Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Evergreen Center For Health & Rehabilitation during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with dementia and a history of falls, who required assistance with bed mobility, was directed by a nursing assistant to turn and grab a side-rail that was not locked. When the resident applied pressure, the side-rail lowered, causing the resident to fall from bed and sustain a head laceration and bruising. Staff interviews confirmed the side-rail was not properly secured before care was provided.
A medication error occurred when an LPN administered a full set of medications intended for one resident to another, failing to properly verify the resident's identity and not immediately notifying a registered nurse or provider after the error was discovered. The affected resident, who had a history of cardiac issues, experienced hypotension and required emergency intervention and hospital evaluation before returning to the facility in stable condition. The incident was not fully reported until later, and the nurse continued the medication pass before the error was recognized by supervisory staff.
A medication error occurred when an LPN administered a full set of medications intended for one resident to the wrong individual, failing to verify identity with the required identifiers and relying only on a photograph. The error led to a significant drop in blood pressure for the affected resident, who required clinical intervention and monitoring. The nurse did not immediately report the full extent of the error, and facility policy for resident identification was not followed.
The facility failed to ensure staff were knowledgeable about Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and proper PPE use. Observations revealed no enhanced barrier signs outside resident rooms, and staff interviews showed inconsistent understanding of EBP, with some unaware of the significance of orange dots indicating EBP. The facility's policy on infection prevention was not effectively communicated, particularly to third-shift staff, leading to inadequate implementation of precautions.
A facility failed to ensure proper communication and documentation for a resident's prosthetic discomfort, leading to frequent refusals without evaluation. Another resident's catheter use lacked a documented diagnosis, and a bruise on a resident's hand was not adequately assessed or documented after a rough transfer incident. These deficiencies highlight lapses in communication, documentation, and adherence to facility practices.
The facility failed to monitor hot water temperatures properly, resulting in excessively high temperatures in two residents' bathrooms. The maintenance staff did not follow the required procedures for checking and logging temperatures, leading to a deficiency in ensuring a safe environment.
A resident with anxiety and depression felt threatened and fearful after two incidents involving an LPN, where medication was mishandled and comments were made that caused distress. The resident reported these incidents to a nurse aide, but the concerns were not effectively communicated to supervisory staff, violating facility policy on reporting allegations of mistreatment.
The facility failed to create comprehensive care plans for two residents, one with urinary catheter needs and another with sensory deficits. Despite assessments indicating the need for care plans, the facility did not address the urinary difficulties of a resident with Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy or the hearing issues of a resident with cognitive communication deficits. Interviews revealed that these oversights were due to a failure to follow the facility's policy on maintaining current care plans.
A facility failed to update a resident's care plan to reflect their preference for how they wished to be addressed. The resident, who required maximum assistance and was cognitively intact, expressed dissatisfaction with being called by their first name, which was not documented in their care plan. Staff interviews revealed that the omission was due to forgetfulness, and the facility's policy of maintaining current care plans was not followed.
The facility failed to administer medications according to professional standards for two residents. An LPN left Ativan at a resident's bedside, leading to a missing dose, and another LPN administered an incorrect dose of Metformin to a different resident. Both actions violated the facility's medication policies.
A resident with a stage 2 pressure ulcer did not receive proper care as the facility failed to use positioning wedges as per the care plan. The resident, who required assistance to turn, was left in one position without the use of wedges, which were found unused in the closet. Nursing staff were unaware of the resident's specific needs, and the facility lacked a policy for using positioning aids.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and mobility issues eloped from the facility due to inadequate supervision. The resident, who had recently developed the ability to self-propel in a wheelchair, was found outside after the receptionist left the desk unattended. The facility's policy required residents to be accounted for at all times, but there was no coverage for short absences, leading to the resident's brief elopement.
A facility failed to ensure pharmacist recommendations were reviewed and acted upon in a timely manner for a resident with PTSD and dementia. Despite severe cognitive impairment, recommendations for Naloxone and Clonazepam were delayed, with actions not taken until months later. A corporate nurse acknowledged the oversight, noting a transition of ownership contributed to the lapse.
