Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Rancho Mesa Care Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
RN Coverage Not Maintained for Required Hours: The facility failed to provide RN services for 8 consecutive hours on multiple sampled days. PBJ staffing reports showed no RN coverage on several days across two fiscal quarters, and review of DHPPD worksheets and payroll records for sampled dates showed no documented evidence that an RN worked at all. The ADON acknowledged call-offs led to no RN coverage, and stated RNs were responsible for IV meds, admissions, resident assessments, and oversight of CNAs and LVNs.
A resident with muscle wasting, protein-calorie malnutrition, and dementia had orders for a LAL mattress for wound management and for the mattress to be set to the resident’s weight every shift. The mattress was observed set to 210 lbs instead of the correct 150 lbs setting, and the TAR had multiple blank entries for both the mattress use and weight-setting tasks. The WCN confirmed the setting was incorrect, and the DON acknowledged the missing documentation and that the correct setting affects airflow and therapeutic benefit.
A resident with dementia, psychosis, hypertension, and bone density/structure disorders did not have bilateral padded floor mats in place as ordered and care planned for fall risk. During observation, only one mat was present, while the WCN, ADON, and DON confirmed the resident was supposed to have mats on both sides of the bed. The MAR also showed inconsistent yes/no documentation for mat placement, and the ADON acknowledged staff were not correctly documenting verification of the mats.
Medication administration was not provided within the required time frame for a resident with morbid obesity, HF, and O2 dependence. An LVN gave omeprazole and empagliflozin 1 hour and 25 minutes before the scheduled MAR time because the resident preferred early meds, even though the omeprazole order specified it was to be given 30 minutes before meals and the IP and DON stated meds should be given within 1 hour of the scheduled time unless otherwise ordered.
An LVN administered omeprazole and empagliflozin to a resident 1 hour and 25 minutes before the scheduled time, resulting in a medication error rate of 7.69% with 2 errors in 26 opportunities. The resident had morbid obesity, heart failure, and oxygen dependence, and the omeprazole order required it to be given 30 minutes before meals. The DON and IP stated meds were to be given within 1 hour of the scheduled time unless otherwise specified, and the facility policy required administration in accordance with prescriber orders.
Expired Bio Patches were found in an IV medication cart during observation, and an LVN confirmed they were expired. The DON later inspected the box and stated it should not have been in the IV cart. Record review showed facility policy required outdated or deteriorated medications and biologicals to be removed from stock and handled per disposal procedures, but the DON stated the policy was not followed.
An LVN failed to perform hand hygiene between administering medications to two residents, including one resident on EBP with a Foley catheter. The same LVN also used only one glove while checking a resident’s blood sugar and while giving a subcutaneous insulin injection, using an ungloved hand during both tasks. The IP and DON stated hand hygiene and proper glove use were required, and facility policies called for hand hygiene before and after resident contact and glove use when exposure to blood or body fluids was likely.
A resident with hemiplegia and moderate cognitive impairment experienced a delay in receiving a requested diaper change due to a lack of communication between CNAs during shift change. The facility did not follow its policy for providing timely ADL assistance, resulting in a three-hour delay.
The facility did not adhere to the prescribed menu for residents on CCHO and regular diets, serving incorrect portions of mashed potatoes and meatloaf. The cook used a larger scoop than specified for mashed potatoes, and the facility lacked a scale to verify meatloaf portions. These actions potentially impacted the nutritional intake of 45 residents.
The facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in its food storage and preparation areas, with crumbs and dust found under the coffee maker, a build-up of food crumbs and a liquid spill in the dry storage room, and old food and dust under refrigerators in the staff lounge. Additionally, the ice machine had black and yellow discoloration where ice is formed. These conditions were not in line with the facility's sanitation policy or the FDA Federal Food Code, posing a risk of contamination and pest attraction.
