Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Sharon Center For Health & Rehabilitation during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with moderate cognitive impairment, an unsteady gait requiring walker assistance, and on Apixaban was inaccurately assessed as not being at risk for elopement, with the facility’s evaluation stating the resident lacked cognitive impairment and physical ability to leave. The resident’s care plan identified fall risk and need for assistance with transfers and ambulation, yet the resident exited through the alarmed front lobby door, which opened via a 15‑second egress mechanism. A therapeutic recreation assistant heard the door alarm, immediately silenced it without checking inside or outside the door and without notifying a supervisor, assuming it was related to a scheduled smoke break. The resident walked to a nearby hospital ED, where staff found the resident confused and documented disorientation and risk for elopement, while facility staff remained unaware of the resident’s absence for an extended period and had no written policy for staff response to exit door alarms, despite having multiple other residents identified as elopement risks.
Failure to timely respond to pharmacy medication review recommendations. A resident with dementia, DM, and HTN was ordered Rexulti for agitation associated with dementia. The consultant pharmacist recommended weekly orthostatic BPs for 4 weeks and an HbA1c, but the chart did not show orthostatic BPs were ever started, and the HbA1c was not obtained until more than 2 months after the initial recommendation despite repeated requests. The DON stated pharmacy recommendations should be addressed within 30 days and that nurse management was responsible for completion.
A dietary service failure occurred when residents were not served the full protein portion listed on the menu and no corn bread or substitute was provided. One resident had no protein with lunch and asked for chicken, but a dietary aide said none was left and offered no alternative. In another dining room, only small chicken legs were served to most residents, and staff acknowledged that the planned 4 oz portion was not provided. The menu also listed corn bread, but it was not served and no substitute was offered.
Infection control failures occurred during a COVID-19 outbreak when one resident with COVID-19 ate in a common area with the mask pulled under the chin while another resident sat about 3 feet away without a mask, despite social distancing and source-control requirements. Staff also entered the room of a resident on droplet/contact precautions wearing only surgical masks instead of the required PPE, and the IP later stated the facility lacked a mechanism to track resident COVID testing during the outbreak.
A resident with COPD kept a ProAir inhaler on the bedside nightstand for self-administration, but the order did not authorize bedside self-administration and no self-administration assessment was found at the time of survey. An LPN confirmed the order lacked self-administration directions, and the DON stated the facility’s process required a resident evaluation, a provider order, care plan inclusion, and a lockbox for safe bedside storage.
A resident with a diabetic right foot ulcer and wound care orders was placed on transmission-based isolation for suspected CRE and confined to the bedroom even though the wound drainage was contained and the culture later ruled out CRE. The resident reported being unable to go to the rehab gym during the period of room confinement, and facility staff later stated that EBP/contact precautions were sufficient rather than isolation.
Medication Left at Bedside During Administration: A resident with CHF, HTN, and atrial fibrillation was observed with pills left in a cup on the bedside table without the nurse present. The resident said meds were taken without staff present all the time and could be taken independently, while the care plan did not show self-administration assessment or permission. An LPN acknowledged leaving the meds with the resident, and the DNS stated the meds should not have been left at the bedside.
Delayed Nutritional Evaluation for Worsening Pressure Injury: A resident with dementia, epilepsy, and significant recent weight loss developed a new sacral pressure injury that progressed from Stage 2 to Stage 3 and then unstageable. The APRN recommended a RD consult to optimize nutrition, but the resident was not evaluated by dietary for about a month after that recommendation. The record and interviews showed the resident had ongoing poor intake and nutritional risk, while the facility did not document a timely RD follow-up after the wound was identified.
Failure to Maintain Ordered Oxygen Therapy: A resident with COPD and continuous O2 needs was found without nasal cannula oxygen in place, with the tubing disconnected and out of reach, while the concentrator was set at 2 L instead of the ordered 1 L. An RN stated she had not known the oxygen was off and later admitted she set the concentrator incorrectly. When oxygen was restored, the resident’s room air O2 sat was 82% and improved after O2 was reapplied.
