Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of August 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Hillcrest Home during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment, wandering behavior, and a known elopement risk exited through an alarmed kitchen door after staff cleared the alarm without checking the outside area. Staff later found the resident outside near another entrance and returned the resident inside. The resident had diagnoses including dementia, was care planned for wandering, and had orders and assessments documenting high risk for elopement.
Failure to timely report allegations of abuse: a resident with severe cognitive impairment made two sexual assault allegations, and staff did not ensure the reports were promptly escalated to the Administrator and SSA as required. One LPN was unaware of the reporting requirements, and the facility’s records showed delays in notifying the State and internal leadership.
The facility failed to ensure that two residents had their facial hair and nails properly trimmed and re-polished. Both residents were observed with chipped nail polish and long facial hair, and staff confirmed the need for grooming attention, which was not provided in a timely manner as per the facility's policy.
Failure to Supervise a Wandering Resident During an Exit Door Alarm
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement for one resident who was reviewed for accident and supervision. The resident had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, unsteadiness on feet, and difficulty walking. The quarterly MDS showed a BIMS of 00, indicating severe cognitive impairment, and the annual MDS showed a SAMS of 3, indicating the resident was severely impaired for daily decision making. The resident was care planned as high risk for wandering, with documentation that the resident liked to walk in the halls independently and that staff were aware of the elopement risk. The care plan included diversional interventions, supervised walks outside, and a wander alert bracelet. Physician orders directed staff to monitor the resident for wandering, pacing, and rummaging. A wandering risk assessment documented that the resident was at high risk for wandering and had a history of wandering behaviors. On the evening of the incident, an alarm sounded from the kitchen exit door. Staff interviews and witness statements showed that one CNA cleared the active alarm without checking the outside grounds or exterior perimeter of the door, even though the facility policy required the outside area of an alerting exit to be searched immediately. Another CNA later found the resident outside the facility near the old dining room area and brought the resident back inside. The administrator’s review of the alarm log confirmed the alarm sounded at the time the resident eloped, and the internal investigation determined the resident exited through the kitchen door, traveled outside across uneven ground and pavement, and re-entered through the old dining room door.
Failure to Timely Report Allegations of Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to the Administrator and the State Survey Agency within the required timeframe for Resident #2. The facility received a report on 10/23/2025 that the resident had alleged being sexually assaulted by an employee, and law enforcement documentation showed the facility called dispatch that day and reported the resident said they had been sexually assaulted by a facility employee while the facility was conducting an internal investigation. However, the allegation was not reported to the State Agency until 06/19/2026. The facility policy required alleged violations to be reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation was made when abuse was involved. A second allegation involving Resident #2 occurred on 11/17/2025, when the resident again alleged sexual assault by the same described individual. The Clinical Coordinator stated LPN #9 was unaware of the reporting requirements and did not report the allegation to the Administrator until the next day. Record review showed Resident #2 had severe cognitive impairment on the MDS, and the care plan documented behaviors including accusations that others raped them and occasional nightmares. The Administrator later stated the first allegation was not reported to the SSA because the resident did not identify the alleged perpetrator at that time, and also stated there was a gap in timely notifications due to lack of a standard process and checklist.
Failure to Maintain Resident Grooming Standards
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that two sampled residents had their facial hair and nails properly trimmed and re-polished. Resident #78 was observed multiple times with chipped nail polish on both hands, and Resident #44 was observed with long fingernails with chipped polish and long facial chin and neck hair. Both residents expressed a desire for their nails to be repainted, and staff confirmed that the residents needed their nails trimmed and re-polished. The facility's policy stated that care and services should be provided for activities of daily living, including grooming, but this was not adhered to in these cases. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 and the Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON) confirmed that the responsibility for trimming and polishing nails lies with the CNAs, unless the resident is diabetic, in which case the nurses are responsible. Both staff members acknowledged that the residents' nails and facial hair should be maintained for their dignity and confirmed that the observed conditions of Residents #44 and #78 were not in compliance with the facility's grooming standards. The ADON observed the residents and confirmed the need for immediate grooming attention, which was not provided in a timely manner as per the facility's policy.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Harrison
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Springs Of Harrison | 1.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| The Springs Of Mt Vista | 1.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Countryside Health & Rehab Of Newton County | 16.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Creekside At The Springs | 23.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| The Blossoms At Berryville Rehab & Nursing Center | 26.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 16 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Hillcrest Home.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.