The facility failed to provide 26 residents on a mechanical soft diet with the appropriate form of meatloaf, serving them regular diet meatloaf instead of the required mashable and moist version with gravy. This was observed during a kitchen inspection, and both the Dietetic Services Supervisor and Registered Dietitian confirmed the need to follow the prescribed menu to prevent choking and aspiration risks.
A facility failed to complete and transmit an MDS Discharge Assessment for a resident discharged with home health services. The resident's last assessment was an Admission Assessment, and the oversight was confirmed by the LVN/MDS Nurse. The DON acknowledged the failure to adhere to facility policy and federal guidelines.
A resident with cerebral infarction and dysphagia did not receive tube feeding as ordered, leading to potential nutritional deficiencies. The feeding was stopped prematurely, and the required amount was not administered, as confirmed by the LVN and DON. The resident's Nutrition Assessment indicated malnutrition and a BMI of 19, underscoring the need for consistent nutritional support.
A resident with cerebral infarction, aphasia, and dysphagia did not receive the full prescribed dose of enteral tube feeding due to nursing staff's lack of competency in calculating the amount administered. The LVN/MDS was unable to determine the feeding amount from the previous shift, resulting in the resident receiving only 940 ml instead of the prescribed 1200 ml. The DON confirmed the oversight and noted the absence of competency evaluations for such calculations, while the RD highlighted the nurses' responsibility to ensure full dosage and timely bottle changes.
A resident with GERD was given Omeprazole after breakfast instead of before, as per physician's orders. The DON confirmed the error, noting the medication's reduced effectiveness when not administered as directed. Facility policy requires adherence to physician's orders, which was not followed in this instance.
The facility failed to store vaccines under proper temperature control, as two vaccine solutions were found in a medication cart instead of the refrigerator. An LVN admitted to storing an unopened vial of Covid Spikevax 23-24 and an unopened syringe of Afluria Quad 2023-2024 in the cart since the start of his shift. The DON confirmed the improper storage and acknowledged the facility's failure to follow its medication storage policy.
RN Coverage Not Provided for Required 8 Consecutive Hours
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for 8 consecutive hours on 15 sampled days during Fiscal Year Quarter 4 of 2024 and Fiscal Year Quarter 3 of 2025. Review of the Payroll-Based Journal staffing reports showed no RN coverage for eight consecutive hours on six days in FY Quarter 4 of 2024 and nine days in FY Quarter 3 of 2025. The report identified specific dates in which the facility had no RN coverage for the required consecutive hours, and the deficiency affected the facility’s ability to provide RN services and oversight for all residents. During interviews and record review, the Director of Staff Development stated the facility used DHPPD worksheets and payroll records to calculate staffing hours and provided documentation for two sampled dates. Review of those worksheets and payroll records showed no documented evidence that any RN worked at all on either sampled day. The Assistant Director of Nursing acknowledged there was no evidence an RN worked on those dates and stated that although an RN had been scheduled, call-offs resulted in no RN coverage at all. The ADON also stated the facility had experienced trouble with RN coverage on weekends in the past. The ADON further stated RNs were responsible for administering IV medications, admitting patients, assessing residents, and providing supervision and clinical oversight for CNAs and LVNs. The Administrator stated an RN was supposed to work every day for at least 8 consecutive hours, and the facility policy stated a registered nurse provides services at least eight consecutive hours every 24 hours, seven days a week.
Incorrect Low Air Loss Mattress Setting and Missing Documentation
Penalty
Summary
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing was not ensured for one sampled resident who was admitted with diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy, protein-calorie malnutrition, and dementia. The resident had physician orders for a low air loss mattress every shift for wound management and to set the mattress according to the resident’s weight every shift. The care plan identified the resident as at risk for skin breakdown and included maintenance treatment as ordered, and another care plan addressed impaired skin integrity with interventions to follow facility protocols for treatment of injury and identify and resolve causative factors where possible. The resident’s history and physical indicated a weight of 153 lbs, but the treatment record showed multiple blank entries for the low air loss mattress task and for setting the mattress according to the resident’s weight. During observation, the mattress was found set to 210 lbs instead of the 150 lbs setting, and the WCN confirmed it was incorrect and stated it should have been set to 150 lbs. The DON acknowledged the mattress should be set to the correct weight because the setting changes the airflow and also acknowledged the missing documentation on multiple shifts. The facility policy stated that residents at risk for pressure ulcers should be placed on an appropriate redistribution support surface and that documentation in the medical record must be objective, complete, and accurate.