Missing annual performance evaluations for multiple employees: The facility did not have required yearly performance evaluations in the personnel files for 3 employees reviewed. One employee had no updated evaluations after becoming an LPN, another had no evaluations for the most recent years, and a third had no annual evaluations at all. Leaders acknowledged the evaluations were expected annually and had fallen behind after the ownership change.
Missing signatures on narcotic shift count logs. Review of narcotic logbooks found repeated gaps in the required dual-signature change-of-shift count process, with missing entries on both the 1st and 2nd floor logs. Facility audits showed the item “All change of shift narcotic count sheets are signed (no empty spaces)” had not been met month over month for several months, and multiple narcotic audit logs from March through August showed ongoing missing signatures. The DNS and RN leadership stated that two nurses were expected to sign each count, but a written policy on the process was not available.
A resident with moderate dementia and intact cognition was addressed by an LPN in a raised voice and with inappropriate language, including profanity, when the resident inquired about a scheduled smoke break. Multiple staff witnessed the incident, and the resident walked away to their room. The interaction did not meet the facility's policy for treating residents with dignity and respect.
A resident with dementia and other health issues had a DNR/DNI directive that was not updated in the clinical record, leading to CPR being performed contrary to their wishes. The social worker documented the change but failed to notify the nursing staff, resulting in the resident being treated as a full code. The facility lacked a policy for updating code status orders, and staff education did not include the social worker involved.
A facility failed to monitor the behaviors of a resident receiving antipsychotic medications for dementia with behavioral disturbances. Despite receiving notifications from a pharmacist to add target behaviors for monitoring, the facility did not document any monitoring from January to July. The resident's care plan indicated a potential for verbal abuse, and the APRN expected behaviors to be monitored every shift, but this was not done.
Failure to Supervise and Respond to Exit Alarm Resulting in Undetected Elopement
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure adequate supervision and accident prevention for a resident with moderate cognitive impairment and an unsteady gait who was receiving Apixaban, a blood thinner. On admission, the nursing assessment documented that the resident required assistance for transfers, had an unsteady gait with poor trunk control, and was at risk for falls, with the resident care plan directing supervision for transfers and ambulation with a walker. An admission MDS identified a BIMS score of 9, indicating moderate cognitive impairment, and a need for partial assistance with bed mobility and transfers. Despite these findings, the facility’s elopement risk evaluation concluded that the resident was not at risk for wandering or elopement, stating that the resident did not have cognitive impairment, had the capacity to make informed decisions about leaving, and did not have the physical ability to leave the facility. On the day of the incident, the resident had a recent APRN remote visit for moderate bright red blood with stool while on Apixaban, with a plan to monitor for bleeding. That evening, the resident was last seen by an LPN at approximately 6:05–6:08 PM when medications were administered. Security video later reviewed by the DON showed the resident exiting the front lobby door at 6:07 PM, activating the 15‑second egress mechanism and door alarm. The front entrance door, which is locked after the receptionist leaves at 6:00 PM, is an egress door that unlocks after 15 seconds when pushed, and an alarm sounds when it is opened. A therapeutic recreation assistant, located near the lobby, heard the front door alarm, went to the door, and immediately deactivated the alarm using the staff code. She reported that she believed the alarm had been triggered for a scheduled supervised smoke break and did not realize it was around 6 PM. She did not look outside or inside the vicinity of the door for residents, did not search for any resident, and did not notify the nurse or supervisor that the alarm had sounded. The nursing supervisor later received a call from the hospital ED at 7:50 PM stating that the resident had arrived at 6:20 PM, appeared confused, believed they were in Texas, and reported living in elderly housing across the street. Hospital discharge documentation listed diagnoses including disorientation and at risk for elopement from a healthcare setting. The facility’s reportable event summary identified that staff were unaware the resident was out of the facility for one hour and 45 minutes, and the DON confirmed there was no written policy governing staff response to exit door alarms, while six additional residents had been identified by the facility as at risk for elopement. These failures were determined to have placed the resident and the six additional at‑risk residents in Immediate Jeopardy beginning on the date of the elopement.
