Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Saint Josephs Living Center, Inc. during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Two residents experienced prolonged unrelieved pain after emergent injuries when staff failed to follow facility pain management, medication, and documentation policies. One resident with multiple chronic conditions sustained a hot-liquid burn to the inner thigh; staff applied cool compresses but did not complete a comprehensive pain assessment, did not administer available PRN acetaminophen, delayed application of an ordered Xeroform dressing until a later shift, and did not promptly transcribe the verbal treatment order, leaving the resident in documented discomfort for more than a day before scheduled analgesia was given. Another hospice resident with Alzheimer’s disease and cancer risk factors suffered a witnessed fall with visible left-arm deformity and severe pain; despite active PRN orders for acetaminophen and morphine, no pain medication was administered in the 35 minutes before transfer to the ED, and the resident did not receive analgesia until more than two hours after the fall. Nursing staff interviews confirmed that pain medications were not offered, orders were not promptly recorded, and nursing notes about the incidents and care provided were incomplete or absent.
Two residents experienced incidents where nursing documentation and order transcription were incomplete. In one case, a resident with multiple chronic conditions sustained a burn from spilled hot tea; staff applied cool compresses and obtained a verbal order for Xeroform gauze, but the order was not promptly entered into the record, the MAR did not reflect treatment on the day of the incident, and the charge LPN did not document the care provided or the timing of dressing application. In the second case, a hospice resident with Alzheimer’s and other comorbidities fell while walking to a closet; an RN documented the assessment, severe arm pain, and transfer to the ED, but the charge LPN who witnessed the fall did not document her involvement or the care she provided, contrary to facility policy requiring documentation of all services and condition changes.
The facility failed to perform weekly skin assessments for four residents as per physician orders, leading to missed documentation and delayed identification of skin issues. Residents with conditions such as dementia, diabetes, and cellulitis were affected, with assessments either not completed or improperly documented. The facility's education on skin assessment protocols was inadequate, contributing to incomplete records.
The facility failed to discard expired IV supplies, including IV start kits and Dextrose IV solutions, found in a locked cabinet. The ADNS was responsible for checking expiration dates, but the Pharmacist, who visits monthly, had not seen the supplies. The facility's policy requires expired drugs to be returned or destroyed, which was not followed.
The facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for residents with MDROs and did not ensure proper hand hygiene and PPE use. A resident with a positive COVID-19 diagnosis was not managed under appropriate Transmission-Based Precautions, as an NA entered the room without the required PPE, despite being informed of the precautions and signage being posted.
A resident with diabetes was not provided meals according to their dietary preferences, despite clear documentation and communication of their needs. The resident was served meals containing items they had requested to avoid, such as pork and desserts, due to dietary aides not fully reading meal tickets. This resulted in the resident not receiving appropriate meal substitutions, highlighting a failure in the facility's implementation of its menu selection and food preference policies.
A resident with COPD, Muscle Weakness, and Congestive Heart Failure experienced discomfort due to a cool room temperature, which persisted for weeks despite reporting it to staff. The facility's maintenance logs were incomplete, and the Director of Maintenance was unaware of the heating issues due to a lack of participation in environmental rounds. The heating system's malfunction was attributed to a zone valve issue, highlighting a deficiency in maintaining a homelike environment.
A resident with Parkinson's, diabetes, and aphasia developed a new stage 2 pressure injury, but the facility failed to ensure timely dietician assessment and weekly skin and wound assessments as per provider orders. The resident's skin assessments were incomplete, and wound assessments were missing, leading to inadequate documentation and delayed intervention.
A resident with cognitive impairment and a history of falls was found deceased after a fall in a facility where the bed alarm, meant to alert staff of movement, was broken. Staff failed to check the alarm's functionality at the start of their shifts, contributing to the resident's ability to self-transfer without intervention. The resident, who had multiple health issues, was found unresponsive and later pronounced deceased.
