incident, he was found unresponsive in his wheelchair in a common area, exhibiting shallow breathing, and was subsequently transferred to the hospital where EMS administered Narcan and a toxicology screen revealed fentanyl in his system. Review of the resident's medication administration record confirmed there were no prescribed opioids or fentanyl patches for him. Interviews with staff indicated that the resident had not been given any opioids and had no access to narcotics. The resident's representative also confirmed that he had never taken opioids and had no known access to them. Despite these findings and the involvement of local law enforcement, the facility did not report the incident as a potential case of abuse or neglect to the State Survey Agency. The Executive Director and Assistant Executive Director acknowledged awareness of the incident and the police investigation but did not initiate a report to the appropriate authorities, citing uncertainty about the source of the fentanyl. The internal investigation conducted by the facility was limited, and there was no documentation of staff interviews by the facility itself, as the police had conducted interviews. The decision not to report was based on the facility's inability to determine how the fentanyl exposure occurred.
Failure to Monitor and Enforce Staff Background Screening Eligibility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all staff were eligible for employment based on background screening, specifically regarding the Director of Facilities. Review of the facility's policies and procedures indicated that individuals with a 'Not Eligible' status on background checks should not be hired or allowed to continue employment. However, the Director of Facilities was listed as active in the facility's emergency management system despite having a 'Not Eligible' status effective as of July 2025, as shown in the AHCA Clearinghouse documentation. The Facility Administrator and Human Resources staff were unaware of this status change and confirmed there was no process in place to monitor background eligibility for staff not included on the skilled nursing roster. Interviews with facility leadership revealed that campus-wide staff, such as the Director of Facilities, were not included on the skilled nursing roster in the AHCA Clearinghouse, and there was no established method to track changes in their eligibility status. As a result, an individual who was not eligible for employment due to background screening was allowed continued access to the building and proximity to residents, contrary to facility policy and procedure.
Food Safety and Sanitation Deficiencies in Facility Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards for food service safety and sanitary conditions, as observed during multiple visits to the main kitchen. Key issues included staff not wearing appropriate hair restraints, with the Senior General Manager of Dining Services, the Director of Dining, and the Sous Chef all observed without facial hair restraints. Additionally, the Clinical Dietitian's hair was not fully covered by a hair net. There were also issues with the storage and handling of food items, such as a scoop touching granulated sugar and a dirty rag not stored in a designated sanitation bucket. The sanitizing solutions in the red buckets were not at the required levels, with several buckets showing a range of 0 parts per million, indicating ineffective sanitization. Further observations revealed personal items, such as a blue plastic bottle and a pink plastic cup, in the food production area, which is against sanitary practices. In the walk-in refrigerator, raw fish was stored with dates that were not consistent with safe food handling practices. Staff A demonstrated a lack of knowledge in calibrating a thermometer, and the temperature of food items like Chicken Salad Pecan and Pureed Chicken Salad Pecan was not maintained at the necessary 40 degrees Fahrenheit or below, posing a risk for foodborne illnesses. These deficiencies highlight significant lapses in maintaining food safety and hygiene standards in the facility's kitchen operations.
Failure to Update Care Plans for High-Risk Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to reassess and update the care plans for two residents who were at high risk for falls, leading to multiple incidents without appropriate intervention adjustments. Resident #7, with severe cognitive impairment and a history of falls, experienced several unwitnessed falls over a period of months. Despite these incidents, the care plan interventions were not updated with specific dates or new strategies to address the recurring falls. The Director of Nursing (DON) and the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator acknowledged the lack of updates and the absence of dates for interventions in the care plan. Similarly, Resident #36, who was at very high risk for falls due to Alzheimer's Disease and anxiety disorder, also experienced multiple falls, some resulting in injuries. The care plan for this resident also lacked updates and specific dates for interventions following each fall. The DON and MDS Coordinator confirmed that the interventions were not revised after each incident, and the care plan did not reflect any new measures to prevent further falls. The facility's policy on fall interventions requires that care plans be reviewed and revised to minimize the risk of recurring falls. However, the facility did not adhere to this policy, as evidenced by the repeated falls of Residents #7 and #36 without corresponding updates to their care plans. This oversight indicates a failure to adequately address the residents' needs and prevent further accidents.
Failure to Secure Medications at Bedside
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all medications were secured at all times for one resident. The resident was observed with several over-the-counter medications at their bedside, which were not secured. The facility's policy requires that medications be labeled and stored securely, and residents may only self-administer medications if assessed and ordered by a physician. However, there was no physician's order or assessment for the resident to self-administer medications, and the medications were not stored in a locked compartment. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of understanding and adherence to the facility's medication storage policies. A registered nurse acknowledged the unsecured medications and the absence of a physician's order or assessment for self-administration. The Director of Nursing and Assistant Director of Nursing provided conflicting information about the requirements for securing medications at the bedside. The Consultant Pharmacist confirmed that medications should be secured at all times unless in use.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 55 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 6 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Naples
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Premier Place At The Glenview | 1.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Naples Health And Rehabilitation Center | 1.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 14 | 3 |
| Adviniacare At Naples | 2.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
| Solaris Senior Living North Naples | 4.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Solaris Healthcare Imperial | 5.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Chateau At Moorings Park, The.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.