Failure to Timely Respond to Pharmacy Medication Review Recommendations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to timely review and respond to pharmacy medication review recommendations for a resident admitted with dementia, diabetes, and hypertension who was severely cognitively impaired and dependent for multiple activities of daily living. A physician order directed Rexulti 0.5 mg every evening for agitation associated with dementia. On the first pharmacy medication review, the consultant pharmacist recommended adding orthostatic blood pressures once weekly for 4 weeks and obtaining an HbA1c lab test, but the clinical record did not show that orthostatic blood pressures were ever initiated. The pharmacist repeated the recommendation for an HbA1c on two later medication reviews, and the lab was not obtained until more than 2 months after the initial recommendation. The Director of Nursing Services stated that pharmacy recommendations should be acted upon within 30 days and that nurse management was responsible for ensuring completion. The facility’s Pharmacy Medication Review Policy stated that the consultant pharmacist reviews each resident’s medication regimen at least monthly, communicates findings and recommendations to those responsible for implementation, and follows up to verify appropriate action or response within a reasonable time frame.
Incorrect Meal Portions and Missing Menu Item
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents received the correct portion of chicken and that corn bread or a similar substitute was provided with the lunch meal. The lunch menu for 8/25/25 listed 4 oz of chicken and corn bread. During observation in the [NAME] Unit dining room, Resident #13 did not have any protein with the meal and told the surveyor he/she wanted chicken. A dietary aide stated there was no more chicken and did not offer an alternative or provide any protein. In the [NAME] Wing dining room, only 7 small chicken legs were served to 11 residents, while 2 residents received sandwiches and 2 residents had puree meals. Resident #19 commented that the chicken leg was very small and should have been another chicken leg because it was not enough chicken; the dietary aide stated there was no more chicken to serve.
Infection Control Failures During COVID-19 Outbreak
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain proper infection control techniques related to social distancing and Enhanced Barrier Precautions during a COVID-19 outbreak. One resident had confirmed COVID-19, dementia, and diabetes, was severely cognitively impaired, and had a care plan directing contact/droplet precautions and assistance with mask use. Another resident had dementia, diabetes, and atrial fibrillation, was cognitively intact, and had a care plan for potential COVID-19 exposure with directions for daily screening, mask use, and hand hygiene. On observation in a common area, the COVID-positive resident was eating with the face mask pulled under the chin while the other resident sat about 3 feet away without a mask, which was less than the 6 feet of distancing referenced by staff and policy. During the same observation, the resident who had been sitting near the COVID-positive resident later walked away, and nursing staff then approached the COVID-positive resident and asked whether he or she wanted to return to the room to finish eating. The resident declined and was allowed to remain in the recliner eating. The Infection Preventionist and RN acknowledged that social distancing should have been used with the COVID-positive resident and that the other resident should not have been sitting in that chair while the COVID-positive resident was not wearing the mask over the nose and mouth. The facility policy also directed that communal dining and activities occur while following core principles, including wearing a mask and limiting crowding in communal spaces. The facility also failed to use the required PPE when entering the room of a resident on droplet/contact precautions. A resident with COVID-19, ESBL resistance, and dementia was placed on droplet/contact precautions, and signage outside the room directed staff to wear gloves, a gown, an N-95 mask, and eye protection. However, a nurse aide and an RN were observed in the room wearing only blue surgical masks while one was emptying garbage and the other was assisting the roommate with respiratory equipment. Both staff members acknowledged they should have worn full PPE, and the RN stated she was on contact/droplet barrier precautions and should have been wearing an N-95, gown, gloves, and goggles. In addition, during the outbreak investigation, the Infection Preventionist stated the facility did not have a mechanism for tracking resident COVID-19 testing, and review of the census report showed some lower-level residents were not tested despite the outbreak and the facility's testing policy.
