Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at River View Post Acute during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Failure to Administer Ordered Anticonvulsant Medication: A resident with epilepsy returned from the hospital with instructions to resume oxcarbazepine, but the order was not entered into the EMR and the medication was not administered for an extended period. The ADON said she wanted clarification and claimed to contact the physician, but there was no documentation of physician communication, notification of the omission, or any medication error reporting in the record.
Unsafe and Unkempt Resident Rooms and Shower Areas: A resident room and shower areas had peeling paint, broken shelving with jagged edges, black discoloration around a vent, an outlet cover pulling away from the wall, a sink detached from the wall, unpainted spackled wall areas, dust and debris on a vent, rust-stained shower curtain and pipe, torn non-skid tape, and splintering wood. The DON confirmed the areas needed upkeep and repairs and were not homelike, and the IP stated several of the conditions created susceptibility for bacterial growth and potential infection.
A resident with cognitive communication deficit had new NP orders for levothyroxine and follow-up labs after lab review, but the RN did not notify the resident representative because the resident was going home the next day. The family member said they visited daily, received minimal communication from staff, and only learned of the new orders after reviewing the discharge medication list at home; the DON stated the representative should have been informed of the new orders and related medication information.
A resident with multiple comorbidities, including a stage 4 left ankle pressure ulcer and hemiparesis, developed a twisted, purple, cold left foot, prompting a STAT x‑ray of the left lower extremity. The STAT x‑ray later showed a distal leg fracture and osteomyelitis, and the results were transmitted to the facility the same evening. The nurse on duty did not re‑check for results after an initial review, did not contact the x‑ray provider to verify timing, and, once the abnormal report was received, notified the physician only by text without follow‑up phone calls or direct confirmation, despite facility policies requiring immediate, voice communication of new fracture findings and STAT results. This failure to follow established notification policies delayed physician awareness and subsequent hospital transfer orders.
A resident with hemiplegia, a stage 4 ankle pressure ulcer, DM2, PVD, and anemia was noted by staff to have a twisted left foot that was purple and cold, prompting a STAT x-ray of the left lower extremity. The x-ray later showed a fracture and acute osteomyelitis of the distal lower leg, and the physician was notified of these abnormal results. However, nursing staff did not complete or document a comprehensive reassessment of the resident’s left leg and foot, including pain and circulatory status, before or after notifying the physician, despite facility policy and job descriptions requiring detailed assessment and use of SBAR for significant changes in condition.
Improper disposal of garbage and refuse was identified when a dumpster lid was observed open and a kitchen trash can was found without a working cover lid. The CDM confirmed the dumpster lid was left open and the trash can lid was broken, and the RD stated both conditions could allow pests, debris, and cross-contamination concerns. Facility policies required garbage and kitchen waste to be kept in tightly closed containers and for dumpster and trash areas to remain closed and clean.
Medication services were not maintained when many non-narcotic medication destruction records lacked the required 2 LPN signatures, and three unidentified pills were found unattended in a resident’s room. LN and the DON confirmed the documentation was incomplete and that pills should not have been left in the room; the resident, who had DM, hypotension, AFib, and metabolic encephalopathy, did not know what the pills were or how long they had been there.
A facility failed to safely store and dispose of medications when an expired IV bag with ertapenem remained with active meds in the med room and was still available for use. In the same med room, the pharmaceutical waste container held recognizable bottles, insulin pens, pills, and solutions that had not been made unretrievable, and the LN and DON confirmed the disposal practices were not followed.
Kitchen Food Safety and Sanitation Deficiencies: A microwave was placed in the kitchen near the stove, a bun toaster had black residue and crumbs, kitchen walls were chipped and cracking, multiple pots and pans had black buildup and were flaky, the stove top and drip pan had grease accumulation, the walk-in refrigerator and freezer had ice buildup, and fans and vents were dirty. The CDM, RD, and DM confirmed these conditions, and facility policies required sanitary food equipment, clean walls, clean ranges, properly maintained refrigeration, and dust-free vents.
Broken Overbed Light and Damaged Room Walls A resident’s overbed light stayed on continuously because the pull string was broken, and the resident said the issue had been reported to multiple CNAs but was not repaired, leaving the resident unable to sleep well. In addition, two other residents had chipped walls and cracked paint behind their bed frames; CNAs, the DSD, the DM, and the DON all confirmed the rooms were not smooth or homelike, and staff stated the conditions did not reflect a comfortable environment.
PASARR Level II Screening Not Completed for Resident with Schizophrenia: A resident admitted with schizophrenia had a PASARR Level I screen that was positive for SMI, including combative behavior, grandiose delusions, irritability, anger, and psychotropic medication use, with the case state identified as Level II. The record also showed that a Level II mental health evaluation was required, but the evaluator later documented that facility staff were unresponsive to repeated attempts to arrange the assessment, and the DSD and DON confirmed the Level II screening never occurred.
Failure to Care Plan for Pain: A resident admitted with stroke-related diagnoses, hemiplegia/hemiparesis, and aphasia was prescribed Tramadol, but the record review and DON interview confirmed no pain care plan was in place. The DON stated pain should have been care planned to identify goals, monitor progression, and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions; the facility policy also addressed developing, implementing, monitoring, and modifying pain management approaches.
Failure to arrange ophthalmology referral for a resident with worsening vision. A resident with DM, dry eye syndrome, depression, anxiety, and weakness reported severe decline in vision, cataracts, and difficulty reading, watching TV, and moving around her room. The MD ordered an ophthalmology referral and an optometrist also recommended one, but there was no record the resident was referred, seen, informed, or refused the appointment. SSD confirmed the referral was not communicated until later and that there was no system for managing referrals.
Enteral feeding care was not provided as ordered for a resident with a G-tube, ESRD, dialysis dependence, and dysphagia. The RD had directed that feeds be held only during dialysis days and certain transport or care periods, but staff found the tube feeding not running on a non-dialysis day and confirmed the order was missing. The ADON and RD stated the resident was at risk of not meeting nutritional needs, and the RD noted risk for weight loss, wounds, and dehydration if the feeding recommendations were not followed.
Failure to address resident pain: A resident with COVID-19, PVD, and COPD reported pain rated 6/10 and did not receive any documented intervention. The record showed an order for PRN acetaminophen with non-pharmacological measures first if appropriate, but the assigned LPN confirmed no non-pharmacological or pharmacological interventions were offered, and the DON confirmed the pain report was not acted on.
An LN made two medication administration errors during observation: she crushed an ER morphine tablet that was labeled to be swallowed whole, and she administered insulin from another resident’s vial because the correct vial was not available. The LN acknowledged both actions were wrong, and the DON stated that ER medications should not be crushed and that borrowing another resident’s medication is not standard practice.
A resident with heart failure, stroke, and diabetic neuropathy pain received an ER morphine sulfate tablet that was crushed during med pass. The bubble pack label said to swallow whole and not to chew or crush, and the MAR listed morphine sulfate ER 15 mg every 8 hours for pain. The LPN stated the resident preferred crushed meds and later acknowledged the morphine should not have been crushed; the DON stated ER meds should not be crushed.
A resident with intact cognition and diagnoses including anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder had loose upper partials identified in the care plan, along with difficulty chewing and nutritional risk related to chewing issues. The resident later reported the upper partials were missing and had not been seen by a dentist, and staff confirmed no dental appointment was scheduled or completed despite the documented need for denture adjustment and dental follow-up.
A resident with multiple complex medical conditions experienced a severe, unrecognized weight loss over several weeks. Facility staff failed to weigh the resident as required, did not notify the physician or implement interventions in a timely manner, and did not document the change of condition, despite facility policy requiring prompt action for significant weight changes.
A resident with a history of stroke and colon cancer, experiencing sadness and depression, did not receive a timely psychiatric evaluation after a referral order was entered. The Social Services Department failed to process the referral, and the resident reported not being offered counseling or therapy. Interviews confirmed the referral was not completed as required by facility policy.
A resident with anxiety and depression was administered PRN lorazepam without the required 14-day stop date or physician documentation explaining the omission. Facility staff and policy confirm that such medications must have a stop date to ensure ongoing evaluation, but the medication was given on multiple occasions without this safeguard.
A resident with documented intellectual disability and cerebral palsy was admitted without these conditions being accurately reflected on the PASRR Level I screening. The screening incorrectly indicated no need for further evaluation, and staff did not review the PASRR for accuracy, resulting in the resident not being properly evaluated for specialized services as required by facility policy.
A resident with adjustment disorder and anxiety did not receive two scheduled psychotherapy sessions as ordered, and facility staff failed to ensure timely follow-up or alternative interventions. Interviews confirmed that the missed visits were not communicated or addressed according to facility procedures.
A resident who required a mechanical lift and sling for transfers was unable to attend preferred activities on multiple occasions due to the facility's failure to provide an available sling. Staff confirmed that equipment shortages and uncharged lift batteries delayed care, and the resident had to use an inappropriate shower sling, resulting in skin irritation. The DON acknowledged the lack of equipment and its impact on the resident's ability to participate in activities, contrary to facility policy on resident autonomy and dignity.
