Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Simi Healthcare Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with altered mental status, chronic subdural hemorrhage, type 2 DM, paroxysmal AFib, and documented claustrophobia eloped through a bedroom window that had an easy-to-open latch and no stops, restrictors, or alarms. The resident had been seen in bed by an LN during a medication pass and reported present by a CNA shortly thereafter, but was later found missing and subsequently located by paramedics in the parking lot, then sent to the ER for leg pain. Although claustrophobia was noted in progress notes, the care plan contained no interventions addressing this condition or related triggers, and similar unsecured window mechanisms were observed in adjacent rooms despite existing facility policies on wandering, elopement, and resident safety.
A resident with multiple cardiopulmonary and renal conditions had two POLST forms on file, one older form that was properly signed by a physician and a newer form reflecting updated DNR and treatment preferences that lacked a physician signature. Facility records, including the order summary, reflected the directives from the unsigned, newer POLST. During a sudden change in condition, staff found the resident unresponsive and called 911; EMS arrived to find the resident pulseless and apneic and encountered conflicting information and two DNR forms, with the most recent one unsigned, causing confusion about which to follow. The DON later confirmed that responsibility for ensuring POLST completion rested with the admission nurse, DON, and social services, and acknowledged that the updated POLST on readmission had been overlooked for physician signature despite facility policy requiring verification and signatures.
The facility did not have a full-time, qualified Director of Food and Nutrition Services, as the individual in the role had not completed required certification and resigned. Additionally, the part-time contracted RD did not provide regular oversight or follow-up on identified issues in the foodservice department. No other staff met the necessary qualifications, and required policies for consultation and oversight were not followed.
The facility did not procure food from approved sources or ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served according to professional standards, as observed by surveyors.
Surveyors found multiple expired medications in storage areas and medication carts, including normal saline, supplements, and prescription drugs, which had not been removed as required by facility policy. Additionally, E-Kits containing emergency medications were not replaced within 72 hours after being opened, as confirmed by staff and documentation.
The facility did not ensure that a licensed pharmacist completed monthly drug regimen reviews for four residents over a three-month period, despite facility policy requiring these reviews. This included residents with complex medical needs and those prescribed psychotropic medications, with no documentation found in their medical records.
Surveyors found that medications, including suppositories and inhalant drugs, were stored above manufacturer-recommended temperatures and that opened medication packaging was not dated as required. Additionally, temperature monitoring logs for medication storage areas were incomplete or missing, and staff could not provide the required documentation, in violation of facility policy.
Multiple residents had undated respiratory and urinary equipment, and a resident requiring enhanced barrier precautions did not have appropriate signage or PPE available, contrary to facility policy and physician orders.
A resident who preferred to sleep late and requested breakfast delivery between 9-9:30 a.m. consistently received cold, unpalatable food because staff delivered breakfast trays early and left them at the bedside. Despite repeated requests and documentation of the resident's nutritional risk and preferences, the facility did not adjust meal delivery times or update the care plan to reflect the resident's wishes.
A resident with anxiety and traumatic brain injury was prescribed Seroquel for psychosis, but the facility did not document any gradual dose reduction attempts or provide required monthly pharmacy reviews for several months. The resident was observed sleeping during the day, and a family member expressed concerns about the medication regimen. Facility policy required gradual dose reductions and documentation, which were not followed.
A resident receiving Cephalexin for pneumonia was incorrectly documented by nursing staff as not being on antibiotics in multiple progress notes, despite physician orders indicating ongoing antibiotic therapy. The ADON confirmed the documentation was inaccurate, contrary to facility policy requiring objective and accurate records.
A resident with a new order for Seroquel to treat psychosis was not reassessed for PASARR following this change in condition. The most recent PASARR on file was outdated, and the DON confirmed that no updated assessment was completed as required by facility policy.
A resident who pulled out a G-tube and required 72-hour CIC monitoring did not have all required monitoring entries documented in the medical record, with several entries missing across multiple shifts, contrary to facility policy.
A resident experienced a decline in vision and reported difficulty watching TV after requesting, but not receiving, an eye appointment. Although ophthalmology consults were ordered on two occasions, there was no evidence in the medical record that these consults were completed or documented, contrary to facility policy.
A resident with a tracheostomy and ventilator support was found to have only one spare tracheostomy tube at bedside instead of the required two, as per facility policy. The respiratory therapist confirmed that the missing tube had been used and not replaced, resulting in a deficiency in emergency respiratory care preparedness.
Dietary staff failed to properly prepare and test sanitizing solutions, with one worker unable to state the correct immersion time for test strips and another using unmeasured amounts of concentrated sanitizer and water, not following manufacturer guidelines. The resulting solution's concentration could not be accurately determined, and the process was confirmed by the dietary supervisor as not compliant with required procedures, creating a risk of toxic exposure.
Two residents requiring vegetarian diets did not receive meals planned in advance or evaluated for nutritional adequacy. Kitchen staff prepared cheese sandwiches without standardized recipes, and the amount of protein provided did not meet facility guidelines. Both residents reported limited variety and inconsistent meal quality, with one supplementing her diet with outside snacks. The RD confirmed the absence of a planned vegetarian menu and could not verify if nutritional needs were met.
A resident on a vegetarian diet was served a cheese sandwich with significantly less protein than the main entrée, due to the facility's lack of standardized vegetarian recipes and failure to follow its own dietary guidelines. Staff were unaware of available vegetarian alternatives, and the meal provided did not meet the required nutritional standards.
A resident with a history of traumatic brain injury and multiple fractures did not receive ordered PT and OT services due to errors in the insurance authorization process and lack of timely follow-up by facility staff. Despite medical orders and therapy evaluations indicating the need for skilled therapy, the resident was not provided these services as required.
The facility did not ensure that physician orders for Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status were entered into the electronic health records for two residents, despite their POLST forms indicating DNR. The DON confirmed the absence of these orders in the system, resulting in incomplete and inaccurate medical records.
Two residents were found with call lights out of reach—one clipped near an electrical outlet and another on the floor behind the bed—preventing them from calling for assistance. The DON confirmed during observation that call lights should be accessible to residents at all times.
A resident with type 1 DM, Parkinson's disease, and heart failure did not receive ordered morning insulin or blood glucose monitoring due to the absence of a licensed nurse on the unit. Staff failed to document medication administration, blood sugar checks, or physician notification. The resident was later found unresponsive with critically high blood glucose, required emergency transfer, and died after ICU admission.
A five-hour lapse in licensed nurse coverage occurred when two scheduled nurses called in and no replacement was secured, leaving 73 residents without required nursing oversight. Attempts by staff to contact the DON and Administrator were unsuccessful, and a staffing error falsely indicated coverage on the assignment sheet.
Multiple residents with diabetes did not receive prescribed insulin doses or blood glucose monitoring as ordered, with no documentation or physician notification of the omissions. The MARs and progress notes were left blank for the scheduled dose, and staff confirmed that no licensed nurse was present during the medication administration window.
