Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at The Pavilion At Sunny Hills during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with a fractured tibia and fibula was transferred by a CNA using a mechanical lift without the required second staff member. The resident reported being raised too high, not having her leg properly supported, and hitting her neck/head on the headboard with pain afterward. The record did not show documentation of the report, physician notification, or continued monitoring, and the LPN did not notify the MD after assessing no injury.
A resident’s floormat was left propped against the side of the bed during a mechanical lift transfer, with the mat touching the bedding. CNA 2 stated he moved the mat off the floor and leaned it against the bed, and the DON acknowledged this was an infection control concern.
A resident admitted from acute care with atrial fibrillation, a Zio cardiac monitor, urinary retention, and rectal bleeding did not have these conditions reflected in the comprehensive care plan. Although transfer documents and physician orders directed cardiac monitoring, PVR checks with I/O catheterization parameters, and monitoring for rectal bleeding, the January care plan contained no problems or interventions for the Zio patch, urinary retention, or rectal bleeding. Nursing leadership and an RN later confirmed these issues were present and should have been included in the care plan.
A resident with physician orders for PVR checks every six hours over several days had a documented PVR of 337 cc, above the ordered threshold for I/O catheterization. The record showed no evidence that an I/O catheterization was performed, that the MD was notified of the continued urine retention, or that further reassessment and monitoring occurred, and the resident’s care plan did not include a urinary retention problem. An RN later confirmed that facility expectations included MD notification, reassessment, monitoring, and care plan development in such circumstances.
A resident experienced a rapid, unplanned weight loss of 12 lbs. (about 6%) within less than a month, triggering thresholds outlined in the facility’s weight management P&P for closer monitoring and intervention. Despite weekly weights showing a 7 lb. loss in nine days and an additional 5 lb. loss shortly thereafter, the nutritional assessment initially documented no weight change, and the RD did not conduct follow-up until weeks after the weight decline began, even though she acknowledged such a loss would be concerning and required follow-up. An IDT note later summarized the ongoing weight loss, and leadership staff were informed of these findings.
A resident’s daughter reported to nursing staff that a CNA was unable to meet the resident’s needs and was harassing the resident, and this was documented as a change of condition using an SBAR tool. Despite facility policy requiring person-centered, comprehensive care plans to be developed and revised by the IDT, review of the medical record showed no care plan problem or interventions were added to address the reported unmet needs or alleged harassment. Two LVNs confirmed during interviews that no care plan was developed in response to this change of condition and acknowledged that care plans are intended to ensure goals and interventions are created and updated as needed.
Two residents receiving respiratory treatments did not have their nebulizer and oxygen equipment stored and labeled according to facility policy, and required oxygen in use signage was missing from their room entrances. For one resident, surveyors found a nebulizer mask and tubing left on a nightstand without a bag, name, or date, while the resident was also using an oxygen concentrator and had portable oxygen tanks in the room with no oxygen in use sign posted. For another resident with asthma using oxygen via concentrator and nasal cannula, oxygen tubing wrapped around a portable tank on the wheelchair was not bagged or labeled, and no oxygen in use sign was posted outside the room. Staff, including an OT, a CNA, an LVN, and the IP, confirmed these observations and acknowledged that facility policies required the equipment to be bagged, dated, and labeled, and signage to be posted when oxygen was in use.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment was placed in a wheelchair with a lap buddy and pressure pad alarm without a physician's order, informed consent, or a care plan. Staff confirmed the use of these devices to prevent unassisted movement, but medical record review and interviews revealed that required assessments and documentation were not completed prior to their application.
Two residents did not receive required care and monitoring after significant events. One resident with severe cognitive impairment had abnormal neurological findings documented after returning from the hospital, but the physician was not notified as required. Another resident was not monitored or documented for required periods following an unwitnessed fall. These failures were confirmed by facility leadership and were not in accordance with facility policy.
A resident with impaired decision-making capacity reported alleged abuse and mistreatment to an acute care hospital RN, who then informed facility staff. The LVN on duty failed to immediately notify the Administrator or report the allegation to required authorities, resulting in an eight-hour delay before the Administrator became aware and submitted the necessary reports. This delay did not comply with the facility's policy for immediate reporting of abuse allegations.
A resident received PRN acetaminophen and baclofen, but the administration was not documented in the MAR or progress notes. An LVN confirmed giving the medications but failed to record them, and this was later verified by an RN. The DON acknowledged that documentation should occur immediately after administration.
A resident did not receive necessary care and services, including suctioning, daily weight monitoring, and medication administration, as per physician orders. The facility failed to document and implement these orders, notify the physician of medication refusals, and provide required catheter and wound care. These deficiencies were confirmed through interviews and medical record reviews.