A resident with bipolar disorder and intact cognition alleged that a CNA forcefully grabbed her legs, causing pain and bruising. Although two LNs and the CNA were aware of the allegation on the day it occurred, the incident was not documented or reported to the Department until five days later, contrary to facility policy requiring immediate reporting of suspected abuse. This delay resulted in a late investigation and reduced the facility's ability to protect residents from harm.
A resident with schizophrenia reported being hit on the head, but the facility did not notify the responsible party (RP) of this abuse allegation as required. The incident was documented in the resident's records and care plan, but the DON confirmed there was no evidence that the RP was informed, contrary to facility policy.
Two residents did not receive required alert charting following incidents—one after an allegation of physical harm and another after a verbal altercation. Despite care plans and facility policy mandating 72 hours of monitoring and documentation for psychosocial effects, licensed nurses did not complete the necessary charting for either resident.
Two residents with depression were unable to enjoy a safe and comfortable environment due to another resident's ongoing disruptive behavior, including yelling and cussing in hallways and activity areas. Staff confirmed that the disruptive resident, who has bipolar disorder, frequently caused distress, leading the affected residents to keep their doors closed and avoid activities. The facility's policy on maintaining comfortable sound levels was not met.
The facility did not ensure that an area was free from accident hazards and failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Surveyors observed environmental hazards and insufficient staff monitoring, increasing the risk of resident accidents.
A resident was not provided with scheduled showers and instead had to use disposable wipes for hygiene, as staff did not accommodate the resident's preference for a female CNA. The care plan was not updated to reflect these preferences, and documentation did not indicate that the resident refused care. This failure to honor the resident's choices and provide routine care led to the resident's needs not being met and caused distress.
Two residents sharing a bathroom were exposed to an unsanitary environment when a toilet seat remained contaminated with fecal matter and urine for an extended period. A housekeeper confirmed the bathroom had not been cleaned during her shift, and the Director of Staff Development acknowledged the lapse, which was inconsistent with facility policies on cleanliness and infection control.
A resident with a history of repeated falls was found to have multiple wheelchairs, a recliner, and an overbed table stored in their room for several days, obstructing access and creating a potential fall hazard. The DSD confirmed these items should not have been stored in the room, as this violated facility policies on safety and a homelike environment.
The facility failed to maintain infection control practices, as personal care items like urinals, wash basins, and toothbrushes were found unlabeled and improperly stored in shared bathrooms. This increased the risk of cross-contamination among residents. Interviews with staff revealed that the facility's process required labeling and proper storage of these items, which was not followed, posing a significant infection control risk.
A resident discharged from the hospital with instructions for follow-up care with a podiatrist and interventional radiology did not receive these appointments from the facility. The resident, who had undergone a partial foot amputation due to gangrene, also required a surgical evaluation that was not communicated to the primary physician. This lack of follow-up and communication may have contributed to the resident's wound infection and subsequent leg amputation.
A CNA in an LTC facility failed to maintain infection control standards by wearing a loosened gauze dressing on her hand while caring for nine residents. The dressing, used to cover a burn, was not properly secured and was washed with the CNA's hands, posing a risk of infection spread. The facility's policies require strict hand hygiene to prevent such risks.
A facility failed to provide proper respiratory care for three residents receiving oxygen therapy. One resident received oxygen without a physician's order, and two residents lacked care plans for their oxygen use. Additionally, a resident's nasal cannula was expired, and the oxygen humidifier bottle was not labeled with a change date, posing an infection risk.
The facility failed to ensure safe medication storage practices, with expired, unlabeled, and undated medications found in two medication carts and two storage rooms. Observations included expired Atropine Sulfate and Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solutions, undated Ipratropium Bromide and Albuterol Sulfate inhalation solution, and a vial of Lorazepam belonging to a discharged resident. Over-the-counter medications with debris were also noted. Licensed nurses and the DON confirmed the need for proper labeling and disposal of medications.
The facility failed to ensure food safety and sanitation, affecting 91 residents. Opened food packages were unlabeled, spoiled and expired food was not removed, and kitchen equipment was not cleaned. A partially consumed water bottle was found in the dry food storage area, violating FDA guidelines.
A resident with physical limitations was denied the use of a personal device for communication and entertainment, despite it being important for their well-being. The facility unplugged the device due to concerns about the roommate, without providing alternatives, contrary to their policies on personal property and a homelike environment.
A resident with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy and adjustment disorder was unable to reach her call light due to contractures in her arms and hands, placing her at risk of falls and unmet care needs. A nurse confirmed the call light was out of reach, and the resident's care plan emphasized the importance of having the call light accessible. The DON expected call lights to be within reach, aligning with the facility's policy for timely responses to residents' needs.
A resident with a history of falls and fractures was observed in a Geri chair with the footrest elevated, preventing free movement and acting as a restraint. The DSD confirmed the chair should be upright when the resident is awake. The facility's policy states that restraints should only be used for medical symptoms, not for convenience or fall prevention.
The facility failed to develop and implement care plans for three residents, leading to potential unmet care needs. A resident with end-stage renal disease lacked a dialysis care plan, another with a splint had no care plan for its management, and a third involved in altercations had no behavioral care plan. These omissions were confirmed by staff and violated facility policies requiring comprehensive, person-centered care plans.
The facility failed to update care plans for two residents, one with new skin wounds and another who switched from smoking tobacco to vaping. The DON acknowledged the lack of a care plan for the resident with wounds, while the AD admitted to not updating the smoking care plan in a timely manner. This oversight could lead to inadequate care, as staff may not be aware of necessary interventions or changes in residents' conditions.
A resident with a left arm injury and chronic pain was not seen by an orthopedist for six months despite a referral from the facility's MD. The resident's splint, worn since admission, showed signs of neglect, and transportation issues were cited as the reason for the delay. Interviews with staff confirmed the oversight, and the MD emphasized the need for the referral.
A resident with worsening eyesight and specific symptoms was not assisted by the facility in obtaining an ophthalmology appointment, despite repeated requests and a care plan intervention. The Social Services Director acknowledged the oversight, and the Director of Nursing confirmed the lack of documentation and emphasized the risk of vision decline affecting mobility and fall risk.
A resident with pressure ulcers did not receive consistent treatment as ordered by their physician, specifically the use of heel protectors every shift. Observations confirmed the resident's heels were bare, and facility staff acknowledged the oversight, which was contrary to the facility's wound care policy.
A resident with quadriplegia did not receive ordered Restorative Nurse Assistant (RNA) services, including the use of orthotics and passive range of motion (PROM) exercises, due to a lack of communication and awareness among staff. Additionally, the facility failed to develop a care plan for the resident's arm and hand contractures, increasing the risk of further decline in range of motion.
A resident at high risk for falls did not have appropriate fall precautions in place, as fall mats were not positioned correctly and were not included in the care plan. Staff confirmed the mats were sometimes moved and not returned, and the resident's bedside table was out of reach, increasing fall risk. The need for fall mats was not documented, highlighting a lapse in care planning and staff education.
A facility failed to obtain a physician's order for a resident's indwelling foley catheter, despite the resident's diagnoses of urinary tract infection and acute kidney failure. The care plan required regular catheter care and infection monitoring, but the absence of a physician's order meant staff were not properly informed of the resident's needs, placing the resident at risk for complications.
A resident receiving IV therapy for MRSA had their IV tubing lying on the floor, and the infusion bag was not labeled with the date, time, or staff initials. The ADON confirmed these issues, acknowledging the risk of infection and physical hazards. The DON expected proper labeling and tubing management, as outlined in facility policies, but these standards were not met, resulting in a deficiency.
Failure to Administer Ordered Anticonvulsant Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a physician-ordered anticonvulsant medication was implemented and administered as ordered for a resident with epilepsy. The resident returned from the hospital on 4/27/26 with instructions to resume home medications, including oxcarbazepine for seizures. Although the resident had previously been receiving oxcarbazepine in multiple doses, the medication was not entered into the electronic medical record when the resident returned to the facility, and there was no documented administration of oxcarbazepine from 4/27/26 through 5/21/26. During interview and record review, the ADON stated she reviewed the hospital discharge orders but did not enter the oxcarbazepine order because she wanted clarification. She stated she contacted the physician, but no documentation or other evidence of physician communication was available, and the order was not entered until 5/22/26. The record also showed no documentation that the attending physician was notified of the medication omission, and there was no documentation of physician clarification, medication error reporting, incident reporting, corrective action, investigation, or follow-up regarding the omission.