A licensed nurse was not provided with formal training or competency evaluation on the use of the electronic Point Click Care (PCC) system for documentation and care coordination. Facility policy required such training and documentation, but interviews and record review confirmed that no records of PCC training were available for staff.
A resident admitted with anemia, dementia, and two bruises to the left lateral ribs did not have a care plan developed to address the skin bruising, as required by facility policy. This omission was confirmed by both MR and the DON during interviews and record reviews.
Several newly admitted residents with treatment orders did not have comprehensive care plans developed upon admission, resulting in a failure to formally address their identified needs as required by regulation.
A resident with a history of falls and conditions affecting coordination and balance was not re-evaluated for fall risk upon readmission to the facility after an ER visit. Despite policies requiring re-evaluation and monitoring, the facility did not document a fall risk assessment, as confirmed by the DON.
A resident with multiple health conditions fell and sustained injuries, but the facility did not revise the care plan to address the incident. The existing interventions were not reassessed or modified, placing the resident at higher risk for future falls.
A resident experienced multiple lapses in care, including unsecured medications, improper medication administration through a gastrostomy tube, and unlabeled oxygen tubing. Medications were left unattended, and a nurse administered them without verifying orders. The gastrostomy tube placement was not checked before medication administration, and oxygen tubing lacked proper labeling, contrary to facility policies.
The facility did not report an allegation of abuse involving two residents to local law enforcement, as required by federal regulations. Despite the facility's policy mandating timely reporting, the incident was not communicated to the police. The Administrator explained that the decision was based on the facility's conclusion that the allegation was unsubstantiated.
A resident was found unable to reach the call light, as it was placed on the far side of the bed. A CNA admitted to forgetting to move it due to being in a hurry. The DON confirmed the call light should have been within reach, as per facility policy.
The facility failed to maintain kitchen sanitation and hygiene, with used gloves found on a food prep counter, an improperly maintained ice machine, and a kitchen staff member handling food and cleaning without gloves or hand hygiene. These actions increased the risk of food-borne illness for residents.
A resident was found with their bed pushed against a wall and a locked transfer chair on the other side, effectively restraining them. This setup was requested by the resident's family for safety after a previous fall, but there was no physician order, assessment, or care plan in place. The DON confirmed this arrangement was a form of physical restraint, violating the facility's policy on restraint use.
The facility failed to ensure accurate MDS assessments for two residents. One resident's MDS inaccurately indicated they were not on anticoagulant medication, despite an active order for Warfarin. Another resident was incorrectly documented as comatose, although they were alert and communicative. These inaccuracies were confirmed by a licensed nurse.
The facility failed to follow a care plan for a resident with shortness of breath by administering oxygen at an incorrect rate, and did not develop a care plan for another resident's hearing needs. These deficiencies were identified during a review of the residents' records and confirmed by facility staff.
A resident experienced significant weight loss due to the facility's failure to implement the Registered Dietitian's recommendations for increasing gastrostomy tube feedings. Despite recommendations to increase the feeding rate to address weight loss and nutrient needs for wound healing, the necessary changes were not ordered or implemented. The RD assumed the nurses would notify the physician, but this did not occur, leading to the deficiency.
A facility failed to ensure a POLST form for a resident was signed by a physician. During a review, it was found that the form, dated May 9, 2024, lacked a physician's signature. An LN acknowledged the missing signature and noted it was flagged for signing. This oversight could impact the resident's healthcare wishes during emergencies.
The facility failed to maintain the correct temperature in the medication storage refrigerator at Nurse Station One. A licensed nurse confirmed the refrigerator was at 50°F, exceeding the recommended range of 36-46°F as per facility policy. This could potentially affect the efficacy of refrigerated medications.
The facility failed to employ a qualified dietary supervisor in the absence of a full-time registered dietitian, potentially risking incorrect diets and food-borne illnesses for residents. The dietary supervisor was not certified, and the facility's administrator could not provide documentation of required training. The job description required a graduate of an accredited dietetic course and state registration, which was not met.
The facility failed to maintain infection control measures for storing oxygen therapy equipment for two residents. A nasal cannula was found on the floor, and another was on a bedside table, along with a nebulizer mask. Both had plastic bags for storage, but were not stored in them, contrary to facility policy.
The facility failed to document offering or explaining the risks and benefits of a COVID-19 vaccination to a resident, identified as Resident 443, who was later diagnosed with COVID-19. The Infection Preventionist confirmed there was no documentation of the resident being offered the vaccine, refusing it, or having received it prior to admission. This lack of documentation is contrary to the facility's policy, which requires offering vaccines and documenting education and vaccination status.
A resident's call light was found on the floor and out of reach, potentially delaying care. A CNA confirmed the call light should have been within reach, as per facility policy.
The facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for three residents, as observed during a tour with the maintenance supervisor. Peeling paint and missing plaster were found in two residents' rooms, and a cracked ceiling was noted in another. These issues were not reported by staff or logged in the maintenance log, despite the facility's policy to maintain a safe and comfortable environment.
A facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for a resident assessed as high risk for falls within 48 hours of admission. The resident, with conditions such as polyneuropathy and hypertension, had a high fall risk score, but the facility did not implement its fall prevention program, including the use of a yellow star sticker. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the oversight.
A resident with moderate cognitive impairment was forced to shower against their will and without privacy, as a CNA disregarded their request to delay the shower and exposed them naked in front of their roommate. This violated the resident's rights to self-determination and privacy.
A facility failed to monitor a resident's behavior after an allegation of mistreatment by a CNA during shower time. The resident expressed dissatisfaction, and the family and DON were informed. However, no monitoring for psychosocial changes was conducted, and the DON confirmed that a COC monitoring should have been implemented.
A facility failed to document a Shower Day Skin Inspection for a resident after a shower, as required by their policy. The Director of Nursing confirmed the shower occurred, but the necessary documentation was missing from the resident's file, which should have included details such as the date, time, assisting staff, and any skin assessment data.
A facility failed to maintain accurate medical records when a controlled medication for seizures was documented as administered despite being unavailable. The MAR inaccurately reflected the administration, and interviews with LNs confirmed the medication was not given.
Elopement Through Unrestricted Window and Lack of Claustrophobia-Related Care Planning
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident was free from accident hazards and received adequate supervision when a resident with a known diagnosis of claustrophobia eloped from the building through a bedroom window without staff notification. The resident had been admitted with multiple diagnoses, including altered mental status, nontraumatic chronic subdural hemorrhage, type 2 diabetes mellitus, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and claustrophobia. Progress notes documented the claustrophobia diagnosis as of 12/11/25, but the resident’s care plan did not contain any documentation or interventions addressing this condition or triggers related to an intense, irrational fear of confined or enclosed spaces. On the night of the incident, the resident was last observed in bed around 4:30 a.m. during a medication pass by a licensed nurse, and a CNA reported the resident present in the room shortly thereafter, but at an unknown later time the resident was discovered missing from the unit. The resident was later found by paramedics outside in the facility parking lot and was transported to the emergency room for evaluation of leg pain, with no visible injuries or bleeding noted. During a tour and inspection of the resident’s room and adjacent rooms, surveyors observed that the bedroom windows had simple, easy-to-use latch mechanisms that allowed the windows to slide fully open with minimal force, and there were no safety stops, restrictors, or alarm systems in place to prevent or alert staff to window openings as a potential exit route. The licensed nurse interviewed stated she was not aware of how or when the resident was able to open or manipulate the window latch. These conditions existed despite facility policies on wandering and elopement and on safety and supervision of residents, which stated that the facility would identify residents at risk of unsafe wandering and identify safety risks and environmental hazards on an ongoing basis.