The facility failed to maintain complete hospice documentation for two residents receiving hospice care. One resident with dementia and heart failure, and another with Alzheimer's disease, both lacked certification records in their clinical files. An LPN noted the absence of documentation and mentioned that hospice providers typically supply paperwork during visits, which is then recorded in hospice binders.
A resident with mobility issues reported being roughly handled by a nurse aide, resulting in bruising. The facility failed to ensure the resident was seen by social services within three days and did not report the incident to the state agency. The incident was not immediately reported by the resident due to fear of retaliation, and the facility's investigation could not substantiate the abuse.
The facility failed to complete Significant Change in Status MDS assessments on time for residents receiving hospice care. A resident with dementia and heart failure had their MDS assessment completed three days late, while two other residents with Alzheimer's and dementia had their assessments completed two days late. The MDS Director was unaware of the requirement to complete these assessments within 14 days of determining a significant change.
A resident with a history of heart failure and a fractured humerus felt scolded by a nursing assistant for frequently ringing the call bell during the night. The NA admitted to being short with the resident due to workload stress, which led to the resident feeling disrespected. The facility's policies on treating residents with dignity were not upheld.
A resident with diabetes was initially deemed competent to self-administer insulin via a pump. However, the resident experienced difficulties managing the pump, resulting in elevated blood sugar levels and requiring nursing intervention. Despite facility policy requiring re-evaluation upon a change in status, the resident was not reassessed, and the potential discontinuation of the insulin pump was not considered.
A resident with Type 1 Diabetes was discharged from an LTC facility without proper documentation regarding their insulin pump, which was crucial for their diabetes management. The discharge packet lacked details on blood sugar monitoring and insulin administration, despite the facility's policy requiring comprehensive discharge planning. The DON confirmed the omission of this critical information.
A facility failed to maintain an insulin pump for a resident with diabetes, as there was no documentation of the insulin infusion set being changed during the resident's stay. The resident, who had moderate cognitive impairment, was discharged from the hospital with instructions to continue using the insulin pump, but the facility did not ensure the infusion set was changed every 2-3 days as per the manufacturer's guidance.
A facility failed to ensure staff were trained in managing an insulin pump for a resident with diabetes. The resident, with moderate cognitive impairment, was unable to manage the pump on certain occasions. Staff, including LPNs, were not trained by the facility and relied on the manufacturer's manual for guidance. The facility's policy required re-evaluation of the resident's ability to self-administer medications, but this was not adequately addressed.
Failure to Ensure Side-Rail Was Locked Results in Resident Fall and Injury
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with dementia, a history of falls, and osteoporosis, who required substantial assistance with bed mobility, was directed by a nursing assistant to turn onto their side in bed and grab the side-rail. The side-rail, which was intended to assist with bed mobility, was not locked into place at the time. As the resident grabbed the side-rail and applied pressure, it lowered unexpectedly, causing the resident to fall out of bed and sustain a head laceration and bruising to the knees and lower leg. The resident's care plan and kardex specified the use of padded side-rails and staff assistance for bed mobility, with the expectation that side-rails would be locked before use. During the incident, the nursing assistant had previously lowered the side-rail to change the bed linens and raised it again but failed to ensure it was securely locked. When the resident reached for the side-rail as instructed, the unlocked rail gave way, resulting in the fall and subsequent injuries. Interviews with facility staff confirmed that the expectation was for side-rails to be locked before providing care to residents who use them for mobility. The nursing assistant involved acknowledged not verifying that the side-rail was locked after raising it. Maintenance staff inspected all beds and found no mechanical issues with the side-rails, and staff education materials indicated that proper use and locking of side-rails were part of both initial and annual training.