Unsafe and Unkempt Resident Rooms and Shower Areas
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for a census of 89 residents. During observations and interviews, peeling paint was noted in Room W behind the trash can, and a resident stated the wall was not pretty to look at. In Room X, a shelf across from the bed that held personal belongings had a broken front edge with jagged edges, and the resident stated the shelf had been broken since September 2025. In Room Y, peeling paint was observed on the closet doors and adjacent wall, the air vent had black discoloration around the perimeter, an electric outlet cover was pulling away from the wall, the bathroom sink was detached from the wall, and an area of the bathroom wall measuring approximately 10 inches by 8 inches was unpainted and covered with white spackle. In Room Z, multiple areas of peeling, flaking paint were observed along the wall behind the head of the bed, and the resident stated he did not like the way it looked and would not have peeling paint in his house. The DON confirmed that Room W, Room X, Room Y, and Room Z required upkeep and repairs and stated the observed areas did not provide a homelike environment for the residents. In the back hall shower room, the DON confirmed peeling plaster behind the shower head, torn and peeling non-skid tape on the floor, and splintering wood on the outside of the door near the handle. In the front hall shower room, the ceiling vent had dust and debris, the shower curtain had rust stains, and the water pipe on the ceiling had rust along its length. The IP stated the dust and debris around the air vents in the front shower room and Room Y, the rust on the pipe and shower curtain in the front shower room, the sink pulling away from the wall in Room Y, and the missing plaster around the shower head in the back hall shower room created a susceptibility for bacterial growth which could lead to the potential for infection to staff and residents.
Failure to Notify Resident Representative of New Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the resident representative of changes in a resident’s medical treatment after new lab tests and medication orders were received. Resident 1 was admitted with diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit, and the record showed that on 5/7/26 the nurse practitioner reviewed labs and entered new orders for levothyroxine daily, a CBC in one week, and vitamin D levels in 3 months. During interview, the family member stated they visited the resident daily, received minimal communication from staff, and were not informed of the new lab tests or medication orders, learning of the changes only after reviewing the discharge medication list at home. The DON stated it was her expectation that the resident representative would have been informed when the new orders were received, and the nurse stated she did not notify the representative because the resident was going home the next day, although she usually informed the representative whenever there was a new order. The facility policy stated that the facility promptly notifies the resident, attending physician, and resident representative of changes in the resident’s medical or mental condition and/or status.
Failure to Immediately Notify Physician of STAT X‑Ray Showing Fracture and Osteomyelitis
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to immediately notify a resident’s physician of significant STAT x‑ray results showing a fracture and osteomyelitis. The resident had multiple serious diagnoses, including hemiplegia/hemiparesis after stroke, a stage 4 pressure ulcer of the left ankle, type 2 diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, and anemia. On the morning in question, a CNA alerted a nurse to check the resident’s left foot; the nurse and supervisor observed the left foot twisted downward from the ankle, with purple, cold skin and an existing stage 4 wound. A physician gave a verbal order for a STAT x‑ray of the left ankle, foot, and knee, which was entered into the record at 12:34 PM. The STAT x‑ray was completed and the radiology report, indicating a fracture and osteomyelitis of the distal left lower leg, was transmitted to the facility at 10:20 PM that same day. The facility’s process was that STAT x‑ray results would be uploaded into the electronic health record and faxed to a designated nurse’s station. The nurse on duty (LN 3) stated that during shift handoff, the pending x‑ray was discussed and that she checked the electronic record and fax machine around 8 PM but did not see results at that time. LN 3 did not check again for the remainder of the shift and did not call the x‑ray company to verify when results would be available. At approximately 1 AM, another nurse brought the faxed x‑ray report to LN 3, confirming the abnormal findings. Upon receiving the abnormal STAT x‑ray results, LN 3 notified the resident’s physician by text message at 1:40 AM and sent a picture of the report but did not make any additional attempts to contact the physician for the rest of the shift. LN 3 acknowledged that facility procedure required immediate reporting of abnormal x‑ray results and that notification several hours after the results were available did not meet the expectation of “immediate.” LN 3 also confirmed that no follow‑up phone call was made when the physician did not respond to the text message, and there was no direct confirmation that the physician had received the results. The DON stated that the nurse who received the STAT x‑ray results should have immediately notified the physician and, if there was no response within 30 minutes, should have called again, and that the lack of timely, direct voice communication delayed the order to transfer the resident to the hospital by approximately twelve hours, placing the resident at risk for pain and complications. Facility policies titled “Guidelines for Notifying Physician of Clinical Problems,” “General Guidelines for Reporting Abnormal Test Results to Physicians,” and “Lab and Diagnostic Test Results – Clinical Protocol” required immediate notification of physicians for sudden or marked changes in condition and for new or unsuspected x‑ray findings such as fractures, with direct voice communication identified as the preferred method for results requiring immediate notification. These policies specified that immediate notification meant contacting the physician as soon as possible, especially for STAT results and problematic abnormal findings. The events described show that the facility did not follow its own policies for immediate physician notification of a STAT x‑ray result revealing a fracture and osteomyelitis, resulting in delayed communication of critical diagnostic information.
Failure to Complete Comprehensive Assessment After Abnormal X-Ray Findings
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to complete and document a comprehensive assessment for a resident who experienced a significant change in condition involving the left lower extremity. The resident was admitted with multiple serious diagnoses, including hemiplegia/hemiparesis after a cerebral infarction affecting the left side, a stage 4 pressure ulcer of the left ankle, type 2 diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, and anemia. The resident’s BIMS score indicated moderate cognitive impairment. On the morning of 2/8/26, a CNA notified nursing staff that the resident’s left foot appeared twisted. A nurse’s note documented that the left foot was in a twisted position, with a stage 4 wound, purple skin color, and skin cold to touch. A physician was contacted and a STAT x-ray of the left ankle, foot, and knee was ordered and carried out. Later that day, radiology results were reported to the facility, indicating a fracture and acute osteomyelitis of the distal lower leg. The clinical record shows that the physician was notified of the abnormal x-ray results in the early morning hours of 2/9/26. However, there is no documentation that the resident’s left leg and foot were reassessed for changes in condition or for pain after the initial assessment at approximately 11:00 AM on 2/8/26 and before or after the physician was notified of the x-ray findings. During interview, the nurse who received the handoff report acknowledged that although she and another nurse viewed the resident’s foot, she did not complete a comprehensive assessment at that time. The DON’s review of the x-ray results and nursing progress notes confirmed that the assigned RN should have completed and documented a comprehensive assessment using the SBAR Communication Form in response to the significant change in the resident’s condition. The DON stated that the assessment should have included a detailed description of the leg and foot, circulation status, presence of bleeding, necrosis, or further twisting, and whether the resident expressed pain or discomfort. The facility’s policy on change in a resident’s condition requires nurses to make detailed observations and gather relevant information, prompted by the Interact SBAR form, prior to notifying the physician. Job descriptions for LVNs, RNs, and the Nursing Supervisor also require assessment and observation of residents with changes in condition. Despite these requirements, a comprehensive reassessment was not completed or documented around the time the abnormal x-ray results were obtained and communicated, constituting the cited deficiency.
Improper Disposal of Garbage and Refuse
Penalty
Summary
Garbage and refuse were not properly disposed of when a garbage dumpster lid was observed open in the outside dumpster area during a concurrent observation and interview with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). The CDM confirmed the dumpster lid was open. During a later interview, the CDM stated the dumpster lid should always be closed when not in use and said she did not want people getting into the dumpsters. The Registered Dietician (RD) stated that leaving dumpster lids open could allow pest and debris issues and that the lids should have been closed securely after each use. The facility policy titled MISCELLANEOUS AREAS stated that garbage and trash cans must be inspected daily to ensure no debris is on the ground or surrounding area and that the lids are closed. The facility also had a trash can in the kitchen without a working cover lid. During a concurrent observation and interview with the CDM, the trash can was observed without a lid, and the CDM confirmed the lid was broken. The CDM stated trash cans should have working cover lids and be closed, and that bugs could enter the facility if trash cans were not closed securely. The RD stated kitchen trash cans should have lids and that cross-contamination risks would increase without a working cover lid. Facility policies titled MISCELLANEOUS AREAS and SANITATION stated that food waste and kitchen wastes must be kept in tightly closed containers and disposed of as necessary to prevent a nuisance or unsightliness.
Incomplete medication destruction records and unattended pills in a resident room
Penalty
Summary
Pharmaceutical services were not maintained for the resident census when non-narcotic prescription medication destruction records in one medication room were incomplete. During review of 24 Medication Disposition Sheets from 2024 and 2025, 17 sheets did not have the signature of the licensed nurse who disposed of the medication and/or the signature of the licensed nurse who witnessed the disposal. LN 4 confirmed the records were not signed and/or co-signed by a licensed nurse and stated that two licensed nurse signatures should be present because improper disposition of unused and discontinued prescription medications could increase the risk for drug diversion and misuse. The facility’s DON also stated that destruction records for non-narcotic prescription drugs should have two licensed nurses’ signatures. The facility policy titled, Disposal of Medications and Medication-Related Supplies Medication Destruction, stated medication destruction occurs only in the presence of at least two licensed healthcare professionals and that the witnesses ensure signatures are entered on the medication disposition form. The missing signatures were identified during record review of the facility’s destruction documentation. Resident 40, who had diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, hypotension, atrial fibrillation, and metabolic encephalopathy, was observed with three unidentified pills in a medication cup on top of a storage container beside her bed. Resident 40 stated she did not know how long the medications had been in her room or what they were for. CNA 1, CNA 2, and LN 2 all confirmed the pills were present in the room, and LN 2 removed the pills from the room and returned to the medication cart. The DON stated pills should not have been left unattended in a resident’s room and that nurses were expected to watch residents take medications before leaving the room.