Failure to Maintain Valid POLST Resulting in Conflicting Code Status Information
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to maintain complete and accurate medical records by not obtaining a physician’s signature on a resident’s updated Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form. The resident, an older female with multiple serious diagnoses including fracture of the left humerus, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, interstitial pulmonary disease, pneumonia, and chronic kidney disease with hypertensive heart disease and heart failure, had two POLST forms on file. One POLST dated 10/05/2023 indicated DNR, selective treatment, and a trial period of artificial nutrition and was signed by a physician on 10/06/2023. A subsequent POLST dated 10/25/2024 indicated DNR, selective treatment, and no artificial means of nutrition, but this form lacked a physician’s signature. The facility’s Order Summary Report still reflected an active order for DNR, selective treatment, and no artificial means of nutrition, consistent with the unsigned 2024 POLST. On the day of the incident, progress notes documented that the resident was eating breakfast with assistance and tolerating a few bites and sips of juice before being found unresponsive around 8:15–8:20 a.m., prompting a 911 call. When EMS arrived, they found the resident pulseless and apneic, and staff provided conflicting information about the resident’s status. EMS noted there were two DNR forms, both marked DNR, but the most recent form was not signed, creating uncertainty about which POLST to follow. Basic Life Support was initiated due to this uncertainty, and the facility contacted the resident’s daughter, who requested full resuscitation measures. During interview, the DON acknowledged that there were two POLST forms, that EMS expressed confusion regarding which to follow, and that the updated POLST on readmission had been overlooked for physician signature, despite facility policy requiring POLST documents to be reviewed for validity and signed by the physician and the resident or legal decision-maker.
Failure to Employ Qualified Food and Nutrition Services Director and Provide Sufficient Dietitian Oversight
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to employ a full-time Director of Food and Nutrition Services (DFN) who met both federal and state educational qualification requirements. The individual who had been serving as the Dietary Manager (DM) for the past year had not taken the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) exam and was therefore unqualified for the position. This was confirmed by multiple staff interviews, including the per diem Dietary Services Supervisor (PD-DSS) and the Administrator, who both acknowledged that the DM did not meet the necessary qualifications. The DM resigned on the day of the survey, leaving the facility without a qualified DFN. Additionally, the facility relied on a part-time contracted Registered Dietitian (RD) who did not provide sufficient, regularly scheduled consultation to the DFN. The RD last completed oversight of the foodservice operations in February, several months prior to the survey, and did not follow up to ensure that identified deficits were addressed. Documentation showed that issues such as missing menu printouts, expired food handler certifications, and lack of a substitution log were not resolved. The RD confirmed that she had not provided adequate oversight or consultation to the DM during this period. Interviews with dietary aides and review of facility policies further revealed that no other staff members met the qualifications to serve as DFN or had completed the necessary training programs. The facility's own policies and job descriptions require a qualified DFN and regular consultation from an RD if the DFN is not a dietitian. The lack of qualified leadership and insufficient RD oversight had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals from the kitchen.
Failure to Follow Professional Standards for Food Procurement and Handling
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to procure food from approved or satisfactory sources and did not store, prepare, distribute, or serve food in accordance with professional standards. This deficiency was identified through surveyor observation and review of facility practices related to food procurement and handling. No additional details regarding specific residents, staff, or incidents were provided in the report.
Expired Medications and Delayed E-Kit Replacement Identified
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all medications stored in its drug storage areas were available for use and had not expired, as well as to replace pharmaceutical emergency kits (E-Kits) within the required timeframe after opening. During observations and interviews, multiple expired medications were found in storage cabinets, countertop baskets, and medication carts, including normal saline unit doses, phosphorus supplements, valproic acid, lactulose, sucralfate, mineral oil, bisacodyl, ondansetron, and hyoscyamine. The Infection Preventionist confirmed that these medications should have been disposed of according to the facility's policy and procedure, which requires immediate removal of outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications. Additionally, the facility did not replace E-Kits within 72 hours of being opened, as required by its policy. Observations revealed that at least two E-Kits had been opened and not replaced within the specified timeframe, with billing slips and staff interviews confirming the delay. The Infection Preventionist acknowledged that the replacement of the E-Kits was not completed within the policy's required 72-hour window.
Failure to Complete Required Monthly Drug Regimen Reviews
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a licensed pharmacist performed the required monthly drug regimen reviews (MRR) for four of nineteen sampled residents during the months of May, June, and July 2025. Specifically, there was no documentation of MRRs for these months in the medical records of residents with complex medical conditions, including colostomy status, gastrostomy status, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. During interviews and record reviews with the Director of Nursing (DON), it was confirmed that the required MRR documentation was missing for these residents. Additionally, a review of one resident's order summary revealed the use of Seroquel for psychosis and behavioral symptoms, yet there was no evidence of a pharmacist's monthly review for the same period. The facility's policy, dated January 2025, clearly states that the consultant pharmacist must review each resident's medication regimen at least monthly, but this was not followed for the identified residents.
Medication Storage and Temperature Monitoring Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified that medications and biologicals were not stored according to manufacturer specifications and facility policies. Specifically, Bisacodyl and Acetaminophen suppositories were observed stored at 80°F, exceeding the manufacturers' recommended maximum of 77°F. Additionally, inhalant medications such as Levalbuterol, Budesonide, and Ipratropium Bromide/Albuterol were found in opened foil packaging without being dated, contrary to both manufacturer instructions and facility policy, which require these medications to be used or discarded within specific timeframes after opening. Further review revealed that the facility failed to consistently monitor and document medication room temperatures. Temperature logs were incomplete, with only a few days recorded for April and May, and no logs available for June, July, or the beginning of August. The Infection Preventionist and DON confirmed the missing documentation and were unable to provide the required records, despite facility policy mandating daily temperature monitoring within a specified range.
Failure to Maintain Infection Control Practices and Precaution Signage
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to observe proper infection control practices for multiple residents, as evidenced by undated nebulizer tubing, plastic storage bags, urinary catheter bags, and suction canisters for both sampled and unsampled residents. During observations, several residents were found with respiratory and urinary equipment that lacked required labeling to indicate the date of change, contrary to the facility’s own policy and procedure, which mandates labeling disposable circuits and supplies with the date of change. Interviews with staff, including a respiratory therapist, confirmed that all such equipment should be labeled with the date it was changed. Additionally, a resident with a gastrostomy tube, urinary catheter, and colostomy had a physician order for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), but there was no EBP signage posted outside the room and no personal protective equipment (PPE) available inside or outside the room. The infection preventionist was unaware of the need for EBP for this resident until it was brought to his attention, despite the facility’s policies requiring PPE to be maintained and signage to be posted for residents on transmission-based precautions. These lapses were confirmed through interviews and review of facility policies.