Missing Bilateral Fall Mats and Inconsistent Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Resident 6 had a fall mat on both sides of the bed as specified in the resident's care plan and physician's orders. Resident 6 was admitted with diagnoses including dementia, hypertension, unspecified psychosis, and disorders of bone density and structure. During an observation in the resident's room, Resident 6 was lying on her left side in bed with a fall mat on only one side of the bed and no fall mat on the other side. The WCN acknowledged that only one fall mat was present and stated she did not know why the resident did not have a fall mat on each side of the bed. The ADON stated Resident 6 was supposed to have floor mats on each side of the bed, and the DON stated the purpose of floor mats next to a resident's bed was to help prevent injury in case the resident experienced a fall. The physician's order directed that bilateral padded floormats may be used as a safety precaution related to fall risk and that placement be monitored every shift. Review of the MAR showed the order was documented with yes/no responses, and 11 of 52 shifts were marked no for verification of bilateral floor mats. The ADON acknowledged that nursing staff was not correctly documenting verification of the floor mats in Resident 6's clinical record. The care plan for risk for falls also included bilateral padded floor mats, and the facility policy required resident-centered fall prevention interventions and documentation to be objective, complete, and accurate.
Medication Given Outside Scheduled Time
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure medications were administered within 1 hour of the scheduled administration time for one sampled resident. Resident 57, who was admitted with diagnoses including morbid obesity, heart failure, and dependence on supplemental oxygen, had orders for omeprazole 20 mg delayed release once daily for acid reflux, to be given 30 minutes before meals, and empagliflozin 25 mg. On September 17, 2025, LVN 1 reviewed the MAR and stated the omeprazole and empagliflozin were scheduled for 6:30 AM but were going to be given at 5:05 AM. LVN 1 then administered both medications by mouth at 5:05 AM, which was 1 hour and 25 minutes before the scheduled time. During interview, LVN 1 acknowledged the medications were given 1 hour and 25 minutes early and stated he did so because the resident preferred to receive all medications as soon as she woke up. The IP stated medications were only supposed to be administered up to 1 hour before or after the scheduled time and that a physician order or MAR change would be needed for a different time. The IP reviewed the physician orders and could not find an order allowing administration more than 1 hour early. Resident 57 later stated she had not told anyone she preferred to receive omeprazole at 5:00 AM and said that was just the time it had been given since she had been at the facility. The MAR showed both medications were scheduled for 6:30 AM, and the physician's order for omeprazole specified it was to be given 30 minutes before meals.
Medication Administration Error Rate Exceeded Allowed Threshold
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5% when the observed error rate was 7.69%, with two errors in 26 opportunities. During observation of medication administration for one resident, an LVN administered omeprazole 20 mg delayed release and empagliflozin 25 mg at 5:05 AM even though both medications were scheduled for 6:30 AM. The LVN stated he gave the medications early because the resident preferred to receive all medications as soon as she woke up. The resident involved had diagnoses including morbid obesity, heart failure, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. The resident’s physician order for omeprazole directed that it be given once daily for acid reflux and 30 minutes before meals, and the MAR showed the medication was scheduled for 6:30 AM. The resident later stated she had not told anyone she preferred to receive omeprazole at 5:00 AM and said that was just the time it had been given since she had been at the facility. The DON and IP stated medications were to be administered within one hour before or after the scheduled time unless otherwise specified, and the facility policy stated medications are to be administered in accordance with prescriber orders and within one hour of the prescribed time unless otherwise specified.