A facility failed to accurately monitor and report significant weight changes for a resident with CHF, diabetes, and hypertension. Despite a care plan requiring daily weight monitoring and reporting of weight gains, inconsistent weight measurements were recorded using different scales, and significant fluctuations were not reported to the physician. The facility's policy required notification of any verified weight change of 5% or more, but this was not followed, leading to a deficiency in care.
The facility failed to consistently complete shift-to-shift controlled drug reconciliation and maintain bi-monthly controlled drug audit documentation. Observations showed missing signatures on required drug sheets, and interviews revealed lapses in staff responsibilities. The ADNS was unaware of these issues, and the DNS admitted to lapses in maintaining audit sheets, contrary to facility policy.
A resident with legal blindness and dietary restrictions was not assisted with menu selection, despite being cognitively intact and requiring help with eating. Interviews revealed confusion among staff about who was responsible for assisting with meal choices, leading to the resident not being informed of meal options or given the opportunity to make selections, contrary to facility policy.
The facility failed to document and offer necessary vaccinations to two newly admitted residents. One resident, with Alzheimer's and other conditions, lacked documentation for the Pneumovax vaccine, while another resident with respiratory issues had no immunization records. The DNS noted the ICN's role in tracking vaccinations but could not explain the oversight, highlighting a lapse in following the facility's vaccination policy.
Failure to Assess and Manage Acute Pain After Burn and Fall Injuries
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to recognize, assess, and manage acute pain for two residents following emergent injuries, despite existing policies requiring immediate pain assessment and timely intervention when new pain occurs. For the first resident, who had dementia without behavioral disturbances, type II diabetes mellitus, muscular dystrophy, lymphedema, and anxiety disorder, the quarterly MDS showed intact cognition and independence with mobility and eating. The resident’s care plan identified an alteration in comfort related to aging and lymphedema, with interventions to interview and observe for pain, monitor for nonverbal signs, administer medications as ordered, and monitor effects. On the date of the incident, the resident spilled hot tea on the left upper inner thigh during a recreational activity, resulting in a burn area described as slightly pink with a popped blister measuring approximately 5 cm by 4 cm. Staff applied a cool compress and obtained a verbal order for Xeroform gauze and a dry protective dressing, but the dressing was not applied until later that night, and the order was not immediately transcribed into the record. Following this burn, the clinical record did not show that a comprehensive pain assessment was completed after this significant change in condition or onset of new pain, contrary to facility policy. The March MAR showed an existing PRN order for acetaminophen 650 mg every six hours for mild pain, but there was no documentation that it was administered on the day of the burn despite documentation of discomfort. The resident reported that after the cool compress was applied, no one returned for several hours, no pain medication was offered or given that day or that night, and the burn area was left open to air, which was uncomfortable, until the dressing was applied later, which was painful. The APRN’s note the following day described a second-degree burn with erythema, desquamation, epidermal sloughing, mild inflammatory edema, and resident-reported discomfort, and a scheduled acetaminophen order was entered. The MAR showed that no acetaminophen or other pain medication was administered until late afternoon the day after the burn, more than 24 hours after the incident, despite documentation that the resident was in discomfort on both days. Interviews with nursing staff confirmed that they recognized the resident’s discomfort, acknowledged that acetaminophen should have been offered, and that the verbal order for the Xeroform dressing was not promptly transcribed, with incomplete documentation of care provided. For the second resident, whose diagnoses included Alzheimer’s disease, low back pain, palliative care, type II diabetes mellitus, and anxiety disorder, the quarterly MDS showed intact cognition, independence with bed mobility, and partial assistance or supervision for transfers and ambulation. The care plan identified hospice admission, fall risk due to decreased safety awareness, unsteady gait, cognitive deficits, and psychotropic and narcotic use, as well as risk for pain and complications due to uterine lesion/tumor, left breast lump, and breast cancer, with interventions to anticipate needs, monitor for pain, and administer medications as ordered. On the date of the fall, the resident tripped while walking to the closet, bumped into the closet door, fell onto the bottom, and hit both upper extremities on the floor. The fall was witnessed by the charge nurse, and the resident complained of severe left arm pain, held the left arm, and the arm appeared deformed. The reportable event identified the fall time and showed that emergency services were called and the resident was transferred to the ED about 35 minutes later. Review of the MAR for this resident showed active PRN orders for acetaminophen 650 mg every four hours for pain or general discomfort and morphine sulfate oral solution every four hours as needed for pain or shortness of breath. Despite these orders and documentation that the resident had severe left arm pain and visible deformity, there was no documentation that any PRN pain medication was administered in the 35-minute interval between the fall and transfer to the ED. Hospital documentation later identified suspicion for a non-displaced humerus fracture and showed that acetaminophen 975 mg was not administered until more than two hours after the fall. In interviews, the DON stated that nursing staff should have offered pain relief when pain or discomfort was identified and that the charge nurse should have documented her role and care provided. The LPN who witnessed the fall acknowledged that the resident was in severe pain, that she did not administer pain medication before transfer, assumed the resident would be medicated in the ED, did not consider the ambulance ride, and did not document her involvement or care. These events demonstrate that, for both residents, staff did not follow facility policies on pain assessment, medication and treatment orders, and charting and documentation, resulting in prolonged unrelieved pain after acute injuries.
