Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around January 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of August 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Plumas District Hospital Dp/snf during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Controlled substances and medications were not stored according to facility policy. The DON confirmed a discontinued Tramadol 50 mg bottle was not double locked before destruction, and an LPN found multiple meds on a cart with incomplete expiration dates, expired bottles of Tessalon, Gabapentin, and Metformin, and Hydrocodone stored in an open bag with no lid. The DON confirmed the expired meds and incomplete expiration dates and stated staff were expected to report illegible dates and not administer expired meds.
Care plans were not revised to reflect changing resident needs for three residents. One resident with an indwelling urinary catheter had no catheter-related interventions in the care plan, another resident with COPD, OA, and chronic pain had reported bilateral hip spasms and pain without corresponding care plan interventions, and a third resident’s care plan did not document interventions related to her son’s loud visits or the planned presence of a male staff member, which the DON confirmed were omitted.
Failure to Manage Indwelling Urinary Catheter: A resident with bladder dysfunction, a stage 4 sacral pressure ulcer, chronic pain syndrome, and osteomyelitis was observed with an indwelling urinary catheter and bedside drainage bag. Record review found no MD order for catheter insertion or continued use, no documented assessment of medical necessity, no catheter-related care plan interventions, and no documentation of routine catheter care in the MAR/nursing notes; the DON confirmed the missing documentation.
Failure to Investigate Suspected Abuse by Resident’s Son: A resident reported her son visited often, asked for money, yelled at her, and upset her during visits. Staff described the son as verbally abusive, loud, and bothersome, and said his behavior made other residents uncomfortable. The DON confirmed the facility did not initiate its abuse investigation process per policy, and the MDS nurse was not familiar with the abuse policy or investigation process.
Controlled substances and medications were improperly stored
Penalty
Summary
Pharmaceutical services were not provided to meet resident needs when controlled substances and other medications were not stored according to facility policy. During a medication cart inspection, the DON showed a bottle of Tramadol 50 mg that had been discontinued for a resident and confirmed it needed to be destroyed, but it was not kept in a securely double locked area as required by the facility’s controlled substance storage policy. The DON stated it was not double locked because she needed a safe that could fit in her office drawer, and confirmed the medication should have been double locked and that the policy was not followed. During the same inspection, LN A and the DON confirmed multiple medication storage problems. The cart contained two Tramadol 50 mg blister packs and one Hydrocodone-acetamin 10-325 mg blister pack with incomplete expiration dates, a bottle of Hydrocodone-acetamin 10-325 mg with no lid and tablets loose in an open plastic bag, and bottles of expired Tessalon, Gabapentin 600 mg, and Metformin 500 mg. There were also 35 out of 50 medication blister packs with incomplete expiration dates. The DON confirmed the expired medications and incomplete expiration dates and stated staff were expected to notify her when expiration dates were incomplete or not legible and to not administer expired medications.
Care plans not revised to reflect resident changes and needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to revise and implement comprehensive care plans for 3 of 8 residents reviewed. Resident 8 was admitted with diagnoses including muscle weakness, difficulty walking, bladder dysfunction, a stage 4 sacral pressure ulcer, chronic pain syndrome, and osteomyelitis. During observation, Resident 8 had an indwelling urinary catheter in place, but the comprehensive care plan dated 1/28/26 did not include interventions for catheter care, monitoring, or related risks, and the DON confirmed the care plan did not include catheter-related interventions. Resident 2 was admitted with diagnoses including COPD, osteoarthritis, and chronic pain. Documentation showed that on 2/3/26 the resident complained that her legs felt like they were ripping apart and reported bilateral hip spasms, and the physician was notified with recommendations to encourage the resident to get out of bed more frequently and provide pain medication as needed. The comprehensive care plan did not include interventions for the spasms, increased mobility, or pain management related to those symptoms, and the DON confirmed the care plan had not been revised. Resident 6 was admitted with diagnoses including right knee osteoarthritis, history of falling, and gait and mobility abnormalities. Review of her care plan showed no interventions for concerns related to her son's visits, although the DON stated his behaviors were loud and bothersome, that a male staff member was to be outside the resident's room during visits, and that the resident's daughter had applied to be her POA; the DON confirmed these interventions were not documented in the care plan.
Failure to Manage Indwelling Urinary Catheter
Penalty
Summary
Appropriate management of an indwelling urinary catheter was not ensured for one resident who was admitted with diagnoses including muscle weakness, difficulty walking, dysfunction of the bladder, a stage 4 pressure ulcer of the sacral region, chronic pain syndrome, and osteomyelitis. During observation, the resident was seen with an indwelling urinary catheter in place and a drainage bag attached at the bedside. Record review showed no physician order for insertion or continued use of the catheter, no documented assessment identifying the medical indication for catheter use, and no documented evaluation of continued necessity. The resident’s comprehensive care plan contained no goals or interventions related to the catheter, catheter care, monitoring for complications, or prevention of UTI. Review of the treatment administration records and nursing documentation also found no documentation of routine catheter care, including peri-care, catheter securement, drainage bag positioning, tubing assessment for kinks or obstruction, or monitoring for signs and symptoms of UTI. The DON confirmed that these records could not be located.
Failure to Investigate Suspected Abuse by Resident’s Son
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to investigate suspicions of abuse involving a resident whose son reportedly verbally assaulted her and coerced her to give him money. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including unilateral osteoarthritis of the right knee, a history of falling, and other abnormalities of gait and mobility. Facility records and interviews showed the resident stated her son had visited, that it was "difficult," and that he had overspent her credit card, while staff later described repeated concerns about the son asking for money and upsetting the resident during visits. Facility staff reported that the son visited frequently, yelled at the resident, called her names, ate her dinner meal at the facility, and brought a male friend who also ate her dinner. A nurse stated the son was verbally abusive and that the resident became upset after his visits and needed her music box to calm down. Staff also reported that the son’s behavior made other residents uncomfortable and that he appeared loud, obnoxious, and sometimes smelled of alcohol during visits. The DON confirmed the son’s behavior was loud and bothersome, likely made other residents uncomfortable, and that staff were very uncomfortable when he visited. The DON also confirmed the facility did not initiate its investigation process per policy. The MDS nurse stated she was not familiar with the facility abuse policy or investigation process. The facility policy required immediate notification, investigation, documentation, and completion of a summation, but no investigation was initiated for the reported abuse concerns.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the citations issued around you in the last 12 months — including the immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Quincy
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eastern Plumas Hospital- Portola Campus Dp/snf | 27.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Seneca District Hospital D/p Snf | 29.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 9 | 0 |
| Lassen Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 36.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 30 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Plumas District Hospital Dp/snf.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.