Medication Error Due to Failure in Resident Identification and Timely Notification
Penalty
Summary
A medication error occurred when a licensed nurse administered a set of prescribed medications intended for one resident to the incorrect resident. The nurse prepared the medications for the intended resident at the doorway of a shared room but then approached the wrong resident and failed to verify the resident's identity using the identification bracelet, relying instead on a verbal confirmation and a photo in the medical record. The nurse did not inform the resident of the medications being administered. After the medications were given, the resident questioned the absence of a specific medication, prompting the nurse to realize the error. At this point, the nurse could not locate a supervisor and instead informed another nurse, but did not fully disclose the extent of the error. The resident who received the incorrect medications had a history of cardiac conditions, including hypertension, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation, and was prescribed different medications than those administered. Following the error, the resident experienced a significant drop in blood pressure and required immediate interventions, including fluids, medication for hypotension, and positioning. The resident was subsequently transferred to the emergency department for further evaluation and treatment, where additional fluids were administered and poison control was consulted. The resident returned to the facility later that day in stable condition. The facility's policies required verification of resident identity using multiple identifiers and immediate notification of a registered nurse and provider in the event of a medication error. However, the nurse failed to follow these protocols, both in verifying the resident's identity and in promptly notifying the appropriate clinical staff and provider about the error. The incident was not fully reported until after the nurse had continued the medication pass, and the full extent of the error was only discovered later by supervisory staff.
Medication Error Due to Failure to Verify Resident Identity
Penalty
Summary
A medication error occurred when a licensed nurse administered a full set of prescribed medications intended for one resident to the incorrect resident, who was the roommate. The nurse prepared the medications at the doorway of the shared room and, upon entering, asked the resident if she was the intended recipient. The resident affirmed, but the nurse failed to verify the resident's identity using the identification bracelet and relied solely on a photograph in the medical record, which she mistakenly believed matched the intended resident. The nurse did not inform the resident of the medications being administered and only realized the error when the resident inquired about a medication not included in the cup. The resident who received the incorrect medications had a history of cardiac conditions, including hypertension, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation, and was prescribed different medications than those administered. After ingesting the medications, the resident experienced a significant drop in blood pressure and required immediate clinical intervention, including fluids, repositioning, and close monitoring. The error was not immediately reported to supervisory staff, and the nurse continued with the medication pass for other residents before the full extent of the error was discovered. Interviews and documentation revealed that the nurse did not follow facility policy, which required verification of resident identity using at least two identifiers, such as the name band and photograph, prior to medication administration. The nurse also failed to communicate the full scope of the error to supervisory staff promptly, resulting in a delay in appropriate response. The facility's policies clearly outlined the steps for medication administration and resident identification, which were not adhered to in this incident.
Inadequate Staff Knowledge on Enhanced Barrier Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all staff members were knowledgeable in identifying residents requiring Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and proficient in utilizing proper personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing care for these residents. During the survey, it was observed that there were no enhanced barrier signs outside resident bedroom doors. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of understanding and inconsistent practices regarding the use of PPE for residents on EBP. For instance, a charge nurse indicated that orange dots on resident room plates signified the need for EBP, but a nursing assistant was unaware of this and did not use gowns while providing care. Another nursing assistant was observed not wearing a gown when exiting a room with an orange dot, despite the resident being dependent on care. The facility's policy on Precautions to Prevent Infection indicated that EBP involves targeted gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. However, the policy was not effectively communicated or implemented among staff, particularly those on the third shift, who found it difficult to attend in-service training. The Infection Preventionist stated that no signage was required outside resident rooms, as visitors were not expected to provide high-risk direct care. Despite this, the lack of clear communication and training led to staff being unaware of which residents required EBP and the necessary precautions to take, as evidenced by the interviews and observations during the survey.