The facility was found non-compliant with State laws and its own policy as an LVN and a CNA were observed not wearing their name badges, which are required for staff identification. The CNA stated her badge had fallen off, while the LVN admitted her badge was on the cart. The ADON confirmed that name badges should be worn at all times.
A resident in hospice care did not receive prescribed latanoprost eye drops for glaucoma due to a failure in communication and documentation by the facility staff. The medication was received, but the order was not documented or administered until days later, causing the resident to experience eye discomfort. Interviews with staff confirmed the oversight, with the LVN admitting to forgetting to verify and carry out the order.
A resident with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus did not receive proper insulin administration due to a failure by nursing staff to prime the Tresiba insulin pen as per manufacturer's instructions. The LVN and RN involved were unaware of the priming requirement, which was confirmed by the ADON. This oversight risked incorrect medication dosing.
Mechanical Lift Transfer and Post-Incident Monitoring Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Resident 5 received proper care during a mechanical lift transfer and failed to document and monitor the resident after she reported hitting her neck and/or head and having pain. Resident 5 was admitted with a fractured tibia and fibula and a long-leg immobilizer, and her H&P noted she had the capacity to understand and make decisions. The facility’s mechanical lift competency for CNA 5 required an assistant for all lifting preparation, transferring from, and transferring to procedures so one staff member could maneuver the machine and another could assist and safeguard the resident to avoid injury. Resident 5 stated that CNA 5 transferred her from her wheelchair to her bed using a mechanical lift without a second staff member assisting, raised her too high, did not properly support her fractured leg, and caused pain. She also stated that when the lift was lowered, she hit her neck on the headboard and had additional pain. CNA 5 acknowledged transferring the resident by herself and stated she should have had a second staff member assist. CNA 1 stated the resident later reported that CNA 5 had transferred her alone, raised her too high, and caused her to hit her head on the headboard. The closed medical record did not show documentation that Resident 5 reported hitting her neck or head or complained of pain or discomfort to her neck or head. The record also did not show physician notification or continued monitoring for potential injury and pain. LVN 2 stated she was notified of the incident, assessed the resident, and found no injury, but did not document elsewhere and did not notify the physician. The DON stated that if a resident reported hitting her head on the headboard during a transfer and continued to have pain the next day, the nurse should notify the physician and perform neurological checks, and verified the record lacked documentation of the report, physician notification, and continued monitoring.
Infection Control Lapse With Floormat Placement
Penalty
Summary
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program was cited after staff failed to follow infection control standards for one sampled resident. During an observation and concurrent interview, CNAs were using a mechanical lift to transfer the resident from bed to a wheelchair while the resident remained lying in bed. A floormat was observed propped up lengthwise against the left side of the resident’s bed and upper grab bar, with the upper portion of the mat touching the resident’s bedding. CNA 2 stated he had moved the floormat off the floor and leaned it against the resident’s bed while performing the transfer, and acknowledged that items on the floor are considered contaminated and that the mat should have been placed against the wall instead of the bed. The DON later stated that items on the floor are considered dirty and acknowledged that leaning the floormat along the resident’s bed was an infection control concern.
Failure to Revise Care Plan for Cardiac Monitor, Urinary Retention, and Rectal Bleeding
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a comprehensive, person-centered care plan was revised to reflect specific care needs for one sampled resident following admission from an acute care hospital. Facility policy titled “Comprehensive Care Plans-Timing” (revised 1/2025) required that each resident have a person-centered, comprehensive care plan developed, reviewed, and revised by the interdisciplinary team, with involvement of the resident and/or representative. For this resident, admitted in January 2026 and discharged in February 2026, review of the January 2026 plan of care showed no care plan problem addressing the presence of a Zio patch, a wearable cardiac monitor that was documented as present on admission in a Wound Weekly Monitoring Assessment dated 1/15/16 and referenced in the Discharge to SNF Summary and Transfer Order dated 1/14/26 as a cardiac monitor requiring follow-up for atrial fibrillation. The same resident’s January 2026 plan of care also lacked care plan problems for urinary retention and rectal bleeding, despite these conditions being identified and ordered for monitoring and intervention. The Discharge to SNF Summary and Transfer Order dated 1/14/26 documented urinary retention as a reason for the acute care hospitalization, and an Order Summary Report dated 1/15/26 included a physician’s order for PVR checks every six hours for three days with in-and-out catheterization if PVR exceeded 250 cc and MD notification if two or more consecutive catheterizations were required. Additionally, an Order Summary Report dated 1/17/26 contained a physician’s order to monitor signs and symptoms of rectal bleeding, yet no corresponding care plan problem was initiated. During interviews, RN 1 confirmed the Zio patch was present on admission and agreed it should have been care planned, and the ADON verified that care plans for urinary retention and rectal bleeding were absent and should have been revised to reflect these problems.
