Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around October 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Apple Rehab Avon during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with significant medical and mental health needs was subjected to verbal abuse by a housekeeper, who used profanity and derogatory language during an argument about room cleaning. The incident was witnessed by the Director of Maintenance and confirmed through facility documentation and staff interviews, constituting a failure to protect the resident from verbal mistreatment as required by facility policy.
A housekeeper was observed using profane and derogatory language towards a resident with significant medical needs. Despite facility policy requiring immediate removal of staff pending investigation after an abuse allegation, the employee was not suspended or taken off the schedule right away. The incident was reported to administration the following day, and only then was a suspension initiated.
A resident with multiple health conditions was subjected to verbal abuse by a housekeeper, who used profanity during an argument. The Director of Maintenance witnessed the incident but delayed reporting it to the Administrator, and the State Agency was not notified within the required timeframe. Facility policy requiring immediate reporting and prompt State Agency notification was not followed.
The facility failed to maintain bi-monthly narcotic audit records. During review of the med storage room, the most recent audit log available was for September, and logs for several prior months were missing. The DON stated the earlier logs could not be located, and the facility policy required completed audit and accountability records to be kept on file for 3 years.
Dietary staff failed to follow grooming and food storage requirements. An unmasked beard was observed over a food prep area with uncovered food, and multiple items in the freezer, pastry fridge, and dry storage were found without required labels, open dates, or expiration/use-by dates. The Dietary Mgr acknowledged items were expected to be dated and labeled, and the facility policy required refrigerated items to be dated when opened.
A resident with HF, depression, HTN, and moderate cognitive impairment had multiple MDS assessments completed late after a hospital transfer and readmission. RN staff reported being behind on MDS completion, being the only nurse doing MDS work, and also helping on the units with other duties; the facility policy required MDS completion per the RAI Manual and submission to QIES within 14 days of completion.
Failure to Document Ordered Monthly Weights: A resident with a Stage 4 sacral PU, hypotension, and neuromuscular bladder dysfunction had a physician order for monthly weights, but the facility did not consistently document the weights in the weights/vitals tab or on the TAR. Several TAR entries noted that weights were obtained, but the actual weights were missing, and the DON acknowledged the documentation problem.
A resident with a history of falls and changing cognition was left in the bathroom during toileting and fell twice when staff did not provide the level of supervision reflected in the record and orders. Staff interviews showed the resident did not reliably use the call light and sometimes got up alone. In a separate event, an NA left pizza unattended in a nourishment room microwave, causing smoke, a fire alarm activation, and a Code RED response.
A resident with ESRD on dialysis and a 1500 mL fluid restriction did not have I&O consistently monitored or documented. The care plan and nursing care card did not identify the fluid restriction or I&O monitoring, and the paper I&O record was incomplete across multiple shifts and days, with no 24-hour totals documented. Staff interviews confirmed gaps in documentation practices and that the hemodialysis policy required maintaining ordered fluid restrictions and documenting every shift and daily totals.
A resident with DM2, depression, anxiety, anemia, hypothyroidism, HTN, and bipolar disorder received insulin, antidepressants, antianxiety meds, anticonvulsants, and hypoglycemics, but the facility did not have monthly pharmacist drug regimen reviews documented for 3 months. The care plan addressed risks related to hypothyroidism, diabetes, and psychotropic meds, and the DNS reported the facility had changed pharmacies and found blank review/recommendation forms when she started.
Failure to Prevent Resident-to-Resident Altercation: Two residents were involved in an unwitnessed altercation after one resident reportedly kicked the other, who then retaliated by pushing the resident, causing both to fall. One resident had dementia with behavioral disturbance and confusion, while the other had paranoid schizophrenia and delusional symptoms. Staff found one resident on the floor with scalp bleeding, and the resident could not accurately describe the event due to baseline confusion.
Missing Bureau Drawer Knobs: A resident with anxiety and depression, who was cognitively intact and needed set up or supervision for some ADLs, had two lower bureau drawers with missing knobs and exposed screws, making the drawers unusable. The maintenance log had no entry for the issue, environmental rounds did not identify the problem, and unit staff reported not noticing the missing knobs; the roommate’s bureau also had missing knobs.