Incomplete Documentation and Untimely Transcription of Orders After Resident Incidents
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to maintain complete and accurate clinical records, including timely transcription of physician/APRN orders and documentation of nursing care following incidents. For one resident with dementia, type II diabetes, muscular dystrophy, lymphedema, and anxiety, an incident occurred during a recreational activity when hot tea was spilled on the resident’s left upper inner thigh, causing a burn with a slightly pink area and an apparent popped blister measuring approximately 5 cm by 4 cm. A cool compress was applied, the responsible party and APRN were notified, and a verbal order for Xeroform gauze and a dry protective dressing was obtained. However, the verbal order obtained on the day of the incident was not transcribed into the clinical record at that time, and the March MAR and physician’s orders did not show the Xeroform treatment as ordered or administered on the date of the burn. The same resident reported that after the initial cool compress was applied, no one returned to check on the burn for several hours, that the area was left open to air and uncomfortable, and that the Xeroform dressing was not applied until later in the day, which was painful when applied. Nursing documentation for that day lacked an entry from the charge nurse (an LPN) describing her involvement or the care she provided following the burn. RN staff interviews confirmed that cool compresses were applied and that a verbal order for Xeroform gauze was obtained from the APRN, but the RN who received the order did not enter it into the record and did not document the timing of the treatment. Another RN later applied the Xeroform dressing when the area was undressed and the resident was in visible discomfort, but she did not document the time of application and was unaware that the order had not been entered or signed off on the date of the incident. A second resident, with diagnoses including Alzheimer’s disease, low back pain, type II diabetes, anxiety, and enrollment in hospice, experienced a fall while walking to a closet. The resident tripped over their own feet, bumped into the closet door, fell onto their bottom, and hit both upper extremities on the floor. The fall was witnessed by the charge nurse (an LPN), and another RN documented that the resident complained of severe left arm pain, was holding the arm, and that the arm appeared deformed. The RN’s accident/incident note recorded the assessment, the resident’s pain, notification of family and hospice, and transfer to the ED. However, there was no nursing note from the charge nurse who witnessed the fall documenting her role in the incident or the care she provided, despite facility policy directing that all services provided and any changes in a resident’s condition be documented in the medical record.
Failure to Perform Weekly Skin Assessments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to perform preventative weekly skin assessments according to physician orders for four residents. Resident #11, who was admitted in August 2023 with diagnoses including dementia and peripheral venous insufficiency, had orders for weekly skin assessments that were not completed on specified dates. The resident's care plan included interventions for potential skin breakdown, but assessments were missed, leading to a delay in identifying a skin tear that was eventually documented after surveyor inquiry. Resident #13, admitted in September 2012 with Alzheimer's disease and diabetes, also did not receive a weekly skin assessment as ordered. The resident was at risk for pressure injuries, and the care plan included interventions for skin breakdown prevention. However, a skin assessment was not performed for nine days, and it was only completed after surveyor inquiry, revealing no skin issues. Resident #22, admitted in December 2015 with diabetes and cellulitis, had orders for weekly skin assessments that were not consistently documented. The resident's care plan addressed risks related to impaired mobility and cellulitis, but assessments were either refused or not entered into the clinical record. Similarly, Resident #99, admitted in November 2024 with a femur fracture and diabetes, had missed skin assessments for several weeks. The facility's education on skin assessment protocols failed to instruct nurses to document wounds not treated by the wound doctor, contributing to incomplete documentation.