Failure to Honor Resident Mealtime Preference Results in Cold, Unpalatable Food
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to honor a resident's request for a later breakfast time, resulting in the resident consistently receiving cold and unpalatable food. The resident, who preferred to sleep late and wake around 9-9:30 a.m., repeatedly communicated her preference for breakfast to be delivered at that time. Despite this, staff continued to deliver breakfast trays early in the morning, leaving them at the bedside while the resident was still asleep. Observations confirmed that the food remained untouched and cold by the time the resident awoke. The resident's private caregiver and a CNA both confirmed that the issue had been raised with the facility multiple times, but no changes were made to accommodate the resident's preference. The resident's care plan documented a risk for altered nutrition and a goal to respect her right to choose and honor food preferences, yet there was no documentation of her preferred breakfast time in the care plan or nutritional notes. The Registered Dietician stated that resident mealtime requests should be honored within a reasonable window for food safety, and the facility's policy also indicated that resident mealtime preferences should be honored and food should be served at appropriate temperatures. Despite these policies and the resident's mental capacity to make decisions, the facility did not adjust its practices or documentation to meet the resident's request.
Failure to Conduct Gradual Dose Reduction for Psychotropic Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for psychotropic medication for one resident. Observation showed the resident sleeping in bed during the day, and interview with a family member revealed concerns about the resident's medication regimen, specifically noting that the resident was sleeping during the day and awake at night. The family member was aware the resident was taking a sleeping pill but was unsure of the administration time. Record review indicated the resident had diagnoses including anxiety and traumatic brain injury and had an active order for Seroquel (Quetiapine Fumarate) 12.5 mg twice daily for psychosis manifested by agitation and aggression. Further review found that the facility was unable to provide monthly pharmacy medication reviews for three consecutive months, and there was no documentation of any gradual dose reduction attempts during that period. The facility's policies required GDRs for residents on psychotropic medications unless clinically contraindicated, and required documentation and action on pharmacy drug regimen review recommendations. The lack of GDR and missing documentation led to the resident potentially receiving unnecessary medication.
Inaccurate Documentation of Antibiotic Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate documentation in the medical record for one resident who was prescribed Cephalexin, an oral antibiotic, for community-acquired pneumonia. A review of the resident's physician's orders confirmed the ongoing antibiotic therapy, while progress notes over a period of several weeks contained ten entries by nursing staff incorrectly indicating that the resident was not currently on antibiotics. During an interview, the Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed that the resident was indeed on antibiotics and acknowledged the inaccuracy in the charting. The facility's policy requires that documentation in the medical record be objective and accurate.
Failure to Complete PASARR Assessment After Change in Mental Health Condition
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was properly assessed for a PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) following a change of condition related to mental illness. Specifically, the resident had a new order for Seroquel, an antipsychotic medication, administered via G-tube every eight hours for psychosis. Despite this significant change in the resident's mental health status and treatment, the facility did not complete a new PASARR assessment to reflect the updated condition and medication order. Record review showed that the most recent PASARR on file for the resident was dated nearly a year prior to the new Seroquel order. During an interview, the DON confirmed that no updated PASARR had been completed after the change in the resident's mental health status. The facility's policy indicated that the MDS Coordinator is responsible for ensuring PASARR updates per guidelines, but this process was not followed in this instance.
Failure to Document 72-Hour Monitoring After Change in Condition
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement and document a complete care plan for a resident who experienced a change in condition after pulling out a gastrostomy tube (G-tube). The resident's G-tube was reinserted at bedside and the resident was placed on 72-hour change in condition (CIC) monitoring. However, review of the resident's progress notes revealed missing documentation of monitoring: one entry was missing on one day and three entries were missing on another day during the 72-hour period. The Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed that monitoring should have been documented on all three nursing shifts as per facility policy. The facility's policy requires nurses to record information related to changes in a resident's condition in the medical record.
Failure to Arrange and Document Ophthalmology Consult for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident received proper treatment to maintain their vision. The resident was observed squinting and having difficulty watching TV, and reported having requested an eye appointment that was not arranged by the facility. Review of the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) showed a decline in vision from adequate to moderately impaired over time. Medical records indicated that ophthalmology consults were ordered on two separate occasions, but there was no evidence that these consults were ever completed. The social services director confirmed there was no documentation explaining why the consult ordered in January was not done. Facility policy required social services to coordinate and document referrals, but this was not followed in this case.
Failure to Maintain Required Emergency Tracheostomy Tubes at Bedside
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the availability of a reserve emergency tracheostomy tube at the bedside for a resident with a tracheostomy connected to a ventilator. During an observation, it was noted that only one spare tracheostomy tube was present in the resident's room, instead of the required two (one of the same size and one smaller). The respiratory therapist confirmed that two emergency tracheostomy tubes should be kept at the bedside for emergencies, and explained that the missing tube of the same size had been used previously and not replaced. A review of the facility's policy indicated that a tracheostomy tube of appropriate size must be maintained at the bedside for all intubated residents in case of accidental extubation, decannulation, or other emergencies, and that the reserve tube should be replaced immediately after use. The failure to replace the used emergency tracheostomy tube resulted in non-compliance with the facility's policy and created a deficiency in providing safe and appropriate respiratory care for the resident.
Improper Preparation and Testing of Sanitizing Solution by Dietary Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that dietary support staff were competent and followed proper procedures for preparing and testing sanitizing solutions in the kitchen. During observations and interviews, a dietary worker demonstrated testing a sanitizing solution but was unable to state the correct immersion time for the test strip, instead guessing various timeframes. Another dietary assistant prepared a sanitizing solution by pouring an unmeasured amount of concentrated sanitizer into a bucket of water without measuring the water temperature or the quantity of sanitizer, and then immediately tested the solution without following the manufacturer's required immersion time for the test strip. The color of the test strip indicated a concentration that could not be accurately determined, as it exceeded the maximum reading on the test strip's color chart. The dietary assistant's method of preparing the sanitizing solution did not follow the manufacturer's guidelines, which specify a precise dilution ratio and temperature range. The product instructions required adding 1-2 fluid ounces of sanitizer per gallon of water to achieve a concentration of 200-400 ppm, and the test strip instructions required a 10-second immersion in solution at a specific temperature range. The dietary staff's failure to follow these instructions was confirmed by the person in charge of dietary services, who acknowledged that the solution was likely too concentrated, creating the potential for toxic exposure. The FDA Food Code was also reviewed, which emphasizes the importance of using chemical sanitizers according to EPA-registered label requirements to prevent harmful residues.