Incorrect MDS Coding for Hospice Services: A resident with cancer, TIA, aphasia, AFib, and dementia was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with ADLs. The care plan and physician order showed the resident was receiving hospice services, but the quarterly MDS assessments did not code the resident as being in hospice. RN review confirmed the assessments were coded incorrectly and failed to reflect the resident’s hospice status.
A resident with a surgical wound experienced a lapse in wound vac function, leading to an alternate dressing being applied based on a verbal order from an APRN. The nurse failed to document this verbal order in the EMR and did not ensure timely documentation of the wound care provided, resulting in incomplete and inaccurate medical records.
A resident with a history of dysphagia and cognitive deficits was served food without the required 1:1 supervision, as ordered by the physician and facility policy. Staff left a dessert at the bedside and did not remain present, leading to the resident experiencing difficulty breathing and requiring emergency transfer for aspiration. Interviews confirmed that the mandated supervision was not provided at the time of the incident.
A resident with borderline personality and PTSD reported being recorded by a supervisor, which was not timely reported to the State Agency as required by facility policy. The DON did not consider the grievance as an abuse allegation, leading to a deficiency in reporting procedures.
Verbal Abuse of Resident by Housekeeper
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with major depression, end stage kidney disease, and heart failure, who was alert and oriented but required extensive assistance for bed mobility, was subjected to verbal mistreatment by a staff member. The resident's care plan indicated a need for two staff during care and interventions for hoarding and treatment refusals. Despite these interventions, a housekeeper engaged in an argument with the resident, during which the housekeeper used profanity and derogatory language directed at the resident. This incident was witnessed by the Director of Maintenance, who observed the housekeeper calling the resident a derogatory term during a dispute about the placement of a bedside table. The facility's abuse policy strictly prohibits any kind of abuse or mistreatment, including verbal abuse defined as the use of derogatory or threatening language towards a resident. The incident was documented in facility records and confirmed through interviews with staff, including the Director of Maintenance and the DON, both of whom acknowledged that the language used constituted verbal abuse. The housekeeper later admitted in her employee file that she may have used the derogatory term when addressing the resident. The failure to prevent this verbal mistreatment resulted in a deficiency related to protecting residents from all types of abuse.
Failure to Immediately Remove Employee After Verbal Abuse Incident
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a staff member, specifically a housekeeper, was observed using inappropriate and profane language towards a resident who had diagnoses including major depression, end stage kidney disease, and heart failure. The resident was alert and oriented, requiring extensive assistance for bed mobility, and had a care plan that included interventions for staff attendance during care. The incident involved the housekeeper engaging in an argument with the resident, during which the housekeeper used derogatory language. This was witnessed by the Director of Maintenance, who did not immediately suspend the housekeeper and was unclear about the required disciplinary action. Despite facility policy requiring immediate removal of an employee from the schedule pending investigation after an allegation of abuse, the housekeeper was not suspended or removed from the schedule immediately following the incident. The Director of Maintenance reported the incident to the Administrator the next day, and a suspension was put in place only after this notification. Documentation confirmed the housekeeper admitted to using inappropriate language, and both the DON and Administrator acknowledged that the incident constituted verbal abuse and that policy was not followed regarding immediate suspension.
Failure to Timely Report and Notify State Agency of Verbal Abuse Allegation
Penalty
Summary
Staff failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse/mistreatment in a timely manner and did not ensure prompt notification to the State Agency as required by facility policy. A resident with major depression, end stage kidney disease, and heart failure, who was alert and oriented but required extensive assistance, was involved in an incident where a housekeeper used profanity and derogatory language during an argument. The Director of Maintenance (DM) witnessed the incident and did not immediately notify the Administrator, waiting until the following day due to the Administrator's unavailability. The facility's policy required immediate reporting of such incidents. Further review revealed that the State Agency was not notified of the incident until three days after it occurred and two days after it was reported to the Administrator, despite policy requiring notification within two hours of awareness. Documentation discrepancies were noted regarding the date of the incident, and interviews confirmed that both the DM and Administrator recognized the delay in reporting. The facility's abuse policy defined verbal abuse and outlined the requirement for immediate reporting and removal of the accused employee from the schedule pending investigation, which was not followed in this case.