Unassessed bedside self-administration of inhaler
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident with COPD was assessed and had a physician order to self-administer ProAir HFA kept at the bedside. The resident’s diagnoses included COPD, and the physician’s order in effect directed ProAir HFA 108 mcg, 2 puffs inhaled every 6 hours for shortness of breath. The resident care plan identified altered respiratory status/difficulty breathing related to COPD and included administering medications per physician order and monitoring for effectiveness and side effects. The quarterly MDS identified the resident as cognitively intact and independent with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. On observation, the resident’s ProAir inhaler was found on top of the nightstand and unsecured while the resident and an ambulatory roommate were present in the room. The resident stated the inhaler was kept on the nightstand for self-administration. An LPN stated the physician’s order did not indicate self-administration or that the inhaler could be kept at the bedside, and record review did not identify a self-administration assessment. After the surveyor’s inquiry, the resident was assessed for medication self-administration, and the DON stated the facility’s process for self-administration included a resident evaluation, a physician’s order, inclusion in the care plan, and a lockbox for bedside storage.
Resident Confined to Room on Incorrect Isolation Precautions
Penalty
Summary
Resident #46 was admitted with diagnoses including a non-pressure chronic ulcer of the right foot and type 2 diabetes, and the admission MDS identified the resident as cognitively intact and requiring moderate assistance from one staff member with activities of daily living. The resident’s care plan identified Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for wounds and an indwelling medical device, and a physician’s order directed topical treatment to the right foot wound, non-weight bearing status to the lower extremities, and limited physical therapy on a recumbent bike with restricted pressure to the forefoot or heel region. After a wound culture from the right foot ruled out CRE, the Infection Control Nurse placed the resident on transmission-based/isolation precautions for suspected CRE and confined the resident to the bedroom. The resident stated he/she had recently been removed from precautions that confined him/her to the room and reported being told the culture did not show infection; the resident also stated he/she likely would have left the room during that time if permitted and had not been able to go to the rehab gym for therapy. The Infection Control Nurse later stated the resident had been placed in isolation in error and that the resident’s wound drainage had always been contained with a dressing. The resident’s care plan was updated regarding resistant bacterium but did not reflect the isolation precautions, and facility staff later stated that isolation was not necessary and that the wound was contained, so contact precautions would have been sufficient.
Medication Left at Bedside During Administration
Penalty
Summary
The nursing facility failed to ensure licensed staff followed standards of practice for medication administration and remained with a resident until the medication was consumed. Resident #48 was admitted with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation. A physician’s order dated 8/14/25 directed Metoprolol Tartrate 12.5 mg twice daily, Spironolactone 25 mg daily, Isosorbide Mononitrate ER 30 mg daily, Lorestan Potassium 25 mg twice daily, and Aspirin 81 mg each morning. The resident’s care plan dated 8/17/25 did not reflect that the resident may self-administer medications or had been assessed for self-administration. The 5-day admission MDS identified the resident as cognitively intact, requiring set-up/supervision for ADLs, and able to eat independently. On 8/26/25 at 8:30 AM, the resident was observed with pills in a medication cup on the bedside table without the nurse present, and stated the medications were taken without the nurse present all the time and that the resident was able to do so independently. LPN #1 stated she had left the medications with the resident and knew she should not have done so, and said she was aware the resident liked to take medications independently. The DNS stated the medications should not have been left at the bedside and that it was the charge nurse’s responsibility not to leave medications with the resident.