Failure to Provide Planned, Nutritionally Adequate Vegetarian Menu
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement a vegetarian menu that was planned in advance and evaluated for nutritional adequacy for two residents who required vegetarian diets. Observations revealed that kitchen staff prepared cheese sandwiches for these residents without following a standardized recipe, and there was no evidence of a planned vegetarian menu or evaluation of its nutritional content. The dietary aide confirmed there was no recipe for cheese sandwiches, and the dietary supervisor indicated that only two slices of cheese, providing 5-6 grams of protein, were used per sandwich, which did not meet the facility's own diet manual guidance for protein content in vegetarian meals. Both residents involved had documented orders for vegetarian diets and the mental capacity to make dietary decisions. One resident reported being a lifelong lacto-ovo vegetarian and stated that her meals often consisted of grilled cheese sandwiches, with the quality and variety of meals varying depending on the kitchen staff. She was unaware of alternative vegetarian options available to her. The other resident, also a long-term vegetarian, reported receiving meals that were high in carbohydrates and lacking in variety and balance, sometimes leading her to supplement her diet with snacks purchased from outside the facility. She also expressed uncertainty about whether certain meals were vegetarian and felt limited in her choices. The registered dietitian confirmed that the facility did not have a vegetarian menu planned a week in advance and could not verify if the meals provided met recommended dietary allowances. Review of facility policies indicated that menus should be planned in advance, provide variety, and meet nutritional needs according to national guidelines, but these requirements were not met for the vegetarian residents. The lack of standardized vegetarian recipes, menu planning, and evaluation for nutritional adequacy led to inconsistent meal quality and potential nutritional deficits for the affected residents.
Failure to Provide Nutritive Vegetarian Meal Alternative
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a vegetarian alternate meal of similar nutritive value for a resident who required a vegetarian diet. During meal service, the resident received a cheese sandwich containing two slices of processed cheese, which provided only 5 grams of protein, compared to the main entrée of Hawaiian chicken that provided approximately 21 grams of protein. The dietary aide preparing the sandwich stated there was no recipe to follow, and the facility did not have standardized vegetarian recipes or planned vegetarian alternatives to ensure nutritional adequacy. The resident’s meal tray card indicated a vegetarian diet with no meats and a preference for veggie patties and cheese, but the meal provided did not meet the facility’s own diet manual guidance, which required 2 to 3 ounces of protein equivalent at lunch. Further review with the registered dietitian and dietary services supervisor confirmed that the cheese sandwich did not meet the protein requirements outlined in the facility’s diet manual. The facility also lacked vegetarian menus and standardized recipes that were analyzed for nutritional adequacy, and staff were unaware of vegetarian alternatives noted in the recipe for the main entrée. The facility’s policies required the use of approved, standardized recipes and the provision of suitable nourishing alternate meals, but these procedures were not followed in this instance.
Failure to Provide Required Physical and Occupational Therapy Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide required physical and occupational therapy services to a resident who had a history of traumatic brain injury, multiple fractures, and acute respiratory failure following a motor vehicle accident. The resident, who was previously ventilator-dependent and required a gastrointestinal tube for nutrition, had shown improvement and was no longer dependent on these supports. Despite medical orders and therapy evaluations indicating the need for skilled PT and OT to maximize mobility and reduce caregiver burden, the resident did not receive these services as prescribed. Interviews and record reviews revealed that a referral for PT was made, but the insurance company did not receive the request due to errors in the authorization process, including the use of an incorrect CPT code and lack of timely follow-up by the business office. The resident was instead placed on a restorative nursing program, but did not receive the skilled therapy ordered. Staff confirmed that without PT authorization, therapy could not be provided, and the business office acknowledged that the lack of follow-up contributed to the ongoing absence of therapy services.
Failure to Maintain Accurate Code Status Orders in Medical Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that resident medical records were accurate and complete by not having physician orders for code status in place for two residents. For both residents, although their Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) forms indicated 'Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNR),' there were no corresponding physician orders entered into the electronic health record system as required by facility policy. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed during interviews and record reviews that the DNR orders were missing from the residents' medical records and acknowledged that these orders should have been entered into the Point Click Care system. One resident was admitted with diagnoses including vascular dementia, a left femoral neck fracture, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. The other resident had an original admission date several years prior. In both cases, the POLST forms clearly documented the residents' wishes regarding resuscitation, but the absence of a physician order in the medical record represented a failure to maintain accurate and complete documentation in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Call Lights Not Accessible to Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that call lights were within reach for two of nineteen sampled residents, as required by facility policy. During observations, one resident was found lying in bed with the call light clipped and secured near an electrical outlet, making it inaccessible. In another instance, a resident was observed sleeping in bed with the call light on the floor behind the bed and out of reach. These deficiencies were confirmed during concurrent interviews and observations with the Director of Nursing, who acknowledged that the call lights were not accessible to the residents as required.
Failure to Administer Ordered Insulin and Monitor Blood Glucose Leads to Resident Death
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide ordered morning medications, including sliding scale insulin, and did not monitor blood glucose levels as ordered for a resident with type 1 diabetes, Parkinson's disease, and hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. The resident was admitted with a care plan that required administration of medications and blood sugar monitoring as ordered. On the night in question, there was no licensed nurse present on the skilled unit from 2 a.m. to 7 a.m. due to staff call-offs, and the scheduled 5 a.m. to 6:30 a.m. medications were not administered. Staffing records confirmed the absence of licensed nurses during this period, and interviews with staff indicated that multiple attempts to notify facility leadership about the staffing shortage went unanswered. Review of the resident's medication administration record showed no documentation of insulin administration or blood glucose monitoring for the scheduled morning dose. Nursing progress notes indicated the resident was sleeping and unable to receive medication, but there was no documentation of further attempts to administer medication, no blood sugar checks, and no physician notification. When the day shift nurse arrived, she was informed by a CNA that no licensed nurse had been present overnight, and she did not check the resident's blood sugar until the resident became unresponsive later that morning. The glucometer then displayed a reading of "HI," indicating critically high blood glucose. The resident was found unresponsive and was transferred to the emergency room, where hospital records indicated severe hyperglycemia, altered mental status, and a glucose reading greater than 650. The resident was admitted to the ICU, placed on comfort care, and subsequently passed away. The facility's policies required medications to be administered safely and as prescribed, and for care plans to describe services necessary to maintain the resident's well-being, but these were not followed in this instance.
Failure to Provide 24-Hour Licensed Nurse Coverage
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide 24-hour licensed nursing staff coverage in the skilled nursing unit, resulting in a five-hour period without a licensed nurse present for a census of 73 residents. According to the facility's own policy, licensed nurses and certified nursing assistants are required to be available at all times to ensure resident safety and to provide necessary care. On the night in question, two licensed nurses scheduled for the overnight shift called in and did not report to work. The two nurses from the previous shift extended their hours but left at 2:00 a.m., leaving the unit without licensed nurse coverage from 2:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. Interviews with staff confirmed that attempts were made to contact the DON, Director of Staff Development, and the Administrator to find replacements, but no licensed nurse arrived to cover the shift. The staffing scheduler acknowledged that a third name was incorrectly added to the staffing sheet without verification or an employee signature, confirming that this individual did not work the shift. As a result, the skilled nursing unit was left without the required licensed nurse coverage for five hours.