Deficiencies in Prosthetic Care, Catheter Documentation, and Bruise Assessment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper communication and documentation regarding the use of prosthetic devices for a resident with a history of cerebrovascular accident and amputations. The resident, who was cognitively intact, expressed discomfort with the prosthetic devices, leading to frequent refusals to wear them. Despite these refusals being documented in the nursing assistant flow sheets, there was no corresponding documentation in the nursing notes, and the physical therapy department was not informed of the discomfort. This lack of communication and documentation resulted in the prosthetic devices not being evaluated for fit and comfort, as the physical therapist was unaware of the resident's discomfort. In another case, the facility failed to document a diagnosis supporting the use of an indwelling urinary catheter for a resident with benign prostatic hypertrophy. Although the resident was admitted with a catheter and had orders for its use, the facility's records did not contain a diagnosis justifying the catheter's continued use. This oversight was identified during a review with the Director of Nursing Services and other staff, who acknowledged the absence of a documented diagnosis in the resident's medical records. Additionally, the facility did not adequately assess and document a bruise on a resident's hand, which was reported after an incident involving a nurse aide. The resident, who had a history of stroke and mobility issues, reported being roughly handled during a transfer, resulting in a bruise. The facility's investigation could not substantiate abuse, but the incident highlighted a failure to follow the facility's practice of assessing and documenting bruises for size, color, and pain. The lack of timely assessment and documentation of the bruise was noted during interviews with facility staff.
Failure to Monitor Hot Water Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to hot water temperature monitoring requirements, leading to excessively high water temperatures in resident bathrooms. Observations on the memory care unit revealed that the hot water temperature in two residents' bathrooms exceeded the acceptable limit set by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, with temperatures recorded at 124.4 and 129.4 degrees Fahrenheit. The maintenance staff was notified, and upon rechecking, the temperatures remained above the acceptable range. The Director of Maintenance was informed and acknowledged the issue, indicating that the system would be flushed and the hot water turned off to ensure resident safety. Further investigation revealed that the facility's hot water temperature monitoring policy was not being followed. The Director of Maintenance admitted that the water temperatures were taken daily but not at varied times as required, and the time of testing was not documented. Additionally, there was no evidence of daily checks and logging of the mixing valve, nor was there documentation of weekly calibration of the tester. The facility policy required immediate action if temperatures exceeded the state's maximum level, but the logs and policy review indicated lapses in compliance with these procedures.
Failure to Report Resident's Allegations of Feeling Unsafe and Fearful
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement policies that ensured allegations of feeling unsafe and being fearful of retaliation were reported for Resident #194. Resident #194, who was cognitively intact and had a history of depression and anxiety disorder, reported feeling threatened and fearful after two incidents involving LPN #5. On one occasion, LPN #5 left Ativan at the resident's bedside, which went missing, and later administered a second dose after the resident requested it. The resident felt threatened by LPN #5's comment that it would not happen again, fearing potential poisoning in retaliation. On another occasion, the resident questioned the dose of Eliquis administered by LPN #5, who allegedly responded in a manner that made the resident feel threatened and fearful of a blood clot, leading the resident to take the medication. The resident reported these incidents to NA #7, who acknowledged the resident's distress but did not effectively communicate the resident's fears of safety and retaliation to the appropriate supervisory staff. The Director of Nursing and RN #5, the nursing supervisor, were not informed of the resident's allegations of mistreatment over the weekend. The facility's policy required immediate separation of the resident from the alleged abuser and notification of administrative staff or the nursing supervisor, which was not followed in this case.
Failure to Develop Comprehensive Care Plans for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident with a urinary catheter. The resident, diagnosed with Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy, was admitted with a history of using intermittent and indwelling catheterization for urinary elimination. Despite the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicating the need for a care plan due to urinary incontinence, the facility did not create one. Progress notes detailed the resident's urinary difficulties, including high post-void residuals and the need for catheterization, but these issues were not addressed in a care plan. Interviews with the Director of Nursing Services (DNS) and other staff revealed that the oversight was due to a failure to follow the facility's policy on maintaining current care plans. Another resident with a cognitive communication deficit and anxiety also lacked a person-centered care plan addressing their sensory needs. The resident, who required assistance with daily activities and had moderate hearing difficulty, was noted to have malfunctioning hearing aids. Despite recommendations from an audiologist for new hearing aids, the care plan did not reflect any interventions for the resident's communication or sensory needs. Interviews with the DNS confirmed that the interdisciplinary team did not update the care plan to address the resident's hearing deficit, contrary to the facility's expectations for customized and updated care plans.