Expired IV Supplies Not Properly Discarded
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly discard expired Intravenous (IV) supplies in one of the two medication rooms reviewed. During an inspection, it was found that various IV supplies, including IV start kits, bags of Dextrose IV solution, Heparin-filled syringes, sterile IV end caps, secondary IV tubing setups, and IV insertion needles, were stored in a locked cabinet within the Infection Preventionist's office, despite being past their expiration dates. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADNS) was identified as responsible for checking the expiration dates of these supplies while the Infection Preventionist position was vacant. The Pharmacist, who visits the facility monthly, indicated that she had not seen the IV supplies during her visits. Her responsibilities include meeting with the Director of Nursing (DNS) and the ADNS, performing resident chart reviews, medication regime reviews, and spot checks on medication rooms. The facility's Storage and Labeling of Medications Policy mandates that all drugs and biologicals be stored safely and securely, and that expired or deteriorated drugs should not be used and must be returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. However, this policy was not adhered to, leading to the presence of expired IV supplies in the facility.
Failure to Implement Proper Infection Control Measures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to initiate Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for several residents with a history of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDROs) as per CDC guidelines. Residents with histories of MRSA, C. Diff., ESBL, and Methicillin Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus were not placed on EBP, despite being identified on the MDRO list. The Director of Nursing confirmed that these residents should have been on EBP, as indicated by the facility's policy and CDC guidelines. Additionally, a nursing assistant (NA) was observed passing meal trays while wearing gloves, failing to change gloves and perform hand hygiene between resident rooms. This action was contrary to the facility's policy on Standard Precautions, which requires hand hygiene after glove removal and before entering another resident's room. The NA admitted to forgetting to perform hand hygiene, and a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) confirmed the correct procedure was not followed. Furthermore, a resident with a positive COVID-19 diagnosis was not properly managed under Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP). An NA entered the resident's room wearing only a surgical mask, without the required PPE, despite signage indicating the need for contact and droplet precautions. The NA was unaware of the TBP requirements, although they had been informed at the start of the shift and signage was posted. The Director of Nursing Services (DNS) later educated the NA on the necessary precautions.
Failure to Honor Resident Meal Preferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to honor and facilitate a resident's right to self-determination and choice regarding meal preferences, leading to a deficiency in nutritional care. Resident #208, who was admitted with a diagnosis of diabetes and a fracture, expressed a desire for a diabetic diet with specific preferences for limited carbohydrates, increased vegetables, and protein. Despite these preferences being documented in the dietary assessment and communicated to the Food Service Director, the resident was repeatedly served meals that did not align with their dietary requests. Observations and interviews revealed that Resident #208 was served meals containing items they had explicitly requested to avoid, such as pork, bread, and desserts. For instance, on multiple occasions, the resident received meals with pork fried rice, breaded chicken, and desserts, which they did not consume due to their dietary restrictions. The resident's meal tickets clearly indicated their preferences, yet the dietary aides failed to adhere to these instructions, resulting in the resident not receiving appropriate meal substitutions. The facility's policies on resident menu selection and food preferences were not effectively implemented, as evidenced by the dietary aides not reading the entire meal tickets and failing to provide the requested meal substitutions. The Food Service Director acknowledged this oversight and indicated a need for further education for the dietary staff. This deficiency highlights a lapse in the facility's responsibility to support resident choice and ensure nutritional needs are met according to individual preferences and medical requirements.