Expired IV Medication Stored With Active Medications and Waste Container Held Recognizable Drugs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide safe and effective use of medications, including administering, storing, and dispensing drugs and biologicals for a census of 85. During a concurrent observation and interview in the medication room on Unit 1, a bag for IV infusion containing 0.9% normal saline and a vial of ertapenem one gram connected to the IV bag was found with a label stating DO NOT USE AFTER 12/15/25, yet it was stored with other active medications and available for use. The LN confirmed the date on the label was beyond the use date and stated the IV bag with the antibiotic should have been removed from active medications and placed in a separate area for destruction. The LN also stated the medication was expired and should not be used after 12/15/25. During the same observation, prescribed medications in the pharmaceutical waste container in the medication room on Unit 1 were not disposed of properly because bottles, insulin pens, pills, and solutions were still recognizable and retrievable by hand. The LN confirmed the medications in the waste container were still recognizable and stated discarded medications should have been mixed to make them unretrievable. The DON stated the pharmaceutical waste containers should have absorption pads, charcoal packets, and/or coffee grounds to bind discarded medications and that liquid medications should have been poured out, noting it was not standard practice to throw whole, recognizable medications into the waste containers. Facility policy stated expired medications are to be removed from active supply and destroyed, and medication disposal requires mixing drugs with an undesirable substance before placing them into a disposable container.
Kitchen Food Safety and Sanitation Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards in the kitchen area. During observation with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), a microwave was placed next to the stove top range oven, and the CDM later stated that the microwave should not have been in the kitchen. The Registered Dietician (RD) also stated that there should not have been a microwave in the kitchen and noted concern that food items prepared with it might not reach proper cooking temperatures. The bun toaster was observed with black residue, food crumbs, and other debris. The CDM confirmed it was dirty and stated she was unable to remove the residue. The CDM further stated the facility may need to replace the toaster. The RD stated the toaster should not have been dirty and should have been cleaned routinely. Facility policy required food machines to be kept in sanitary condition and cleaned daily, including removal of crumbs from the crumb tray. Kitchen surfaces and equipment were also observed in poor condition. The kitchen walls were chipped and had cracking or faded paint, and the CDM, RD, and Director of Maintenance stated the walls should have been smooth and free of chipped paint. Multiple pots, pans, and other food holding containers had black residue buildup, dirty edges, and were described as flaky or damaged. The stove top and drip pan had grease, black residue, and food debris, and the CDM stated there were years of grease and food buildup. The walk-in refrigerator and freezer had ice buildup on door frames, hinges, and under the compressor unit, and the CDM and RD stated the freezer door and compressor were not functioning properly. Two fans and two vents in the kitchen were dirty, dusty, and had grayish debris, and the CDM, RD, and DM confirmed they were dirty. Facility policies reviewed during the investigation required clean walls, sanitary utensils and equipment, routinely cleaned ranges and ovens, properly maintained refrigeration equipment, and vents free of dust and dirt.
Broken Overbed Light and Damaged Room Walls
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide and maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for residents when an overbed headlight in one resident’s room remained continuously on because the pull string was broken. The resident, who had diagnoses including need for assistance with personal care and generalized muscle weakness, reported that the light had been stuck on for several days and that the issue had been reported to multiple CNAs. The resident stated that no staff came to assess or repair the light and that the constant light exposure interfered with sleep and made the resident feel tired and unable to join activities. During observation, the Director of Staff Development confirmed that the overbed headlight was on and that the pull string was broken, preventing the resident from turning the light on and off. Staff interviews showed that the maintenance logbook was used to report problems, but the issue was not promptly resolved. A CNA stated she found no documentation when checking the logbook, while later interviews with the Medical Record Director and Assistant DON confirmed the broken pull string had been reported multiple times and signed off as completed even though it was still broken. The Administrator stated the issue was urgent and expected it to be fixed the same day it was first reported. The facility also failed to maintain the appearance of resident rooms when chipped walls and cracked paint were observed behind the bed frames in two other residents’ rooms. One resident stated she would have painted the walls herself if she had the means, and another resident said it would have been nice to have a wall that was fixed. CNAs, the DSD, the DM, and the DON all confirmed that the walls were chipped, cracked, and not smooth, and that the condition did not reflect a homelike environment. Facility policies and the maintenance job description stated that residents should be provided a clean, orderly, comfortable, and homelike environment and that interior fixtures and surfaces should be kept in good repair.
PASARR Level II Screening Not Completed for Resident with Schizophrenia
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II screening was completed for one sampled resident who was admitted with a diagnosis of unspecified schizophrenia. The resident’s record showed a PASARR Level I screening dated 2/25/25 that was positive for Serious Mental Illness, citing schizophrenia disorder, combative/abusive behavior, grandiose delusions, irritability and anger, and psychotropic medication use, with the case state identified as Level II. The resident’s record also included a notice stating that a Level II mental health evaluation was required and that the facility would be contacted within two to four days to schedule the evaluation. A later notice documented that the Level II evaluation could not be completed because facility staff were unresponsive to two or more separate attempts of communication within 48 hours of the Level I screening. During interview and record review, the DSD and DON confirmed that the resident had schizophrenia, that the Level I screening was positive, and that the Level II screening did not occur; both stated that the screening should have been completed in a timely manner and that waiting 10 months was too long.
Failure to Care Plan for Pain
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop or revise a comprehensive care plan for one sampled resident, Resident 34, when a care plan for pain was not developed. Resident 34 was admitted with diagnoses including generalized muscle weakness, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, and aphasia. A review of the resident’s clinical record showed an Order Summary Report dated 12/17/2025 indicating the resident was prescribed Tramadol, a prescription pain medication. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/17/25 at 11:45 a.m., the DON reviewed Resident 34’s care plan and pain levels documented over the last 30 days and confirmed there was no care plan in place for pain. The DON stated the resident’s pain should have been care planned to identify goals, monitor progression, and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions. The facility’s policy and procedure titled Pain Assessment and Management, dated 10/2022, stated pain management includes developing and implementing approaches to pain management, monitoring the effectiveness of interventions, and modifying approaches as necessary.
Failure to Arrange Ophthalmology Referral for Resident with Worsening Vision
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Resident 65 received appropriate medical evaluation and treatment for a reported vision concern. Resident 65 was admitted with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, dry eye syndrome, depression, anxiety disorder, need for assistance with personal care, and generalized muscle weakness. During an interview, Resident 65 stated that she had seen an optometrist earlier in the year, was diagnosed with cataracts, and that glasses did not help much. She reported that her vision had become very poor, that watching TV was like seeing shadows, and that she had trouble reading books and moving around her room. Resident 65 stated that both her MD and the optometrist told her she needed to see an ophthalmologist because her vision was worsening, but no one helped her make an appointment and she had not yet seen one. The Activity Director confirmed that Resident 65 still enjoyed reading novels and watching TV with the help of a magnifying lens. The MDS Coordinator confirmed that the MD ordered a referral to an ophthalmologist, but there was no record that Resident 65 was referred to, seen by, informed about, or refused an ophthalmology appointment. The Social Service Director confirmed that the optometrist evaluated Resident 65 and recommended an ophthalmologist due to cataracts in both eyes, and stated that the referral was not communicated until the day of the interview. The Social Service Director also stated there was no system in place for managing referrals and that no follow-up was done after the MD order or the optometrist recommendation. The ADON and Administrator both stated that the delay in referring Resident 65 to an ophthalmologist was unacceptable and reflected a failure in the facility's process.
Enteral Feeding Order Not Followed for Resident With G-Tube
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services were provided for a resident with an enteral feeding tube when the resident’s enteral feeding orders were not carried out as recommended by the RD. Resident 76 was admitted with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, dysphagia, and encounter for attention to gastrostomy. The RD’s progress note stated that feeds should be stopped from 0600-1200 on dialysis days (MWF) due to dialysis and ADL care, and that feeds should also be stopped if the resident needed transport for authorized reasons, with notification to the RD for non-ADL or non-dialysis interruptions so recommendations could be made to help the resident meet at least 75% of estimated nutritional needs. During observation, Resident 76’s enteral feeding was not running at 10:01 a.m. on a day that was not a dialysis day. The ADON reviewed the order summary and confirmed the tube feeding order was missing and that the feeding should have been running. The ADON also confirmed the resident was at risk of not meeting nutritional needs if the enteral feeding order was not carried out as the RD recommended. Later, the ADON again observed that the enteral feed was not running and stated it was her expectation that the RD recommendations be followed. The RD stated the resident was at risk of weight loss, wounds, and dehydration if the recommendations were not carried out. The facility policy stated that adequate nutritional support through enteral nutrition is provided as ordered and that enteral nutrition is ordered by the provider based on the dietitian’s recommendations.