Missing Bi-Monthly Narcotic Audit Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain and keep records of bi-monthly narcotic audits as required for pharmaceutical services. During the onsite review of the medication storage room, the most recent documented bi-monthly narcotic audit log available was dated September 1, 2025. Review of the audit logs showed that records for April 2025, May 2025, June 2025, July 2025, and August 2025 were not available. The DON stated that the bi-monthly narcotic audit logs were not located prior to her start date in August 2025 and later stated that the logs before September 2025 had been completed by the previous DON but could not be located. The Controlled Medications Policy dated 2025 stated that completed audit and accountability records are to be submitted to the DON and kept on file at the facility for three years.
Dietary staff failed to wear beard covering and food items were not dated or labeled
Penalty
Summary
The Dietary Department failed to ensure proper hair covers were worn while staff were in the kitchen and near food preparation areas. During a tour of the department, the Dietary Manager was observed standing over a food preparation area containing an uncovered tray of ham and carrots while wearing a full beard with no beard covering. When interviewed, the Dietary Manager stated that a hair covering should be worn by all persons in the kitchen but did not provide a reason his beard was not covered while in the kitchen and near food. The facility's Dress Code Policy stated that hairnets or hats must be worn at all times, hair restraints must completely cover the hair line at all times, and beard guards needed to be worn as appropriate. The facility also failed to ensure food items were consistently dated and labeled in refrigerators, freezers, and dry storage. In the meat freezer, there was one open bag of chicken cutlets with no label and no date showing when it was opened, along with three additional unopened bags of chicken cutlets with no labels identifying the item, size, expiration date, or contents, and one unopened bag of breaded meat described as fish patties with no label or expiration date. In the pastry fridge, a 10-inch strawberry cream pie and a pound cake had no use-by or expiration dates. In dry storage, three cans of shredded sauerkraut had no expiration date and an open pack of chocolate cake had no open date or use-by date. The Dietary Manager stated that items were expected to be dated and labeled, and the facility's perishable dating policy indicated that all items stored in the refrigerator would be dated the date opened.
Late MDS Assessments for a Resident With Multiple Diagnoses
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure staff submitted Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments timely for Resident #61. The resident’s diagnoses included heart failure, depression, and hypertension, and a quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #61 was admitted to the hospital on 8/28/25 and readmitted to the facility on 9/4/25, while the facility was in the process of completing an annual MDS combined with a discharge return anticipated assessment. On 9/24/25, an interview and MDS review with RN #2 showed the assessments for Resident #61 had not been completed by that date and were not completed timely. The entry MDS dated [DATE] was due by 9/11/25 and was 13 days late, the annual discharge return anticipated assessment and care plan decisions were due by 9/20/25 and were 4 days late, and the entry assessment dated [DATE] was due by 9/21/25 and was 3 days late. RN #2 stated he/she was behind in completing assessments, was the only nurse completing MDS assessments at the facility, and at times assisted on the units with other duties. RN #2 also stated he/she had been told September MDS assessments were due on September 15th but would refer to the RAI manual for CMS guidance. The facility policy stated MDS assessments would be completed according to the MDS RAI Manual and submitted to the QIES database within 14 days of completion, and MDS Validation Reports were requested but not provided.