Failure to Administer and Document Insulin and Blood Glucose Monitoring
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to administer prescribed insulin doses and monitor blood glucose levels as ordered for five out of seven sampled residents with diabetes mellitus type 2. For each of these residents, physician orders specified insulin administration according to a sliding scale and required regular blood glucose monitoring. On a specific date, the Medication Administration Records (MARs) for all five residents showed no documentation of insulin administration or blood glucose checks for the scheduled early morning dose. Additionally, there was no documentation in the nursing progress notes explaining the missed doses, nor any evidence that the attending physicians were notified of these omissions. The affected residents had complex medical histories, including conditions such as hemiplegia, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, osteomyelitis, and recent fractures, in addition to diabetes. Their care plans consistently included interventions to administer diabetes medications as ordered, monitor for side effects and effectiveness, and report abnormal findings to the physician. Despite these care plan directives, the required insulin and blood glucose monitoring were not performed or documented for the specified dose. Interviews with facility staff confirmed that there was no licensed nurse present in the skilled unit during the relevant time frame, resulting in the omission of scheduled medications for multiple residents. The Interim Director of Nursing acknowledged the blank MARs and confirmed that staff should have documented the reason for any missed doses in the progress notes. Facility policies reviewed by surveyors required medications to be administered as prescribed, all services to be documented, and any medication omissions to be recorded as errors.
Failure to Train Licensed Nurse on Electronic Documentation System
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a licensed nurse was trained and competent in using the electronic Point Click Care (PCC) system for documentation and care coordination. According to the facility's policy and procedure, competency evaluations, including training on documentation tools and equipment, were to be conducted upon hire, annually, and as needed. However, during interviews, a licensed nurse supervisor reported not receiving any formal training on the PCC system, and the interim director of nursing confirmed that there were no available records indicating that staff had received such training. This lack of documented training and competency evaluation led to the deficiency.
Failure to Develop Care Plan for Skin Discoloration on Admission
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for a resident who was admitted with skin discoloration, specifically two bruises to the left lateral ribs. According to the facility's policy and procedure, an individualized comprehensive care plan with measurable objectives and timetables should be created for each resident to address identified problem areas. Upon review of the resident's admission record and condition on admission, it was confirmed that no care plan was developed to address the resident's skin bruising. This was acknowledged by both the Medical Records staff and the Director of Nursing during interviews and record reviews.
Failure to Develop and Implement Comprehensive Care Plans for New Admissions
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified regarding the facility's failure to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for residents as required by federal regulations. Specifically, the report notes that a resident was admitted to the facility and did not have a care plan developed to address their treatments upon admission. This omission was discovered during a review of new admissions, where it was found that several newly admitted residents with treatment orders did not have corresponding care plans in place. The lack of care plans for these residents meant that their medical, nursing, and psychosocial needs, as identified in their comprehensive assessments, were not formally addressed through measurable objectives and timeframes. The report does not provide additional details about the specific medical history or conditions of the affected residents at the time of the deficiency, but it does confirm that the required documentation and planning for their care was not completed as mandated.
Plan Of Correction
PLAN OF CORRECTION (2567) FOR CA00954971 (F tag: 656) SS= D (DEVELOPMENT/IMPLEMENT COMPREHENSIVE CARE PLAN)
Failure to Re-evaluate Fall Risk on Readmission
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct a fall risk re-evaluation for a resident upon readmission, despite the resident's prior history of falls. The resident, an elderly male with acute toxic encephalopathy, lack of coordination, and cervical disc degeneration, experienced a fall on 12/18/24, which resulted in right hip pain, bruising, and swelling. This incident led to the resident being transferred to the emergency room on 12/21/24. Upon the resident's return to the facility, there was no documentation of a fall risk re-evaluation, which was confirmed by the Director of Nursing during a record review and interview. The facility's policy and procedures on falls, revised in 9/2021 and 12/2007, require staff to re-evaluate the situation and consider other possible reasons for falls if a resident continues to fall. Additionally, the policies mandate monitoring and documenting each resident's response to interventions aimed at reducing falls. However, these protocols were not followed in the case of the resident, as evidenced by the lack of a fall risk re-evaluation upon readmission, despite the resident's unsteady gait and poor balance noted in the weekly nursing notes.
Failure to Revise Care Plan After Resident Fall
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to revise the care plan for a resident after the resident experienced a fall and sustained injuries. The resident, who has multiple diagnoses including cerebral palsy, epilepsy, and quadriplegia, was found face down on the floor next to the bed with injuries including an abrasion on the right temple, bruising on the forehead, and redness on the left knee. Despite the incident, the care plan, which was initiated prior to the fall, was not updated to address the specific circumstances of the fall or to implement new interventions to prevent future falls. The facility's policy and procedure for managing falls and fall risk require that staff identify and implement interventions based on the resident's specific risks and causes to prevent falls and minimize complications. However, the Director of Nursing acknowledged that there was no care plan revision following the resident's fall. The facility's failure to update the care plan placed the resident at a higher risk for future falls and injuries, as the existing interventions were not reassessed or modified in response to the incident.
Medication and Procedure Lapses in Resident Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its policies and procedures regarding medication management and administration for Resident 1. Medications were left unsecured and unsupervised when a licensed nurse (LN 2) left medication cups on a bedside table in Resident 1's room and exited the room. This action was against the facility's standard practice, which requires medications to be returned to the cart and stored if the resident is not ready. Additionally, medications were administered by another licensed nurse (LN 3) who did not verify the doctor's orders or the Medication Administration Record (MAR) before administering them, which is not in line with the facility's policy that requires the administering nurse to verify the right resident, medication, dose, time, and method before administration. The facility also failed to follow the doctor's order during the administration of medication through a gastrostomy tube. LN 2 administered medication by pushing it through the tube without verifying the placement of the tube, which is against the facility's policy that requires medications to be administered by gravity unless there is a specific doctor's order for a slow push. LN 2 admitted to not having checked the tube placement before administering the medication, which poses an aspiration risk. The facility's policy mandates checking tube placement before medication administration, which was not adhered to in this instance. Furthermore, the facility did not label the oxygen tubing used by Resident 1, which is required by the facility's policy to ensure the tubing is changed every week to prevent infection. The lack of labeling meant that staff could not determine how long the tubing had been in use, which could lead to the accumulation of debris and dried mucus. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the policy is to change and label the tubing weekly, but this was not done, indicating a failure in following the facility's infection prevention procedures.
Failure to Report Alleged Abuse to Law Enforcement
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse involving two residents to the local law enforcement as required by federal regulations. The facility's policy and procedure, titled 'Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program,' mandates the investigation and reporting of any allegations within the required timeframes. However, the facility's investigation report, dated December 23, 2024, indicated that the incident was not reported to the local police department. Additionally, the Report of Suspected Dependent Adult/Elder Abuse (SOC 341) confirmed that a telephone report was not made to law enforcement. During an interview, the Administrator stated that the incident was not reported because the facility concluded the allegation was not substantiated.
