Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0692
G

Failure to Address Insidious Weight Loss in a Resident

Milpitas, California Survey Completed on 06-27-2025

Penalty

Fine: $12,73529 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for a resident who experienced an unplanned, insidious weight loss over several months. The resident, who had multiple diagnoses including congestive heart failure, type 2 diabetes, hypothyroidism, Alzheimer's disease, and dementia, lost 10 pounds (6.8%) in three months and 16 pounds (9.8%) in six months. Despite this ongoing weight loss, the facility did not implement timely or adequate interventions to address the issue. The resident's dietary intake was inconsistently documented, and the registered dietitian (RD) repeatedly noted that the resident was meeting estimated nutritional needs based on meal intake percentages, without specifying time frames or providing evidence that caloric intake actually met the resident's requirements. The RD discontinued a nutritional supplement due to frequent refusals but did not recommend alternative interventions until significant weight loss had already occurred. The RD also did not participate in interdisciplinary team (IDT) meetings or communicate with the resident's representative regarding weight goals or preferences. The facility's documentation showed that weight variance IDT meetings were not held to address the resident's ongoing weight loss until after a significant decline was documented. Additionally, the resident's food preferences were not adequately assessed or accommodated, as the dietary manager did not consult with the resident's family and the facility did not offer culturally preferred foods, despite the resident's cognitive impairment and expressed dissatisfaction with the meals. Further, the facility failed to accurately document significant weight loss in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments, and staff interviews confirmed that required reviews and discussions regarding the resident's nutritional status and weight changes were not consistently performed. The lack of timely intervention, inadequate assessment of intake and preferences, and insufficient interdisciplinary communication contributed to the resident's continued insidious weight loss.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