Expired Bio Patches Left in IV Cart
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that one discontinued medication was removed from the IV medication cart and that one box of Bio Patches was not expired and available for use. During a concurrent observation and interview, an LVN inspected a box of Bio Patches from the IV medication cart and found that the box contained 10 patches with an expiration date that had passed. The LVN stated the patches were expired. During a later concurrent interview and observation, the DON inspected the same box and acknowledged the expiration date, stating the expired box should not have been in the IV cart. During concurrent interview and record review, the facility’s policy and procedure manual was reviewed and indicated that outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications must be immediately removed from stock and disposed of according to medication disposal procedures. The DON stated the policy was not followed. Another policy on medication labeling and storage was also reviewed, and it stated that discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated medications or biologicals require the dispensing pharmacy to be contacted for instructions regarding return or destruction; the DON again stated the policy was not followed.
Failure to Follow Hand Hygiene and Glove Use During Resident Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control policies and procedures during medication administration and resident care. During an observation in a shared room, an LVN administered levothyroxine to one resident and then went to the medication cart and retrieved pantoprazole for the other resident without performing hand hygiene between the two residents. The second resident was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions, and the doorway to the room had a sign indicating that status. The Infection Preventionist stated staff were supposed to perform hand washing or use hand sanitizer between residents, and the DON stated hand hygiene between residents was important to help prevent the spread of infection. Resident 47 had diagnoses including chronic viral Hepatitis C, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the right dominant side, and hypertension. Physician orders dated September 15, 2025, indicated the resident had a Foley catheter and that staff were to monitor for signs and symptoms of infection. The facility policy on hand hygiene stated hand hygiene was the primary means to prevent the spread of infections and required handwashing or alcohol-based hand rub before and after direct contact with residents and before preparing or handling medications. The facility also failed to ensure proper glove use during blood sugar testing and insulin administration for the same resident. During observation, the LVN wore only one glove while checking the resident’s blood sugar, using an ungloved hand to hold the lancet and glucometer, and later wore only one glove while administering a subcutaneous insulin injection with the ungloved hand. The LVN acknowledged using only one ungloved hand for both tasks and said he had done so because he was focused on ensuring he was performing handwashing correctly. The Infection Preventionist and DON stated staff were supposed to wear two gloves for blood sugar checks and injections, and the facility’s glove policy stated gloves were indicated when hands could come in contact with blood, body fluids, secretions, excretions, mucous membranes, non-intact skin, or during invasive procedures.
Failure to Provide Timely ADL Assistance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its policy and procedure for activities of daily living (ADL) by not providing timely care and services to a resident who was unable to perform ADLs independently. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis, had a moderate cognitive impairment and was completely dependent on staff for toileting hygiene. On one occasion, the resident requested a diaper change from a certified nursing assistant (CNA 1), who stated she only performed diaper changes once per shift. As a result, the resident's request was delayed for approximately three hours. The delay occurred because CNA 1 did not communicate the resident's request to the incoming CNA (CNA 2) at the end of her shift. CNA 2, who was unaware of the situation, changed the resident's diaper twice during her shift, but not until several hours after the initial request. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged that the facility's policy, which mandates appropriate care and services for residents unable to carry out ADLs independently, was not followed in this instance.
Failure to Follow Prescribed Menu and Portion Sizes
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to the prescribed menu for residents on a carbohydrate-controlled diet (CCHO) and regular diets during lunch on August 5, 2024. Specifically, the cook served 1/2 cup of mashed potatoes instead of the 1/3 cup indicated on the menu for residents on the CCHO diet. This discrepancy was observed during a meal preparation and tray line observation, where the cook used a #8 scoop (4 oz) instead of the #12 scoop (3.25 oz) specified in the Cooks Spreadsheet. The Dietetic Services Supervisor (DSS) and the Registered Dietitian (RD) both confirmed that the menu should be followed as planned. Additionally, the facility did not have a method to ensure that the correct portion size of 4 oz of meat was served to residents on both CCHO and regular diets. During the same observation, the DSS was unable to verify the weight of the meatloaf portion due to the absence of an ounce scale. The RD emphasized the importance of following the menu to ensure correct portion sizes, as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure titled "Menu Planning." These failures potentially affected the nutritional intake and weight maintenance of 45 out of 52 residents.