Failure to Address Resident Pain
Penalty
Summary
Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who required such services was not met for Resident 97. Resident 97 was admitted with diagnoses including COVID-19, peripheral vascular disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. During an interview, Resident 97 stated she reported pain rated 6 out of 10 to a licensed nurse and denied receiving any intervention to manage the pain. The clinical record showed an order for acetaminophen as needed for general pain, with non-pharmacological intervention to be used first if appropriate. Record review showed Resident 97 had a pain level of 6 out of 10 documented in the Weights and Vitals Summary. During interview, LN 1 confirmed he was the nurse assigned to Resident 97 when the pain rating was reported and stated he did not offer any non-pharmacological or pharmacological interventions. The DON reviewed the record and confirmed the pain report was not acted on by staff, and stated it was her expectation that licensed staff provide both nonpharmacological and pharmacological interventions to address the resident's pain.
Medication Administration Errors Involving Crushed ER Morphine and Borrowed Insulin Vial
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure safe medication administration practices when the medication error rate was 7.69% based on 2 errors out of 26 opportunities during observations of medication administration. The deficiency involved one resident observed for medication administration, and the report states the failures had the potential to affect the health and well-being of that resident. During a medication administration observation, an LN administered 3 medications to the resident and emptied a capsule and hand crushed 2 pills, including Morphine Sulfate 15 mg ER. The resident’s medication label stated the morphine was an extended-release tablet to be swallowed whole and not chewed or crushed. The MAR listed Morphine Sulfate ER 15 mg to be given by mouth every 8 hours for pain, and there was no documented warning on the MAR not to crush the medication. The LN stated the resident preferred medications crushed and later acknowledged the morphine should not have been crushed, explaining that an extended-release medication is unsafe to crush because it would be absorbed quickly. During the same observation, the LN checked the resident’s fasting blood sugar and administered insulin aspart 10 units subcutaneously before meals for hyperglycemia, holding for FBS below 120. The insulin vial used to withdraw the medication had a different resident name and a different dose. The LN stated the resident’s own insulin vial was not available in the medication cart because it had been ordered from the pharmacy and had not yet arrived, and she used another resident’s vial instead. The LN acknowledged this was wrong because the label would show the wrong patient and dose and stated another resident’s medication could increase the risk for cross contamination. The DON stated medications should be available and delivered timely, that borrowing medications from another resident was not standard practice, and that crushing ER medications was unsafe.
Crushed Extended-Release Morphine Administered
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents were free from significant medication errors when an extended-release morphine sulfate 15 mg tablet was crushed and administered to Resident 6. Resident 6 was admitted with diagnoses including heart failure and stroke, and the care plan noted pain related to diabetic neuropathy with pain medication to be given as ordered. During medication administration observation, a licensed nurse emptied a capsule and hand-crushed two pills, including the morphine sulfate ER tablet, while administering medications to Resident 6 in the hallway outside the resident’s room. The medication label on the bubble pack identified the morphine as an extended-release tablet and stated to swallow whole and not chew or crush, and the MAR listed morphine sulfate ER 15 mg to be given every 8 hours for pain. The nurse stated the resident preferred medications crushed and acknowledged that the morphine should not have been crushed, explaining that she could have contacted the physician for an alternate form. The DON also stated ER medications should not be crushed and that staff could have called the physician for another form of medication.
Failure to Arrange Dental Care for Missing Upper Partials
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide dental services for one resident with impaired dentition after loose upper partials were identified. The resident had diagnoses including anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder, and a BIMS score of 14 out of 15 on the quarterly MDS, indicating intact cognitive functioning. The resident’s care plan documented difficulty chewing related to loosely fitting dentures and included recommendations to assist with booking an appointment for denture adjustment and to assess chewing ability. A nutritional care plan also identified chewing issues and set a goal for no significant weight changes. During observation and interview, the resident stated the upper partials were missing and that he had not seen a dentist about replacing them. Record review and staff interviews showed the resident was not scheduled for dental care after the issue was identified, and there were no appointments made with either the in-house dentist or the resident’s own dentist. The Social Service Director confirmed the resident had not been seen by a dentist and that the care plan recommendations were not followed, while the Administrator stated ancillary services such as dental care were not being provided adequately for the resident.
Failure to Recognize and Address Severe Weight Loss
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutrition for a resident who experienced a significant, unrecognized weight loss. The resident, admitted with multiple diagnoses including colon cancer, dehydration, post-surgical aftercare, anemia, vitamin D deficiency, and muscle weakness, lost 21.4 pounds (15.7% of body weight) over a 10-day period, and a total of 31.8 pounds (23.3% of body weight) over five weeks. This weight loss was not identified, addressed, or reported to the physician in a timely manner, as required by facility policy. Observations and interviews revealed that the Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) was responsible for weighing residents and documenting the results, with the expectation to notify the DON or ADON of any weight change of 3 pounds or more. However, the RNA did not recall notifying anyone about the resident's severe weight loss. Licensed nursing staff and the DON confirmed that there was no documentation of physician notification or change of condition related to the weight loss during the critical period. The resident was not weighed weekly as required, and the significant weight loss was not recognized until more than four weeks after it occurred. Further review with the Registered Dietician (RD) and Medical Director (MD) confirmed that the resident met the criteria for severe weight loss, but interventions were not implemented until more than a month after the initial documented loss. The facility's own policies required prompt notification of significant changes in condition and unplanned weight loss, but these procedures were not followed. The delay in recognition and intervention was attributed in part to staff transitions, including changes in DON and RD positions during the period in question.
Failure to Process Psychiatric Referral for Resident with Depression
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to ensure the psychosocial well-being of a resident by not processing a psychiatric referral in a timely manner. The resident, who had a history of hemiplegia, hemiparesis following a stroke, malignant neoplasm of the colon, and recent colon surgery, was admitted with significant medical and emotional needs. An order for a psychiatric referral was entered by a Nurse Practitioner after the resident was observed with tears in her eyes and refusing therapy. However, the Social Services Department did not process this referral as required, and the resident did not receive the intended psychiatric evaluation. During interviews, the resident expressed feelings of sadness, loneliness, and depression related to her medical condition and stay at the facility, stating she had not been offered counseling or therapy. The Social Services Director confirmed that the referral process was not completed, and the DON acknowledged the importance of timely referrals for residents' mental health. The Nurse Practitioner who ordered the referral was unaware it had not been completed, and facility policy required social services to coordinate and document such referrals in collaboration with nursing staff.
Failure to Ensure Required Stop Date for PRN Psychotropic Medication
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with diagnoses including anxiety disorder and depression was prescribed lorazepam, an anti-anxiety medication, on an as-needed basis without the required 14-day stop date or a documented rationale from the physician for omitting the stop date. The medication order, signed by the physician, instructed administration of lorazepam 0.5 mg every 6 hours as needed for anxiety or restlessness. Facility staff, including a licensed nurse and the Assistant Director of Nursing, confirmed that as-needed psychotropic medications are expected to have a 14-day stop date to ensure periodic evaluation of the medication's necessity and safety. However, the order for lorazepam did not include this stop date, and there was no documentation from the physician explaining the omission. Record review showed that the resident received lorazepam on three consecutive days without a stop date in place. The Minimum Data Set Coordinator and the facility pharmacist both confirmed that as-needed anti-anxiety medications require a specified duration or stop date to prompt re-evaluation before continuation. The facility's policy also states that PRN psychotropic drug orders, except for antipsychotics, are limited to 14 days unless the attending physician documents a rationale and indicates a duration for the order. In this case, the required documentation and stop date were missing, resulting in the administration of lorazepam without proper oversight.