Failure to Document Ordered Monthly Weights
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure Resident #24’s weight was documented monthly according to physician orders. Resident #24 had diagnoses including a Stage 4 pressure ulcer to the sacrum, hypotension, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. The annual MDS identified the resident as cognitively intact and dependent with eating, oral hygiene, and chair-to-bed transfer. The care plan dated 7/3/25 stated the resident did not have behaviors of refusing care, and a physician’s order dated 10/1/24 directed staff to obtain the resident’s weight on the first shower day of the month, every day shift starting on the 1st and ending on the 7th each month. Review of the monthly weights showed that weights were not documented as ordered from May 2025 through September 2025. The TAR showed weights were obtained on several dates in March, June, July, August, and September 2025, but the records did not identify the actual weights taken, and the weights were not documented in the weights/vitals tab. Review of the paper chart also did not reveal weights for the missing months. The DNS stated that all weights should be documented in the weights/vital tab during the shift they were taken, refusals should be documented in the notes section each time, and refusal behaviors should be care planned if present. The DNS was unsure why weights were not consistently taken or documented and acknowledged that weights were an issue for the facility.
Failure to Supervise Resident in Bathroom and Unattended Microwave Use Caused Falls and Smoke Event
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision for a resident with a history of falls and changing cognitive status, resulting in falls in the bathroom. The resident’s record showed diagnoses including congestive heart failure, constipation, history of urinary tract infection, and history of falls. A quarterly MDS identified intact cognition and partial/moderate assistance needs for toileting, dressing, and personal hygiene, while a later MDS identified severe cognitive impairment and dependence on staff for toileting, toileting hygiene, and transfers from bed to chair. The care plan identified the resident as at risk for falls due to impaired balance, unsteady gait, and pain, and physician orders dated 4/15/25 directed transfer with the assistance of 2 persons and no device, while another order directed use of a rolling walker with transfer. A facility reportable event dated 5/29/25 stated that after a nurse aide walked the resident to the bathroom using the resident’s walker, the aide instructed the resident to use the call light when finished and left the resident in the bathroom. The resident was later seen walking out of the bathroom alone, had not used the call light, and fell while trying to use the wall-mounted hand sanitizer. The report stated the resident was not injured and returned to bed. A second reportable event dated 6/14/25 stated that another nurse aide walked the resident to the bathroom with a walker and stood in the doorway while the resident attempted to turn toward the toilet, tripped over his/her own feet, and fell sitting on the floor. During interviews and record review, the Director of Nursing stated the aide should have had hands on the resident with another person assisting the transfer, and the orders should have been on the care card. The Administrator and DNS also stated the falls were related to the resident going to the bathroom unassisted and not using the call bell. Staff interviews reflected that the resident’s mentation varied, that the resident would not reliably use the call bell, and that the resident sometimes got up on his/her own and did not use the walker. The facility policy stated that falls would be documented, investigated, and used to inform care planning, including updating the resident’s care card with fall risk and precautions. The facility also failed to ensure staff remained with food items while reheating in a microwave, resulting in smoke, activation of the fire alarm, and dispatch of the fire department. On the morning of the event, the DNS met the surveyor at the entrance and stated there was a smoke issue with a microwave and that staff had pulled the fire alarm. The Administrator later observed the microwave in the nourishment area, which was unplugged, warm to the touch, and had brown discoloration inside. The Administrator stated pizza had been reheated by staff and that the incident was being investigated. Another Administrator stated it was unlikely nursing staff had been in-serviced on proper use of the nourishment room microwave and that there was no policy or procedure for heating or reheating food or staying with food during the heating process. The facility later identified that a nurse aide placed a piece of pizza in the microwave, left it unattended while heating, and smoke and a burning smell were observed, leading to the Code RED response and emergency services being activated.
Failure to consistently monitor and document I&O for a dialysis resident with fluid restriction
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident receiving dialysis and subject to a 1500 mL fluid restriction had fluid intake consistently monitored and documented. The resident had diagnoses of end-stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis, was severely cognitively impaired, and required assistance with oral hygiene and was dependent for toilet and personal hygiene. Physician orders directed a 1500 mL fluid restriction, and the resident’s records also identified dialysis and fluid restriction needs, but the care plan did not identify the fluid restriction and the nursing care card did not identify either the fluid restriction or Intake/Output (I&O) monitoring. The Intake/Output Report in the paper chart from 7/14/25 through 9/23/25 was not consistently completed for every shift, and every day was missing a 24-hour calculated total. Several dates had no recorded intake on any of the three shifts and no documented 24-hour total. Nursing notes and physician orders showed the resident was in the facility with an active fluid restriction during the period reviewed. During interview, an LPN stated that some agency staff might not know how to document I&O and that there was no unit list of residents on I&O or fluid restrictions, while the DNS stated the hemodialysis policy required staff to maintain ordered fluid restrictions and to document every shift and total every day.