Failure to Update Resident Care Plan with Preferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to update the care plan of Resident #342 to reflect their preferences, specifically regarding how they wished to be addressed. Resident #342, who has diagnoses including Acute Embolism and Thrombosis, Paraplegia, and anxiety disorder, was identified as cognitively intact and requiring maximum assistance with dressing and bathing. Despite this, the care plan dated 11/7/24 did not include the resident's preference for how they wanted to be addressed, which was a concern expressed by the resident in a grievance logged on 11/11/24. The grievance indicated that the resident was unhappy with being called by their first name by a staff member. Interviews with staff revealed that RN #3 acknowledged the omission, stating that the resident's preference should have been included in the care plan for the benefit of all staff, not just those who had direct communication with the resident. RN #3 admitted forgetting to update the care plan. Additionally, NA #8, who provided care to Resident #342, reported that the resident expressed concerns about another staff member during their interaction. However, NA #8 did not engage further beyond providing care and was subsequently removed from the resident's assignment and received an in-service. The facility's policy requires that care plans be kept current by all disciplines, but this was not adhered to in this instance.
Medication Administration Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to professional standards of practice for Resident #194, who had a history of depression and anxiety disorder. On 11/16/24, LPN #5 prepared Ativan for Resident #194 but left the medication at the bedside when the resident indicated it was too early to take it. Upon returning, the medication was missing, and the resident reported not having taken it. A second dose was administered after the initial dose was unaccounted for. The facility's policy clearly stated that medications should not be left at the bedside, and the Director of Nursing Services confirmed this expectation. Additionally, the facility failed to follow the five rights of medication administration for Resident #74, who had diagnoses including Type 2 diabetes mellitus and Parkinson's disease. On 11/20/24, LPN #1 administered only one tablet of Metformin instead of the prescribed two tablets. LPN #1 admitted to not being familiar with the resident and not reading the physician's order carefully. The facility's active Medication Pass policy required medications to be administered safely and per physician's orders.
Failure to Use Positioning Wedges for Pressure Ulcer Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper pressure ulcer care for a resident who was at risk for pressure ulcers and had developed a stage 2 pressure ulcer on the right buttocks. The resident, who was cognitively intact and required partial/moderate assistance to roll, was not turned using the appropriate offloading device as per the care plan. The care plan specified repositioning every 2 hours with positioning wedges, but observations and interviews revealed that the wedges were not used, and the resident was left in one position without assistance. Nursing staff were unaware of the resident's specific positioning needs, and the wedges were found stored in the resident's closet, unused. The resident expressed an inability to turn without assistance and indicated that staff had not used the wedges for positioning. Interviews with nursing staff revealed a lack of awareness and communication regarding the resident's care plan and positioning needs. The facility did not have a policy for the use of positioning wedges and air mattresses, contributing to the deficiency. The wound care nurse acknowledged the importance of using wedges for effective pressure offloading but noted that the resident did not like using them, leading to the consideration of an air mattress as an alternative.
Resident Elopement Due to Inadequate Supervision
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a resident from eloping. The resident, who had diagnoses including hemiplegia, hemiparesis, TIA, and cerebral infarction, was severely cognitively impaired and dependent on assistance for all activities of daily living. Despite these conditions, the resident was found outside the facility self-propelling in a wheelchair. This incident occurred after the resident had been discharged from occupational therapy, having reached their goals, and was noted to have recently developed the ability to self-propel short distances. The deficiency occurred when the receptionist left the front desk unattended for a brief period, during which the resident managed to exit the building. The facility's elopement policy required residents to be accounted for at all times, but there was no expectation for desk coverage during short absences like bathroom breaks. Staff interviews revealed that the resident had not previously attempted to elope, and the incident was unexpected. The resident was quickly returned to the building by staff who noticed the elopement through a window.
