Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at The Blossoms At White Hall Rehab & Nursing Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with blindness and moderate cognitive impairment was repeatedly observed sitting in a recliner with the call light out of reach on the floor. The resident was unable to locate or use the call light to request assistance, despite care plans and staff knowledge indicating the need for the call light to be accessible at all times.
A resident dependent on staff for toileting and incontinent care did not receive timely assistance despite repeated requests, resulting in prolonged exposure to soiled conditions and a foul odor. When care was eventually provided by two CNAs, they failed to follow proper infection control practices, did not perform hand hygiene, reused cleaning wipes, and did not thoroughly clean the resident. The DON confirmed these lapses, and the facility lacked written policies for incontinent care and hand washing.
A resident who was initially documented as a non-smoker was later observed smoking and provided cigarettes by staff before a re-assessment for safe smoking behaviors was completed, contrary to facility policy requiring evaluation prior to granting smoking privileges. The resident's care plan and smoking assessment were only updated after the resident had already been allowed to smoke.
Staff failed to follow infection prevention and control protocols during incontinent care for a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions with a stage 2 pressure injury. Two CNAs provided care without proper PPE, did not perform hand hygiene, and reused cleaning wipes, while the DON also participated in care without changing gloves after handling soiled materials. The facility lacked written policies for EBP, incontinent care, and hand washing.
Failure to Ensure Call Light Accessibility for Visually Impaired Resident
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when staff failed to ensure that a call light was kept within reach for a resident with significant visual impairment. The resident, who had diagnoses including anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, muscle weakness, and blindness, was care planned to have the call light within reach at all times. The resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated highly impaired vision, moderate cognitive impairment, and a history of rejecting care daily, but was otherwise independent with toileting and ambulation for short distances. During multiple observations on two consecutive days, the resident was found sitting in a recliner with the call light lying on the floor out of reach. When asked, the resident, who confirmed being blind, was unaware of the call light's location and unable to access it. Staff interviews confirmed awareness of the resident's visual impairment and the requirement for the call light to be accessible, yet the deficiency persisted across several checks.
Failure to Provide Timely and Proper Incontinent Care with Infection Control Lapses
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to provide timely and appropriate incontinent care to a resident who was dependent on staff for all toileting hygiene and had a history of bowel and bladder incontinence, as well as a pre-admission stage 2 pressure injury at the sacrum. The resident, who was cognitively intact and able to communicate, reported requesting incontinent care from two staff members over a period of more than two hours, during which no staff entered the room to provide assistance. The room developed a foul odor during this time, and the resident confirmed that care had not been provided. When two CNAs eventually entered the room to provide care, multiple deficiencies in infection control and care technique were observed. Both CNAs failed to use hand sanitizer or perform hand hygiene at any point during the care, changed gloves without sanitizing hands, and reused cleaning wipes multiple times, tucking used wipes into the soiled brief. The CNAs also failed to thoroughly clean the resident, as evidenced by a large amount of fecal material remaining after they stated care was complete. Only after intervention by a restorative CNA, who followed proper infection control procedures, was the resident fully cleaned. Interviews with the CNAs and the DON confirmed that proper procedures for hand hygiene and thorough cleaning were not followed during the provision of incontinent care. The DON acknowledged that the care provided did not meet expectations. Additionally, the facility was unable to provide a policy for incontinent care or hand washing when requested by the surveyor.
Failure to Re-Assess Resident for Safe Smoking Behaviors Prior to Smoking
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was properly re-assessed for safe smoking behaviors before being allowed to smoke, despite initial admission documentation indicating the resident did not use tobacco products. Upon admission, the resident was evaluated and marked as a non-smoker, which led to the smoking assessment being stopped. However, subsequent progress notes and medication records showed that the resident expressed a desire to smoke, was observed preparing to smoke, and was ultimately provided cigarettes and allowed to smoke with staff supervision. The resident also had a nicotine patch prescribed and later discontinued due to active smoking. Despite the facility's policy requiring assessment for safe smoking behavior prior to granting smoking privileges, the resident was permitted to smoke before a re-assessment was completed. The care plan and smoking assessment were only updated after the resident had already been observed smoking. Interviews with facility leadership revealed uncertainty about whether residents were assessed before being allowed to smoke, and documentation confirmed that the resident was not re-assessed for smoking safety until after smoking had occurred.
Failure to Follow Infection Control Protocols During Incontinent Care
Penalty
Summary
Staff failed to follow proper infection prevention and control procedures during incontinent care for a resident who was dependent for mobility, always incontinent of bowel and bladder, and had a stage 2 sacral pressure injury. The resident was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), as indicated by physician orders and signage on the door. During observed care, two CNAs entered the room without donning the required personal protective equipment (PPE), specifically gowns, and proceeded to provide perineal care while wearing only gloves. Both CNAs used cleaning wipes multiple times, tucked used wipes into the soiled brief, and touched various surfaces and their own clothing with contaminated gloves. Neither CNA performed hand hygiene or used hand sanitizer at any point during the care, despite changing gloves several times. The Director of Nursing (DON) entered the room during the care episode and instructed the CNAs to don gowns, as required for EBP and due to the resident's wound. The DON then participated in care, but was observed to handle the resident's arm brace and reposition the resident while wearing the same gloves used to handle soiled materials, without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene. After care was completed, it was confirmed that the only hand sanitizer in the room was located by the door, and both CNAs acknowledged they had not used it during the procedure. Interviews with the CNAs and a restorative CNA revealed knowledge of the need for glove changes and hand hygiene, but this was not practiced during the observed care. Further review revealed that the facility did not have written policies for Enhanced Barrier Precautions, incontinent care, or hand washing. The administrator confirmed the absence of these policies when requested by the surveyor. The lack of adherence to infection control protocols and the absence of guiding policies contributed to the deficiency identified during the survey.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 6 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near White Hall
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Village Medical Center | 9.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| The Springs Of Pine Bluff | 9.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Pine Bluff Transitional Care | 9.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 6 | 0 |
| Sheridan Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center | 18.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Cavalier Healthcare Of England | 19.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for The Blossoms At White Hall Rehab & Nursing Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.