Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around September 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Milpitas Care Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to develop person-centered care plans for therapy services for five residents who had active orders for PT, OT, and/or ST. Residents with muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and dysphagia received ordered therapy treatments without corresponding care plans that identified target symptoms, measurable goals, and specific interventions. During record review and interviews, the MDS coordinator, DON, and DOR all confirmed that therapy staff were responsible for initiating these therapy care plans and that none had been created, despite facility policy requiring interdisciplinary care planning that includes therapists.
The facility failed to maintain and integrate PT, OT, and ST documentation into the medical records for five residents who had active therapy orders for conditions such as muscle weakness, gait abnormalities, and dysphagia. Record review showed that, despite written orders for multiple weeks of PT, OT, and/or ST, there were no corresponding therapy treatment notes or care plans in the electronic medical record. The MDS coordinator, medical records director, LVN, and DON all confirmed that therapy documentation was not available in the system, and the director of rehabilitation stated that therapy notes were not routinely loaded into the electronic record, even though they are part of the resident’s medical record. Facility policies required progress notes for residents receiving specialized rehabilitation and documentation of treatments or services performed, but these requirements were not met.
A resident with multiple chronic conditions experienced ongoing, unplanned weight loss over several months. Despite documented declines in weight and inconsistent meal intake, the facility did not implement timely interventions, failed to accurately document weight changes, and did not adequately assess or accommodate the resident's food preferences. The registered dietitian did not participate in interdisciplinary meetings or communicate with the resident's representative, and weight variance meetings were not held until after significant weight loss had occurred.
Staff failed to follow proper hand hygiene and food handling protocols during meal service, including not sanitizing hands between assisting two residents and handling the drinking surface of a cup. Additionally, food storage shelves were in poor condition with peeling paint and residue, increasing the risk of food contamination.
Three residents were administered psychotropic medications, including Depakote, quetiapine, lorazepam, haloperidol, and bupropion, without required monitoring for side effects, quarterly assessments, or documentation of behavioral monitoring. The interim DON confirmed the lack of monitoring and assessments, which was not in accordance with the facility's policy on psychotropic medication management.
The facility did not ensure that regular and pureed potatoes were flavorful or served at the required temperature, as observed during a test-tray review by the CDM. The potatoes were found to be bland and below the policy-required temperature, with the CDM confirming ongoing issues in these areas. This failure had the potential to reduce food intake and nutrient consumption among residents.
A resident was not provided with written information or assistance regarding the right to formulate an advance directive, and there was no documentation that this topic was addressed or that help was offered, as required by facility policy.
A resident was not given a written Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) at least two days before the end of Medicare Part A coverage. Instead, the NOMNC was provided to the resident's representative on the day of discharge, after coverage had already ended, contrary to facility policy and federal requirements.
Two residents with documented schizophrenia were admitted without their mental health diagnoses being accurately recorded on PASARR Level I screenings. Nursing staff confirmed the screenings should have indicated serious mental disorders, as required by facility policy, but did not, resulting in missed referrals for PASARR Level II evaluations.
Staff failed to document an apical pulse before administering Digoxin to a resident with atrial fibrillation, and another resident received Carvedilol despite a low diastolic blood pressure, contrary to physician orders and facility policy. The DON confirmed that required checks were not performed or documented prior to medication administration.
A resident with a history of weight loss did not receive one-to-one feeding assistance with all meals or weekly weights as ordered by the physician. Instead, the resident was observed eating independently and was weighed only monthly, contrary to the care plan and physician's orders. The IDON confirmed these services were not provided as required.
The facility did not complete required annual performance reviews for a CNA and an LVN, resulting in missed opportunities to identify training needs and improve staff skills. Personnel files confirmed the absence of these evaluations, and the director of staff development acknowledged the oversight.
A deficiency was identified when staff failed to accurately document the number of lorazepam tablets for destruction. During a medication audit, the DON and an LVN counted 24.5 tablets, but the record sheet showed only 14.5 tablets for destruction, contrary to facility policy requiring accurate documentation of quantities destroyed.