Failure to Follow Physician Orders and Monitor Urinary Retention
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide necessary care and services related to urinary retention and bladder management for one resident. The facility’s policies required licensed nurses to document and implement physician orders and outlined expectations for bowel and bladder retraining, including assessment of continence status and voiding patterns. For this resident, the January care plan did not include a problem for urinary retention. A physician’s order dated mid-January directed staff to check post-void residual (PVR) every six hours for three days, to perform an in-and-out (I/O) catheterization if the PVR was greater than 250 cc, and to notify the physician if there were two or more consecutive catheterizations every six hours for three days. On a specific date in January at 1200 hours, the Medication Administration Record documented a PVR of 337 cc, which exceeded the ordered threshold for I/O catheterization. There was no documentation in the progress notes or closed medical record that an I/O catheterization was performed in response to this elevated PVR, that the physician was notified of the continued urine retention, or that the resident was reassessed or further monitored after the 337 cc residual was identified. The 337 cc PVR entry was the last documented PVR in the ordered sequence. During interview and concurrent record review, an RN confirmed that if a resident continued to retain urine after three days, the physician should be notified, reassessment and monitoring should occur, and a care plan problem should be created, and verified that these steps were not documented for this resident. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the resident’s well-being.
Failure to Timely Address Significant Resident Weight Loss
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure timely nutritional intervention for a resident who experienced significant, rapid weight loss. The facility’s Weight Management policy, revised in 12/2024, required monitoring and intervention for residents with sudden changes in nutritional intake, a loss or gain of 5 lbs. since the last recorded weight, or weight changes greater than 5% in one month, among other thresholds. The resident was admitted in mid-January 2026 with a goal weight of 185–190 lbs., and the nutritional assessment dated 1/21/26 documented “no weight change” despite subsequent weight records showing a decline. The Weight and Vitals Summary showed the resident’s weight decreased from 187 lbs. on 1/15/26 to 180 lbs. on 1/24/26 (a 7 lb. loss in nine days), and then to 175 lbs. on 2/1/26, totaling a 12 lb. loss (approximately 6.4%) in less than a month. Despite these documented changes, the facility did not address the resident’s significant weight loss in a timely manner. The resident’s weight remained 175 lbs. on 2/8/26, and an IDT Progress Note dated 2/9/26 recorded no change for one week, a 5 lb. loss over two weeks, and a 12 lb. (6%) loss over three weeks since admission. During interview, the RD stated she received copies of the weekly weights and acknowledged that a 7 lb. weight loss in nine days would be concerning and require follow-up, and that the resident had experienced significant weight loss of 6% from admission. The RD reported that she did not follow up with the resident until 2/9/26 and stated that, ideally, she should have followed up earlier. The Administrator, Administrator Assistant, ADON, and DON were informed of and acknowledged these findings.
Failure to Update Care Plan After Reported Staff Inability to Meet Needs and Harassment
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan addressing a reported change of condition and allegation of staff misconduct for one resident. The facility’s policy on Comprehensive Care Plans requires that each resident have a person-centered, comprehensive care plan developed, reviewed, and revised by the interdisciplinary team, including the resident and representative when applicable. For this resident, an SBAR: Change of Condition dated 1/31/26 documented that the resident’s daughter reported a CNA was unable to meet the resident’s needs and was harassing the resident. Despite this documented change of condition and allegation, review of the resident’s plan of care showed no care plan problem was developed to address the daughter’s report that staff were not meeting the resident’s needs and the allegation of harassment. During interviews and concurrent medical record reviews, LVN 2 and LVN 3 each verified that no care plan problem had been developed following the reported change of condition on 1/31/26. LVN 2 stated that the purpose of developing a care plan related to a change of condition is to ensure goals and interventions are being met or revised as needed, and LVN 3 stated that the importance of a care plan is to create and update resident goals and interventions as needed. The Administrator was later informed of and acknowledged these findings. The facility’s inaction in updating the care plan after the documented report from the resident’s daughter constituted a failure to develop a comprehensive care plan that reflected the resident’s individual care needs and the reported concerns.
