Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Crestpark Stuttgart, Llc during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene during resident feeding, as observed with multiple CNAs not sanitizing or washing hands between assisting different residents. Instances included CNAs handling personal items, food carts, and used utensils without performing hand hygiene. Interviews confirmed that staff were expected to wash hands between resident contact, which was not followed.
The facility failed to keep heating and air ventilation systems clean, with surveyors observing a dark black substance on vents in resident rooms and bathrooms. The Housekeeping Supervisor suggested it might be smoke residue from a past incident, while the Maintenance Director confirmed it was mold. The Administrator was unaware of the issue and the facility lacked a policy on vent cleaning.
The facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for three residents, leading to a deficiency in accommodating their needs. One resident with dementia and another with a traumatic amputation were found with call lights on the floor, out of reach. A third resident with congestive heart failure had two call lights, neither accessible. Care plans for all three emphasized the need for call lights to be within reach due to fall risks. CNAs confirmed the importance of accessible call lights, and the DON acknowledged the lack of specific policy or training on this issue.
Failure in Hand Hygiene During Resident Feeding
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene practices were followed by staff when assisting residents with dining. Multiple instances were observed where Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) did not sanitize or wash their hands between feeding different residents. For example, CNA #4 was seen wiping her face and touching various objects without performing hand hygiene before feeding a resident. Similarly, CNA #2 and CNA #5 were observed not washing their hands between feeding different residents and after handling potentially contaminated items such as phones, food carts, and used utensils. Additionally, CNA #6 was noted to have worn gloves while handling dirty items and then proceeded to feed residents without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene. This included touching residents' eating utensils and personal items with the same gloves used to handle soiled materials. Interviews with the Dietary Manager and the Director of Nursing confirmed that staff were expected to wash their hands between resident contact and avoid using personal items like cell phones and drinks while feeding residents, which was not adhered to in these instances.
Facility Fails to Maintain Clean Air Vents, Potential Mold Presence
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain clean heating and air ventilation systems, potentially exposing all 47 residents to airborne sickness. During a survey, air vents in multiple resident rooms and bathrooms were observed to be coated with a dark black substance. Additionally, a similar substance was noted on a ceiling tile above a vent in one of the rooms. The Housekeeping Supervisor suggested that the substance might be smoke residue from a previous incident involving melted wires after a water pipe burst. She also indicated that the maintenance department was responsible for cleaning the vents. The Maintenance Director confirmed the presence of mold on the vents and expressed skepticism about the effectiveness of cleaning, suggesting that the mold would return. He mentioned the possibility of involving the company that repaired the roof to investigate further. The Administrator, upon being shown the affected areas, denied prior knowledge of the issue but committed to addressing it. It was also revealed that the facility lacked a policy on cleaning vents, as confirmed by the Administrator.
Call Light Accessibility Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the call lights were within reach for three residents, leading to a deficiency in accommodating their needs and preferences. Resident #3, diagnosed with dementia and requiring maximal assistance with toileting and supervision with transfers, was found with the call light on the floor, out of reach, while lying in bed. The care plan for Resident #3 indicated the need for the call light to be within reach due to the risk of falls. Similarly, Resident #4, who had a traumatic amputation and was dependent on assistance for transfers and toileting, was observed with the call light on the floor, not attached to the bed, and out of reach. The care plan for Resident #4 also noted the importance of keeping the call light within reach due to the risk of falls. Resident #5, with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure and dependent on assistance for toileting and transfers, was found with two call lights, neither of which was within reach. The care plan for Resident #5 emphasized the need for the call light to be accessible due to the risk of falls and the need for incontinent care. Interviews with CNAs confirmed the importance of having call lights within reach for residents to call for assistance. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the lack of a specific policy or in-service training regarding call lights, stating that it was considered basic nursing knowledge.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 11 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Stuttgart
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewitt Nursing Home | 18.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Crestpark Dewitt, Llc | 18.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Maple Healthcare | 21.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Cavalier Healthcare Of England | 22.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Chambers Health And Rehabilitation | 22.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Crestpark Stuttgart, Llc.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.