Two residents receiving apixaban were not monitored for side effects and did not have care plans addressing the use of this anticoagulant, despite physician orders and facility policy requiring such oversight. The interim DON confirmed the absence of monitoring and care planning for both individuals.
A medication error rate of 8% was found when a nurse administered Metformin and Insulin Lispro to a resident without food, contrary to physician orders requiring these diabetes medications to be given with meals. The medications were given before dinner, with no food present, and facility policy required adherence to prescriber orders and optimal timing for therapeutic effect.
An opened box of lorazepam oral concentrate was discovered in the medication room refrigerator without an open-date label, as confirmed by the IDON. Facility policy requires refrigerated medications to be labeled, but this was not done in this case.
A resident's family refused the COVID-19 vaccine on his behalf, but the facility did not obtain or document the required consent from the responsible party, as mandated by facility policy. The infection preventionist confirmed the absence of this documentation during record review.
Rooms housing multiple residents were found to provide less than the required 80 square feet per resident, with each resident receiving approximately 71.96 square feet. Staff and residents reported no concerns about space or privacy, and care provision was not observed to be inhibited.
During a respiratory illness outbreak, the facility failed to implement isolation precautions for five residents who exhibited symptoms such as cough and runny nose. Despite physician orders for cough treatment, there was no documentation of isolation measures being taken, as confirmed by the Infection Prevention Nurse. This oversight was contrary to the facility's policy on Infection Prevention and Control, which mandates transmission-based precautions for residents with signs of transmissible infections.
A resident with dementia and a history of elopement left the facility without staff knowledge due to inadequate supervision and failure to check the functionality of her wander guard. Staff interviews revealed that the resident's whereabouts were not monitored as required, and the facility's elopement policy was not followed.
Failure to Develop Person-Centered Therapy Care Plans for Multiple Residents
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to develop person-centered care plans that included target symptoms, measurable objectives, and specific interventions for residents receiving PT, OT, and ST services. For five sampled residents, the surveyor’s record review showed active therapy orders without corresponding individualized care plans for those services. One resident admitted with muscle weakness had orders for PT five times per week for 12 weeks and OT twice per week for 12 weeks, but there was no documented care plan addressing these therapies. Another resident with muscle weakness and abnormalities of gait and mobility had orders for PT, OT, and ST over several weeks, yet there was no individualized care plan for any of these treatments. A third resident with abnormalities of gait and mobility had PT and OT ordered, a fourth resident with abnormalities of gait, mobility, and dysphagia had PT and ST ordered, and a fifth resident with abnormalities of gait and mobility had PT ordered; none of these residents had documented care plans for the ordered therapy services. During concurrent record review and interviews, the MDS coordinator confirmed that there were no therapy care plans for any of the five residents and stated that therapy staff were responsible for initiating and implementing these care plans when residents received therapy. The DON also confirmed that therapy treatments were provided as ordered but that therapy staff had not initiated the required care plans. The director of rehabilitation similarly stated that therapy staff should have initiated separate care plans for therapy. The facility’s policy on care planning indicated that care plans are to be based on the comprehensive assessment and developed by an interdisciplinary team, including therapists as applicable.