Failure to Address Pharmacist Recommendations in a Timely Manner
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that pharmacist recommendations were provided to the physician for review and response for a resident diagnosed with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and dementia with psychotic disturbance. The resident had severe cognitive impairment as indicated by the Comprehensive Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. Despite consultant progress notes identifying recommendations for the prescriber to review the physician's order for Naloxone and to add a stop date for Clonazepam, these recommendations were not addressed in a timely manner. Specifically, recommendations made on 2/21/2024, 6/20/2024, and 7/21/2024 were not acted upon until 10/23/2024. During an interview and record review, a corporate nurse acknowledged the oversight and noted that pharmacy recommendations should be reviewed and signed by the physician. However, due to a transition of ownership in June 2024, there was a lapse in addressing these recommendations. The facility's policy requires that pharmacist recommendations be submitted to the Director of Nursing Services and followed up on to ensure appropriate action is taken within a reasonable timeframe. The failure to adhere to this policy resulted in sporadic entries and a lack of timely response to the pharmacist's recommendations.
Incomplete Hospice Documentation for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the completeness of hospice notes for two residents receiving hospice care. Resident #12, diagnosed with dementia and heart failure, had severe cognitive impairment as indicated in a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This resident elected hospice services on November 5, 2024, and the care plan required coordination with the hospice provider to review the effectiveness of care. However, the clinical record lacked certification records for this resident. Similarly, Resident #91, diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease and receiving palliative care, elected hospice services on December 18, 2023. The care plan for this resident included interventions for comfort and coordination of care. During a review on November 21, 2024, it was identified that certification records were also missing for this resident. An LPN acknowledged the absence of documentation and mentioned that hospice providers usually visit the facility and provide paperwork, which is then entered into hospice binders containing notes from the hospice nurse.
Failure to Report and Follow Up on Allegation of Mistreatment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was seen by social services within three days following an allegation of mistreatment, as per the facility's practice. Additionally, the facility did not report the allegation of mistreatment to the appropriate state agency. The resident involved, who was admitted with diagnoses including hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, osteoarthritis, and a history of stroke, reported that a nurse aide roughly handled them during a transfer, resulting in bruising on the resident's hand. The incident occurred when the resident, who required assistance with mobility and self-care, rang the call bell for help to use the bathroom. The nurse aide allegedly grabbed the resident's hand and feet to transfer them to a wheelchair, which the resident claimed led to bruising. The resident did not report the incident immediately due to fear of retaliation, and it was only brought to attention after a physical therapist noticed the bruising and reported it to the nursing staff. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the social worker was aware of the incident but did not follow up with the resident within the required timeframe. Furthermore, the social worker did not report the incident to the state agency, citing workload as a reason. The facility's investigation could not substantiate the abuse, but the care plan was updated to require two staff members for assistance with the resident's care.
Late Completion of Significant Change MDS Assessments for Hospice Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that staff accurately coded the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments to reflect significant changes in the status of residents receiving hospice care. Resident #12, diagnosed with dementia and heart failure, elected hospice services on November 5, 2024. However, the Significant Change in Status MDS assessment, which should have been completed within 14 days of the determination of a significant change, was not completed by November 21, 2024, making it three days late. Similarly, Resident #91, with Alzheimer's disease and receiving palliative care, elected hospice services on December 18, 2023. The MDS assessment for this resident was completed two days late on January 3, 2024. Resident #101, also diagnosed with dementia and receiving palliative care, elected hospice services on February 18, 2024. The MDS assessment for this resident was completed two days late on March 5, 2024. An interview with RN #6, the MDS Director, revealed a lack of awareness and training regarding the requirement to complete a significant change MDS within 14 days after the determination of a significant change. RN #6 mistakenly believed the facility had 14 days after setting the Assessment Reference Date to complete the MDS. This misunderstanding led to the late completion of the significant change MDS assessments for Residents #12, #91, and #101.
Failure to Treat Resident with Respect and Dignity
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect and dignity, as evidenced by an incident involving a nursing assistant (NA) and a resident. The resident, who was alert and oriented, had a history of a fractured humerus, heart failure, and localized edema, and required maximal assistance for toileting. On the night in question, the resident's family member reported that the resident felt scolded by the NA for frequently ringing the call bell between 1 AM and 2 AM. The NA admitted to being short with the resident due to the frequent calls for assistance with toileting, talking, and repositioning, and acknowledged that she may have scolded the resident, although she denied yelling. The incident was documented in a facility Reportable Events Form, and the resident confirmed feeling scolded during an interview. The NA's statement indicated she was overwhelmed with her workload that night, which included caring for new arrivals to the unit. The facility's Employee Code of Ethics and Resident Rights Policy emphasize treating residents with care, courtesy, respect, and dignity, which was not upheld in this instance. The deficiency was identified through clinical record review, facility documentation review, and interviews.