Delayed Nutritional Evaluation for Worsening Pressure Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to obtain a timely nutritional evaluation for a resident with a new and worsening sacral pressure injury. The resident had diagnoses including epilepsy, dementia, and leukoencephalopathy, and the quarterly MDS identified the resident as moderately cognitively impaired, at risk for pressure injury, and dependent for eating, bed mobility, and transfers. The resident also had significant recent weight loss and variable oral intake, and a nutritional evaluation on 4/1/25 documented intake of only 51% to 75% of estimated needs, with a 7% weight loss in 30 days and risk for malnutrition related to a non-pressure wound, mechanically altered diet, dementia, and cholecystectomy. A facility-acquired sacral wound was first documented on 4/19/25 as a Stage 2 pressure ulcer, but the wound evaluation did not identify that the practitioner, responsible party, or dietician had been notified. On 4/25/25, APRN #1 documented the new Stage 2 pressure injury and recommended optimizing nutrition with a registered dietician consultation. On 5/2/25, the wound had worsened to Stage 3, and the APRN again recommended a dietician consultation. Review of nursing notes and nutritional/dietary evaluations from 4/25/25 through 5/22/25 failed to identify that the resident was evaluated by a dietician after this recommendation. The resident was not seen by Dietician #1 until 5/23/25, about 30 days after the APRN’s recommendation. That evaluation identified the resident had a new pressure injury, significant weight loss, and ongoing nutritional risk related to the pressure injury, mechanically altered diet, dementia, and cholecystectomy. By 5/25/25, the wound had worsened further and was documented as unstageable with 100% slough. Interviews with the Dietician, APRN, and DNS confirmed that nutrition concerns were linked to wound healing, that the resident should have had a nutritional evaluation after the pressure injury was identified, and that the covering dietician during the primary dietician’s absence was not identified.
Failure to Maintain Ordered Oxygen Therapy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow a physician’s order for oxygen administration and failed to ensure that a resident with COPD and dependence on supplemental oxygen received oxygen as ordered. Resident #85’s record showed diagnoses of COPD, dependence on supplemental O2, and shortness of breath, with care plan interventions directing oxygen via nasal cannula at 1 liter and monitoring for increased coughing, wheezing, and SOB. Physician orders directed oxygen at 1 L per minute every shift for SOB related to COPD and to call the MD if oxygen saturation was below 90%. Surveyors observed the resident in bed without oxygen in place, with the oxygen tubing disconnected from the concentrator, coiled on top of the machine, and out of the resident’s reach. The concentrator was operating at 2 L despite the order for 1 L. At the time of the observation, the resident could not explain how the oxygen had become disconnected or out of reach. RN #3 stated she had not known the oxygen was off or out of reach and later acknowledged she had made a mistake by setting the concentrator at 2 L instead of 1 L. When the oxygen was reapplied, the resident’s room air saturation was 82% and increased after oxygen was restored. Nursing documentation also showed the resident had been observed on 2 L despite the 1 L order, and a later physician order stated oxygen should not be increased past 1 L under any circumstance. The DNS stated the resident should have had oxygen in place, should have been checked regularly, and should have been on the correct 1 L setting because the resident would become hypoxic without continuous oxygen.
Missing annual performance evaluations for multiple employees
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure required annual performance evaluations were completed for 3 of 3 employee files reviewed: NA #4, NA #5, and NA #6. NA #4’s personnel file contained a last performance evaluation dated 10/20/20, and no updated annual evaluations were available for 2021 or 2022. The DNS identified that NA #4 had become an LPN in 2022, and there were no yearly evaluations for 2023, 2024, or 2025, even though time clock records showed the employee was actively working in the facility in August 2025. NA #5’s file contained a last yearly performance evaluation dated 5/5/23, but no additional annual evaluations were available for 2024 or 2025, despite time punch records showing the employee was working in August 2025. NA #6’s personnel file contained no yearly performance evaluations at all, and the facility could not provide any annual evaluations for this employee, who had a date of hire of 6/22/23 and was also shown on time punch documentation as currently working in August 2025. The Director of Human Resources, Facility Administrator, and DNS each acknowledged that performance evaluations should be in the personnel file and should be completed annually, and they stated that evaluations had fallen behind after the change in ownership. The facility did not provide a policy on performance evaluations.