Sanitation Deficiencies in Food Storage and Preparation Areas
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in its food storage and preparation areas, as observed during a survey. Crumbs and dust were found on the shelf under the coffee maker, which could attract pests and promote microorganism growth. Additionally, the floor under the shelves in the dry storage room had a build-up of food crumbs and a liquid spill, further increasing the risk of pest attraction and microorganism growth. These conditions were not in line with the facility's sanitation policy or the FDA Federal Food Code, which require nonfood contact surfaces to be free of dust, dirt, and food residue. In the staff lounge, old food and dust were found under the refrigerators, which the Dietetic Services Supervisor acknowledged. The Registered Dietitian stated that the area should be kept clean to the same standards as the main kitchen. This failure to maintain cleanliness could potentially contaminate food and attract pests, posing a risk to the residents who consume food prepared in the facility. The ice machine in the facility was also found to have black and yellow discoloration in the area where ice is formed. This was acknowledged by the Maintenance staff and the Registered Dietitian, who stated that the ice machine should be clean and free of discoloration. The facility's policy requires the ice machine to be cleaned and sanitized monthly, but the observed condition indicated a failure to adhere to this policy, potentially leading to contamination of the ice used by residents.
Failure to Serve Appropriate Diet to Residents on Mechanical Soft Diet
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that food was prepared in a form designed to meet the individual needs of residents on a mechanical soft diet. Specifically, 26 residents who required a mechanically soft diet due to difficulties with chewing and swallowing were served regular diet meatloaf instead of the mashable and moist meatloaf with gravy as prescribed. This oversight was observed during a kitchen inspection, where a cook served a resident the incorrect form of meatloaf. The facility's documentation, including the Cooks Spreadsheet - Summer Menus, indicated that the meatloaf for mechanical soft diets should be mashable and moist with gravy. Interviews with the Dietetic Services Supervisor and the Registered Dietitian confirmed that the cook should have followed the menu to prevent risks such as choking and aspiration. The facility's policy on Menu Planning also emphasized the importance of adhering to menus that meet the nutritional needs of residents according to physician orders.
Failure to Complete and Transmit MDS Discharge Assessment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete and transmit a Minimum Data Set (MDS) Discharge Assessment for a resident, identified as Resident 53, in accordance with federal guidelines. Resident 53 was admitted with diagnoses including hyperlipidemia and major depressive disorder. The resident was discharged home with home health services on March 28, 2024, but the discharge assessment was not completed or transmitted. The last MDS assessment for Resident 53 was the Admission Assessment completed on February 15, 2024. This oversight was confirmed by the LVN/MDS Nurse during a review of the resident's clinical record. The Director of Nurses (DON) acknowledged that the discharge assessment should have been completed on the discharge date, March 28, 2024, and confirmed that the facility did not adhere to its policy. The facility's policy, revised in March 2022, mandates that comprehensive assessments be conducted at intervals designated by OBRA and PPS requirements. The DON reviewed the CMS RAI manual, which outlines the federally mandated assessments, including the Discharge Assessment, and confirmed that the facility failed to follow these guidelines.