Failure to Maintain and Integrate Therapy Documentation in Medical Records
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to follow its policies and procedures for progress notes, charting, and documentation of therapy services for five sampled residents. For each of these residents, physician orders were in place for PT, OT, and/or ST at specified frequencies and durations, but there was no corresponding documentation of the therapy treatments or services in the facility’s electronic medical record. The residents had diagnoses such as muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and dysphagia, and were admitted and, in some cases, discharged during the time periods when therapy orders were active. Record review showed that one resident admitted with muscle weakness had orders for PT five times per week for 12 weeks and OT twice per week for 12 weeks, but there was no documented evidence of PT or OT services provided. Another resident with muscle weakness and gait abnormalities had orders for PT, OT, and ST, yet the electronic medical record contained no documentation of any of these therapies. A third resident with gait and mobility abnormalities had orders for PT and OT, but again, no therapy treatment notes were found in the electronic record. Two current residents with gait and mobility abnormalities, and in one case dysphagia, had active orders for PT and/or ST, but there was no documentation of therapy services in their electronic medical records. Interviews with facility staff confirmed the absence of therapy documentation in the electronic medical record. The MDS coordinator verified that there were no PT, OT, or ST treatment notes available in the system and stated that therapy staff should document after each session. The medical records director confirmed there were no therapy treatment notes or care plans accessible and reported having no access to any therapy documentation, despite stating that such documentation should be part of the resident’s medical record. An LVN reported being unable to access therapy documentation and noted that access would help understand residents’ functional progress. The DON confirmed that no therapy treatment documentation was available in the electronic record and that staff should have access to review it. The director of rehabilitation acknowledged that therapy documentation was not included in the facility’s electronic system, explaining that it took a long time to load and was only provided upon request, while also stating that these documents are part of the resident’s medical record. Facility policies on Progress Notes and Charting and Documentation required that progress notes be maintained for residents receiving specialized rehabilitation services and that treatments or services performed be documented in the medical record, which was not done in these cases.
Failure to Address Insidious Weight Loss in a Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for a resident who experienced an unplanned, insidious weight loss over several months. The resident, who had multiple diagnoses including congestive heart failure, type 2 diabetes, hypothyroidism, Alzheimer's disease, and dementia, lost 10 pounds (6.8%) in three months and 16 pounds (9.8%) in six months. Despite this ongoing weight loss, the facility did not implement timely or adequate interventions to address the issue. The resident's dietary intake was inconsistently documented, and the registered dietitian (RD) repeatedly noted that the resident was meeting estimated nutritional needs based on meal intake percentages, without specifying time frames or providing evidence that caloric intake actually met the resident's requirements. The RD discontinued a nutritional supplement due to frequent refusals but did not recommend alternative interventions until significant weight loss had already occurred. The RD also did not participate in interdisciplinary team (IDT) meetings or communicate with the resident's representative regarding weight goals or preferences. The facility's documentation showed that weight variance IDT meetings were not held to address the resident's ongoing weight loss until after a significant decline was documented. Additionally, the resident's food preferences were not adequately assessed or accommodated, as the dietary manager did not consult with the resident's family and the facility did not offer culturally preferred foods, despite the resident's cognitive impairment and expressed dissatisfaction with the meals. Further, the facility failed to accurately document significant weight loss in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments, and staff interviews confirmed that required reviews and discussions regarding the resident's nutritional status and weight changes were not consistently performed. The lack of timely intervention, inadequate assessment of intake and preferences, and insufficient interdisciplinary communication contributed to the resident's continued insidious weight loss.
Deficient Food Safety and Infection Control Practices During Meal Service
Penalty
Summary
Staff failed to adhere to professional standards for food safety and infection control during food service and storage. Certified nursing assistants (CNAs) were observed assisting multiple residents with feeding and handling their cups without performing hand hygiene between residents. One CNA handled the drinking surface of a resident's cup, and another CNA did not sanitize her hands after leaving a resident's room before touching and shifting lunch trays on the meal cart. These actions were contrary to the facility's hand hygiene policy, which requires hand sanitization before and after resident contact and before handling food items or trays. Additionally, the facility's dry food storage area was found to be in poor condition, with shelving that had peeling paint, a rough texture, and black residue. The Certified Dietary Manager acknowledged the unsatisfactory state of the shelves. According to the FDA Food Code, food storage areas must be maintained in good repair and food must be stored in clean locations to prevent contamination. The observed conditions and staff practices had the potential to result in bacterial or physical contamination of food served to residents.