Failure to Maintain Comfortable Room Temperature for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a comfortable room temperature for a resident, leading to a deficiency in providing a safe and homelike environment. The resident, who was admitted with conditions including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Muscle Weakness, and Congestive Heart Failure, reported feeling cold for several weeks. Despite communicating this to the staff, the issue persisted, and the resident was observed wearing a jacket and covered with thick blankets. The room temperature was recorded as cool, with the heating system not functioning properly due to a zone valve issue. The facility's maintenance logs for October and November were missing, and no heating concerns were noted for December. The Director of Maintenance was unaware of the heating issues and did not consistently participate in monthly environmental rounds, which could have identified the problem earlier. The facility's policy on maintaining a homelike environment was not effectively implemented, as evidenced by the lack of a policy for Environmental Rounds and the absence of maintenance oversight in addressing the heating system's deficiencies.
Failure to Provide Timely Pressure Ulcer Care and Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure timely and adequate pressure ulcer care for a resident with a new facility-acquired pressure injury. The resident, who was admitted in November 2023, had a history of Parkinson's disease, diabetes, and aphasia, and was identified as severely cognitively impaired and at risk for developing pressure injuries. Despite the presence of a new stage 2 pressure injury on the right buttock identified in October 2024, a dietician assessment was delayed by seven days, and the facility did not perform weekly skin assessments as required by provider orders and facility policy. The facility's documentation revealed that weekly skin assessments were not completed on several occasions, including 10/20/24, 10/27/24, 11/3/24, and 12/1/24, despite the presence of the pressure injury. Additionally, the skin assessments that were completed failed to document the existing pressure injury or its resolution. The Assistant Director of Nursing Services (ADNS) confirmed that licensed nurses were responsible for documenting existing skin issues, but there was a lack of consistent assessment and documentation. Furthermore, the facility did not conduct weekly wound assessments as ordered by the physician. There were no documented wound assessments during specific weeks, and the ADNS was unable to provide a healed date for the wounds. The Director of Nursing Services (DNS) identified new stage 2 pressure injuries during an observation, which were not documented in the previous skin assessment. The ADNS acknowledged the responsibility of charge nurses to document new or existing wounds not followed by the wound doctor, but there was a failure to consistently assess and document wound status, leading to a lack of timely intervention and communication with the provider.
Failure to Follow Fall Prevention Protocols Leads to Resident's Death
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow the plan of care for a resident at risk of falls, leading to a serious incident. The resident, who was moderately cognitively impaired and had a history of falls, was supposed to have bed and chair alarms in place to alert staff of any movement. However, the bed alarm was found to be broken, and staff did not check its functionality at the beginning of their shifts, as required by the facility's protocol. This oversight contributed to the resident's ability to self-transfer out of bed without staff intervention. The resident, who had multiple health issues including chronic respiratory failure and was on anticoagulants, was found unresponsive on the floor after a fall. The resident had been experiencing confusion and poor safety awareness, which were documented in the care plan. Despite these known risks, the bed alarm did not sound when the resident moved out of bed, and staff were not alerted in time to prevent the fall. The resident was found with a bruise and bleeding near the eye, and despite emergency measures, was pronounced deceased shortly after the fall. Interviews with staff revealed that the bed alarm had last sounded earlier in the day, and the broken control unit was not identified until after the incident. Staff admitted to not checking the alarm's functionality to avoid disturbing the resident's sleep, which was against the routine safety checks required. The facility's policy on fall prevention was not effectively implemented, as evidenced by the lack of a functioning bed alarm and the absence of documented competencies or staff education on checking alarm functions.