Call Light Accessibility Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the call light was within reach for a resident, which could have resulted in the resident not receiving needed care. During an observation and interview, the resident was found sitting in a wheelchair next to the bed, with the call light located on the far side of the bed, out of reach. The resident indicated that the call light could not be reached. A certified nursing assistant admitted to being in a hurry and forgetting to move the call light. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the call light should have been placed within the resident's reach. The facility's policy and procedure require staff to ensure the call light is accessible to the resident before leaving the room.
Kitchen Sanitation and Hygiene Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain proper kitchen and food storage sanitation, as evidenced by several observations and interviews. A pair of used gloves was found on the food preparation counter, indicating a lapse in cleanliness and hygiene standards. Additionally, one of the two ice machines was not maintained according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Calcium deposits were observed on the ice machine tray, and there was no cleaning log available, which was confirmed by the maintenance supervisor. The facility's policy required regular cleaning and sanitizing of the ice machine every three months, but this was not adhered to. Furthermore, a kitchen staff member was observed handling food and cleaning surfaces without wearing gloves or performing hand hygiene between tasks. This included cooking mixed vegetables and meatballs, transferring food trays, and wiping down the stove top and counters. The dietary supervisor acknowledged that the staff member should have used clean gloves and performed hand hygiene between these activities. These failures increased the risk of food-borne illness for residents due to potential contamination.
Failure to Ensure Resident is Free from Physical Restraints
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from physical restraints, as observed during a survey. Resident 443 was found lying in bed with one side of the bed pushed against a wall and the other side blocked by a locked transfer chair. The resident expressed that their family wanted the chair positioned there for safety reasons, due to a previous fall in the facility. However, there was no physician order for this setup, and the resident had not been assessed for their ability to move the chair. Additionally, no care plan had been developed to address this situation. Licensed Nurse 4 acknowledged that the placement of the chair was a family request and admitted it was not appropriate. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the arrangement restricted the resident's movement, constituting a physical restraint. The facility's policy on restraints requires that any restraint use must be medically justified, with informed consent obtained, and alternative measures considered. The policy also mandates regular reviews of residents on restraints to explore less restrictive options or eliminate restraints altogether. In this case, these procedures were not followed, leading to the deficiency.
Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two residents, leading to potential inadequacies in care. For Resident 8, the MDS assessments dated 7/14/24 and 7/17/24 inaccurately indicated that the resident was not taking anticoagulant medication, despite an active order for Warfarin Sodium, a medication prescribed to prevent blood clots. This discrepancy was confirmed during a review with a licensed nurse, who acknowledged the oversight. For Resident 13, the MDS assessment dated 6/20/24 incorrectly documented the resident as comatose. However, during an observation and interview, the resident was found to be alert and capable of communication. This error was confirmed by the same licensed nurse during a subsequent review. The facility's policy requires all individuals completing any portion of the MDS to attest to the accuracy of the information, which was not adhered to in these cases.
Failure to Implement and Develop Comprehensive Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure comprehensive person-centered care plans were developed and implemented for two residents. For Resident 79, the care plan intervention for managing the risk of shortness of breath was not followed. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including heart failure and sleep apnea, and the physician's orders specified oxygen inhalation at 2 liters per minute (lpm) via nasal cannula to maintain oxygen saturation above 90 percent. However, during an observation, it was found that the oxygen was set at 5 lpm instead of the prescribed 2 lpm, which was acknowledged by a licensed nurse as a deviation from the care plan. For Resident 13, the facility did not develop a care plan to address the resident's hearing needs. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including cerebral infarct, encephalopathy, heart disease, and unspecified hearing loss. During a review, it was confirmed by the MDS licensed nurse and the director of nursing that there was no care plan for hearing loss in the resident's electronic medical record or paper chart. This lack of a care plan for hearing needs was a failure to meet the resident's identified needs as per the facility's policy on comprehensive person-centered care plans.
Failure to Implement Dietitian's Recommendations for Tube Feeding
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate nutrition for a resident, identified as Resident 43, who was receiving gastrostomy tube feedings. The Registered Dietitian (RD) recommended an increase in the resident's gastrostomy tube feeding to address significant weight loss and increased nutrient needs related to wound healing. Despite these recommendations, the necessary changes to the feeding regimen were not ordered or implemented. The resident experienced a weight loss of 11 pounds over six months, which was a 7.6% decrease in weight, and the feeding remained at 50ml/hr instead of the recommended 55ml/hr. The RD's recommendations were not communicated effectively to the physician for order implementation. The RD explained that after writing recommendations, they are given to the nurses, who are responsible for notifying the physician to obtain the order. However, this process was not followed in June, and the RD did not follow up, assuming the nurses would handle it. The facility's policy required dietary recommendations to be completed within three days of receiving the RD's report, but this was not adhered to, contributing to the deficiency.
Unsigned POLST Form for a Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form for one of the sampled residents, Resident 68, was signed by a physician. During an interview and record review, it was observed that the POLST, dated May 9, 2024, lacked a physician's signature. A licensed nurse, LN 2, acknowledged the missing signature and noted that the form was flagged with a sticker to indicate the need for a signature. This oversight had the potential to affect Resident 68's healthcare wishes during a medical emergency, as the POLST is a critical document for communicating a resident's treatment preferences.
Medication Storage Temperature Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an optimal temperature in the medication storage refrigerator located in Nurse Station One. During an observation and interview, a licensed nurse confirmed that the refrigerator thermostat read 50 degrees Fahrenheit, which is above the recommended temperature range for storing refrigerated medications. The facility's policy and procedure for medication storage and labeling specifies that drugs requiring refrigeration should be stored between 36 and 46 degrees Fahrenheit. This discrepancy in temperature control was identified as a potential issue that could result in refrigerated medications being less effective.
Lack of Qualified Dietary Supervisor in Absence of Full-Time Dietitian
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to employ a qualified dietary supervisor in the absence of a full-time registered dietitian to oversee its kitchen and food service operations. During an interview, the dietary supervisor (DS 1) revealed that he had been employed at the facility for several years and had assumed the position of dietary supervisor a month and a half ago, but he was not certified as a dietary supervisor. A review of the kitchen staff credentials showed that DS 1 was only certified as a Food Handler, which indicates completion of a food safety course approved by the state. The facility's administrator confirmed that the registered dietitian was not employed full-time and that DS 1 had attended a dietary supervisor training program, but no documentation of this training was available. The facility's job description for the Director of Food Services required the individual to be a graduate of an accredited course in dietetic training approved by the American Dietetic Association and to be registered as a Food Service Director in the state. This deficiency had the potential to result in residents not receiving correct diets and an increased risk of food-borne illness due to the lack of proper staff education and training.