Failure to Monitor and Assess Psychotropic Medication Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that three residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications and that appropriate monitoring and assessments were conducted. One resident received Depakote as a mood stabilizer without any monitoring for side effects or quarterly assessment, as confirmed by review of the clinical record and by the interim director of nursing (IDON). Another resident was also given Depakote for mood stabilization without a quarterly assessment, which was similarly confirmed by the IDON upon review of the clinical record. A third resident was prescribed multiple psychotropic medications, including bupropion, haloperidol, lorazepam, and quetiapine, for various behavioral and mood-related indications. However, there was no monitoring documented for the behaviors associated with the use of these medications. The IDON confirmed that there was no monitoring in place for these medications and acknowledged that such monitoring should have occurred. The facility's own policy requires adequate monitoring for efficacy and adverse consequences of psychotropic medications, as well as comprehensive review and evaluation of the resident's signs and symptoms prior to use.
Failure to Serve Palatable and Properly Heated Potatoes
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that both regular and pureed potatoes served to residents were flavorful and maintained at a palatable temperature. During a test-tray observation, the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) measured the temperature of regular diced potatoes at 100°F, which was below the facility's policy requirement of at least 120°F for hot foods. The CDM acknowledged ongoing issues with maintaining proper potato temperatures, and when tasted, the potatoes were barely warm. Additionally, both the regular and pureed potatoes were found to be bland, with the pureed version described as milky-bland and lacking flavor. The facility's policies require that hot foods be served at or above 120°F and that prepared foods be sampled to ensure satisfactory flavor, with the use of herbs and spices encouraged to enhance taste. The CDM confirmed that the potatoes did not meet these standards for temperature or flavor. These deficiencies had the potential to result in residents consuming less food and receiving inadequate nutrient intake.
Failure to Inform Resident of Advance Directive Rights
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to inform and provide written information to one of five residents regarding the right to formulate an advance directive. Review of the resident's admission and clinical records showed that the resident did not have an advance directive on file, nor was there documentation that the topic had been addressed or that assistance was offered to the resident or their representative in formulating one. During an interview, a registered nurse confirmed the absence of both an advance directive and any acknowledgment that the resident had been informed or assisted in this matter. The facility's policy requires staff to offer assistance in establishing advance directives if the resident or representative has not already done so, and to document whether assistance was accepted or declined.
Failure to Provide Timely Medicare Non-Coverage Notice
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a resident with a written Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) at least two calendar days before the end of Medicare Part A coverage. Record review showed that the NOMNC was issued to the resident's representative on the same day as the resident's discharge, which was one day after the last covered day. During an interview, the Social Services Director confirmed that the notification was not issued in a timely manner and acknowledged that neither the resident nor the representative was informed about the last Medicare covered day prior to discharge. Facility policy requires that the NOMNC be given in advance, no later than two days before the termination of services.
Failure to Accurately Complete PASARR Screenings for Residents with Schizophrenia
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately complete the federally mandated Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I screenings for two residents who had documented diagnoses of schizophrenia. For both residents, the PASARR Level I forms incorrectly indicated that they did not have a serious diagnosed mental disorder, despite their admission records and hospital discharge summaries clearly listing schizophrenia as a diagnosis. Registered nursing staff responsible for completing the PASARR screenings confirmed during interviews that the forms should have reflected the residents' mental health diagnoses. The facility's policy requires all new admissions and readmissions to be screened for mental disorders, intellectual disabilities, or related disorders, and to refer individuals for a Level II evaluation if a serious mental disorder is identified. By failing to accurately document the residents' mental health conditions on the PASARR Level I screenings, the facility did not ensure that the appropriate PASARR Level II evaluations were conducted for these residents.