Failure to Administer Tube Feeding as Ordered
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for Resident 58, who was dependent on tube feeding due to conditions such as cerebral infarction, aphasia, dysphagia, and debility. On August 6, 2024, it was observed that Resident 58's tube feeding was not connected, and the machine was off, contrary to the physician's order which specified that the feeding should be administered at 60 ml/hr for 20 hours daily. The Licensed Vocational Nurse/Minimum Data Set (LVN/MDS) confirmed that the tube feeding was stopped at 9:40 AM, and the feeding bottle was discarded without calculating the total amount administered. The Director of Nurses (DON) confirmed that the tube feeding should have been on from 2:00 PM to 10:00 AM, and a new bag should have been hung at 6:00 AM to ensure the resident received the full 1200 ml as ordered. The Registered Dietitian (RD) noted that without the tube feeding running, the resident was not receiving necessary nutrition, increasing the risk of weight loss. Resident 58's Nutrition Assessment indicated malnutrition related to dysphagia, severe muscle wasting, and a BMI of 19, with a goal weight range of 160-170 pounds, highlighting the critical need for consistent nutritional support.
Inadequate Tube Feeding Administration Due to Staff Competency Issues
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that nursing staff had the appropriate competencies to provide adequate tube feeding to a resident, identified as Resident 58. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, aphasia, and dysphagia, was prescribed 1200 ml of Osmolite 1.5 enteral tube feeding formula per day. However, the resident only received 940 ml due to the tube feeding being stopped prematurely. The Licensed Vocational Nurse/Minimum Data Set (LVN/MDS) was unable to calculate the total amount of feeding administered during the previous shift, leading to an incomplete dose. The Director of Nurses (DON) confirmed that the tube feeding was not administered as per the physician's orders, and a new bag should have been hung at 6:00 AM. The DON acknowledged that there was no competency evaluation for licensed nursing staff on calculating the amount of feeding administered per shift. The Registered Dietitian (RD) emphasized that licensed nurses are responsible for ensuring the full dose is given and knowing when to change the feeding bottle. The facility's policy indicated that inservice training on monitoring enteral solutions should be provided, but this was not effectively implemented.
Medication Administration Error for GERD Treatment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to administer medication according to the physician's orders for a resident diagnosed with hepatic encephalopathy, morbid obesity, and phantom limb syndrome. The resident was prescribed Omeprazole, a delayed-release medication intended to manage gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), to be taken before breakfast. However, during an observation, a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) administered the medication after the resident had already eaten breakfast, contrary to the physician's instructions. The Director of Nurses (DON) confirmed that the medication should have been given before breakfast to ensure its effectiveness. The facility's policy and procedure manual also stipulates that medications must be administered in accordance with the attending physician's written orders. The failure to follow these orders and the facility's policy was acknowledged by the DON, who noted that the medication would not have the same effect if given after a meal.
Improper Storage of Vaccines in Medication Cart
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to store medications under proper temperature control, as specified by the manufacturer, when two vaccine solutions were found inside the medication cart instead of the refrigerator. During an observation and interview, a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) was found to have stored an unopened vial of Covid Spikevax 23-24 and an unopened syringe of Afluria Quad 2023-2024 in the medication cart since the start of his shift. Both vaccines were labeled to be kept in the refrigerator, and the LVN acknowledged that they should not have been in the medication cart. The Director of Nurses (DON) confirmed the improper storage of the vaccines and acknowledged that the facility did not follow its policy on medication storage. The facility's policy, effective since November 2020, requires medications and biologicals to be stored safely and properly, following the manufacturer's recommendations. The manufacturer's guidelines for Spikevax and the CDC's guidelines for influenza vaccines both specify that these vaccines should be refrigerated between 2°C and 8°C. The failure to adhere to these guidelines had the potential to decrease the efficacy of the vaccines administered to residents.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,682 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 5 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Alta Loma
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Villa Mesa Care Center | 2.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 19 | 0 |
| Upland Rehabilitation And Care Center | 2.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Heritage Park Nursing Center | 3.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Ontario Grove Healthcare & Wellness Centre, Lp | 3.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Las Colinas Post Acute | 3.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 24 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Rancho Mesa Care Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.