Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0685
D

Failure to Arrange and Document Ophthalmology Consult for Resident

Simi Valley, California Survey Completed on 08-07-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident received proper treatment to maintain their vision. The resident was observed squinting and having difficulty watching TV, and reported having requested an eye appointment that was not arranged by the facility. Review of the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) showed a decline in vision from adequate to moderately impaired over time. Medical records indicated that ophthalmology consults were ordered on two separate occasions, but there was no evidence that these consults were ever completed. The social services director confirmed there was no documentation explaining why the consult ordered in January was not done. Facility policy required social services to coordinate and document referrals, but this was not followed in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