Missing Monthly Pharmacist Medication Reviews
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a licensed pharmacist completed monthly drug regimen reviews, including review of the medical chart, for Resident #32 for 3 months. Resident #32 had diagnoses that included Type 2 diabetes, depression, anxiety, anemia, hypothyroidism, hypertension, and bipolar disorder. The quarterly MDS assessments indicated the resident received insulin injections, antidepressants, antianxiety medication, anticonvulsant medication, and hypoglycemic medications. The resident care plan identified risks related to hypothyroidism, diabetes, and psychotropic medication use, with interventions to administer medications, monitor blood sugars, obtain lab work as ordered, and observe for adverse effects. Review of the pharmacy medication monthly reviews showed that Resident #32's monthly medication regimen was not reviewed by the pharmacist for November 2024, February 2025, and June 2025. The facility policy stated that the consulting pharmacist reviews every resident's medication regimen at least monthly, including a medical record review, and documents the date each review is completed on the appropriate form. During interview, the DNS stated the facility had transitioned to a new pharmacy and that monthly pharmacy regimen reviews and recommendation forms were blank when she began working at the facility. Attempts to reach the previous pharmacy consultant were unsuccessful.
Failure to Prevent Resident-to-Resident Altercation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that two residents were free from a resident-to-resident altercation. One resident had diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, anxiety disorder, adjustment disorder, and depressed mood, and the care plan identified the resident as potentially physically and/or verbally aggressive toward staff or other residents. The other resident had diagnoses including chronic diastolic heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and paranoid schizophrenia, and the care plan identified risk for changes in mood state and behaviors, including delusions and hallucinations. On the day of the incident, a nurse aide heard yelling for help and found one resident on the floor while the other resident was hurrying back into a wheelchair. According to the second resident’s statement, the first resident kicked him/her, and he/she retaliated. Nursing documentation and staff statements described that the second resident pushed the first resident, both residents fell to the floor, and the first resident had mild bleeding from an open area to the scalp. The first resident was confused and could not provide accurate information about what happened. The incident report identified the event as unwitnessed and documented that the second resident reported standing up and pushing the first resident off of him/her. The first resident was sent to the emergency room for evaluation after the altercation. The administrator stated that the pushing and altercation would be considered a form of abuse and reported that the facility policy called for residents to be immediately separated, seen by psychiatric services, and offered a room change if applicable.
Missing Bureau Drawer Knobs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure bureau drawer knobs were in place so the resident could access a facility-supplied bureau safely and comfortably. Resident #32 had diagnoses of anxiety and depression, and the quarterly MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact and required set up or supervision for dressing, walking, and wheeling the wheelchair. During observation, two lower bureau drawers in Resident #32’s room were found with the knobs missing and screws exposed where the knobs had been, which rendered the drawers unusable to the resident. Facility interviews and record review showed the maintenance process for repairs was to be written in the unit maintenance book for staff to address, but no entry was found for Resident #32’s missing bureau knobs. The Director of Maintenance stated the unit had older bureaus and nightstands and that drawer knobs frequently came off and had to be glued back on. A review of the most recent environmental rounds did not identify the bureaus as having issues, and staff interviewed on the unit reported not noticing missing knobs or receiving resident requests for repair. The roommate’s bureau was also observed with missing lower drawer knobs and exposed screws, and the maintenance director stated the knobs for both residents would be replaced immediately.