Failure to Accurately Complete PASRR Screening for Resident with Intellectual Disability
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately complete the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for one resident who had documented diagnoses of mild intellectual disabilities and cerebral palsy. Upon review, the PASRR Level I screening did not indicate the presence or suspicion of intellectual or developmental disability or related conditions, despite these diagnoses being present in the resident's admission record. The Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC) confirmed that the PASRR did not match the resident's diagnoses and stated that, had the intellectual disability been identified, it would have triggered a Level II evaluation. The PASRR was completed at the facility but was never reviewed for accuracy. Interviews with facility staff, including the MDSC and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), revealed that staff were expected to review completed PASRRs for accuracy, but this was not done in this case. The facility's policy required all new admissions and readmissions to be screened for mental disorders, intellectual disabilities, or related disorders, and to refer individuals for Level II evaluation if indicated. The failure to accurately complete and review the PASRR resulted in the resident not being properly evaluated for specialized services as required by policy.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Psychotherapy and Timely Follow-Up
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health care and services for a resident diagnosed with adjustment disorder with depressed mood and anxiety disorder. The resident had a physician's order for psychotherapy sessions twice a week, as documented in the psychologist's progress notes and the doctor's order summary. However, both scheduled psychotherapy sessions during a specific week were missed, with no documentation indicating that services were provided or that alternative interventions were implemented. Licensed nursing staff confirmed the missed visits and acknowledged the absence of follow-up or backup plans. Interviews with facility staff, including the Social Services Director and the Director of Nursing, revealed that the process for handling missed psychotherapy appointments required communication and timely follow-up, which did not occur in this instance. The Social Services Department was responsible for managing psychology referrals and appointments, and staff were expected to notify appropriate personnel if a visit was missed. Despite these expectations, there was no evidence that the missed psychotherapy sessions were addressed, placing the resident at risk for negative psychosocial outcomes.
Failure to Provide Mechanical Lift Sling Prevents Resident Participation in Activities
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation for a resident who required a mechanical lift and sling for transfers, as documented in her care plan due to an ADL self-care deficit. On multiple occasions, the resident was unable to attend morning activities of her choice because the facility did not have a mechanical lift sling available. Documentation showed that transfers out of bed occurred at irregular times, often after scheduled activities, and staff interviews confirmed that a lack of available slings and uncharged lift batteries delayed care. On one occasion, the resident had to use a shower sling, which caused skin irritation, due to the shortage of regular slings. Interviews with staff and the resident confirmed that the absence of appropriate equipment directly prevented the resident from participating in preferred activities. The DON acknowledged that the facility should have the necessary equipment to meet the resident's needs and that missing activities could negatively affect the resident's psychosocial well-being. Facility policies reviewed emphasized the importance of resident autonomy, participation in activities, and dignity, all of which were not upheld in this instance due to the equipment shortage.
Failure to Timely Report Alleged Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that an allegation of abuse involving a resident was reported to the Department in a timely manner. A resident with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder and intact cognitive function alleged that a certified nursing assistant (CNA) forcefully grabbed her legs, causing pain and bruising. The incident was initially reported by the resident to licensed nurses, who assessed her but did not observe visible marks and failed to document or report the allegation as required. Both nurses later acknowledged that they should have documented and reported the incident for the safety of the resident and others. The incident occurred on a Saturday evening, but the administrator did not become aware of the allegation until five days later, resulting in a delayed report to the Department. Interviews confirmed that two licensed nurses and the CNA involved were aware of the resident's allegations on the day of the incident, but no immediate action was taken to notify the administration or authorities. Facility policy required immediate reporting of suspected abuse within two hours, but this protocol was not followed, leading to a delay in the investigation process and a failure to protect the resident and others from potential harm.
Failure to Notify Responsible Party of Abuse Allegation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the responsible party (RP) of a resident's allegation of abuse. The resident, who had a diagnosis of schizophrenia, reported to staff that she had been hit on the head by a tall man with a stick during the early morning hours. This allegation was documented in the resident's progress notes, and the care plan was updated to address a potential psychosocial well-being problem related to the claim. The care plan included an intervention to increase communication between the resident, family, and caregivers. During an interview and record review with the Director of Nursing (DON), it was confirmed that there was no documentation indicating the RP had been informed of the abuse allegation. The DON acknowledged that the RP should have been notified and kept updated about the resident's situation. Facility policy requires that all reports of resident abuse be reported and that the resident's representative be notified immediately upon conclusion of the investigation, but this was not done in this case.
Failure to Implement and Document Required Alert Charting After Incidents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement care plan interventions for two residents following incidents that required monitoring for potential psychosocial effects. One resident, admitted with schizophrenia, reported being hit on the head and claimed to have lumps and bumps. The care plan for this resident included alert charting for 72 hours to monitor for possible psychosocial effects of the reported incident. However, documentation confirmed that alert charting was not completed by licensed nurses on two subsequent days as required. Another resident was involved in a verbal altercation with a peer, after which staff were instructed to monitor both individuals for behavioral changes. The care plan for this resident also required alert charting for 72 hours to assess for any adverse psychosocial effects. Record review and staff interviews confirmed that no alert charting was completed for this resident during the specified period. Facility policy mandates documentation of such incidents and subsequent care every shift for at least 72 hours, which was not followed in these cases.
Failure to Maintain Homelike Environment Due to Resident's Disruptive Behavior
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment for two residents who were negatively affected by the disruptive behavior of another resident diagnosed with bipolar disorder. Both affected residents, who had diagnoses including depression, requested that their room doors be kept closed due to the noise and verbal aggression occurring in the hallway outside their rooms. One of these residents also avoided participating in activities because the disruptive resident was present, yelling and cussing at others in the activities room. Multiple staff members, including CNAs and licensed nurses, confirmed that the disruptive resident frequently yelled and used profanities toward other residents, causing discomfort and distress among those exposed to the behavior. Review of the disruptive resident's care plan and progress notes revealed a history of sudden and abrupt episodes of verbal and physical aggression without warning, with documented incidents of yelling at both staff and residents. Staff interviews indicated that the behavior was ongoing and had a negative impact on the environment, with staff expressing concern and empathy for the affected residents. The facility's policy on maintaining a homelike environment emphasized the importance of comfortable sound levels, which was not upheld in this situation.
Failure to Maintain Accident-Free Environment and Adequate Supervision
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that an area was free from accident hazards and did not provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Surveyors observed that the environment contained hazards that could lead to resident accidents, and staff did not implement sufficient measures to monitor or protect residents from these risks. This deficiency was identified based on direct observations and findings during the survey, which indicated lapses in maintaining a safe environment and in providing necessary supervision to prevent accidents.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Showers and Honor Resident Preferences
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident was not provided with routine showers as scheduled, despite being cognitively intact and having a care plan that required assistance with bathing and shower transfers. The resident was scheduled to receive showers twice weekly, but documentation and interviews confirmed that showers were not provided on multiple scheduled dates. Instead, the resident resorted to using disposable wipes for personal hygiene, as staff did not offer showers outside of the assigned days and there was no documentation of refusal by the resident. Further investigation revealed that the resident preferred a female CNA to assist with showers and would decline when a male CNA offered assistance. This preference was reported to the licensed nurse several times, but the care plan was not updated to reflect the resident's needs or preferences. The facility's own policies and job descriptions emphasized the importance of honoring resident choices and promoting dignity, but these were not followed in this case, resulting in the resident's care needs not being met and causing distress.
Failure to Maintain Sanitary Shared Bathroom Environment
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and sanitary environment for two residents who shared a bathroom. During an observation, a clump of brown bowel movement was found smeared on the toilet seat in the shared bathroom. The housekeeper assigned to clean the area confirmed that she had cleaned one of the resident's rooms earlier in her shift but had not yet cleaned the bathroom, stating she planned to do so later. At the time of the interview, the toilet remained soiled with both smeared feces and urine in the bowl. The Director of Staff Development acknowledged that the toilet should not have been left in such a condition and emphasized that it should have been cleaned to prevent injury or transmission of infection. Facility policies reviewed indicated that residents are to be provided with a safe, clean, and homelike environment, and that infection control practices are intended to maintain a sanitary environment and prevent disease transmission. The failure to promptly clean the soiled toilet created an unsanitary environment for the residents using the shared bathroom.
Unsafe Storage of Equipment in Resident Room Creates Fall Hazard
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a safe and hazard-free environment for one of three sampled residents when multiple items, including three standard wheelchairs, a high back wheelchair, an overbed table, and a reclining medical chair, were stored in the resident's bedroom. These items were placed on the side of the room closest to the door, while the resident's bed and personal belongings were on the opposite side. The resident reported that the items had been in the room for several days to clear the hallway. The resident involved had a history of repeated falls and was identified in the care plan as being at risk for falls due to poor safety awareness, with fall risk precautions indicated. During an interview, the Director of Staff Development confirmed that the items should not have been stored in the resident's room and acknowledged that their presence could create a trip or fall hazard. Facility policies reviewed emphasized the importance of maintaining a safe, clean, and homelike environment, free from accident hazards.
Inadequate Infection Control Practices in Shared Bathrooms
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain proper infection prevention and control practices for its 91 residents. During multiple observations of shared bathrooms, various personal care items such as urinals, wash basins, kidney basins, toothbrushes, and bedpans were found unlabeled and stored in unsanitary conditions. These items were often placed on the floor or on top of paper towel dispensers, increasing the risk of cross-contamination among residents. Certified Nurses Assistants (CNAs) confirmed that the items were not labeled and acknowledged the risk of cross-contamination due to improper labeling and storage. Interviews with the Infection Preventionist (IP), Director of Nursing (DON), and Administrator (ADM) revealed that the facility's process required staff to label personal care items with the resident's room number, first name, and last initial before use. After use, items were to be cleaned, dried, and stored in a bag in the resident's personal area, not in shared bathroom spaces. The IP, DON, and ADM all expressed that the condition of the bathrooms and the improper handling of personal care items did not meet the facility's expectations and posed a significant infection control risk.