Failure to Reassess Resident's Self-Administration Capability
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to reassess a resident's ability to self-administer medication after a change in the resident's status. The resident, who had a diagnosis of diabetes and was using an insulin pump, was initially assessed and deemed competent to manage the pump. However, on two consecutive days, the resident was unable to manage the insulin pump, and there were concerns noted, although specifics were not documented. The resident's blood sugar levels were significantly elevated on these days, requiring intervention from the nursing staff. Despite the facility's policy requiring re-evaluation of a resident's ability to self-administer medication upon a change in status, the resident was not reassessed when difficulties were identified. The facility's policy also indicated that the right to self-administer medication could be withdrawn if the resident could no longer safely perform the task. The Director of Nurses and Assistant Director of Nurses acknowledged that the resident should have been re-evaluated and that discontinuation of the insulin pump should have been considered.
Failure to Include Insulin Pump Information in Discharge Instructions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the discharge instructions for a resident included critical information about the use of a specialized device, specifically an insulin pump, which was necessary for the resident's diabetes management. The resident, who had a diagnosis of Type 1 Diabetes and was using an insulin pump during a hospital stay, was discharged to a home care setting without the necessary documentation regarding the insulin pump. The discharge packet did not include details such as the frequency of blood sugar monitoring, insulin type, frequency, route, or the presence of the insulin infusion pump, which are essential for the resident's ongoing care. The deficiency was identified through a review of clinical records, facility documentation, and interviews. The Director of Nurses confirmed that the nurse responsible for completing the discharge paperwork failed to include information about the insulin pump. The facility's discharge planning policy requires collaboration with social services to create a viable discharge plan, but in this case, the necessary information was omitted, leading to an incomplete discharge packet for the resident.
Failure to Maintain Insulin Pump for Resident with Diabetes
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper maintenance of a medical device for a resident with diabetes who was using an insulin pump. The resident was discharged from the hospital with instructions to continue using the insulin pump, and the insulin infusion set was due to be changed on specific dates according to the manufacturer's guidance. However, the clinical record did not show any evidence that the insulin infusion set was changed during the resident's stay at the facility. The resident had a moderate cognitive impairment and required supervision with activities of daily living. Despite having a physician's order allowing the resident to self-administer the insulin pump, there was no documentation to confirm that the infusion set was changed as required. The Director of Nursing Services acknowledged the lack of documentation supporting the change of the insulin infusion set, which was supposed to occur every 2-3 days as per the manufacturer's instructions.
Lack of Staff Training on Insulin Pump Management
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that staff were trained and competent in managing and monitoring a specialized medical device, specifically an insulin pump, for a resident with diabetes. The resident was identified as having moderate cognitive impairment and required supervision with activities of daily living. Despite being deemed capable of self-administering the insulin pump, there were documented instances where the resident was unable to manage the device, leading to concerns that were not clearly specified. The facility's policy required re-evaluation of the resident's ability to self-administer medications if there was a change in status, but it appears this was not adequately addressed. Interviews with staff, including LPNs and the Director of Nursing, revealed that the facility did not provide training on the insulin pump. Instead, staff were expected to refer to the manufacturer's instructions. On one occasion, an LPN had to fill and insert a new insulin cartridge using the user manual, as she had not received training from the facility. The lack of training and reliance on the manual indicates a gap in ensuring staff competency in managing the resident's insulin pump, which is critical for the resident's well-being.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 459 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 3 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Stafford Springs
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vantage At Hampden Llc | 6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Woodlake At Tolland | 7.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 20 | 0 |
| Chestnut Hill Health And Rehabilitation Center Llc | 7.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Complete Care At Fox Hill | 8.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 12 | 0 |
| Care One At Redstone | 8.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 13 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Evergreen Center For Health & Rehabilitation.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.