Failure to Properly Store Respiratory Equipment and Post Oxygen in Use Signage
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to follow its own policies and procedures for nebulizer and oxygen therapy for two residents. For one resident with a physician’s order for albuterol-ipratropium via nebulizer every six hours, surveyors observed the nebulizer mask lying face down and the nebulizer tubing connected to the machine on the nightstand, not stored in a plastic bag, and not labeled with the resident’s name or date, contrary to the facility’s nebulizer therapy policy. This resident was also using an oxygen concentrator at the bedside with two portable oxygen tanks present, but there was no “oxygen in use” signage posted outside the room as required by the facility’s oxygen therapy policy. The OT and an LVN both confirmed the mask and tubing were not bagged, dated, or labeled, and verified the absence of the required oxygen signage. For another resident with asthma and an order to use oxygen via nasal cannula as needed to maintain oxygen saturation above 92%, surveyors observed oxygen tubing curled around a portable oxygen tank in an oxygen holder on the back of the resident’s wheelchair. The tubing was not stored in a plastic bag and was not labeled, despite the facility’s oxygen therapy policy requiring oxygen delivery equipment to be changed weekly, stored in a plastic bag at the bedside when not in use, and used for a single resident only. This resident was on oxygen therapy via concentrator and nasal cannula at the time of observation, yet there was no “oxygen in use” signage posted outside the room entrance. A CNA and an LVN both verified that the tubing was not bagged or labeled and that the required oxygen signage was not present. The Infection Preventionist later acknowledged that oxygen and nebulizer tubing should be changed, bagged, and dated weekly and as needed, and that oxygen in use signage should be posted for all rooms with residents using oxygen.
Failure to Obtain Physician Order and Consent for Restraint Devices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from unnecessary restraints by not obtaining a physician's order or informed consent for the use of a lap buddy and pressure pad alarm on the resident's wheelchair. Observations and interviews confirmed that the resident was using these devices, but a review of the medical record showed no documentation of a physician's order, informed consent, or a care plan addressing their use. The facility's policies require a physician's order, informed consent, and a resident-centered care plan for any physical restraint, including devices such as lap buddies and alarms that the resident cannot remove easily. The resident in question had severe cognitive impairment, as indicated by a BIMS score of 00 and documentation that the resident lacked capacity to make decisions. Staff interviews revealed that the devices were used to alert staff if the resident attempted to get up unassisted, due to episodes of leaning forward. Despite this, there was no evidence that the required assessments, orders, or consents were completed prior to the application of these devices. Further interviews with nursing staff and facility administration confirmed the absence of a physician's order, informed consent, and a care plan for the use of the lap buddy and pad alarm. The facility's own policies, as reviewed, clearly outline the steps required before applying such devices, including assessment by the interdisciplinary team and ongoing documentation, none of which were present in this case.
Failure to Report Abnormal Neuro Findings and Monitor Post-Fall Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary care and services to maintain the highest practicable well-being for two residents. For one resident with severe cognitive impairment, after returning from the hospital following a fall with a forehead laceration, neurological assessments documented fixed pupil reactions on multiple occasions. Despite these abnormal findings, there was no evidence that the physician was notified as required by facility policy. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed that these findings were abnormal and should have been reported and documented. For another resident with intact cognition, following an unwitnessed fall, the medical record did not contain documentation of post-fall monitoring during the morning and night shifts. Facility policy requires 72-hour monitoring and documentation after a fall, including assessments and physician notification. The ADON verified that there was no documentation to show the resident was monitored as required during these shifts. Facility policies reviewed included requirements for neurological assessments, documentation after significant events, and post-fall management, all of which were not followed in these cases. The failures were confirmed through observation, interviews, and medical record review, and were acknowledged by facility leadership.
Failure to Timely Report Alleged Abuse to Authorities
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse in a timely manner for one of four sampled residents. According to the facility's policy, all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment must be reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation is made if it involves abuse or results in serious bodily injury. In this case, a resident who lacked capacity to make decisions was transferred to an acute care hospital, where she informed the hospital RN that she did not want to return to the facility due to alleged abuse and mistreatment. The hospital RN relayed this information to the facility staff around midnight. However, the LVN who received the information only reported it to the RN supervisor on duty and did not notify the Administrator, CDPH L&C Program, Long-Term Care Ombudsman, or local law enforcement as required by policy. The Administrator, who serves as the facility's Abuse Coordinator, was not informed of the allegation until approximately eight hours after it was made. Only after being notified did the Administrator report the incident to the appropriate authorities. Both the LVN and the Administrator acknowledged that the allegation should have been reported immediately according to facility policy. The delay in reporting had the potential to delay the investigation and prevent prompt corrective actions.