Failure to Arrange Follow-Up Care Leads to Resident's Amputation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary follow-up care for a resident who was discharged from the hospital with specific instructions for follow-up with a podiatrist and interventional radiology within 1-2 weeks. Despite these clear instructions, the facility did not arrange for these appointments, which were crucial for the resident's ongoing care following a partial amputation of the right foot due to gangrene. The resident's medical records indicated a lack of documentation regarding the condition of the surgical wound upon admission to the facility, and there was no evidence that the facility consulted with the physician about the removal of the surgical sutures. Additionally, the facility did not act on a recommendation from the wound care physician for a surgical evaluation of the resident's right foot. The wound care physician noted the need for a surgical examination for revision of the right TMA stump, but this recommendation was not communicated to the resident's primary physician or nurse practitioner. The facility's staff, including the Assistant Director of Nurses and the Social Services Director, acknowledged that the necessary follow-up appointments were not scheduled, and the resident was discharged without these critical consultations being arranged. The failure to ensure proper follow-up care and communication among the facility's staff and external healthcare providers may have contributed to the resident's wound infection and subsequent amputation of the right leg below the knee. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of awareness and communication regarding the resident's follow-up needs, highlighting deficiencies in the facility's processes for managing and coordinating care for residents with complex medical needs.
Infection Control Breach Due to Improper Dressing Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain proper infection prevention and control standards for nine residents when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) wore a loosened gauze dressing on her right hand. The CNA had burned her hand at home and chose to cover it with a dressing rather than call in sick. During her shift, she washed her hands with the dressing on and changed it three times, which was observed to be dislodged near the thumb and top of the hand. This action posed a risk of spreading infection to the residents under her care and potentially to others she assisted. The Director of Staff Development (DSD) confirmed that the dressing was only partially covered with an occlusive dressing and was peeling away, which was against the facility's infection control policies. The facility's policy emphasized hand hygiene as the primary means to prevent infection spread, requiring all personnel to follow handwashing procedures. The Administrator also acknowledged that the CNA should have changed the dressing every time she washed her hands to prevent the risk of infection spread.
Deficiencies in Oxygen Therapy Management
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide respiratory care in accordance with professional standards for three residents receiving oxygen therapy. Resident 53 was observed receiving oxygen therapy without a physician's order, which is necessary to determine the correct flow rate and monitor oxygen saturation levels. The Licensed Nurse confirmed the absence of an order and was unsure why the resident was receiving oxygen therapy. The Director of Nursing stated that a physician's order is expected for oxygen administration. Additionally, both Resident 53 and Resident 90 did not have care plans developed for their oxygen use. Resident 53's care plan was missing, which should have informed staff of the need for oxygen therapy. Similarly, Resident 90, who was diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, was observed using oxygen without a corresponding care plan. The Director of Nursing and the Director of Staff Development emphasized the importance of care plans to ensure staff are aware of and can meet the residents' needs. Resident 30's nasal cannula was found to be expired, and the oxygen humidifier bottle was not labeled with a change date. The Licensed Nurse confirmed that the nasal cannula was nine days old, exceeding the recommended seven-day change interval, which poses a risk of infection. The Director of Nursing and the Infection Preventionist both stated that oxygen tubing and humidification water should be changed weekly to prevent infection and ensure proper function.
Medication Storage Deficiencies in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure safe medication storage practices in two out of four medication carts and two medication storage rooms. Observations revealed expired, unlabeled, and undated prescription medications in the active storage areas of medication cart 2, including vials of Atropine Sulfate and Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solutions. Medication cart 4 contained an undated foil package of Ipratropium Bromide and Albuterol Sulfate inhalation solution. Additionally, the Station 1 medication room had an undated open foil package of Albuterol Sulfate Inhalation Solution, and the Station 2 medication room contained a vial of liquid Lorazepam belonging to a discharged resident. Over-the-counter liquid medications with dry, crusty debris were also found in medication carts 2 and 4. Licensed nurses confirmed that medications should be labeled, dated when opened, and disposed of after a specified period. The Director of Nursing stated that medications should be pulled for destruction when expired, undated, unlabeled, or belonging to discharged residents. The facility's policy indicated that nursing staff are responsible for maintaining medication storage areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner, and that the dispensing pharmacy should be contacted for instructions regarding the return or destruction of discontinued, outdated, or improperly labeled medications.
Food Safety and Sanitation Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure safe food production in accordance with professional standards for food safety, affecting 91 residents who received facility-prepared meals. During an inspection, it was observed that opened food packages and containers were not labeled with an open date. Specific instances included unlabeled containers of ground mustard, rubbed sage spice, baking powder, parsley flakes, oregano leaves, cream of wheat dry cereal, and a bin containing a white substance. The facility's policy required all food items to be labeled and dated, but this was not adhered to. Additionally, the facility did not remove spoiled and expired food products. An opened container of Italian seasoning was found to be expired, a red onion with mold growth was noted, and loaves of bread were expired. In the walk-in refrigerator, a flat of eggs contained a cracked egg. These observations were contrary to the facility's policy, which required produce to be fresh and free of spoilage, and bread to be used in the order delivered to ensure freshness. The facility also failed to maintain cleanliness of kitchen equipment and food contact surfaces. A can opener had a dried grayish substance on the blade, and the walk-in refrigerator had rust and substances on the walls. The oven had black, grimy build-up, and a metal strainer had a dried brownish substance. Other equipment, such as a toaster oven, commercial mixer, muffin tin, and metal rack, were also found with various residues. Furthermore, a partially consumed bottle of drinking water was found on a shelf with food items in the dry food storage area, which was against the FDA Food Code that requires designated areas for employee consumption to prevent contamination.
Failure to Provide Communication and Entertainment Alternatives
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a resident with alternative methods of communication and entertainment, despite the resident's physical limitations that prevented the use of a cell phone or tablet device. The resident, who was readmitted to the facility with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy and adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, was provided with a device by their family to receive phone calls and listen to music. However, the facility repeatedly unplugged the device, citing concerns about it bothering the roommate and the potential for the family to overhear the roommate's conversations. Interviews with staff and family members revealed that the resident enjoyed listening to music and white noise, which helped them relax and feel less lonely. Despite this, the staff were instructed to unplug the device, and no alternative was provided. The facility's policies on personal property and creating a homelike environment emphasize the importance of allowing residents to use personal belongings to maintain comfort and independence, yet these policies were not adhered to in this case.
Resident's Call Light Inaccessible, Risking Unmet Needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accommodate the needs of a resident when the resident's call light was not within reach, placing the resident at risk of falls and unmet care needs. The resident, who was readmitted to the facility with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy and adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, was observed with contractures of both arms and hands, which were held against her chest. During an observation, the resident attempted to reach her call light but was unable to extend her arms enough to access it. The resident stated that if she could not reach the call light, she would yell for help. A licensed nurse confirmed that the resident was unable to reach her call light and stated that it should be within reach. The resident's care plan indicated that the resident was at risk for falls and required the call light to be within reach to request assistance. The Director of Nursing stated that it was her expectation that residents' call lights would be in reach at all times. A review of the facility's policy on answering call lights indicated that the call light should be accessible to the resident when in bed and that the resident call system should be answered immediately.
Improper Use of Geri Chair as Restraint
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Resident 19 was free from the use of physical restraints. Resident 19, who was admitted in 2023 with a history of falling, fractures, and altered mental status, was observed on multiple occasions sitting in a Geri chair that was reclined with the footrest elevated. This positioning prevented Resident 19 from freely getting out of the chair, effectively acting as a restraint. The Director of Staff Development (DSD) confirmed that the Geri chair should be upright with the footrest down when the resident is awake to avoid it being considered a restraint. Observations and interviews revealed that Resident 19 was awake and attempting to get out of the Geri chair, which was reclined and had the footrest elevated. The Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the expectation was for the footrest to be down to allow residents to get in and out of the chair easily. The facility's policy on the use of restraints indicated that restraints should only be used to treat medical symptoms and not for staff convenience or fall prevention. The policy also defined physical restraints as any device that restricts freedom of movement, which includes Geri chairs that residents cannot remove themselves.