Missing signatures on narcotic shift count logs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure completion of controlled medication counts by licensed staff at change of shift. Review of the 1st floor narcotic logbook with the Nursing Supervisor/RN identified 8 of 78 missing signatures on the Narcotic Change of Shift Audit for August 2025, and review of the 2nd floor narcotic logbook with the DNS identified 7 of 82 expected signatures missing on the same audit form. Both reviewers stated that two nurses, the nurse coming on shift and the nurse leaving the prior shift, were expected to sign each change-of-shift narcotic count to confirm and reconcile the narcotics available in the medication cart. Further review of the facility’s Clinical Services: Bi-Monthly Narcotic Drug Audit Forms showed that the item, “All change of shift narcotic count sheets are signed (no empty spaces),” had repeatedly not been met month over month since at least January 2025. Review of the Narcotic Change of Shift Audit logs from March through August 2025 showed multiple missing signatures across upper and lower level narcotic logs, including repeated gaps in March, April, May, June, July, and August. The DNS and Regional Director of Clinical Operations stated that staff were oriented on the process, that the DNS was responsible for reviewing the logs but could delegate that task, and that missing signatures were to be addressed in real time when possible; however, the report also noted that a facility policy on documentation of narcotic counts at change of shift was not available.
Resident Not Treated with Dignity Due to Staff's Inappropriate Language
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with moderate dementia, anxiety, and tobacco use, but with intact cognition and independence in activities of daily living, was not treated in a respectful and dignified manner by a staff member. The resident, who was permitted to smoke only during designated times per physician orders and care plan, approached the nurse's station to inquire about the scheduled smoke break. At that time, an LPN responded to the resident in a raised voice and used inappropriate language, including profanity, stating it was not her job to take the resident out for a smoke break. Multiple staff members witnessed the incident, and the resident subsequently walked away to their room. Facility documentation and interviews confirmed that the LPN addressed the resident with a raised voice and used the word "damn" in her response. The resident reported not feeling embarrassed, humiliated, or threatened, and stated feeling safe after the incident. However, the interaction was found to be inconsistent with the facility's policy requiring residents to be treated with consideration, respect, and full recognition of their dignity and individuality. The incident was reported, documented, and corroborated by staff and the resident involved.
Failure to Honor Resident's Advance Directives
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to honor a resident's advance directives following a change in condition. Resident #2, who had diagnoses including dementia with psychotic disturbances, atrial fibrillation, and malignant neoplasm of the prostate, had an advance directive indicating a DNR/DNI status as directed by their court-appointed conservator. However, the facility did not update the clinical record to reflect this change, and the resident was treated as a full code. This discrepancy was discovered when the resident was found unresponsive, and CPR was initiated contrary to the DNR/DNI directive. The social worker, SW #2, had documented the change in advance directives but failed to ensure the nursing staff was adequately informed, resulting in the clinical record not being updated. The RN Supervisor was not notified of the change, and the facility's documentation did not reflect the updated code status. The incident report revealed that CPR was performed until EMS arrived, at which point the DNR/DNI paperwork was found, and the EMS was informed. The facility lacked a policy regarding entering code status orders in the clinical records, and staff education on code status documentation did not include SW #2.
Failure to Monitor Behaviors for Resident on Antipsychotic Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to monitor the behaviors of a resident receiving antipsychotic medications, specifically Quetiapine Fumarate, for dementia with behavioral disturbances. The resident's diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbances, major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and anxiety disorder. Despite being identified as alert and oriented, and receiving antipsychotic medications routinely, the facility did not monitor the resident's target behaviors from January 23 through July 18, 2024, as required by the physician's orders and facility policy. The resident's care plan indicated a potential for verbal abuse due to dementia, and interventions were directed to monitor behaviors, but this was not implemented. The facility received notifications from the pharmacist in January and April 2024, recommending the addition of target behaviors for monitoring due to the resident's use of Seroquel and other psychotropic medications. However, the clinical and facility documentation did not reflect any monitoring of target behaviors during the specified timeframe. An interview with the APRN revealed an expectation for nursing staff to monitor target behaviors every shift and report any significant changes, but the APRN was unaware that monitoring was not conducted prior to July 19, 2024. The facility's policy on psychotropic medications required documentation of specific conditions or targeted behaviors in the clinical record, which was not adhered to in this case.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 126 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Sharon
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noble Horizons | 8.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 30 | 1 |
| Geer Nursing And Rehabilitation | 11.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Havencare At Litchfield Woods | 18.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Wolcott Hall Nursing Center Inc | 18.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Torrington Center For Nursing & Rehabilitation Llc | 19.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Sharon Center For Health & Rehabilitation.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.