Failure to Document PRN Medication Administration in Medical Record
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of medication administration for one resident. According to the facility's policy, medications must be administered and documented in accordance with physician orders and professional standards. A review of the resident's medical record and Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that two tablets of acetaminophen 325 mg and one tablet of baclofen 5 mg, which were ordered to be given as needed, were not documented as administered on a specific date and time. The progress notes also lacked documentation of these medications being given. Interviews with the resident's family member and the LVN confirmed that the medications were administered between 1200-1300 hours, but the LVN acknowledged failing to document the administration in the MAR. The RN corroborated that the LVN had verified the administration verbally but was unable to document it. The Director of Nursing was informed of these findings and acknowledged the expectation that licensed nurses document medication administration immediately after giving medications.
Failure to Provide Necessary Care and Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary care and services to maintain the highest practicable well-being for a resident, identified as Resident 2. The facility did not ensure that Resident 2 had a physician's order for suctioning as per the discharge order from the acute care hospital. Despite the resident's care plan indicating the need for suctioning to maintain a clear airway, the order was not documented or implemented by the nursing staff upon admission. This oversight was confirmed during an interview with an LVN, who acknowledged that the suctioning order was missing and should have been entered by the nurse receiving the physician's orders. Additionally, the facility did not adhere to the physician's instructions to weigh Resident 2 daily and administer Lasix medication as needed based on weight changes. The resident's medical records lacked documentation of daily weight monitoring, which was a critical component of managing the resident's heart failure and COPD. Interviews with the LVN and ADON confirmed the absence of a physician's order for daily weight monitoring, which was a deviation from the prescribed care plan. The facility also failed to notify the physician and responsible party of Resident 2's repeated refusals of medications and supplements. The resident's MAR indicated multiple instances of medication refusal, yet there was no documentation of physician notification or a COC/SBAR being completed. Furthermore, the facility did not provide the necessary indwelling urinary catheter care and wound care treatments as ordered by the physician. The TAR showed blank entries for several dates, indicating that these treatments were not performed. The ADON confirmed that blank entries meant the care was not provided, and the Administrator and DON were made aware of these findings.
Non-Compliance with Name Badge Policy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to comply with State laws and its own policies and procedures regarding employee identification, as evidenced by two staff members, an LVN and a CNA, not wearing their name badges. During an observation and interview, the CNA was found without her name badge and stated it had fallen off, but she intended to put it back on. Similarly, the LVN was observed without her name badge and acknowledged that the purpose of the badges was for residents and families to identify staff members. The LVN admitted that the badge was on the cart instead of being worn. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed that name badges are expected to be worn at all times as part of the staff uniform.
Failure to Administer Prescribed Eye Drops for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary care and services for a resident by not following up with the hospice for an order of latanoprost eye drops, which are used to treat glaucoma. The resident was admitted for hospice care, and an order for the eye drops was issued by the hospice physician. The medication was received by the facility nurse, but the order was not documented in the resident's medical records or administered until several days later. This oversight resulted in the resident experiencing eye discomfort for weeks before receiving the prescribed treatment. The facility's policies and procedures require that nursing home staff obtain and communicate orders from hospice physicians to the resident's attending physician in a timely manner. However, the order for the eye drops was not communicated or documented, leading to a delay in treatment. Interviews with facility staff, including the MDS nurse, hospice case manager, and DON, confirmed the lapse in following up on the order. The LVN who received the medication admitted to forgetting to verify and carry out the order, resulting in the resident not receiving the necessary eye drops until a later date.
Failure to Prime Insulin Pen Before Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary pharmaceutical services for a resident by not following the manufacturer's instructions for administering insulin using a Tresiba insulin pen. During a medication administration observation, a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) was seen preparing and administering the Tresiba insulin pen without priming it as required. The manufacturer's instructions specify that the pen should be primed by selecting two units, holding the pen with the needle pointing up, and ensuring a drop of insulin is visible at the needle tip before selecting the prescribed dose. This step was omitted by the LVN, who directly selected the prescribed dose and administered it to the resident. The resident involved had a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and was prescribed a daily dose of 12 units of Tresiba insulin. The LVN, along with a Registered Nurse (RN), admitted to being unaware of the priming requirement. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed the findings and acknowledged that the insulin pen should be primed before selecting the dose. This oversight in following the correct procedure for insulin administration posed a risk of the resident not receiving the correct amount of medication.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 6,096 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 22 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Fullerton
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenfield Care Center Of Fullerton, Llc | 0 mi | ★★★★★ | 15 | 0 |
| Terrace View Care Center | 0 mi | ★★★★★ | 28 | 0 |
| St Elizabeth Healthcare Center | 0.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 25 | 0 |
| Park Vista At Morningside | 1.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 21 | 0 |
| St. Catherine Healthcare | 1.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 22 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for The Pavilion At Sunny Hills.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.