Failure to Adhere to Medication Administration Standards for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to provide services that meet professional standards of quality for two residents. For one resident with a diagnosis of unspecified atrial fibrillation and an order for Digoxin, staff did not document the apical pulse prior to administering the medication, as required by both physician order and standard nursing practice. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed Digoxin was given daily at 9:00 a.m., but no apical pulse reading was recorded at that time. Although apical pulse readings were documented twice daily, they were not specifically taken or recorded immediately before the Digoxin dose, and the Interim Director of Nursing confirmed this omission during interview and record review. In a separate incident, another resident with an order for Carvedilol to be held if systolic blood pressure was less than 105 or pulse less than 55 was administered the medication despite a recorded diastolic blood pressure of 50 mmHg, which is considered low. The nurse did not recheck the blood pressure or consult the physician prior to administration. The Interim Director of Nursing verified the physician order and the low diastolic blood pressure reading prior to medication administration, acknowledging that the nurse should have taken additional steps before giving the medication. Facility policy requires vital signs to be checked and verified prior to medication administration when necessary.
Failure to Provide Ordered Feeding Assistance and Weekly Weights
Penalty
Summary
Resident 15, who had a history of insidious weight loss since October 2023, was admitted to the facility and had physician orders for one-to-one feeding assistance with all meals starting on 2/13/24 and weekly weights every Tuesday starting on 5/21/24. Despite these orders, documentation showed that the resident was only weighed about once a month rather than weekly, and multiple observations revealed that the resident was eating meals independently without the required one-to-one feeding assistance. The interim director of nursing confirmed that the resident should have received weekly weights and one-to-one feeding assistance as ordered, but these services were not provided as required.
Failure to Complete Annual Staff Performance Reviews
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct annual performance reviews for one certified nursing assistant (CNA) and one licensed vocational nurse (LVN), as required by facility policy. Review of personnel files showed that the CNA, hired on 9/26/22, did not have a performance review completed in 2023, and the LVN, hired on 8/18/22, had not received any performance review since being hired. During an interview, the director of staff development confirmed the absence of these required evaluations and acknowledged that annual performance reviews should have been conducted. The facility's policy, dated 9/2020, specifies that each employee's job performance must be reviewed and evaluated at least annually.
Inaccurate Documentation of Controlled Medication Destruction
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to maintain an accurate record of medication disposition for lorazepam tablets designated for destruction. During a random audit, the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) and the Administrator (ADM) observed that a bottle of lorazepam 0.5 mg tablets contained 24.5 tablets, while the record sheet indicated only 14.5 tablets were to be destroyed. The IDON acknowledged that the correct number should have been recorded as 24 tablets and confirmed that the count was performed with a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) prior to documentation. LVN B also verified the count of 24.5 tablets and stated she participated in the count with the IDON before documentation. Review of the facility's policy confirmed that the medication disposition record should include the quantity destroyed.
Failure to Monitor and Care Plan for Anticoagulant Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that two residents receiving apixaban, an anticoagulant, were monitored for side effects and had appropriate care plans in place regarding the use of this medication. For both residents, physician orders were present for apixaban administration, but their clinical records did not show evidence of monitoring for adverse effects or documentation of care planning related to the medication. The interim director of nursing confirmed during interviews that neither resident was monitored for side effects nor had a care plan addressing the use of apixaban. The facility's own anticoagulation clinical protocol required assessment for signs or symptoms of adverse drug reactions, but this was not followed for the two residents in question. The lack of monitoring and care planning was identified through record review and staff interviews, indicating a failure to comply with both physician orders and facility policy regarding the safe administration and oversight of anticoagulant therapy.
Medication Error Rate Exceeds Threshold Due to Improper Timing of Diabetes Medications
Penalty
Summary
A medication error rate of 8% was identified during a medication pass observation, exceeding the acceptable threshold of less than 5%. Specifically, a licensed vocational nurse administered Metformin 1000 mg orally and Insulin Lispro 4 units subcutaneously to a resident without providing food, despite physician orders specifying that both medications should be given with meals. At the time of administration, there were no snacks or food present at the resident's bedside, and dinner was not scheduled to be served until later. Review of the resident's physician orders confirmed that Metformin and Insulin Lispro were to be administered with meals for diabetes management. The facility's policy and procedure also required medications to be given in accordance with prescriber orders and at times that enhance optimal therapeutic effect. The interim director of nursing verified the orders and acknowledged that the medications should have been given with food.