Failure to Accurately Monitor and Report Resident Weight Changes
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to obtain accurate weights and notify the provider of significant weight changes for a resident with a history of congestive heart failure (CHF), diabetes, and hypertension. The resident was admitted in December 2024, and the care plan included daily weight monitoring and reporting any weight gain of 3 pounds or more in a day to the physician. However, the facility's records showed inconsistent weight measurements using different scales, with significant fluctuations that were not reported to the physician as required. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADNS) acknowledged that the physician should have been notified of the weight changes and that weights should have been obtained using the same scale. The facility's policy for Weight Assessment and Intervention required nursing staff to measure resident weights as scheduled and notify the physician and dietitian of any verified weight change of 5% or more. Despite this policy, the clinical record for December 2024 did not show any provider notification of the documented weight changes. A handwritten weights worksheet provided later showed different weight entries, and a dietitian's note identified a significant weight change, recommending continued daily weights and obtaining a baseline weight. The ADNS could not determine the reason for the weight fluctuations, and subsequent to surveyor inquiry, the provider was notified, and orders for bloodwork were received.
Failure in Controlled Drug Reconciliation and Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure consistent shift-to-shift controlled drug reconciliation and did not maintain documentation of bi-monthly controlled drug audits. Observations revealed missing signatures on the Change of Shift Inventory Record for Required Drugs sheet on multiple dates, indicating that the controlled drug reconciliation was not completed as required. Interviews with staff, including an LPN and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADNS), confirmed that the responsibility for signing the reconciliation form was not consistently upheld. The ADNS admitted to not being aware of the missing signatures and acknowledged that it was his responsibility to check the forms weekly, which he failed to do. Additionally, the facility was unable to provide bi-monthly controlled drug audit sheets during an observation with the ADNS. The Director of Nursing (DNS) explained that although she reviews the controlled drug book and verifies counts against pharmacy delivery sheets, the process of maintaining a book with audit sheets had lapsed. The facility's policy on handling and destroying narcotics requires strict narcotics counts at the start and end of each shift, with both incoming and outgoing nurses signing the narcotics book, a procedure that was not consistently followed.
Failure to Assist Resident with Menu Selection
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to assist a dependent resident, identified as Resident #57, with menu selection, which is a requirement to accommodate resident preferences and dietary needs. Resident #57, who was admitted in July 2023, has legal blindness, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and feeding difficulties. A provider order dated December 12, 2023, specified a regular diet with an allergy to eggs and egg derivatives. Despite being cognitively intact and requiring assistance for eating, Resident #57 reported not being informed of meal options or given the opportunity to make selections, contrary to the facility's policy. Interviews with various staff members, including the Food Service Director, Nurse Aides (NAs), and the Director of Nursing Services (DNS), revealed a lack of clarity and responsibility regarding who should assist Resident #57 with meal selections. The NAs were identified as responsible for assisting residents with menu selections, but it was not completed for Resident #57. The DNS confirmed that according to policy, residents should be assisted with meal selections if they are not capable of making them independently. The facility's policy also states that residents should be offered the opportunity to choose their meals in advance, but this was not adhered to in the case of Resident #57.
Failure to Document and Offer Vaccinations to New Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly identify and document the vaccination status and offer necessary vaccinations to newly admitted residents, as observed in the cases of two residents. Resident #85, who was admitted with Alzheimer's Disease, Atrial Fibrillation, Asthma, and Osteoporosis, had a documented Moderna Covid-19 vaccine and an Influenza vaccine but lacked documentation regarding the Pneumovax vaccine. There was no record of a Vaccine Administration Consent form for the Pneumovax vaccine, indicating a lapse in the facility's vaccination protocol. Similarly, Resident #98, admitted with Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia and Pneumonia due to Covid-19, had no documentation of any immunizations being offered, refused, or administered. The Director of Nursing (DNS) acknowledged that the Infection Control Nurse (ICN) was responsible for interviewing residents and using an electronic vaccine tracking system to determine vaccination status. However, the DNS was unable to explain why vaccines were not offered, noting that the ICN was new to the role. The facility's policy mandates that all residents be offered vaccines unless contraindicated, with documentation of education and consent in the resident's medical record, which was not adhered to in these cases.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 177 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Windham
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Douglas Manor | 1.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 7 | 0 |
| Vanderman Place | 2.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Mansfield Center For Nursing And Rehabilitation | 6.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Norwich Sub-acute And Nursing | 12.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Complete Care At Harrington Court | 12.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 1 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Saint Josephs Living Center, Inc..
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.