Incorrect MDS Coding for Hospice Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately code the quarterly MDS assessment for one resident to reflect hospice services. The resident was admitted in 2020 with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of the breast, transient cerebral ischemic attack, aphasia, atrial fibrillation, and dementia. The quarterly MDS assessments identified the resident as severely cognitively impaired and requiring extensive assistance with toileting hygiene, showers, upper and lower body dressing, personal hygiene, and transfers. The resident care plan dated 6/25/25 identified that the resident was receiving hospice level of care from a contracted hospice agency and that death was expected due to illness, with interventions focused on pain control, symptom management, maintaining dignity, and arranging clergy visits as requested. A physician order dated 8/14/25 directed hospice services effective from 8/19/24. During interview and review of the 2/26/25 and 6/20/25 MDS assessments with RN #5, the assessments did not identify that the resident had entered hospice services from 8/19/24. RN #6 stated the resident was already on hospice services when the MDS dated [DATE] was coded incorrectly. The facility policy stated the MDS 3.0 is to be completed according to the MDS RAI Manual, and Section O requires coding residents identified as being in a hospice program for terminally ill persons.
Incomplete Documentation of Verbal Wound Care Orders and Treatment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record for a resident who had undergone a panniculectomy and experienced wound dehiscence and infection. Although there was a physician order for wound vac dressing changes three times per week, on one occasion the wound vac stopped working and an alternate dressing was applied. The nurse documented the wound treatment as held and referenced nursing progress notes, but there was no corresponding physician order for the alternative dressing in the record for the period when the wound vac was unavailable. Interviews revealed that the nurse had received a verbal order from an APRN to apply a wet to dry dressing until the new wound vac arrived, but this verbal order was not documented in the electronic medical record as required by facility policy. Both the nurse and the APRN confirmed that verbal orders should be entered into the EMR, and the facility's policies direct that such orders be written down, verified, and properly documented. Additionally, documentation of the wound care provided was not completed in a timely manner, as required by the facility's nursing documentation policy.
Failure to Provide Required 1:1 Supervision During Meals Resulting in Choking Incident
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when staff failed to follow a physician's order requiring one-to-one (1:1) supervision during meals for a resident with multiple diagnoses, including bipolar disorder, diabetes mellitus, and mild oropharyngeal dysphagia following an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. The resident's care plan and physician's order specified a dysphagia level 3 diet with thin liquids and mandated 1:1 supervision and assistance with feeding, including cues for small bites, small sips, and alternating solids with liquids. Despite these orders, staff delivered a piece of cake to the resident and left it on the overbed table without remaining present to provide the required supervision. Subsequently, the resident was found to be having difficulty breathing after consuming the dessert without supervision. Staff attempted abdominal thrusts and called emergency services, resulting in the resident's transfer to the hospital, where aspiration was diagnosed. Interviews with staff and the DON confirmed that the facility's policy and the physician's order for 1:1 supervision were not followed at the time of the incident, as staff were distributing meals and intended to provide supervision only after all trays had been delivered.
Failure to Timely Report Allegation of Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the State Agency in a timely manner regarding an allegation of abuse involving a resident. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including borderline personality and post-traumatic stress disorder, reported that a weekend supervisor recorded them on a cell phone, allegedly stating that the resident had psychological problems. This incident was documented in a grievance form. Despite the facility's policy requiring immediate investigation and notification to the State Agency within two hours of an abuse allegation, the Director of Nursing (DON) did not consider the grievance as an allegation of abuse and thus did not report it to the State Agency. The facility's policy on protecting resident privacy and prohibiting mental abuse clearly defines mental abuse to include actions by staff that demean a resident through recordings. The resident's care plan noted behaviors such as accusatory tendencies and poor impulse control, requiring staff to approach the resident calmly and avoid engagement if the resident escalates. The DON's failure to recognize the grievance as an abuse allegation and the subsequent delay in reporting to the State Agency constituted a deficiency in adhering to the facility's abuse policy.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 732 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 8 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Avon
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avon Health Center | 0.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 14 | 1 |
| Countryside Manor Of Bristol | 4.7 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Cherry Brook Health Care Center | 4.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare At West Hartford | 4.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 21 | 0 |
| Amberwoods Of Farmington | 5.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Apple Rehab Avon.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.