Failure to Develop Resident-Specific Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement resident-specific care plans for three residents, leading to potential unmet care needs. Resident 32, who was admitted with end-stage renal disease and dependent on dialysis, did not have a care plan addressing her dialysis treatment. Despite receiving dialysis three times a week, there was no documented care plan to guide staff in meeting her dialysis needs, as confirmed by a licensed nurse. This oversight was contrary to the facility's policy, which mandates a comprehensive care plan for residents with end-stage renal disease. Resident 197, admitted with chronic pain syndrome and a splint on her left arm, also lacked a care plan for her splint care. The Director of Nursing confirmed the absence of a care plan, which should have included interventions for monitoring the splint and preventing skin problems. The facility's policy requires regular review and management of splints as part of the resident's care plan, which was not adhered to in this case. Resident 46, involved in an altercation with another resident, did not have a behavioral care plan addressing her conflict with Resident 23. Despite multiple incidents and ongoing tension between the two residents, there was no care plan to guide staff in managing these behaviors. The Social Services Director and the Director of Nursing acknowledged the lack of a behavioral care plan, which was necessary to prevent escalation and ensure appropriate interventions were in place. This was in violation of the facility's policy on resident-to-resident altercations, which requires care plan updates following such incidents.
Failure to Update Care Plans for Residents with Changing Conditions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to update or revise the comprehensive care plan for two residents, leading to potential inadequacies in their care. Resident 83 experienced a change in condition due to the development of multiple skin wounds or ulcers, as documented in the SBAR Summary for Providers Record. Despite the physician being notified and a wound care consult being ordered, the Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged that no care plan was initiated for this change in condition. The facility's policy requires care plans to be updated with any significant change in a resident's condition, which was not adhered to in this case. Resident 71's care plan was also not updated in a timely manner regarding her smoking habits. Initially admitted with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and centrilobular emphysema, Resident 71's smoking care plan was not revised to reflect her switch from tobacco to vape products until much later. The Activity Director (AD) admitted to not updating the care plan when Resident 71 began vaping, which led to confusion among staff about her smoking privileges and preferences. The Director of Staff Development (DSD) and Licensed Nurse (LN) 8 emphasized the importance of having updated smoking care plans to ensure staff are aware of residents' smoking preferences and necessary precautions. The facility's policy mandates that comprehensive, person-centered care plans be developed within seven days of a significant change in status and be revised as residents' conditions change. The failure to update the care plans for Residents 83 and 71 as required by the facility's policy and procedure potentially compromised their care and well-being, as staff may not have been aware of the necessary interventions or changes in their conditions.
Failure to Execute Orthopedic Referral for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow a physician's order for a resident, identified as Resident 197, who was admitted with a splint on her left arm due to an injury. Despite a referral from the facility's Medical Director to see an orthopedist for persistent pain, the resident had not been seen by a specialist for six months. The resident's clinical records indicated a history of chronic pain syndrome and a previous injury requiring a splint, with multiple orders and notes confirming the need for an orthopedic consultation. However, the referral was not executed, and the resident continued to wear the same splint since admission. Interviews with facility staff, including a licensed nurse and the Director of Nursing, revealed that the referral was not carried out due to transportation issues, as the resident's wheelchair exceeded transport capacity, and the clinic could not accommodate her in a gurney. The splint was observed to have brown spots and a foul odor, indicating potential skin issues. The Medical Director confirmed the need for the referral and suggested that the resident should have been sent to the ER if transportation to the orthopedic clinic was not feasible. The facility's job description for Licensed Vocational Nurses emphasized the importance of following physician orders and meeting residents' individualized care needs.
Failure to Provide Vision Care for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary vision care for a resident who complained of worsening eyesight and requested to see an ophthalmologist. Despite the resident's repeated requests and the presence of a care plan intervention indicating the need for an ophthalmology referral, the facility did not assist in scheduling the required appointment. The resident, who had been admitted in 2022 with diagnoses including palliative care, history of falling, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder, expressed concerns about her vision deteriorating and reported specific symptoms such as her right eye fading to black and experiencing lightening flicks. The Social Services Director (SSD) acknowledged the responsibility for arranging ancillary care, including vision appointments, and confirmed that an appointment should have been made shortly after the care plan was created. However, there was no documentation in the resident's clinical record regarding her vision concerns or any follow-up appointments. The Director of Nursing (DON) also confirmed the lack of documentation and emphasized the risk of continued vision decline, which could affect the resident's mobility and increase the risk of falls. The facility's policy on visually impaired residents highlighted the responsibility to assist with scheduling appointments and arranging transportation, which was not fulfilled in this case.
Failure to Follow Heel Protector Order for Pressure Ulcer Prevention
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident received consistent treatment to promote the healing and prevention of pressure ulcers. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including pressure ulcers to the sacral region and left heel, had a physician's order for heel protectors to be worn on both feet every shift for pressure ulcer prevention. However, during observations and interviews, it was confirmed that the resident's feet and heels were bare and without protection, indicating that the treatment order was not followed. The Director of Staff Development and the Director of Nursing both acknowledged that the treatment order for heel protectors was not adhered to. The facility's policy and procedure for wound care, which includes applying treatments as indicated and using supportive devices as instructed, was not followed in this case. This oversight placed the resident at risk for worsening their current pressure ulcer and increased the chance for the development of new pressure ulcers.
Failure to Implement Restorative Services and Care Plan for Resident with Quadriplegia
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate care and services to maintain the highest level of range of motion (ROM) for a resident diagnosed with quadriplegia. The resident, identified as Resident 74, had an order for Restorative Nurse Assistant (RNA) services, which included donning and doffing bilateral orthotics and performing passive range of motion (PROM) exercises. However, these services were not implemented, as confirmed by the RNA staff who were unaware of the resident's needs. The Occupational Therapy Director also did not know what happened to the referral for the resident, and the Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA) and Licensed Nurse (LN) caring for the resident were not informed about the hand splints or the need for ROM exercises. Additionally, the facility did not develop a care plan for Resident 74's arm and hand contractures, which are conditions that could lead to deformity and rigidity of joints. The Medical Records staff confirmed the absence of a care plan, and the Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged that a care plan was necessary to communicate the resident's care needs and ensure staff awareness. The lack of a care plan and the failure to implement RNA services placed Resident 74 at risk of a decline in ROM and worsening contractures.
Failure to Implement Fall Precautions for High-Risk Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure appropriate fall precaution measures were in place for one resident, identified as Resident 12, who was at high risk for falls. During an observation, it was noted that Resident 12's bedside table was out of reach, and two fall mats intended to cushion falls were not properly positioned next to the resident's bed. One mat was found folded against the wall, and the other was under the bed. A Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) confirmed that the fall mats were sometimes moved during feeding assistance and should have been placed back correctly. The CNA also noted that the resident might attempt to reach the table and fall, indicating a lack of adequate supervision and safety measures. Interviews with nursing staff revealed that Resident 12 was at risk for falls and should have had fall mats and padded side rails due to a risk of seizures. However, the need for fall mats was not documented in the resident's care plan or medical record, which was confirmed by a Licensed Nurse (LN) and the Director of Nurses (DON). The DON acknowledged that the resident's fall risk evaluation indicated a high fall risk, yet the care plan did not include fall mats as an intervention. This oversight in care planning and staff education contributed to the deficiency, as the necessary interventions to prevent falls were not implemented or communicated effectively.
Failure to Obtain Physician's Order for Indwelling Catheter
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to obtain a physician's order for an indwelling foley catheter for a resident who was admitted with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, acute kidney failure, and urine retention. The resident's care plan indicated the presence of an indwelling catheter and the need for regular catheter care and monitoring for signs of infection. However, the resident's nurses' weekly summaries did not reflect the presence of a catheter, and there was no physician order documented in the clinical record for its use. During interviews, both the Assistant Director of Nurses and the Director of Nursing confirmed the absence of a physician's order for the catheter, which is necessary to ensure proper care and monitoring by the nursing staff. The lack of an order meant that the staff was not adequately informed about the resident's catheter care needs, including monitoring for urine characteristics and signs of infection. This oversight placed the resident at risk for catheter-associated urinary tract infections and other complications.
Deficiency in IV Therapy Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the safe and appropriate administration of intravenous (IV) therapy for a resident, identified as Resident 297, who was receiving treatment for a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. During an observation, it was noted that the IV tubing connected to Resident 297's access site was lying on the floor, and the IV infusion bag was not labeled with the date, time, or initials of the staff who administered the medication. The Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON) confirmed these observations and acknowledged the importance of labeling the IV bag to track administration details and prevent expiration. The ADON also recognized the risk of infection and potential physical hazards posed by the tubing lying on the floor. The Director of Nursing (DON) stated that it was her expectation for IV infusion bags to be properly labeled and for IV tubing to be kept off the floor to prevent infection. The facility's policies and procedures, including those on preventing intravenous catheter-related infections and ensuring resident safety, were reviewed and indicated the importance of maintaining a safe environment and adhering to current standards of care. However, these standards were not met in the case of Resident 297, leading to a deficiency in the administration of IV therapy.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 194 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Modesto
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Valley Skilled Nursing Center | 1.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Modesto Post Acute Center | 1.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 17 | 0 |
| Golden Modesto Care Center | 1.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Crestwood Manor | 1.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 11 | 0 |
| Garden City Healthcare Center | 2.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 20 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for River View Post Acute.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.