Infection Control Deficiency in Oxygen Equipment Storage
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain proper infection control measures for storing oxygen therapy equipment for two residents. During an observation and interview with the Infection Preventionist Nurse, it was noted that Resident 83's nasal cannula was found on the floor while still connected to the oxygen concentrator. Additionally, Resident 57's nasal cannula was observed on the bedside table, and the nebulizer mask was on the side table. Both pieces of equipment had plastic bags provided for storage when not in use, but they were not stored in them. The Infection Preventionist Nurse acknowledged these findings and confirmed that the equipment should have been stored in the provided plastic bags, as per the facility's policy and procedures dated October 2017, which stated that tubing, masks, and cannulas should be placed in a labeled plastic bag.
Failure to Document COVID-19 Vaccination Offer and Education
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide documentation indicating that it had offered or explained the risks and benefits of a COVID-19 vaccination to one of the sampled residents, identified as Resident 443. The review of Resident 443's admission record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on an unspecified date and was later diagnosed with COVID-19, with an onset date of June 7, 2024. During a concurrent record review and interview with the Infection Preventionist (IP), it was confirmed that there was no documentation showing that Resident 443 had been offered the COVID-19 vaccine, refused it, or had previously received it prior to admission. The facility's policy and procedure titled 'Refusal of COVID-19 Vaccination' states that all residents should be offered vaccines unless medically contraindicated, for religious beliefs, or if the resident has already been vaccinated. The policy also requires that residents or their legal representatives be provided with information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of vaccinations, and that this provision of education be documented in the resident's medical record. Additionally, all new residents should be assessed for their current vaccination status upon admission, and any refusal of the COVID-19 vaccine should be documented in detail in the resident's medical record. The lack of documentation for Resident 443 indicates a failure to adhere to these procedures.
Call Light Accessibility Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a call light was within reach for a resident, identified as Resident 12, which could potentially lead to unmet needs or delayed care. During an observation, the call light was found on the floor and out of reach of Resident 12, who was lying in bed. This was confirmed during a subsequent observation and interview with a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1), who acknowledged that the call light should not have been on the floor and was indeed out of reach of the resident. The facility's policy and procedure titled 'Answering the Call Light,' dated October 2020, states that when a resident is in bed or confined to a chair, the call light should be within easy reach. This policy was not adhered to in the case of Resident 12, as evidenced by the observations and CNA 1's confirmation.
Failure to Maintain Homelike Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for three unsampled residents, which had the potential to negatively impact their psychosocial status. During an observation and interview with the maintenance supervisor, it was noted that Resident 9's and Resident 12's rooms had portions of the wall with peeling paint and missing plaster, while Resident 14's room had a ceiling with cracked and peeling paint. The maintenance supervisor confirmed the disrepair in these areas and acknowledged that these issues had not been reported by staff or logged in the facility maintenance log. The facility's policy and procedure documents indicated a commitment to providing a safe, functional, and comfortable environment, and maintaining the building in good repair and free from hazards.
Failure to Develop Baseline Care Plan for High Fall Risk Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for a resident who was assessed as high risk for falls within 48 hours of admission. The facility's policy and procedures require that a baseline care plan be developed for each resident within 48 hours of admission to provide effective and person-centered care. However, during a review of the resident's records, it was confirmed that no baseline care plan for fall risk was documented for this resident. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including polyneuropathy, hypertension, and atherosclerotic heart disease, had a fall risk assessment score indicating a high risk for falls. Despite this, the facility did not implement its fall prevention program, which includes identifying high-risk residents with a yellow star sticker and a yellow-colored name band. An observation revealed that the yellow star sticker was not posted outside the resident's room, and the Director of Nursing acknowledged that this was an oversight.
Violation of Resident's Right to Self-Determination and Privacy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to honor the resident's right to self-determination and privacy, resulting in a deficiency concerning Resident 2. The facility did not allow Resident 2 to choose their shower time, as evidenced by an incident where a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 2) insisted on giving Resident 2 a shower despite their refusal. Resident 2, who has a BIMS score of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment, expressed a desire to delay the shower while watching a game, but CNA 2 was persistent and did not respect the resident's wishes. Additionally, the facility did not maintain Resident 2's privacy during the showering process. Resident 2 was left fully naked in a shower chair at the foot of their roommate's bed, with the blinds open, leading to feelings of humiliation. This was corroborated by Resident 1, who witnessed the event, and Resident 2's family member, who reported that Resident 2 was upset about the lack of privacy. The facility's policy requires residents to be covered and their privacy maintained during such procedures, which was not adhered to in this case.
Failure to Monitor Resident After Allegation of Mistreatment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to monitor a change in behavior for a resident following an allegation of staff mistreatment. The incident involved a certified nursing assistant (CNA) who was reportedly rough with the resident during shower time, as noted in the Nursing Notes. The resident expressed dissatisfaction with the CNA's behavior, and the family and Director of Nursing (DON) were informed. However, there were no subsequent entries in the resident's records to indicate that the facility monitored the resident for any psychosocial changes after the incident. During an interview, the DON confirmed that the facility did not implement a Change of Condition (COC) monitoring for the resident, which should have been done for 72 hours to assess any behavioral changes following the mistreatment allegation.
Incomplete Medical Records for Resident's Shower Day Skin Inspection
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for a resident, identified as Resident 2, when a Shower Day Skin Inspection was not documented for a shower provided on May 4, 2024. According to the facility's policy and procedure titled 'Shower/Tub Bath,' dated October 2010, specific information should be recorded on the resident's ADL record and/or medical record, including the date and time of the shower, the name and title of the individual(s) assisting, and any assessment data such as skin changes. During an interview on May 15, 2024, the Director of Nursing confirmed that Resident 2 received a shower on the specified date. However, a review of the resident's Shower Day Skin Inspection forms for April and May 2024 revealed no record for May 4, 2024. Both the Director of Nursing and the Director of Staff Development confirmed the absence of the required documentation, acknowledging that it should have been present in the resident's file.
Inaccurate Medication Administration Record
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for a resident when it was documented that a medication was administered twice when it was not. Specifically, the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for a resident indicated that Clobazam 30 mg, a controlled medication prescribed for seizures, was administered at 9 p.m. on two separate days, even though the medication was not available and therefore not given. This discrepancy was confirmed by both Licensed Nurses involved, who acknowledged that the medication was not administered due to its unavailability. The facility's policy and procedure for medication administration required that medications be charted immediately after each administration. However, the MAR inaccurately reflected that the medication was given, and the Record of Controlled Substances showed no signatures for the medication being dispensed on the specified dates. Interviews with the Licensed Nurses confirmed the medication was not administered, and one nurse admitted to overlooking and signing the MAR incorrectly.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,834 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 16 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Simi Valley
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chatsworth Park Health Care Center | 5.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Stoney Point Healthcare Center | 5.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Topanga Terrace | 5.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 16 | 0 |
| West Hills Health And Rehabilitation Center | 6.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 17 | 1 |
| Canyon Oaks Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 6.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 12 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Simi Healthcare Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release June 2026) and official state health department websites.