Failure to Label Opened Medication in Refrigerator
Penalty
Summary
During an observation in the medication room, an opened box of lorazepam oral concentrate was found inside the refrigerator without an open-date label. The Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) confirmed the medication was opened and not labeled with the date it was first used. Facility policy requires that medications stored in the refrigerator be labeled accordingly, but this procedure was not followed in this instance. No information about specific residents or their medical history was provided in relation to this deficiency.
Failure to Obtain Documented Consent for COVID-19 Vaccine Refusal
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to obtain documented consent from the responsible party for a resident regarding the refusal of the COVID-19 vaccine. The resident was admitted with one of his sons designated as his responsible party. According to the resident's COVID-19 immunization record, the family refused the vaccine for the resident on a specific date. However, upon review, the infection preventionist was unable to locate any documentation of consent or refusal from the responsible party in the clinical record. The facility's policy requires that residents or their representatives sign a consent form prior to vaccination, provided in a language and format they understand. This requirement was not met in this instance.
Multi-Resident Rooms Below Minimum Square Footage Requirement
Penalty
Summary
Multi-resident rooms were found to provide less than the required 80 square feet per resident, with rooms 6, 7, and 10 each offering approximately 71.96 square feet per bed for four residents. Observations during the survey indicated that neither staff nor residents experienced any limitations in movement or care provision within these rooms. Both staff and residents reported no complaints or concerns regarding space or privacy during interviews and observations. Despite the lack of reported issues from staff and residents, the physical measurements of the rooms did not meet the regulatory requirement for minimum square footage per resident in multi-resident rooms.
Failure to Implement Isolation Precautions During Respiratory Outbreak
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement its policy on Isolation-Initiating Transmission-Based Precautions during a respiratory illness outbreak, affecting five residents. The Infection Prevention Nurse (IP) acknowledged that in March 2024, several residents exhibited symptoms such as runny nose and cough, and a physician was notified to obtain orders for cough treatment and isolation precautions. However, the facility did not document any isolation precautions for the affected residents, despite the presence of symptoms indicative of a transmissible infection. Resident 1 was noted to have a persistent non-productive cough, and a physician's order for guaifenesin was issued, but there was no evidence of isolation precautions being implemented. Similarly, Residents 2, 3, 4, and 5 all exhibited productive coughs, and while they received physician orders for guaifenesin, there was no documentation of isolation precautions being taken. The IP confirmed the absence of physician orders for isolation precautions for these residents during the outbreak. The facility's policy on Infection Prevention and Control, as well as the specific policy on Isolation-Initiating Transmission-Based Precautions, requires the initiation of transmission-based precautions when a resident shows signs of a transmissible infection. Despite this, the facility did not follow through with the necessary precautions, as evidenced by the lack of documentation and physician orders for isolation during the outbreak, potentially allowing the spread of infectious disease among residents and staff.
Failure to Prevent Resident Elopement Due to Inadequate Supervision
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a resident at risk for elopement from leaving the facility without staff knowledge or permission. The resident, who had a history of dementia, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and falls, was readmitted to the facility and had previously eloped on two occasions. Despite these risks, the resident's wander guard, a device intended to monitor her movements, was not checked for functionality, and staff did not provide the necessary supervision or assistance. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the wander guard was not checked, and the resident's whereabouts were not monitored as required. A licensed vocational nurse confirmed that the failure to check the wander guard led to the staff being unaware of the resident's departure. A certified nursing assistant also admitted to not checking the wander guard or the resident's location due to being occupied with another resident. The facility's policy on elopement required staff to investigate and report missing residents and ensure wander guard devices and alarms were functioning, which was not adhered to in this case.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 731 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 3 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Milpitas
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Santa Clara Post Acute | 3.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 27 | 0 |
| Canyon Springs Post-acute | 5.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Inspire Behavioral Health | 5.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 17 | 1 |
| Vista Manor Nursing Center | 5.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| San Jose Healthcare & Wellness Center | 5.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Milpitas Care Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release June 2026) and official state health department websites.